On 07/27/2011 03:14 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:54:09 +0200
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
If you don't hide ~/.local and ~/.config then users who are less savvy
than us might wonder what thzat stuff is and delete it and nothing
will stop them and then all
On 07/28/2011 12:54 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:24:48 +0100
Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com wrote:
There are already quite a few things that may place executables
under . prefixed paths in home. Java web start (javaws) for instance
will install an entire jre under .java
On 07/28/2011 01:41 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 07/28/2011 07:53 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
On 07/28/2011 12:46 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
This is a good point. Especially when you start on a 64 bit box and
login to a 32 bit (or other arch) - bin now makes now sense at all. You
need arch
On 07/28/2011 01:22 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:00:28 +0100
Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com wrote:
It is nevertheless an *added* avenue to do some phishing. And for what
benefit?
No, it's not; at the very most it's making something very slightly less
noticeable but even
On 07/28/2011 03:50 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
My understanding of the history of /usr/local's nomenclature is that it
was intended to be local to the machine (and thus not NFS mounted).
I always understood it to be site local rather than machine local - the FHS
states that it may be used for
On 08/12/2011 04:40 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:27:13AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Rightly or wrongly, upstream libfoo-1.0 has some additional utilities that
access the PrivateData. Because the utilities are built from the libfoo
source, they can include the
On 10/24/2011 04:05 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
There is a project named SOS in Fedora collection on Transifex. I'd
like to know if there is anyone maintaining it, because it seems like
it needs to be translated, but there is no maintainer assigned in Tx
and no translation team creation request
On 09/15/2010 05:06 PM, Robert Spanton wrote:
Hi,
I've recently had to link a fair amount of my work statically so that
it'll run on a cluster of RHEL machines. Unfortunately, I am just a
user of these machines, and so I don't have the power to get them to run
Fedora or even to get the
On 10/26/2010 10:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 14:07:53 -0700,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
That's only if you give root the right to disable or load new selinux
policy.
And the policy is tight enough. You need to
On 10/09/2012 03:19 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
While less helpfully wraps your log lines at the edge of your terminal
journalctl unhelpfully truncates them or, if -a is used, makes you use
left/right cursor to scroll back and forth in an attempt to read the
lines. Especially since it fully
On 19/12/12 15:12, Adrian wrote:
-Wl,-z,relro -lfltk
Which is pretty close to what you get on current Ubuntu:
root@u1210-vm1:~# grep PRETTY /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME=Ubuntu quantal (12.10)
root@u1210-vm1:~# dpkg -s libfltk1.1 | head -2
Package: libfltk1.1
Status: install ok installed
On 19/12/12 17:30, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fedora the following command fails:
g++ -I/usr/include/freetype2 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
-D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -pipe -Wall -fexceptions -O2 -ffast-math
On 19/12/12 21:35, Adrian wrote:
*From*: Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com
On 19/12/12 17:30, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Probably http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
Mirek
So why does this bug not show itself on Suse, and any of the Debian based
builds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/20/2012 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 00:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:30 +0100, Miloslav Trma? wrote:
Probably
On 01/29/2013 03:24 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Wow this brings me back to Windows 95/XP antifeatures where changing
hardware even a little bit strands you to not be able to boot and having
to go to rescue mode.
Actually this is how mkinitrd/nash worked by default for many years
(pre-dracut, i.e.
On 01/29/2013 03:45 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
I guess it was in the short while I switched to Ubuntu, because from my
memory I used to change hardware on my machines and always be extremely
happy at how Linux was resilient to hardware changes between boots and
automatically detected new hardware
On 01/29/2013 04:32 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
In a Fedora context, when you do this it's because the old motherboard
failed unexpectedly, you bought a new one. It's a great relief to see
plugging the old drive on the new mobo just works. There is no prep in
advance and old and new mobo have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/29/2013 10:09 PM, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
This is simply not true.
There are hundreds of thousands of older desktops that are not
technically servers that have lots of older interfaces.
Evidence is better than unsupported claims. Although
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:41 -0800, Cleaver, Japheth wrote:
Denis Leroy
what about '/usr/bin/[', part of cureutils... had never
noticed this one before.
-denis
Isn't that simply what makes if [ (blah) ] work?
It's cute isn't it? I had the biggest grin the day I realised that '['
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 17:44 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com writes:
nitpick [ may be a built in but then again (as its presence
in /usr/bin implies) it may not be :).
Like any other command.
But unlike '[[' which is the point I was replying to. Afaik you
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 23:38 -0800, Eric Smith wrote:
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
You could probably package up libbsd for inclusion:
http://libbsd.freedesktop.org/wiki/
That's exactly the kind of thing I was hoping to find. I've submitted a
package for review:
On 02/14/2010 04:59 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Any truth here?
http://www.osnews.com/story/22872/Linux_Not_Fully_Prepared_for_4096-
Byte_Sector_Hard_Drives
One-line-summary: googling common search terms for Linux help may lead
you to some out-of-date HOWTOs.
This passes as news these days?
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 19:11 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
MultiGHz, Multicore CPUs consume magnitudes more power than HDs.
Not always. A typical 3.5 harddrive consumes about (max):
0.65A * 5V = 3.25W
0.50A * 12V = 6.00W
which totals 9.25 Watts, and less when not transferring
On 11/04/2013 11:32 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Just see how others does this. Linux Kernel is one example, Django is
another. This two projects from very different corners are able to
provide stable API/ABI for some longer time period. I really appreciate
The kernel does not provide
On 02/08/2011 02:22 AM, Roberto Spadim wrote:
hi guys, i made some changes to md raid1 software, could fedora test
it? for me it work very nice =)
the raid1 new code is based in kernel 2.6.37
here is the new and old code:
www.spadim.com.br/raid1
just read_balance changed (4 modes:
On 03/30/2011 01:11 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/30/2011 02:10 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/3/30 Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de:
On 03/30/2011 01:54 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya,
I just uploaded a new version of systemd into F15, which establishes a
directory /run in the
On 03/30/2011 02:08 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/30/2011 02:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 30.03.11 18:04, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote:
Also, can somebody point me to the place where the FHS would say no
other directories below / are allowed? I can't find that.
On 04/14/2011 04:38 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/4/14 Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.com:
2011/4/14 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 16:53:00 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed a rare condition that could cause the drive to reset and clear
On 04/14/2011 04:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 09:15 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I experienced a small loss of power during commiting to a git repo.
I can't resist...how does a 'small' loss of power differ from a 'large'
loss of power? :)
Haha only-serious
On 05/01/2011 11:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.05.2011 09:56, schrieb David Timms:
Should I be suggesting to upstream to attempt to detect CPU before
running non-available instructions, eg as part of app startup ?
Can that even be done (reliably)?
ffmpeg has since years a option
On 05/10/2011 03:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 21:14 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Sorry... Did I miss something?
I'd imagine someone signed an interlinux address up to the list, and
that was an automated response.
Right - that was my assumption too. I met the owner of
On 05/14/2011 08:35 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
lör 2011-05-14 klockan 19:33 +0200 skrev Xose Vazquez Perez:
default is 24010, but it was reduced to 1024 by
user(included root) in: /etc/security/limits.d/90-nproc.conf
to prevent accidental fork bombs(see rhbz #432903).
Is it still worth
On 06/02/2011 08:28 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Maybe I'm not understanding your question correctly, but a filesystem
is more general than LVM. You can create directories corresponding to
your current VGs and files for your LVs, with the advantage that you
can nest directories which you
On 07/14/2011 05:26 PM, JB wrote:
Now just a loud thinking ...
Have you thought about first preparing a CD (even a live CD) with BTRFS and
some extra preinstalled software like VirtualBox etc just for testing ?
What, you mean like the live and non-live Fedora ISOs that have had btrfs
support
On 07/14/2011 05:48 PM, JB wrote:
Good. Perhaps a weekly snapshot CD, with the latest BTRFS and related utils,
so that the testing would be more up-to-date and meaningful.
JB
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
Regards,
Bryn.
--
devel mailing list
On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
hopefully systemd will aslo live for 40 years as sysvinit
did or the next replacement will be finished BEFORE release
including the correspondending parts of the distribution
Just to be clear as this has been mentioned several times in recent
On 07/27/2011 11:43 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 07/27/2011 01:23 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:07 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
We track autofs issues for fedora, upstream and RHEL and seems to work well
in
the field.
What specifically does systemd do that autofs does not
On 04/25/2012 06:22 PM, Chris wrote:
2012/4/25 Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com:
That's because Btrfs is way more stable than ext4,
[citation needed]
https://twitter.com/#!/josefbacik/status/195190540529184768
Is this a joke? Btrfs more stable than ext4??? Not really???
I think the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/15/2012 07:10 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
A bit of sloppy cut and paste gave me this insightful result:
$ 0.e+00] bash: 0.e+00]: command not found...
Failed to search for file:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/15/2012 07:20 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
Try disabling it via /etc/profile.d/PackageKit.sh (and starting a
new login shell to ensure it's not inherited from your old
environment) to make sure it's PK and then file a bug.
Also exists on f15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 02:48 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
From Fedora 18 on, Fedora will no longer include the freedom to for
a user to create a fork or respin which is the technological equal
of the Project's output. Instead, this freedom will be available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 03:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I thought I'd pay him the respect of sleeping on it and giving
someone in support of this rather secretive move time to post about
it and discuss it, so that people wouldn't be learning about it
from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 05:16 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:13 PM, Miloslav Trma? wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net
wrote:
http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement
SecureBoot is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 07:21 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
Not yet. But HDD technology is changing rapidly. Just look at
hybrid drives, SSD.
No reason they could not add this capability.
Not really. Both of these have been in development for years and have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 08:03 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I wasn't responding to MJG, I was responding to Peter— who said I
was wrong in the message where I was stating that a freedom is
being lost, and has subsequently spoken more clearly on the
position—
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 10:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 15:07 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
Yes, all these would currently support what I'm suggesting.
Actually, if you're willing to flip a lot of switches, you
could probably make your /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2012 01:51 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Actually, with enough PCI USB port cards, USB hubs, and thumb
drives, you could use MD RAID and possibly LVM to make a
poor-person's SAN. Hot-swappable drives and all.
And with LIO in the kernel you can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2012 06:53 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
For all available firmware vendors and models?
For the ones that end users are actually likely to have, which
aren't that many. There are much fewer BIOS vendors than hardware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/19/2012 02:01 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
This is rediculous. I liked the idea of 775 when it was
introduced, since it did solve an annoyance with the old unix
groups. But then we should make the default fedora install work by
setting the sshd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/19/2012 04:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
Jun 19 09:44:41 nbecker5 sshd[25418]: Authentication refused:
bad ownership or modes for directory /home/nbecker
Looks like a new change in OpenSSH then, which is IMHO a
regression,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/19/2012 02:47 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Bryn M. Reeves wrote: On 06/19/2012 02:01 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
This is rediculous. I liked the idea of 775 when it was
introduced, since it did solve an annoyance with the old
unix groups
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2012 01:06 PM, Scott Schmit wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 01:56:29PM +0200, Roman Rakus wrote:
Hi, I have a question about nullglob bash's shell option. I want
to hear opinions. The behavior is nicely described in bash
reference manual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2012 01:31 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
I wouldn't back this change either but that's not the behaviour of
nullglob. If nothing matches the glob the word remains unchanged
(i.e. *.foo - *.foo):
Eh, nevermind.. not enough coffee.
Bryn
On 07/17/2012 12:38 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Jan Kratochvil writes:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:00 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
And I wouldn't be so presumptions as to state authoritatively what
is or is not a bug, in something whose purpose is not known to me.
Non-existing /proc/self/exe
On 07/17/2012 03:02 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Mike Manilone wrote:
I think we can create a new repo called security like Debian. Push all
the security updates to it.
Uhm, we have that. It is called RHEL
Not quite although RHEL errata are also categorised as
On 07/17/2012 12:01 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
Yes, it's the pathname that started this process. Yes, that pathname
may point to file that no longer exists. That's UNIX.
No, that's Linux with prelink installed.
And a number of other common configurations for e.g. a
On 07/17/2012 12:42 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
… which can be used to reset the
application, so that it knows that it's been updated.
Because that is a common need across many packages.
Apparently being notified of a prelink is not such a common need. Even
if such a thing did exist it could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/17/2012 04:01 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, it really should use the system version. If it's not in
Fedora, submit it as a review for a new package.
-J
If I read correctly there is no system version since the code
discussed is not a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/16/2012 02:33 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Perhaps and stupid question:
After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added
to .gitignore: Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2012 01:15 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com
wrote:
You're allowing the local sandbox user to connect to the local X
server so any process running in one of your sandboxes can start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2012 04:56 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
Good point. I don't visit those sites, and it's important for me
to mention that. No p0rn, period, and many of the moral reasons are
in
There are a lot of perfectly family-friendly websites whose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 11:38 AM, Mike Manilone wrote:
I think if there's a Graphical Rescue Mode (GRM), that would
be great and friendly to end-users. I know many users who can't
rescue their systems from a shell. The work needs a lot of
knowledge about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 12:05 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 04/04/12 11:38, Mike Manilone wrote:
Hi there,
I think if there's a Graphical Rescue Mode (GRM),
This can be done with install dvd, troublshoot recsue installed
system chmod /mnt/sysimage (iirc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 12:06 PM, Mike Manilone wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 11:59 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
Maybe it would be an idea to extend livecd-tools to allow a live
image to be installed to the hard disk and booted via grub to
allow a graphical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 12:13 PM, Mike Manilone wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 12:05 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
This can be done with install dvd, troublshoot recsue installed
system chmod /mnt/sysimage (iirc) startx
If there's a grub entry will be more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 06:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
This should work as long as the rescue CD finds all your file
systems and mounts them in the right place (inc. bind mounts for
/proc, /sys, /dev). If not then setting them by hand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 06:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
On 04/04/2012 06:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
What I think would be really helpful would be a menu item (next
to the liveinst one) on the live images which does the same
magic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/05/2012 01:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
Detecting and mounting the file systems is straightforward and
that's what anaconda does. I read the request as wanting to also
make the live environment chroot into the detected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/24/2010 09:39 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 16:36 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:14:33AM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
Why is the systemd executable in /bin instead of /sbin?
Without looking too
On 07/16/2013 12:41 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 10:42 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
FWIW this change caused a segfault in OpenStack
This phrase is very dramatic. I'd say triggered a double free in an
untested libguestfs error path is more accurate and less dramatic.
On 08/07/2013 04:12 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 17:23 -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
I have installed Fedora 17/18/19 (selected Minimal installation) from
DVD and it completed successfully, however there is no tar
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 08:31:12AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Hi, just seen that sos package is starting to fail on rawhide with
> following error:
>
>
> Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb
> --target noarch --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/sos.spec'] with env
72 matches
Mail list logo
