On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, at 11:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Demi Marie Obenour:
>
>> From this thread, it appears that non-LFS 32-bit software is fundamentally
>> unsupportable in the long run, just like software with 32-bit time_t is
>> unsupportable. That leaves two options:
>>
>> 1. Break
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 03:50:05 UTC
From c133bb83e72e63f4a8749de3beb272da49564988 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 03:49:59 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 03:21:10 UTC
From 892c0a10c7b1998df912fe34c55beeb771748142 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 03:21:04 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 03:19:25 UTC
From 550f90339e7e2b56f4fc0162e94e59a30cd153e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 03:19:19 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
I orphaned the libdmapsharing package. All of the F38 and Rawhide packages
that depended on libdmapsharing have moved on to libdmapsharing4. I
recommend allowing libdmapsharing to retire in favor of libdmapsharing4.
--
Mike
:wq
___
devel mailing list
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 03:10:07 UTC
From 9146b128e917d008fa439aedd2f327d55b2c77ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 03:10:02 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 02:42:30 UTC
From f0ecb9e4011ae90ee79acb04c64b6302d2258095 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 02:42:23 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 01:49:46 UTC
From 7f5c92257d73a0b2685e351cc4dabe0e28a5fb47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 01:49:41 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 01:49:05 UTC
From 976ae3670f78f83ff2d07451b0de87753c615083 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 01:49:00 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 01:40:08 UTC
From 9468f4c8fc543f3606a6eba672e2ff7a46164b73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 01:40:03 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 01:26:34 UTC
From e3b0491220e1b5c40e7913f7b3774f420bae21b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 01:26:29 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 01:23:03 UTC
From 3e1006980e5998c95cb5c7c6d6c5592fddb1d458 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 01:22:58 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 01:20:15 UTC
From 69a89d6478745fc7aa96a06108728d407596947e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 01:20:10 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 01:20:05 UTC
From 79a1acee75a36f06b795a3a1c88556b1a1adaa88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 01:19:59 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 00:52:43 UTC
From 40d2934be1b78764088e4774e5f6f2e8318db1f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 00:52:38 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 00:22:37 UTC
From ef7b39f64c6f6fa3165f9ed932799b74e11a4610 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 00:22:31 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 00:22:27 UTC
From 3ab22dc19a2f64c508d389d6c3ebfcc85e407591 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 00:22:21 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-21 00:22:17 UTC
From 8bc0e2c49591e4690450fffa6950a2d97a4ffca2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 21 2023 00:22:11 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224456
Bug ID: 2224456
Summary: perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90131 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Catalyst-Runtime
Keywords:
Is there something wrong with the Java-Devel list?
I can send a message to the list and get no reject or error, but is never shows
up, at least it looks like that.
Or did I miss something?
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1)
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 23:37:52 UTC
From 4ea96a9010fc63b2875260173d049b523e96347e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 23:37:45 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 23:34:37 UTC
From 7f25de28de4f01ff8399adc704fb8b83087b5931 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 23:34:32 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 23:23:38 UTC
From 2dc3ecdfaee6bf46825ed01a5167e92f90fb61ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 23:23:32 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 23:22:17 UTC
From 8386eb4bbc365c58be2d471a05fe62dc0909e697 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 23:22:12 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 23:20:56 UTC
From ce3b7718cf5f7501b740fef9e0c98e05137c2e37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 23:20:51 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 23:17:39 UTC
From bab68cf798fa3f1d08e4d9e9224e17104b246257 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 23:17:34 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 23:08:33 UTC
From f6bf3b0443896b20c99929721ae4bcc08cc65347 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 23:08:27 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224451
Bug ID: 2224451
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230720 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 09:17:51 -0500
Justin Forbes wrote:
> for them. I have been running preempt=full for quite some time on my
> desktops systems here.
I've been running custom compiled kernels with preempt_full=Y on my
desktop for several years (since at least kernel 5.1). Currently
running
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 22:39:37 UTC
From 7d3912af22d1a3398843dd20fc48d73145fdf44b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 22:39:31 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 22:29:33 UTC
From 3c29b715501213dba50a81c4fd57a1780c474834 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 22:29:28 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 22:28:21 UTC
From 04dabc1b5b74b5ac56a236fde7e25de142bafb33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 22:28:15 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 15:38 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> On 7/20/23 2:09 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 13:59 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> > > This bz[1] was opened on one of my packages not building on f39.
> > > I did a quick rawhide scratch build and sure enough
> > >
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 21:29:39 UTC
From 9658e30de65e1edd139905ed0590b9fb073d99a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 21:29:33 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224450
Bug ID: 2224450
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230720 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this requires a bit of background, so please bear with me :)
Thanks for all the background... :)
...snip reasonable stuff...
I agree that an upstream systemd solution is what we should strive for.
> The problem is
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 21:00:04 UTC
From 3b9043e270bb8f23d5ca7251edb734f20e2de3af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 20:59:58 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Hi Fabio, Robert-André,
Thank you for the explanation. It makes sense.
Golang has this uniqueness about libs that removes some of the shared
objects pros but I see there are other things at play.
Thank you,
Carlos.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 1:44 PM wrote:
> On 7/20/23 8:20 PM, Carlos Rodriguez
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 3:46 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Stephen Gallagher proposed a change to FESCo voting rules [1].
This will be helpful to people who aren't regularly involved in FESCo
votes. If that's you: the proposal presented here is largely
clarification. There's not much
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 20:29:28 UTC
From ccd1d0bc51d9d2e52651f5268333715c25a26908 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 20:29:23 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 20:25:49 UTC
From 5b163921e973941e6e972232d18f813dc81c8af7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 20:25:44 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 20:13:53 UTC
From c24c31bed5a044432a70bc737164d74afb888ec3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 20:13:48 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2023-07-20 20:11:32 UTC
From da80016ba97bdcb43025058ed39e31ee356ab624 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 20 2023 20:11:26 +
Subject: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230719.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230720.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 128
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 15.69 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi,
Stephen Gallagher proposed a change to FESCo voting rules [1].
The latest draft:
--&<-
Ticket Votes (Preferred)
Once a formal proposal is made in a ticket, voting will proceed. A
Change ticket is assumed to be a a formal
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-07-20/fesco.2023-07-20-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-07-20/fesco.2023-07-20-17.00.txt
Log:
On 7/20/23 2:09 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 13:59 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
This bz[1] was opened on one of my packages not building on f39.
I did a quick rawhide scratch build and sure enough
the build fails with [2]
The important part is earlier in the log:
On 7/20/23 8:20 PM, Carlos Rodriguez Fernandez
wrote:
Hi all,
I am interested in packaging some golang programs for Fedora (and EPEL), and I read through
the guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:22 PM Carlos Rodriguez Fernandez
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am interested in packaging some golang programs for Fedora (and EPEL), and
> I read through the guidelines:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/
>
> My question is more about the
Hi all,
I am interested in packaging some golang programs for Fedora (and EPEL),
and I read through the guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/
My question is more about the reasoning for the recommended handling of
dependencies.
Other language platforms
On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 13:59 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> This bz[1] was opened on one of my packages not building on f39.
> I did a quick rawhide scratch build and sure enough
> the build fails with [2]
The important part is earlier in the log:
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils'
Hello,
This bz[1] was opened on one of my packages not building on f39.
I did a quick rawhide scratch build and sure enough
the build fails with [2]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line
93, in trace
result =
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:10:37 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 10. 07. 23 v 10:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > libtomcrypt
> >
>
> So this is the dependency chain:
>
> libtomcrypt <= python3-crypto <= python3-beaker <= python3-mako
I raised
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224383
Bug ID: 2224383
Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.059 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PAR-Packer
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
* Demi Marie Obenour:
> From this thread, it appears that non-LFS 32-bit software is fundamentally
> unsupportable in the long run, just like software with 32-bit time_t is
> unsupportable. That leaves two options:
>
> 1. Break the ABI, preferably in such a way that causes non-LFS
>code to
On 7/20/23 11:06, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Demi Marie Obenour:
>
>> On 7/17/23 09:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Daniel P. Berrangé:
>>>
> But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
> started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
> The list of updates that
Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:07 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Demi Marie Obenour:
>
> > On 7/17/23 09:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Daniel P. Berrangé:
> >>
> But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
> started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
> The
On 20. 07. 23 12:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
python-rapidfuzz thrnciar troycurtisjr
See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rapidfuzz/pull-request/2
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list --
* Demi Marie Obenour:
> On 7/17/23 09:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Daniel P. Berrangé:
>>
But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
The list of updates that were applied to builders in that timeframe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218167
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Code-TidyAll-0.83-3.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218167
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Hi,
this requires a bit of background, so please bear with me :)
Earlier this year, the libvirt project changed its RPM package to be
more granular[1] as a step towards a future where the legacy
monolithic daemon (libvirtd) is completely gone. This change has
happened upstream, but the Fedora
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:53 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 06:14:17PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 3:44 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I noticed that by default, Qubes OS has voluntary kernel preemption
> > > as opposed to full
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 4:07 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:01 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Now Apache Arrow 12.0.0 has been released.
>>
>> Rebase landing soon in Rawhide.
>
>
> Apache Arrow (libarrow) 13.0.0 has been released.
>
> At least within Fedora, only
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:01 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
>
> Now Apache Arrow 12.0.0 has been released.
>
> Rebase landing soon in Rawhide.
>
Apache Arrow (libarrow) 13.0.0 has been released.
At least within Fedora, only Ceph (ceph-common, ceph-radosgw, ceph-test,
librgw2) depends on libarrow.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, at 9:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> What's the downside from full pre-empt that makes it inappropriate
> as the defualt for Fedora server spins too ? Is it that it is
> trading off overall peak performance in favour of reduced latency,
> and we think servers would
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, at 9:51 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19 2023 at 06:50:24 PM -0400, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>> If restricted to desktops, then we can only do it with kernel
>> parameters. That probably means doing it in Anaconda kickstart, with
>> a per edition/spin option
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 06:14:17PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 3:44 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
> >
> > I noticed that by default, Qubes OS has voluntary kernel preemption
> > as opposed to full preemption. I found that enabling full preemption
> > (preempt=full on
On Wed, Jul 19 2023 at 06:50:24 PM -0400, Chris Murphy
wrote:
If restricted to desktops, then we can only do it with kernel
parameters. That probably means doing it in Anaconda kickstart, with
a per edition/spin option for doing so.
I'm not fond of this solution. In practice, this would
On 7/17/23 09:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrangé:
>
>>> But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
>>> started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
>>> The list of updates that were applied to builders in that timeframe
>>> doesn't raise any alarm bells
On 20-07-2023 14:38, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
I think I may have used Zim in the past and I may have some use for it
again. I'd be happy to co-maintain.
Great! I have added you with commit privileges. In case you (or anybody
else) know Python buildsystems, you could check the upstream issue
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 02:20:59AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> /home/rjones/d/fedora/polymake/rawhide/polymake-4.10/lib/core/src/perl/RefHash.xxs:737:11:
> > error: ‘Perl_ck_fun’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean
> > ‘Perl_cx_dup’?
> > 737 |
Sandro kirjoitti 20.7.2023 klo 12.42:
On 19-07-2023 23:11, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
Robin Lee kirjoitti 14.7.2023 klo 17.53:
I've orphaned the Zim package. It fails to build with Python 3.12 in
Rawhide.
Users can move to the flatpak on Flathub, which is also packaged by me.
Thank you for
Hi，I am interesting in the upgrading of perl. Where can I find the detailed
process of upgrading and building Perl, including the entire build steps, the
list of built RPM packages, and the building order of Perl module packages?
___
devel mailing list
Hi all,
I've orphaned the Onboard package. I stopped using it personally and don't have
enough time to handle some bug report.
If anyone want to take it please do so.
- Qiyu
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-07-20 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> "Only dead projects has stable API"
Sorry, but this is just nonsense. APIs can be appended to, even rewrites can
be made API-compatible if developers actually care about that. Even if the
internal code is completely different, the public API can be retained, at
least if
On 17. 07. 23 21:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello Pythonistas,
apparently, Cython 3.0.0 final was released today.
I plan to make it build somehow in
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Cython/pull-request/41 and once it does,
I'll update the package in Rawhide, introducing a python(3)-cython0.29
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:46 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 20. 07. 23 v 10:08 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > The dnf5 API has similar primitives (Base, Goal, Package, etc.), but it's
> >> not at all compatible.
>
> It may be worth to add the link to the API:
>
>
Dne 20. 07. 23 v 10:08 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
The dnf5 API has similar primitives (Base, Goal, Package, etc.), but it's
not at all compatible.
It may be worth to add the link to the API:
https://dnf5.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api/index.html
So everything has to be rewritten across the
On 19-07-2023 23:11, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
Robin Lee kirjoitti 14.7.2023 klo 17.53:
I've orphaned the Zim package. It fails to build with Python 3.12 in
Rawhide.
Users can move to the flatpak on Flathub, which is also packaged by me.
Thank you for maintaining the Zim package until now. I
Recently, I adopted the orphaned Zim package for Fedora. The previous
maintainer had added the package to EPEL, while I am not involved with
EPEL at all. Consequently, I will not maintain the EPEL branches anymore.
From going through the EPEC documentation, it looks like the Retirement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224116
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:35 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
>
> 2023-07-19T13:39:57Z Peter Robinson :
>
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:20 PM Nicola Sella wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >> Yesterday, DNF5 5.1.0 was released upstream[1] and in rawhide[2]. This
> >> update makes DNF5's API stable. This means
86 matches
Mail list logo
