On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 09:12:06AM +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
Publishing them is a bit tricky - I can of course publish them (we scan
with cppcheck, enhanced gcc warnings, clang and coverity) - but the
reports may contain some attack vectors - and for inactive packages, it
would only show
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:26:08PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Because it's pretty much dead upstream, getting towards dead in real-world
deployments, and never really worked well anyway in Linux.
Orphaned in F20, rawhide. If no one wants to grab it, will retire in
a week or two.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:57:55PM +0200, Michal Toman wrote:
In last two weeks these components were crashing the most:
1. kernel seen 85925 times (52% of all reports)
https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1174076/
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:46:33AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
This is the offending function:
void
cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, unsigned int *ecx,
unsigned int *edx)
{
__asm volatile
(cpuid\n\t
: =a (*eax),
=b (*ebx),
=c
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:14:55AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
going forward we need to work out how to do the
perl builds quicker. there really is no reason why it needs to take as
long as it does.
Maybe only rebuild things that have a buildrequires on perl ?
None of the rebuild
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:17:01PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
So this thread is complaining about..
Removing:
glusterfs x86_64 3.4.0-2.fc19 @updates-testing
4.7 M
Removing for dependencies:
glusterfs-api x86_64 3.4.0-2.fc19
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 02:25:22PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I Want To Believe in btrfs, but unfortunately it's still excessively
buggy. It's actually got worse in Rawhide recently
Well, it works fine for myself and for quite a few other folks I know.
Cool story.
I am
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:12:58PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 14 mars 2013 20:57, Adam Williamson a écrit :
So - don't get bitten by this :) If you really want to get on the F19
branch, then just make sure you hand-check your grub config file before
rebooting.
Thank
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:30:01AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
F19 has been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick
up the new branch, additionally rawhide/f20 has had inheritance cut off
from previous
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:51:01AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:35:00 -0500
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com said:
Having my local mirror wiped when I rsynced todays rawhide tree was
unexpected. Having to do
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:35:08PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
1: Long-term ABI for applications that we don't want to break without
significant discussion.
For now, this will include the stable kernel and libc
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:13:27AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
I have a script that automates some of the workload of reassigning the
component back to where the bug really is, but it currently requires
some manual intervention:
http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/dmalcolm/public_git/triage.git
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:10:38PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
So if you want to hack this into a tool for use on kernel bugs, go for
it.
...and please integrate with abrt! Let's have it all working together :)
- I am all for it, the abrt server is exactly the place where these
kind
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:40:27PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As part of preparations for possible switch of system compiler in F19
to GCC 4.8.0, we (myself and Marek Polacek) have performed a test mass
rebuild of rawhide (December 17th package list) using gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19
on
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:59:55PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
Given that the kernel is currently a full quarter of the current image, I
think it has to be.
No you could also use a different kernel image; build your own kernel;
use a compressed filesystem, don't use a kernel at all and
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 04:52:19PM +0200, Richard Marko wrote:
kernel 220 ▁▂▄▅▇▇█
Nice graphs!
What's this about?
--
These are the statistics generated by ABRT Server deployed on [1].
We are going to send these reports
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:02:43AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 04:52:19PM +0200, Richard Marko wrote:
kernel 220 ▁▂▄▅▇▇█
Nice graphs!
What's this about?
--
These are the statistics
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:10:47AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Feature request:
Can you do the same backtrace hashing abrt does, and provide a link to any
bugs in bugzilla with the abrt_hash in the whiteboard ?
Never mind. It seems you do that, and I was looking at reports where
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:39:31AM +0200, Michal Toman wrote:
We believe this will help developers to better prioritize their
work and make debugging easier (crashes in common libraries are
grouped into a single problem, for each crash versions of affected
packages/architectures are
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:20:43AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
1G fits on both the smallest MiniDVD format and most extant USB sticks.
Let's do it already.
If so, then please acknowledge explicitly that Fedora would be discarding
some 4% of running, otherwise-capable machines
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 07:19:32AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
I've had some reports recently that appeared to suggest that in F17,
GFS2 was no longer being supported by the kernel. Having investigated
this, it appears that the root cause is that the gfs2.ko module has been
moved to
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 04:48:38PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
[*] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting_channel
Related question: Should
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kernel/2012-March/003711.html
([PATCH] rawhide: enable HYPERV drivers) also be on the agenda? It
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:34:59PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
* #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr, 17:40:06)
* AGREED: tmp-on-tmpfs is accepted (+5 -3)
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:27:04PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
All sorts of things can speed it up, most of the Fedora builders are
currently loopback ext4 over NFS over 100Mb ethernet over USB. Not
optimal.
Just switching them to ext2 would save a ton of IO. The buildroots
get regenerated
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:32:04AM -0400, Zach Brown wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:58 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:27:04PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
All sorts of things can speed it up, most of the Fedora builders are
currently loopback ext4 over NFS over 100Mb
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:54:36PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
The hardware is way slower ... so we can just build on faster hardware
(x86_64). Which is the only sane way to do it.
Trying to build on ARM directly is kind of a gimmick but nothing one
can seriously use to build a whole
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org said:
No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy.
Why not?
For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use
of IPC and needs
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:42:50PM +0200, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
What happens if two packages want to set a sysctl to different values ?
that's why they are prefixed with numbers, the higher number will take
effect
eg. 99-foobar.conf
sometimes we have conventions for number ranges
The kernel has several widespread bugs that are affecting all releases,
that are impacting a lot of users.
* Hibernation
There are so many bugs here it's hard to know where to begin.
- We have cases where it fails to sleep, or resumes instantly.
- There are cases where it looks to be
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 16:34 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
Hi,
I've noticed some strange soft lockup behaviour on my system (please
see the attachment). Soft lockup appears to be
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:22:03AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 02/16/2012 10:08 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Not to mention that the kernel devs use gcc to compile the kernel -
and it most certainly puts a lot of pressure on the compiler. I suspect
unless linus drops gcc as well,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a F16 kernel and
is little better than F17 3.3 kernels.
the first -rc build of each kernel release has
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:53:13AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
According to the updates policy the
maintainer needs to consider that their change will cause problems for third
party kernel module packagers and end users that are compiling their own
kernel modules.
We *know* we're going
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:55:59AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
So, yes, it may be fully expected that issuing an update will break out of
tree modules but that doesn't stop it from being one factor to *consider*.
Consideration implies that the following thought process will occur
This
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 07:24:20PM +0100, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2011/11/22 Dave Jones da...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:55:59AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Consideration implies that the following thought process will occur
This update will break out of tree modules
Looking at http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-2014/logs/mash.log
(and previous logs), I don't see any obvious message for why the images/
directory isn't being created in the composes.
anyone have info on what's broken ?
Dave
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:29:10AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Nov 14, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
Looking at
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-2014/logs/mash.log
(and previous logs), I don't see any obvious message for why the images/
directory isn't
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 07:33:22AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 15:36:27 -0400,
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
So we're thinking of trying this again this thursday with a focus on 16,
(but triage work on older releases is welcomed too).
I have
Some details about the triage day we are holding tomorrow.
Where:
#fedora-kernel on irc.freenode.net
When:
October 6th 2011
What:
The primary focus is going to be on getting things in the best shape possible
for Fedora 16's release. However there are some useful things that can be done
for all
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:24:45PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:33:24PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
We'll be doing this in #fedora-kernel next Monday (22nd)
I expect that the wiki page will continue to evolve as we start working
on this, and perhaps
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:59:02PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I think the degree of slow down now, compared with the past, makes this
issue a bug. If things are like they are now, I won't be running debug
kernels on my rawhide systems. It costs me too much time. It would be
nice to
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:31:09AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
P.S. Your argument will be moot when the kernel drops the floppy module.
Is there actually a plan for this to happen? Curious, not arguing here.
Not any time soon.
Dave
--
devel mailing list
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 05:35:19PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Why does it need so much to start with?
Because the installer initrd contains the kitchen sink.
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:33:24PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
We'll be doing this in #fedora-kernel next Monday (22nd)
I expect that the wiki page will continue to evolve as we start working
on this, and perhaps this can even become a regular thing.
apologies for not helping
We've been planning on doing one of these forever, but never seeming
to get around to it.
The kernel gets a lot of bugs (possibly more than any other package),
and as such, we've got nearly a thousand bugs open right now, and just
three people working on it full-time.
The problem we've faced
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:16:43AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
i have running 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 #1 SMP in my testing-virtual-machine
since
some minutes, boot looked fine, after a minute a got a btrfs-stack-trace
hope this helps (no i do not tend use btrfs in production *gg*)
hmm,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:29:58PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
wasn't there some kind of issue in vm's ? Maybe I'm not remembering
correctly.
too vague to comment. there are always 'issues in vm's :)
Dave - how is the 2.6.40 code different or not from 3.0.0-2 ?
pretty much the same
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 06:22:50PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
FYI, I've just yum-updated my rawhide VM to the latest
(but not from the console) and was surprised to lose the connection
while it was happening. Again. It happened to me last week, too.
I got back in via the console and
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:11:43PM +0400, Lucas wrote:
Dear All.
Just updated and got the following in dmesg:
Thanks, I just reported this upstream.
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orphan isic
seeing as I took ip6sic which is similar, I'll take this too.
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:12:07PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orphan minicom
comaintained by: jcapik
If something is orphaned, but has comaintainers, is that enough to keep
it in the distro ?
Not really - we'd like one of the comaintainers to pick it up as
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:04:51PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:28:59PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orphan ip6sic
I've used this from time to time. I'll pick it up.
So I took maintainership in pkgdb. Now every time I commit,
I get a bounce email from ip6sic
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 06:47:12PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Orphan midisport-firmware
I own hardware that uses this. Taken.
you'll want to take its dependancy too 'fxload'
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:40:06PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
I thought so - glad its benign ... I assume the messages will
sometimes be useful to the kernel team ...
so should I keep mentioning new ones or only if its an actual OOPS?
If you have abrt installed it will file bugs
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:54:14PM +0400, Lucas wrote:
Dear All
I have installed the latest kernel from koji and found out that now I have 3
new modules:
appletalk
psnap
ipx
I know what is IPX.
But do we really need to have AppleTalk always loaded in the kernel?
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:27:44PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 2011-06-11 12:11, Lucas wrote:
Actually it does relabel by it self after boot with option selinux=0
That sounds rather useful. How does it know whether or not it was
previously booted with selinux=0?
booting with
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:01:06PM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
I agree. As virtualization technology becomes more and more involved
and frequent on users systems, particularly with advanced Linux users,
I think there
I don't own a device to test this any more, so I'm going to orphan
these two. If anyone wants them, they're very low maintainence.
(mostly just keeping up with package guideline changes, though there's
a newer version of fxload available, but the absense of hardware made me
nervous to blindly
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:56:25PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
What would cause someone to choose to use these tools rather than the
ones that exist in Fedora already?
They come from an environment where plan9 is more commonly used
Rob Pike's house ?
Dave
--
devel mailing
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 07:02:04PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
On 05/14/2011 06:10 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
It used to be a module, but was converted to built-in as we were always
loading it in the network scripts. A lot of the decisions made in
those '5 second boot' days seem
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 05:22:35PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
hi,
why is it 'yes' instead of 'm'(module)? bug/feature??
performance troubles: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=130212178423334w=2
It used to be a module, but was converted to built-in as we were always
loading it
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 06:53:31PM +0100, jan.klepek wrote:
In not so recent past, powertop2 alpha has been released [1] and it is
currently in version 1.97. It is usuable and I was thinking about
packaging it for Fedora. However, there is already old powertop.
So I will have to package
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:46:04AM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Apropos of nothing: kerneloops reporting seems to have been broken ever
since
we switched from using the kerneloops client to abrt, but that's another
story..
- I reported quite a few oops using abrt (even found
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:45:10PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
The problem here is that some maintainers doesn't want ABRT reports at
all even those not yet reported...
It's arguable that such people are 'maintainers' at all if this is the case.
I find it quite sad that we have packagers
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:11:27AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:45:10PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
The problem here is that some maintainers doesn't want ABRT reports at
all even those not yet reported...
It's arguable
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:51:39AM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
The problem is entirely cosmetic. No data is harmed, the program exits
after that, it's just a child thread and the main process don't
communicate the exit quite right. So, pretty much everyone who uses
calibre sees
Wtf happened in updates-testing ?
gdm and a bunch of other stuff crashes on startup..
NetworkManager[1059]: error [1290185488.399900] [nm-manager.c:1332]
user_proxy_init(): could not init user settings proxy: (3) Could not get owner
of name 'org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerUserSettings': no
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 01:23:26PM -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
Wtf happened in updates-testing ?
gdm and a bunch of other stuff crashes on startup..
gdm[1622]: #9 0x0032031195aa
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:23:56PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
It is very sad that Intel/AMD just didn't make sure rep movsb
isn't the fastest copying sequence on all of their CPUs,
which underneath could do whatever magic based on size and src/dst
alignment (e.g. for small length handle
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 05:23:09PM +0300, macachuto wrote:
Dear All.
I would like to ask, when it will be possible to have kernel 2.6.35 with
/sys/module/drm_kms_helper/parameters/poll to disable hotplug polling.
I have laptop with i915GM video and experience mouse cursor freezes
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 04:51:01PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
[ But yes, 4% is a big hit. 1% I would accept without hesitation.
4% does make me hesitate a little bit. During devel cycles, we
accept much more slowdown than that for the debug kernel,
of course. If we can figure out
I did a minimal install yesterday, and was surprised to find that
cairo, and a bunch of X libs were still installed.
The dependancy chain that pulled them in looks like this..
policycoreutils - dbus-glib - gobject-introspection - fontconfig - cairo
Could any part of that chain have its
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 03:31:39PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
At the Fedora 14 Beta Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 14 Beta was
declared GOLD and ready for release on September 28, 2010.
is what's at rsync://mirrors.kernel.org/mirrors/fedora/development/14/
right now the beta tree, or is
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I can see a big increase in boot time with my desktop setup when using a
debugging kernel among other slow-downs. From 8 seconds (non-debug) at
least double that. I use modern CPUs (quad core a minimum) with SSDs and
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:11:47PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
One problem fixed, introduced another
===
[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
---
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:11:52PM +0200, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Michal Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:03 PM
To:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:30:57AM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
This article:
http://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/notices/security_mechanisms_in_linux_environment__part_1___userspace_memory_protection/
seems to
I just hit this on an f13 box.
Transaction Check Error:
package libgcc-4.4.4-11.fc12.x86_64 (which is newer than
libgcc-4.4.4-10.fc13.i686) is already installed
Could the buildsystem be changed to prevent newer NVRs from being built if an
older
one exists in a newer buildroot ? Should it ?
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:32:01AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 18.08.10 18:15, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote:
# systemctl enable ge...@.service prefdm.service getty.target
rc-local.service remote-fs.target
And that should make things work again
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:53:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
It tells me to see the logs for details, but there's not a single
message
from systemd in the logs.
There should be an explanation in dmesg, that it cannot find
default.target.
at the stage
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:47:37PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Good luck getting Mozilla to accept anything. Just like the kernel, they're
a very hard to work with upstream. If you don't know the right people, your
stuff just doesn't get in. :-(
Which is odd, because the number of
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:58:26PM -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
That's not corruption, that's just an unreferenced object, which does
no harm except to waste space. git gc will delete such objects.
(20:50:18:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full
dangling blob
Check this out..
(00:13:25:da...@gelk:kernel)$ fedpkg -v upload patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2
Creating module object from /mnt/data/src/fedora/kernel
Uploading: f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2
Running curl -k --cert /home/davej/.fedora.cert --fail -o /dev/null
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 02:39:55PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) said:
of those that it does open(),.. Is there seriously a use-case for someone
wanting
lvm partitioned /dev/ram disks ? or /dev/loop ?
I would assume that's for testing.
point being
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:26:14PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 20.07.10 16:04, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
I am not entirely sure though why those processes actually access those
dirs in this case. Maybe they are iterating through the files in /dev?
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:30:03PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:26:14PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 20.07.10 16:04, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
I am not entirely sure though why those processes actually access those
dirs
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:47:38PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
There will be an outage starting at 2010-07-21 16:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 3 hours. Outages will be small but noticeable for
small segments as systems are updated and rebooted.
To convert UTC to your
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:28:16AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
* The desktop default update manager must not periodically check for
updates when the system is booted live, but must periodically check for
updates when running on an installed system
tangentally related:
Do we ever
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:28:08AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
greater for f12: x86info (davej )
f12 = 1:x86info-1.25-1.45.fc12.src
f13 = 1:x86info-1.25-1.44.fc13.src
These are actually the same, (I did two commits in f12, and combined
both when I updated f13).
is
So after having heard the nth discussion about tor, I decided to check it out.
I tried installing it on a stripped down f12 box that has no X, or other stuff
unnecessary for routing network packets.
What happened next has me lost for words.
Our dependency chains suck.
Dave
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:51:17AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:37 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
-- Processing Dependency: tor-lsb = 0.2.1.23-1200.fc12 for package:
tor-0.2.1.23-1200.fc12.i686
This is where things go to hell. Why in the hell is tor-lsb /required
I'm going to recommend dropping this package from Fedora entirely.
- Upstream seems to have stopped development on it since intel acquired
its developers (opened-hand)
- The new profiling tools (perf) are in many cases easier to use than
oprofile
- oprofileui had a number of bugs that look
92 matches
Mail list logo
