TermRecord software in Fedora/EPEL

] and will follow those steps if this is well received. Thanks, Dusty Mabe [1] https://github.com/theonewolf/TermRecord [2] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/TermRecord [3] http://dustymabe.com/2014/05/19/termrecord-terminal-screencast-in-a-self-contained-html-file/ [4] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: TermRecord software in Fedora/EPEL

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:53:31PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: You can try asciinema which is already packaged in Fedora: yum install asciinema Hi, Thanks for the suggestion. What I like about TermRecord is that it produces a self-contatined html file as output and that it doesn't

Re: TermRecord software in Fedora/EPEL

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:25:51AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:39:55AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: I would like to package this software for Fedora and possible EPEL if others think it would be useful. I have reviewed the Fedora package review process [4

unsigned f21 package: perl-Term-ANSIColor

I get this when I try to install vim via yum on my f21 candidate cloud image: Package perl-Term-ANSIColor-4.03-2.fc21.noarch.rpm is not signed Is this on anyones radar already? Dusty -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: unsigned f21 package: perl-Term-ANSIColor

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:37:13AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Dusty Mabe dustym...@gmail.com wrote: I get this when I try to install vim via yum on my f21 candidate cloud image: Package perl-Term-ANSIColor-4.03-2.fc21.noarch.rpm is not signed

Circular dependencies in RPM

I know I have probably been hiding under a Rock but can anyone help me understand Fedora's stance on circular dependencies within RPMs? At least in the past I think circular dependencies have been kept to a minimum as it can cause issues with rpm sorting: i.e. for two rpms A,B with a circular

Re: Circular dependencies in RPM

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:11:25PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 22.08.2014 um 21:53 schrieb Dusty Mabe: I know I have probably been hiding under a Rock but can anyone help me understand Fedora's stance on circular dependencies within RPMs? At least in the past I think circular

Re: Circular dependencies in RPM

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 08/22/2014 02:23 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: The scenario I am concerned with here is: if * A requires B * B requires C * C requires A This basically yields a case where ordering can't be properly done because rpm

[Base] Terminology for docker/atomic images

Hi All, Per discussion in the #fedora-cloud meeting last Friday I would like to start a thread about the names of the Docker and Atomic deliverables for F21. I know of at least a few cases where there has been confusion regarding what deliverable has been the subject of a conversation on IRC

Re: [Base] Terminology for docker/atomic images

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:29:12AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: On Sun, Sep 7, 2014, at 11:22 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: In a nutshell, it would be great if we added Container to references we make to the container image (in conversation and docs). I tend to say Docker Base Image - that's

Re: [Base] Terminology for docker/atomic images

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:28:20AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: On 09/07/2014 11:22 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: Hi All, Per discussion in the #fedora-cloud meeting last Friday I would like to start a thread about the names of the Docker and Atomic deliverables for F21. I know of at least a few

cloud-init / dnf selinux denials

Hey all, We have a bug that affects booting cloud images (see [1]). There are denials that don't allow cloud-init to install packages. I'm not exactly where a fix needs to be applied but I

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and Test Compose 11 (TC11) Available Now!

On 10/16/2015 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and TC11 are now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! Hey Adam/Cloud list, Does anyone know what happened between TC9 / TC10 / TC11 with regards to

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and Test Compose 11 (TC11) Available Now!

On 10/16/2015 02:24 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 10/16/2015 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: On 10/16/2015 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and TC11 are now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! Hey

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:07:42AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015, at 10:21 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > Just wondering if anyone has started to feel any pain from trying to > > use ansible with F23 systems. As part of the Fedora Cloud working > > group

ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

Hey all, Just wondering if anyone has started to feel any pain from trying to use ansible with F23 systems. As part of the Fedora Cloud working group it would be nice to ship a system that could be targeted by ansible out of the box. Unfortunately, since ansible uses python 2.X vs python 3 it

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

On 10/14/2015 12:42 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:07:42AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: Just wondering if anyone has started to feel any pain from trying to use ansible with F23 systems. As part of the Fedora Cloud working group it would be nice to ship a system that

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

On 10/14/2015 09:40 AM, Pete Travis wrote: On 10/14/2015 07:47 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:57:57PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Beyond that, though, why not just have your ansible play ensure its own deps are installed? If you're dealing with docker, make sure the

Re: Who owns the Fedora Atlas account?

On 01/08/2016 01:09 PM, Daniel Farrell wrote: > Hello Fedora devs, > > Who owns this account? > > https://atlas.hashicorp.com/fedora > > My initial hope was to get the F22 boxes[0] hosted there, in addition to > the current F23 ones[1]. Digging into that on #fedora-devel, dgilmore told > me

Re: Disabling predictable interface names

On 11/20/2015 05:10 AM, wheelz wrote: You need to run dracut to rebuild initramfs, or you wait for the next kernel > update. Thanks wheelz. I'll have to look into that. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code

Disabling predictable interface names

According to [1] predictable interface naming can be disabled with a symlink to /dev/null or by providing net.ifnames=0 on the kernel command line. It seems like symlinking to /dev/null isn't working any more. Is symlinking to /dev/null supposed to still work? We are seeing this on Atomic

Re: Fedora Rel-Eng builder boxes can't run qemu-kvm on F23

On 11/19/2015 09:41 AM, Cole Robinson wrote: On 11/19/2015 09:35 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: Basically this means we can't build any images (rawhide/Fedora23/etc) because the builder hosts have been moved to Fedora 23. The following BZ has more info. Please discuss in the bug if you have comments

Fedora Rel-Eng builder boxes can't run qemu-kvm on F23

Basically this means we can't build any images (rawhide/Fedora23/etc) because the builder hosts have been moved to Fedora 23. The following BZ has more info. Please discuss in the bug if you have comments about the technicals. Please discuss here otherwise.

Making mailman3/hyperkitty send my emails to me

I have played with all of the settings in hyperkitty and I still am failing to get the emails that I compose and send to a mailing list also sent back to me. The reason I want this is because of the "archived-at" email header. Once I compose an email and get it sent to me from mailman it will

Re: Making mailman3/hyperkitty send my emails to me

On 02/10/2016 01:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:39:51 -0500 > Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: > >> I have played with all of the settings in hyperkitty and I still am >> failing to get the emails that I compose and send to a mailing l

Re: Making mailman3/hyperkitty send my emails to me

On 02/10/2016 02:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:03:48 -0500 > Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Kevin. I'm playing around with settings now to see if I can get >> it. I can file a bug if needed. Is this the right place: >&

Re: Making mailman3/hyperkitty send my emails to me

On 02/10/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:47:56 -0500 > Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: > >> On 02/10/2016 02:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:03:48 -0500 >>> Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com>

iwl8000 driver in Fedora 24

I have the Lenovo T460s with the Intel Wireless AC 8260 chip in it. According to the page at [1], that chip is supported by the iwlwifi-8000 firmware. I don't see that package as an option in the Fedora 24 repos [2]. The newest I see is the 7260. Googling around hasn't led me to a solution.

Re: iwl8000 driver in Fedora 24

On 07/22/2016 09:40 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >> I have the Lenovo T460s with the Intel Wireless AC 8260 chip in it. >> According to the page at [1], that chip is supported by the >> iwlwifi

Re: iwl8000 driver in Fedora 24

On 07/22/2016 10:22 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 07/22/2016 09:40 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: &

Re: iphone mount in nautilus on Fedora 24

On 07/11/2016 07:33 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - >>> On 07/09/2016 12:04 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > In older Fedora (at least Fedora 22) I could easily mount my ihphone > in Nautilus. I could click on it in the left hand side of the File > Manager

Re: iphone mount in nautilus on Fedora 24

On 07/12/2016 05:01 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > Huh, the phone should still be getting mounted, but as a camera, and just as > a camera, and you can remove photos there without botching the phone's > internal > photo database. > > That definitely works here. > -- Yeah All I see are

Re: iphone mount in nautilus on Fedora 24

On 07/13/2016 08:49 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> >> >> On 07/12/2016 05:01 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >>> >>> >>> Huh, the phone should still be getting mounted, but as a camera, and just >>> as >>> a camera, and you can remove photos there without botching

iphone mount in nautilus on Fedora 24

In older Fedora (at least Fedora 22) I could easily mount my ihphone in Nautilus. I could click on it in the left hand side of the File Manager and it would mount. I am having trouble getting this same behavior in Fedora 24. Can someone verify this works or does not work for them? You should be

Re: iphone mount in nautilus on Fedora 24

On 07/09/2016 12:04 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> In older Fedora (at least Fedora 22) I could easily mount my ihphone >> in Nautilus. I could click on it in the left hand side of the File >> Manager and it would mount. >> >> I am having trouble getting this same behavior in Fedora 24. Can >>

T460s + latest kernel doesn't boot

kernel-4.6.4-301.fc24.x86_64 Once I select the latest kernel in grub it then pops up and says Probing EDD (edd=off to disable)... OK and then nothing else and stays there. Anyone else having this problem? If i boot the original kernel from f24 (kernel-4.5.5-300.fc24.x86_64) then the

Re: T460s + latest kernel doesn't boot

On 07/22/2016 09:00 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 08:40:16AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> kernel-4.6.4-301.fc24.x86_64 >> >> >> Once I select the latest kernel in grub it then pops up and says >&

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image

On 01/31/2017 10:35 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Jan Kurik <jku...@redhat.com> wrote: >> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ContainerMinimalImage >> >>

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image

On 01/31/2017 09:54 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:00:01AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Container Minimal Image = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ContainerMinimalImage >> >> Chang

bex represents pagure emails in hyperkitty

The atomic working group has configured pagure to send notifications to the cloud mailing list. These notifications come through as normal emails but for some reason in hyperkitty the emails from pagure show up as coming from Brian Exelbierd (bex). Anyone know why that is? You can see that he

Re: Changing default "docker" storage to to Overlay2 in Fedora 26

On 01/18/2017 03:50 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 01/06/2017 03:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DockerOverlay2 >> >> Can we g

Re: Changing default "docker" storage to to Overlay2 in Fedora 26

On 01/06/2017 03:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DockerOverlay2 Can we get this onto the "official looking" page for F26 changes [1]? Do we also need to document in here the different configurations for the different variants? Atomic Host vs Server vs

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20170227.n.0 compose check report

On 02/27/2017 09:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 17:25 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: >> Missing expected images: >> >> Atomic qcow2 x86_64 > > There seems to be some sort of problem in pungi-make-ostree: >

unretire kompose package

I am trying to package [1] in fedora and there is a name conflict with an old/retired package [2] that no longer has an upstream. I have talked with the old maintainer (cc'd) and we would like to unretire the package and allow for the new project to assume the name in rpm. I'm attempting to

Re: unretire kompose package

The package has been un-retired and I have started the process of putting the new kompose into place. Thanks! On 09/29/2016 03:48 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > I am trying to package [1] in fedora and there is a name conflict with an > old/retired > package [2] that no longer has an

Re: t460s fedora 24 - display freeze

On 09/20/2016 06:28 PM, Jonny Heggheim wrote: > I have not run into this issue on my T460s, using the latest BIOS on > Fedora 25. I can try to reproduce the error if you are able to give me > a more detailed walk-through. > > Jonny Heggheim Thanks Jonny, Are you in IRC? I may try to find you

Re: t460s fedora 24 - display freeze

On 09/20/2016 07:22 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Sep 20, 2016 7:31 AM, "Dusty Mabe" <du...@dustymabe.com > <mailto:du...@dustymabe.com>> wrote: >> >> >> Several times over the past month my t460s has just blank screens >> when I come b

Re: t460s fedora 24 - display freeze

On 09/21/2016 08:41 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 09/20/2016 07:22 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> On Sep 20, 2016 7:31 AM, "Dusty Mabe" <du...@dustymabe.com >> <mailto:du...@dustymabe.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Several tim

Re: t460s fedora 24 - display freeze

On 09/20/2016 05:08 PM, Keith Keith wrote: > > I ran in to a problem that involved an unresponsive screen a few months ago > and also had a FIFO underrun. I think your problem is somewhere in the intel > graphics stack. Here's the bug I had: >

Re: t460s fedora 24 - display freeze

On 09/21/2016 09:05 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 09/21/2016 08:41 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> On 09/20/2016 07:22 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >>> On Sep 20, 2016 7:31 AM, "Dusty Mabe" <du...@dustymabe.com >>> <mailto:d

t460s fedora 24 - display freeze

Several times over the past month my t460s has just blank screens when I come back to it after some time. I don't know if the thing froze up completely or if it is just the display not working. I lock my screens (laptop + 2 external monitors) and then leave for an hour or so. When I come back no

Broken: Firefox 48 + Private Tab + Kerberos SSO

I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a non-private window. Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else seeing this? Dusty -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

fc24 packages when running dnf on f25

Is it normal to have fc24 packages get installed when I install a package on F25? This system started as an F25 cloud instance based on the cloud image. $ rpm -qa | grep fc24 | wc -l 116 $ cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) - Dusty

Re: fc24 packages when running dnf on f25

On 11/07/2016 11:03 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 11/07/2016 08:52 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> Is it normal to have fc24 packages get installed when I install a package on >> F25? >> This system started as an F25 cloud instance based on the cloud image. >> >> $ r

new gemspec behavior in rawhide

Hey all, In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get differing outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of `.freeze` added to my strings like: s.authors = ["Dusty Mabe".freeze] See the full diff at [1]. This is causing pain for me because I actu

Re: new gemspec behavior in rawhide

On 11/26/2016 12:31 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Dusty Mabe wrote on 11/27/2016 01:35 AM: >> >> Hey all, >> >> In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get >> differing >> outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of

Re: Self Introduction: Olzhas Rakhimov

On 03/19/2017 07:17 PM, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote: > Hello everybody, > > My name is Olzhas Rakhimov. I am an open-source enthusiast > (https://github.com/rakhimov). > I'd like to package https://github.com/rakhimov/scram > The review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433686 >

Re: Default permissions on /dev/kvm

On 03/15/2017 05:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Sure, if udev maintainers are willing to ship the kvm rule by default, > that's fine with me for reason you suggest. I simply don't think it'll > have any effect on usage of /dev/kvm inside containers > Does that mean you assume my

Re: Default permissions on /dev/kvm

On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > I'm fuzzy about the issue faced with containers. Containers will usually > have a separate /dev that is populated by the container mgmt engine (whether > docker, libvirt, lxc or something else). That mgmt engine is responsible for > setting

Re: Default permissions on /dev/kvm

On 03/14/2017 05:15 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > On 03/14/2017 05:02 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> On 03/14/2017 04:56 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>> >>> On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> I guess if you volume/bind mount

Re: Default permissions on /dev/kvm

On 03/14/2017 04:56 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > I guess if you volume/bind mount the device into the container you could > see an issue, > but most containers that deal with /dev/kvm are going to be run as root, > anyways. I was running

Re: Default permissions on /dev/kvm

On 03/15/2017 11:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> On 03/15/2017 05:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> >>> Sure, if udev maintainers are willing to ship the kvm rule by default, >>

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

On 04/12/2017 10:49 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:18:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller >>> wrote: On Wed,

Re: pagure notification outage

Adding in fedora-devel On 04/05/2017 10:23 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > I've identified that we have not been getting notifications from > pagure for the past few days. I'm working with pingou to resolve this. We were not getting pagure notifications to our cloud mailing list. It

Re: pagure notification outage

On 04/05/2017 11:06 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > Adding in fedora-devel > > On 04/05/2017 10:23 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> I've identified that we have not been getting notifications from >> pagure for the past few days. I'm working with pingou to resolve this. &

Re: switching libcurl back to OpenSSL and providing the libcurl-minimal subpackage

On 04/05/2017 12:17 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Wednesday, April 05, 2017 11:38:35 Colin Walters wrote: >> >> libostree does that - >> https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/blob/c937305c0e7f5609273e25753912c294b0 >> 40a6ac/src/libostree/ostree-fetcher-curl.c >> >> In the exploded archive case, I

Re: Fedora 26-20170309.n.0 compose check report

On 03/09/2017 05:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 20:10 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: >> Missing expected images: >> >> Atomic qcow2 x86_64 >> Server dvd i386 >> Workstation live i386 >> Server boot i386 >> Atomic raw-xz x86_64 >> Workstation live x86_64 > > Atomic

Re: whatever happened to yum + btrfs snapshotting?

On 02/17/2015 07:53 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > Some time back there was discussion of being able to rollback yum updates via > btrfs snapshotting. As I recall, it turned out that the default btrfs > install > was not setup correctly to make this feasible (I had briefly tested it on my >

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

On 07/14/2017 05:04 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 14 July 2017 at 20:28, Andreas Tunek wrote: >> Is this really more reliable than using dnf (for graphical packages >> like Recepies and Builder)? > > It's hugely more reliable. You can't actually trust rpm to do

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

On 07/17/2017 08:44 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Dusty Mabe wrote: >> I'm sure some people are aware but for those who aren't it is worth noting >> that we have an entire edition (atomic host) that is built around atomic >> updates for rpm content. > > Atom

Fedora Atomic WG - Changes to IRC/Mailing list

TL;DR There is a new fedora atomic mailing list [1] and IRC channel [2], but the mailing list should only be used for automated messages and the IRC channel should be used only when something extremely Fedora specific (like releng bits) is being discussed. Otherwise please

Re: retiring git-annex

On 05/28/2017 12:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 04:00:32PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: >> Am 27.05.2017 um 15:13 schrieb Jens-Ulrik Petersen: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think we need to retire git-annex from Fedora (the current >>> version is very old and has security

Re: retiring git-annex

On 05/29/2017 09:16 AM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Okay thanks for all the offers of help! > > I will post more details tomorrow then. > I saw a link to a copr come through, but not much on how to get git-annex fixed in Fedora proper. Any info for that? Unfortunately /me knows nothing

Re: Self Introduction: Thanos Apostolou

On 05/18/2017 11:42 AM, Thanos Apostolou wrote: > Hi, my name is Thanos Apostolou and I am from Greece. I am studying > Electrical and Computer Engineering in the National Technical University of > Athens. Hi Thanos, Big welcome to you! > > > > My linux experience, so far, is this: > > I

Re: [atomic-devel] tools and systemtap containers are available in Fedora

On 09/18/2017 10:48 AM, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > Hello, > > we managed to move tools container from Fedora Dockerfiles github repo to > Fedora infra [1]. As a side effects, we put systemtap in a dedicated > container. > > We would very much appreciate your feedback here: so if you have some

Re: Introducing myself to Fedora

On 12/16/2017 05:37 PM, Spyros Trigazis wrote: > Hello Fedora Developers, > > I would like to join the packagers group and I am sending you > this email to introduce myself. > > My name is Spyros Trigazis and I'm currently working for the CERN [1] > Cloud Infrastructure team [2]. More

please help us test the f27 cloud images in RC1.2

You can grab the image download links and fill out the results here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_27_RC_1.2_Cloud Unfortunately only half the AMIs uploaded: Fedora-Cloud-Base-27-1.2.x86_64 EC2 (us-east-1) ami-acaa02d6 paravirtual gp2

Re: Fedora 27 Final blocker status mail #1

On 10/19/2017 08:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489942 - dbxtool - MODIFIED >dbxtool fails at boot 'Could not apply database update > "DBXUpdate-2016-08-09-13-16-00.bin": Permission denied' > > AFAICS this is aarch64-specific, so cannot

Re: Fedora-Atomic 27-20180407.0 compose check report

On 04/25/2018 05:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 09:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > OK, it wasn't quite 'next week', but :P > > I figured out why this was broken, finally. The 'special' configuration > for the two-week Atomic reports (mail them to a different set of >

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180515.1

On 05/16/2018 02:03 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180515.1 > Commit(x86_64): > a29367c58417c28e2bd8306c1f438b934df79eba13706e078fe8564d9e0eb32b > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180613.0

On 06/13/2018 06:23 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180613.0 > Commit(x86_64): > c51100f14cf12b25c16562cede7455191e536c0534e3b2ef87e66be9e12899ae > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180527.0

On 05/29/2018 03:06 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180527.0 > Commit(x86_64): > 291ea90da29bc5abe757b5a50813b3de1396b08412939a89b3b671aba9856093 > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: Release criteria proposal: drop kickstart package criterion

On 06/19/2018 08:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > A further update here: it appears releng, at least for the present, is > inclined to favour manual tagging of just the kickstarts for the actual > release compose. Given that, I think we should still have a release > criterion (since this will

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/25/2018 02:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 28 Candidate RC-1.1 is now > available for testing. Here are the Cloud Base AMIs for RC-1.1: Fedora-Cloud-Base-28-1.1.x86_64 ap-northeast-1 ami-a600e6d9

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On 04/30/2018 02:16 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > And there's still the fun restriction of XFS not being able to shrink. It's > not particularly important in the server case, but in the desktop/laptop > case, it happens enough in my experience that I'm not sure I'd want a > default filesystem that

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180425.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 28.20180425.0 Commit(x86_64): 94a9d06eef34aa6774c056356d3d2e024e57a0013b6f8048dbae392a84a137ca Commit(aarch64): 12a95314084eaa2242bdfe24197774aac163433d2405bc2813b4d89180434630 Commit(ppc64le):

Re: make yum repo when we build things in koji

On 01/20/2018 06:53 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 19 January 2018 at 22:53, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> >> >> On 01/19/2018 10:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>&

Re: make yum repo when we build things in koji

On 01/21/2018 02:46 PM, Lars Seipel wrote: > Use includepkgs in the repo definition? > >> includepkgs Inverse of exclude, yum will exclude any package in the repo. >> that doesn't match this >> list. This works in conjunction with exclude and doesn't override it, so >> if you

Re: Self-Introduction Christian Glombek (lorbus) / NEEDSPONSOR / NEEDREVIEWs / Let's Meet @ DevConf or FOSDEM!

On 01/23/2018 10:39 AM, Christian Glombek wrote: > Hello World! > > My name is Christian Glombek (or simply Chris :) Welcome Chris! Dusty ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Atomic Host/Workstation Interview for Linux Unplugged Podcast

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 A couple of us went on the LUP podcast this week to talk about Atomic Host/Workstation. Check it out: https://twitter.com/jupitersignal/status/961283877883977728. We start around minute 16:20. Dusty -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

runroot changing during the course of a rawhide pungi run

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 If I understand correctly there was a new lorax build [1] that completed at 01:11 UTC (02/23) that then made it into the runroot of a task [2] that was part of a pungi compose [3] that started at 14:54 UTC (02/22). I think this caused problems

Re: [CoreOS] Re: [atomic-devel] Re: Starting a Container SIG

On 07/31/2018 08:29 AM, Clement Verna wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 13:38, Sanja Bonic wrote: >> >> For search and threaded visibility, it would be useful to have these >> discussions happen on the forums (created a category, let's see if we use >> it:

Re: Fedora updates-20180815.1 compose check report

On 08/15/2018 07:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 19:51 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: >> No missing expected images. >> >> Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) >> -- >> Mail generated by check-compose: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose > > So, generating

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: Luke Macken (lmacken)

On 08/16/2018 07:29 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Luke Macken (lmacken) is not responsive. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610474 > > Anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? > ping him on twitter? https://twitter.com/lmacken ___

Re: ideas about logging during the initramfs

On 08/17/2018 01:57 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 08/17/2018 01:20 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: >> On 08/17/2018 08:55 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >>> I'd love to make logging during early boot not require everyone >>> to happen to get the `console=` entries ordered co

Re: [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180816.1

On 08/20/2018 04:24 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180816.1 > Commit(x86_64): > c6b1e97b93424c260baa98518277d87f7f4ebf036c09a9a0aeb7097c33c2099c > Commit(aarch64): >

ideas about logging during the initramfs

I'd love to make logging during early boot not require everyone to happen to get the `console=` entries ordered correctly on the kernel command line. Inevitably we always get it wrong or the ordering of the `console=` lines on a pre-baked works great for some people but not for others. What if

Re: ideas about logging during the initramfs

On 08/17/2018 01:20 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 08/17/2018 08:55 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> I'd love to make logging during early boot not require everyone >> to happen to get the `console=` entries ordered correctly on the >> kernel command line. Inevitably we always get it

Re: [atomic-devel] [CoreOS] Re: Re: Starting a Container SIG

On 08/24/2018 10:24 AM, Brian Clark wrote: > Are there any minutes from this meeting? Here ya go: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-containers/2018-08-23/fedora_container_sig_kickoff.2018-08-23-15.00.html Mostly look at the logs since we didn't have any big ticket items.

Re: python-sshtunnel?

On 08/26/2018 07:11 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27.8.2018 01:03, Joseph D. Wagner wrote: >> I'd be happy to help, but I feel overwhelmed.  I've never used the whole >> stack of koji, src.fedoraproject.org, fedpkg, etc. >> >> I need someone to help walk me through the first one. > > Feel free

  1   2   3   4   >