On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:38 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 7 September 2011 01:02, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Is this a Bodhi bug? Or does FESCo expect voluntary compliance /
case-by-case enforcement of this policy?
I'm guilty of this too; when I file an update that's not
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 22:21 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:33:33PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
package for a while. If I'm happy with my subsequent testing, then I'll
+1 my own update, on the grounds that I've been viewing the change from
a testing perspective, rather
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 12:24 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:05:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
The fact that it is important for Fedora users, doesn't mean it must be
in the official Fedora repos (see MP3 codecs or other lovely programs in
non-Fedora repos). [...]
I
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the
upgrade will be performed in F17 directly.
That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root
Python 3.2's distutils was byte-compiling .py files to the wrong
location, putting the .pyc/.pyo files in the same directory as the .py
files, rather than in the __pycache__ subdirectory.
This has led to some python3 packages having duplicate .pyc files in
their payloads:
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:46 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Tom spot Callaway said the following on 08/05/2010 10:08 AM Pacific Time:
On 08/05/2010 12:59 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
597858 [NEW - high - dwa...@redhat.com - --- -] SELinux is preventing
firefox from making its memory writable and
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 09:59 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
[snip]
Here are the unfixed bugs we are waiting for more information on:
[snip]
621030 [ASSIGNED - medium - wwo...@redhat.com - --- -] Fail to save
traceback to bugzilla
wwoods created a patch which has seen some testing; update has
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 15:07 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 09:59 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
[snip]
Here are the unfixed bugs we are waiting for more information on:
[snip]
621030 [ASSIGNED - medium - wwo...@redhat.com - --- -] Fail to save
traceback
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:07 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
JP == John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com writes:
JP Also *PLEASE* make sure any scripts or other external applications
JP that rely on bugzilla.redhat.com are tested against our test server
JP before the upgrade if you have not
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 21:26 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi everybody,
a lot of packages were rebuilt for Python 2.7 recently, but
unfortunately they've turned out to be not all that needed rebuilding.
Essentially, all packages that contain .py files that aren't
below /usr/lib(64)/python
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:11 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
I updated system yesterday, installed scd just now:
[init 3]# system-config-display
File /usr/share/system-config-display/xconf.py, line 27, in module
import xf86config
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/xf86config.py, line 1,
(Sorry about the length of this email)
Python 2.7 deprecated the PyCObject API in favor of a new capsule API.
http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.7.html#capsules
The deprecations are set to ignore by default, so in theory the API
still works: every time an extension uses the API, a
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 16:12 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 23:17:39 +0200
Sven Lankes s...@lank.es wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:21:50PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
I wonder why I get the impression that the only ones who strongly
oppose this change are you folks
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 19:38 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:20:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
(Sorry about the length of this email)
Python 2.7 deprecated the PyCObject API in favor of a new capsule API.
http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.7.html#capsules
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 13:44 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:20 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
Personally, I'm leaning towards option (a) above (the don't override
warnings option): closing the various as WONTFIX, and adding a section
to the release notes
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 21:57 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:24:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 19:38 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:20:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Possible ways forward:
(a) don't fix
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 19:42 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:20:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
(Sorry about the length of this email)
Python 2.7 deprecated the PyCObject API in favor of a new capsule API.
http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.7.html
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 14:19 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 19:42 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:20:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
[snip]
Porting to the capsule API, I believe the code needs to look something
like this (caution: untested
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 15:14 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 02:03:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 21:57 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:20:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
If this is okay, then I'd modify your point
I just built Python 3.2a1 into rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=191382
so the meaning of python3 in rawhide just jumped from Python 3.1 to
Python 3.2
A new opcode (SETUP_WITH [1]) was added, to speed up the with
statement, and this changes the bytecode format for
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 16:31 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:48:31 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
[snip]
So you'll need to update the %files for python3 subpackages, listing
something like:
foo/__pycache__
to capture the directory and the bytecode files within
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 22:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 23.08.10 16:17, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
Oh, I have found a later meeting, from August 3rd. There, the
comments
(after a brief discussion o updating the wiki)
[snip]
[... different-topic python
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:47 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 23.08.10 17:31, David Malcolm (dmalc...@redhat.com) wrote:
20:07:05 dmalcolm nirik: hence F15, I think
20:07:11 mclasen nirik/adamw: I know lennart was working on a bugfix
release of systemd todasy
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 14:50 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 04:31:08PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:48:31 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
[snip]
So you'll need to update the %files for python3 subpackages, listing
something like:
foo
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 19:16 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:48 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
I just built Python 3.2a1 into rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=191382
so the meaning of python3 in rawhide just jumped from
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:51 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 23:29:38 +0800
Chen Lei wrote:
2010/8/22 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:48:31 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
[snip]
So you'll need to update the %files for python3
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 09:10 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:16 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
A suggested fix (caveat: not tested): ensure that the python-lxml.spec
has a
BuildRequires: Cython = 0.12
and delete the .c file in the %prep, to ensure
I suspect I haven't had enough coffee yet, but I don't see the problem
here. Why not simply add python3-devel as a build requirement as
Ignacio says?
If a build requirement isn't installed, it's acceptable for a build to
fail: it's a violation of a precondition.
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 19:35
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 15:46 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Thank you to all the feature owners and developers for all their hard
work to make Fedora 14 the best Fedora release yet. We are almost to
the end!
As a follow-up to last week's reminder
As I mentioned on IRC yesterday, I've moved the huge tables showing
Python 3 status from:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python3F13#Porting_status
to a new page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Python3
(rather than have it be specific to Fedora 13)
I've tried to preserve the barebones
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 15:57 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:22:14 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:36:23 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
I have started porting to python3. So far I have a patch for
fpconst. I have not so far
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:02 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Bert Desmet wrote:
hi!
This is something I got in my mail box today.
As I don't have a valid answer for this, maybe someone else can answer for
me?
cheers, Bert
the url of the blog of the
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 17:51 +, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 07:41 Thu 04 Nov , Ralf Corsepius wrote:
snip...
As a maintainer, abrt to me primarily means wading through wakes of
hardly readable emails, mostly to scan them for useful information. I
many cases I ended up with
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 20:20 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 10/09/2012 08:15 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.10.12 10:54, Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:18:27AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 10:41 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 10/05/2012 01:32 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
mod_python -- An embedded Python interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Last I heard, this was a dead project. Probably it's time to retire this
one in favor of mod_wsgi.
FWIW mod_python
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 11:38 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/17/2012 11:32 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
I would think the only sane way would be to just change the packaing,
not actually build multiple kernels (or even multiple packages with
kernels).
For example, a kernel-minimal that has
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 11:28 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
Okay, cool -- there's a lot of enthusiasm for a SIG for the core package
set.
So, first up on the SIG goals: clarifying our target.
It's been suggested before that there's so many possibilities that this is
useless, but the point
A while back I ran my static checker on all of the Python extension
modules in Fedora 17:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/StaticAnalysisOfPythonRefcounts
I wrote various scripts to build the packages in a mock environment that
injects my checker into gcc, then wrote various scripts to
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 01:00 -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
(Thanks; various replies inline below)
2012/12/11 David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com:
A while back I ran my static checker on all of the Python extension
modules in Fedora 17:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features
might
encourage Uwe to use and recommend Fedora.
Hope that makes sense
Sources: http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/faf.git/
RFE: https://fedorahosted.org/abrt/newticket?component=faf
Michal ABRT
[1] http://abrt.fedoraproject.org
On 2012-12-11 22:52, David Malcolm wrote:
A while back I
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 15:03 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 01:00:36 AM Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
wrote:
A while back I ran my static checker on all of the Python extension
modules in Fedora 17:
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 21:45 +0200, Alek Paunov wrote:
On 11.12.2012 23:52, David Malcolm wrote:
We'd be able to run all of the code in Fedora through static analysis
tools, and slurp the results into the database
Dave, I really do not know what to say first :-). The subject is so
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:34 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
[...]
= Features/Php55 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
[...snip...]
Dtrace enabled build
As I understand it, Fedora has systemtap but not dtrace (/usr/bin/dtrace
is a shim to systemtap), so does this mean that
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 19:23 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:05:39PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:34 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
[...]
= Features/Php55 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
[...snip...]
Dtrace enabled
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 19:29 +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 08/01/2013 19:05, David Malcolm a écrit :
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:34 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
[...]
= Features/Php55 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Php55
[...snip...]
Dtrace enabled build
As I
This is a followup to my proposal in
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/175232.html
I want a common output format for static analysis tools so that we can
easily slurp the results from different tools into a database and have a
common system for managing the results
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 13:33 +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:53:56PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
This is a followup to my proposal in
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/175232.html
I want a common output format for static analysis tools
Michael Hrivnak and I spent some time at FUDcon Lawrence looking at
static code analysis.
We hacked on the proposed common format for analysis tools (aka
firehose).
We now have parsers (and test suites) for coercing the following into a
common format:
* gcc warnings
* cppcheck warnings
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 10:04 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:44 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
* packaging more static analyzers in Fedora (e.g. has anyone looked at
Frama-C ?)
Frama-C has been in Fedora for nearly 3 years now. :-)
Aha! Thanks - yes, I
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 18:11 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-01-24 17:44, David Malcolm wrote:
Michael Hrivnak and I spent some time at FUDcon Lawrence looking at
static code analysis.
We hacked on the proposed common format for analysis tools (aka
firehose).
[cut]
The plan
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 13:03 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:51:13PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:18:43PM +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
On Friday, January 25, 2013 09:07:22 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:11:11PM
Short version:
Updates to mock-with-analysis [1]:
(a) changes to the data model
(b) cpychecker support added
Longer version:
I've been hacking on mock-with-analysis, my tool for running static
code analysis as a side-effect within a regular srpm rebuild (see [1]).
I've tweaked the data model
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 22:29 +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2010/1/14 David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com:
Anyone got any better ideas? Thoughts about which of the above is
preferrable?
I am not sure it qualifies as better than your suggestions... but
the problem of different executables
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 10:55 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:31:41PM +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2010, 22:54 -0500 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:56:23PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
python3 is in rawhide and I'm hoping
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 12:19 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
In Fedora 12 several daemons (e.g. dhclient) were modified to drop
unnecessary capabilities, most importantly the dac_override
capability, allowing the daemon to ignore file permission bits. This,
in combination with removing
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 14:13 -0800, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
... looking pretty good. Thanks everybody!
Some deps still need to be rebuilt (qpid).
Here are some details from somewhat current rawhide reports cross
indexed with koji:
[snip]
gnuradio
python?
python3-tools since the library is now in the python3 package
- Few other changes to cleanup style
* Fri Jan 22 2010 David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com - 0.6.9-2
- add python3 subpackage
[snip]
And here's another one with a non-monotonic ordering:
valgrind-3.5.0-14.fc12
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 17:04 +, Mat Booth wrote:
On 29 January 2010 17:00, Pierre-Yves pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:59 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
Here's where it gets weird:
0.6.10-1 then 0.6.10-2 then 0.6.9-4 then 0.6.9-2 seems an arbitrary
ordering
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 01:18 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
I'm trying to debug an issue for the upstream author of ocp and am
running into an issue where gdb is showing value optimized out for
variables even though I've compiled the program with gcc -g -O0. Are
there any gcc/gdb gurus who
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 20:51 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, inode0 wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
I really don't know what our users are a measure of. I don't think it's
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:37 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
So after having heard the nth discussion about tor, I decided to check it out.
I tried installing it on a stripped down f12 box that has no X, or other stuff
unnecessary for routing network packets.
What happened next has me lost for
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 22:09 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:59:29PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We assume the following axioms:
[..]
2) It is impossible to ensure that functionality will not be reduced
without sufficient testing.
Your axioms are obviously
I noticed that we were missing from this page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicating_and_getting_help#Contributors_Mailing_Lists
so I've gone ahead and added a link to this list to it.
Hopefully this will make us more visible after the mailing list
reorganization.
Dave
[CCing Fedora Python SIG: context is that unladen-swallow is the
optimized branch of python with JIT, and Jeffrey Yasskin is working
towards being able to dynamically link Python against LLVM, in the
python 3.3 timeframe]
Does Fedora's LLVM build have just a single configuration, or would it
be
I recently discovered this script for downloading scratch builds from
Koji:
http://people.redhat.com/mikeb/scripts/download-scratch.py
Is this the official way of doing this? If so, is this packaged
somewhere? (e.g. in a more recent build of koji or rpmdevtools). I
keep losing the URL, and
I noticed that there's an effort to better organize the various Special
Interest Groups in Fedora:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-engineering-services/ticket/2
I noticed that although https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Python
had [[Category:Language-specific SIGs]] we didn't have:
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 15:32 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:44:13AM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 05:22:48PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 02:51 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:45:27PM -0400, David
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EasierPythonDebugging
is currently marked as 95%, but a better answer is it's complicated.
I've done all I can for now to finish it, and it does provide some
useful improvements, but it's being heavily impacted by a bug outside of
my expertise (see (b)
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 04:11 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Jussi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
A Python package BuildRequiring numpy does not need to mean anything.
All of my packages on the list BuildRequires numpy simply because the
install
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 15:06 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:27:05AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michael scherer wrote:
Let's rather ask the contrary, why is this so much a issue to communicate
with upstream to fix things, and add patches ?
The vast majority
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 18:42 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Invariably when adding a patch to a spec, often I forget some detail,
whether it be adding the %patchN macro to %prep or `git add`ing the
patch. It would seem I'm not alone, either. A Google search for e.g.
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 14:10 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
I was reading some of the discussion of feedback directed optimization and
link
time optimization for python here:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel/143941
I'm wondering if Fedora should be enabling some of these
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 21:12 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 11/18/10 10:58 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
- Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:29:56PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Most code is not performance critical.
Much more code than you think is
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:51 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
Here's some of my pet irritations with abrt. Feel free to add your own,
but please keep the gratuitous me tooing to a minimum.
1) The generated reports contain far too little information for library
owners. Consider this report:
I've built python-3.2b2 into rawhide as python3-3.2-0.6.b2.fc15
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=212004
This version is the first to hit rawhide with PEP 3149, which is another
ABI change.
It's a somewhat ironic change, in that the in-DSO ABI hasn't really
changed, so much as
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 13:10 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
Broken deps for x86_64
--
...
dpm-python3-1.8.0.1-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libpython3.2.so.1.0()(64bit)
lfc-python3-1.8.0.1-3.fc15.x86_64 requires
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 17:03 +0100, Thomas Woerner wrote:
Hello,
as discussed some time ago, I worked on the proof of concept
implementation of firewalld. FirewallD is a service daemon with a D-BUS
interface that provides a dynamic managed firewall.
For more information on firewalld,
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 20:22 +0100, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
On Tue, 04/01/2011 at 00.45 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 01/04/2011 12:38 AM, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
The package contains a manual page, it supports building using autoconf
and automake and it just needs to be reviewed.
I've imported pypy and built it into rawhide.
I've updated the list on:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Python#Python_Runtimes
moving it from Awaiting review to Within Fedora.
Enjoy!
Dave
---BeginMessage---
I've packaged pypy in RPM form for the Fedora distribution [1] - RPM
packages are
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 16:57 -0500, Erik Blankinship wrote:
What would be the best practice for python applications targeting f11
gnome on the olpc xo?
I am developing on f13, but my target is f11 (an olpc xo machine)
running python 2.6.
Both f13 and f11 had Python 2.6, though slightly
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 15:55 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 6/10/11 9:07 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
At the very least, I would like to see its memory consumption
to go down substantially.
Let's try to turn this into something constructive. I'll start with
David Malcolm's rather nifty, if
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 20:02 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 19:28, schrieb Lucas:
Strange, I did exactly the same thing with Fedora 14, I add new kernel,
changed xorg and intel driver.
But I have i686.
mhh - strange - an trying to update glibc results in chaos
Datei oder
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 09:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 00:30 +0900, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 10:04 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:33:18 +0900
夜神 岩男 supergiantpot...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
Considering the frequent calls of Gnome
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:17 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
using rawhide from 2011-06-16
Good hunting!
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
pypy-1.5-1.fc16 (build/make) dmalcolm,tomspur
I don't see a directory
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 12:07 -0400, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
Hi,
A new yum and urlgrabber packages have just hit Rawhide. These releases
include some new features, including parallel downloading of packages and
metadata, and a new mirror selection code. As we plan to include these
features in
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 20:32 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
Hi,
While an anaconda/systemd problem is being worked on (bug #841822),
now my next problem when making new F17 spins including all updates:
anaconda can't display PNG images anymore.
For all images it tries to open (and all these images
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 04:53 -0400, Andrew Parker wrote:
[...snip...]
I don't think there are RPM bindings for python3 yet, although it
looks like it is getting
closer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531543
The bindings are done; they're just waiting on review of that change to
the
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 12:32 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sat Aug 4 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[...snip numerous missing deps of the form
requires python(abi) = 0:3.2
requires
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 21:30 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 8:57 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 12:32 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sat Aug 4 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 12:26 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 11:27:38 -0400
David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 12:32 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sat Aug 4 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 11:51 +0200, Petr Machata wrote:
David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com writes:
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 21:30 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Thanks. But I am getting this error for xs package scratch build.
DEBUG util.py:257: -- gc-devel-7.2c-3.fc18.x86_64
DEBUG
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 01:22 +0200, Petr Machata wrote:
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:33 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
Feature freeze for Fedora 18 is tomorrow (2012-08-07), and git is about
to be branched after that for Fedora 19, as per
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 13:39 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
mercurial-2.3.1 will not build on f18 because of the python-docutils version.
It does build on f17, and also on f19.
f19 has
python-docutils-0.10-0.6.20120824svn7502.fc19.src.rpm
f18 has this update:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 09:39 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:42:52PM +0200, Tadej Janež wrote:
Hello!
I've reported this issue with brp-python-hardlink back in January:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783433
Could someone (a provenpackager) please
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
Just seeing if it's just me, or we back to being slow again during
testing with the debug options and the kernel? Am on a F16 kernel and
is little better than F17 3.3
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 15:16 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 14:40:53 -0500,
David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 12:06 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44:45AM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
Just seeing if it's just me
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 07:02 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
I think he's got a point
http://www.osnews.com/story/25659/Torvalds_requiring_root_password_for_mundane_things_is_quot_moronic_quot_
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeaturePolicyKit
in Fedora 8 onwards,
It was revamped in Fedora
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 16:41 -0700, Anthony Sasadeusz wrote:
Hi, I want to try to get involved with the open source community. I am
a junior at University of Maryland Baltimore County studying Computer
Engineering. My goal is to eventually help out with the JBOSS
packaging for Googles summer of
Do we have a schedule for Fedora 18 yet?
I've started creating a feature page for getting Python 3.3 into Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_3.3
but it's not clear to me yet how well the Python 3.3 upstream schedule
lines up with Fedora's schedule. So for now I've simply
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 17:39 -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
Do we have a schedule for Fedora 18 yet?
Robyn is great at keeping the scedules updated -- they're typically in
her directory on fedorapeople.org. Here
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
