On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 7:36 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I've spent the day fixing various issues in qemu on Rawhide, but
> > there's one remaining issue. The tests stubbornly fail on i686. It
> > seems as if there is s
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:51 AM Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 10:41:37 -0800
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 9:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 07:53:57PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > &
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete. Change owners can
> > > indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tracke
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 6:43 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 8:02 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 7:55 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > >
> > > pkgconf-1.9.4-1.fc39, comparing to 1.8.0-6.fc39, changed a soname without
> > > a notice on this list. Affected packages:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 5:44 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 22. 02. 23 17:27, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > I just found out about this change yesterday. I suspect it's a
> > security-driven requirement, so I don't know how much room there will
> > be for changes. I'll pass this on to the Bugzilla team and
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:48 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a
> priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere...
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JYKVELSBJ
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCo (2023-02-21)
===
Meeting started by decathorpe at 17:00:46 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-02-21/fesco.2023-02-21-17.00.log.html
Meeting summary
---
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-02-21 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be di
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:40 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:56:30AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 2023-02-20 10:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >Does it have to be something which looks so much like it might be a
> > >version number? For example it could be he
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 7:15 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 2/20/23 10:46, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corre
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding
> build [2] has already been deleted. This is not ideal from maintainer
> perspective as it effectively is a bug with no info provided whatsoever.
> Not to m
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 1:22 AM Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 2023-02-18 15:53, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > I see a big hole in that problem (assuming that I understand Things
> > correctly): What happens to packages where this .so.x.y.z pattern does
> > not match their act
On Sat, Feb 18, 2023, 18:20 Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 2023-02-18 04:40, Björn Persson wrote:
> > The Detailed Description describes the problem thoroughly, but fails to
> > describe the solution.
>
> Thanks. I'll make sure that it does before formally proposing it,
> assuming that we proceed t
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 2:40 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hello fellow Rustaceans and / or frustrated Rust packagers,
>
> My work on the "next generation" of Rust packaging tools has finally
> progressed to the point where it can be tested by actual people. :)
Afte
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 3:08 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:19:38 -0600
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > I currently have to disable tests for s390x[1] (and ppc64le) for likely
> > endianess issues.
> >
> > Troubleshooting these is more than a little outside of my wheelhouse.
> >
> > I
Hello fellow Rustaceans and / or frustrated Rust packagers,
My work on the "next generation" of Rust packaging tools has finally
progressed to the point where it can be tested by actual people. :)
Adding support for new features of cargo - "namespaced dependencies"
(`dep:foo`) and "weak dependenc
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:24 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 6:49 PM Josh Stone wrote:
> >
> > On 11/22/22 8:13 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > List of Rust library-only packages,
> > >
> > > - rust-rustfilt
> >
&g
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 5:05 PM Pete Walter wrote:
>
> Today, we have 3 versions in rawhide (libgit2 was updated from 1.3.x to 1.4.x
> and then 1.5.x over the last month and the compat packages were added today):
>
> libgit2 package with version 1.5.1 (security supported still from upstream)
> lib
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:27 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I have just realized, that the rpmautospec is not documented in the
> guidelines (unless my search-fu is failing me). Therefore I consider it
> strange that we should go from "no documentation at all" to "use it by
> default". I don't think thi
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 1:53 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 1:16 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:37:44PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> > Now I'm getting bit by the rpmautospec and COPR issue.
>>
>> Please be more precise. How are you b
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 11:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 08:11:41PM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > The following comment has been added to the systemd-253~rc2-2.fc38 update:
>
> >Bugs: 2156900 - None
> > Notes: Automatic update for s
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 5:20 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> As a heads up - openmpi 5.0.0 drops support for 32-bit builds [1]. I'm
> not sure how far away it is from release - we're on rc10 at the moment.
>
> Affected packages seem to be:
>
> amg4psblas-1.1.0-4.fc38.src.rpm
> arbor-0.7-4.fc38.src.r
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:03 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 01:49:17PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 09:03:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >
> > > This is indeed a shortcoming in the rpm symbol dependency generation
>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:15 AM Sandro wrote:
>
> Having read all the responses, I'm more inclined to head down the road
> of orphanage, giving other people a chance to adopt the package. Due to
> my limited knowledge of (packaging) Rust, I don't feel I'm the right
> person to be main admin for B
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:38 PM Pete Walter wrote:
>
> I am not happy about dropping Fedora packages in favor of upstream Flatpaks
> either.
>
> Can you assign the package to me instead of retiring it? I can get it updated
> so we can keep it in Fedora.
It looks like Bottles itself doesn't con
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:18 AM Michal Konecny wrote:
>
> I would say that the current way is OK, the bot asks fedora-scm-requests
> admins to validate the requests, because it is marked as exception.
> After being validated it gets created.
>
> Or if there should be an exception for Rust package
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 8:20 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 18 2023 at 10:19:24 AM -0800, Gordon Messmer
> wrote:
> > Several people suggested using a weak dependency (Suggests:) on the
> > iscsi driver, but I don't think that would solve the problem for most
> > users because weak d
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 4:48 PM David Howells wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know how to package a rust project as an rpm on Fedora 37,
> specifically stgit-2?
Looking at the upstream project, it doesn't look too bad. Should be
relatively straightforward to package for Fedora, with one caveat.
>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:05 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 17/01/23 12:54, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
> >
> > Is it possible that bodhi no longer automatically recognizes the changelog
> > of
> > Rawhide updates?
> >
> > See before the update:
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updat
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 16. 01. 23 21:37, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Isn't the problem here that building Python extensions needs to work
> > correctly in two - possibly conflicting - scenarios:
> >
> > - in RPM packages, whe
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 4:13 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:18 AM Arthur Bols wrote:
>>
>> On 17/01/2023 14:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>> > So bodhi and pagure are at different datacenters with hopefully different
>> > network paths. Could people do some mtr or traceroutes f
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still
> > being voted about by FESCo.
> >
> > Apparently, the following packages now don't install:
>
> Ther
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:01 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:42:32PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 16. 01. 23 20:30, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > > If it is for distribution packages then I reckon the flags should be
> > > as close as possible for the mere reason of con
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>
> We could just remove xorg-x11-drv-qxl from the list of drivers pulled
> in from xorg-x11-drivers, wdyt?
Aren't QXL the default graphics when setting up a Fedora VM with
libvirt (i.e. gnome-boxes and virt-manager)?
Maybe letting that drive
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 7:34 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnfilteredFlathub
>
> Note that I am processing this proposal past the deadline because 1. I
> think it could reasonably be considered a Self-Contained Change
> proposal and 2. the reasons outlined by Matt
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:15 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > (In particular, I doubt the _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 change was really a major
> > consideration here.)
>
> What was, then? That was literally the only thing that has changed between
> the two diametrically di
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 3:25 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
>
> Jan 7, 2023 4:41:29 PM Lumír Balhar :
>
> > y-py upstream uses maturin as a build backend which is not available in
> > Fedora yet so I had to add some metadata manually to port it to
> > setuptools-rust
> Why not package maturin? Is
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 04:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>> > On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > > - fedpkg mockbuild
>
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 3:48 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 9:37 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Can we please have gcc-rs also built (even though it's experimental)?
> >
> > Will gcc-rs be able to generate usable shared libraries for Rust crat
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 9:38 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> My main questions are what is this supposed to fix long term?
>
> I have guessed that it has to do with automation, the shrinking number of
> active packagers in operating systems, and the exploding number of packages
> in requested lang
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 4:38 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> On Friday, December 23, 2022 1:34:48 PM EST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 7:21 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > This is nice, but all I ever seen is a black screen and a spinning
> > > circle. No text of any kind. If som
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 7:30 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Hey all-
>
> I commented out a SOURCES line in a spec file to test something and got an
> interesting warning: “Macro expanded in comment on line …”. I assume it’s
> just that, a warning, but was kinda surprised to see a commented-out line
>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:02 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Is there a lightweight tool to take the repository generated by
> %autosetup -S, with some new commits on to top, and turn that into a
> spec file update? That is, generated the new patches, and make a
> conservative change to the spec fi
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 1:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 19. 12. 22 18:47, Barry Scott wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 19 Dec 2022, at 17:40, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:36 PM Barry wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Why is pysvn on the list? I the pysvn maintainer and i am active.
> >>> I a
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022, 20:59 Florian Weimer wrote:
> It looks like COPR always produces 1 for %autorelease. Is this a known
> issue? Is there a way around it?
>
> Here's a build that shows this:
>
> <
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fweimer/modernc-1/build/5152562/>
>
> Thanks,
> Flo
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 4:38 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Hey all-
>
> I’m curious how Upstream Monitoring works; I got a BZ filed that Swift 5.7.2
> is available, which I’m building now, but what surprised me was how fast the
> new version was detected and brought to my attention. Does it use The Ne
Hi all,
With the update to the regex-syntax crate package that I'm building
right now, the license will change from "MIT OR Apache-2.0" to "(MIT
OR Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-DFS-2016".
The project includes code that is derived from Unicode data files, and
it already shipped a license text for the U
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:20 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 3:16 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > I have now submitted
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150093 and
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150094 for the
> > `node
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:58 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I how solved this ? [1]
> Thank you
I suggest that you take a look at the Rust packaging guidelines, or at
how other packages in similar situations have handled this.
You need to configure the cargo build system correctly, i.e.
1.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 11:43 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> So since this turns out to be less important than I thought (thanks bcl
> for the correction) I won't poke it much further than I have today, but
> following up on the above, I've done a couple of PRs, one to strip more
> stuff in lorax:
>
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022, 17:26 Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new package
> > > with
> > > ImageMagick 7 , when we have all applications us
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 11:13 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 3:30 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> What does everyone else think? Has the time come? Or is there more we
>> need to do to make side tags usable for all cases before getting rid of
>> overrides?
>
>
> I wasn't a
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 4:13 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 10:07 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 7:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > Help would very much be appreciated, I'm currently underwater with other
&
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 7:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Help would very much be appreciated, I'm currently underwater with other work.
I've prepared PRs with the version bumps for the different branches,
including lists of packages that need to be rebuilt:
- rawhide: https://src.fedoraproject.org/r
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 7:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > If you need help with any of the rebuilds, feel free to ping me.
> > I'm currently handling the same CVE for the capnp Rust crate (where
> > thankfully only one application needs to be rebuilt).
> >
>
> Help would very much be appreciated, I'm
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:17 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 9:25 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > capnproto 0.10.2 is being upgraded in Rawhide. As part of this, I'll
> > be rebuilding its reverse dependencies:
> >
> > * fastnetmon
> > * librime
> > * rr
> > * soni
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 6:21 PM Daniel Alley wrote:
>
> > Do I really need to explain this point? I think linking against system
> > OpenSSL is *way better* than statically linking to a random vendored
> > copy of it.
>
> There are maybe about 100-120 libraries for which this is obviously the case
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 2:13 PM Mauricio Teixeira
wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Following up on the steps provided by the documentation [1], I would like to
> announce that I am willing to unretire the package rust-starship [2]. I use
> this app on a daily basis, and it seems like the previous mai
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:54 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > This is true, and probably also not "fixable". We need to make some
> > amount of non-upstreamable patches to some crates (most notably,
> > removing Windows- or mac OS-specific dependencies, because we don't
> > want to package those),
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:44 PM Kai A. Hiller wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am in the process of figuring out packaging of a Python/Rust hybrid
> and have a few questions. Specifically, my work is on updating the
> matrix-synapse package[0]. Synapse is originally a Python package, but
> the developers
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 11:13 AM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> IIRC the problematic components were only used in tests and could just
> be stripped. Could be wrong, though.
They interface definitions are loaded and used to generate Rust code
at build time with "wiggle":
https://github.com/byteco
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 5:41 PM Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
>
> The Ruby new version 3.2.0 will start to support Web Assembly. It is
> planned to release the official version next month.
> https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2022/11/11/ruby-3-2-0-preview3-released/
> https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blo
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 6:49 PM Josh Stone wrote:
>
> On 11/22/22 8:13 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > List of Rust library-only packages,
> >
> > - rust-rustfilt
>
> This one does have a binary, a Rust equivalent to binutils' c++filt.
Thanks for
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 9:37 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 02:53:14PM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On a similar note, should the CARGO_NET_OFFLINE=true environment
> > variable also be set in %set_build_flags?
I don't think so. I already think it's weird that %set_
Hi all,
I've been collecting data about the dependency graph of Rust packages
in Fedora for over a year now, and I would like to start the process
of removing some accumulated cruft. In particular, I've been keeping
track of which packages for *library* packages (i.e. they ship only
source code bu
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 7:41 PM Michael Dawson wrote:
>
> As Web Assembly (WASM) gains momentum we’d like to create a SIG as a place to
> collaborate to ensure that Fedora is a great platform to both build and run
> WASM workloads. This includes looking at the toolchains needed to build WASM
>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 1:33 PM Bob Mauchin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, 10:09 Remi Collet, wrote:
>>
>> It looks like EPEL-9 is managed like rawhide.
>>
>>
>> 1/ dav1d 1.0.0 update (also in F37)
>>
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-40bb8ce9c5
>>
>> This introduce
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, 17:06 Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The webkit2gtk5.0 package in rawhide will be removed and replaced by
> webkitgtk6.0. Affected packages that will need to be patched to use the
> new API version and rebuilt are: evolution-data-server, gnome-builder,
> gnome-initial-se
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 2:52 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 09. 11. 22 v 13:58 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
>
> What do we do if the SPDX tag is the same as the existing license
> tag (eg ISC) though? Do we just add a dummy change/commit entry that
> mentions SPDX to confirm we've reviewed it?
>
> Don't
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 9:21 AM Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote:
>
> I'm not really sure why upstream did this.
> I'll take a look and submit a patch to upstream. Thanks for pointing it out.
It looks like you were able to resolve this upstream, thanks for that!
https://github.com/breezy-team/breezy/commit
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 9:59 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> hi,
> I'm upgrading libbpf to 1.0 and because it's changing the soname it
> requires changes in dependent packages.
(snip)
> I was NOT able to build following packages with libbpf 1.0:
>
>- bcc (needs 0.25 update first)
>- bpftrace (nee
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 12:42 PM Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote:
>
> The missing dependency is pkg-version[0]. It seems like its only outside
> dependency is already packaged[1] in Fedora.
>
> It would be great if you could package it. If not, I'll look into it.
>
>
> [0]https://docs.rs/pkg-version/lates
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 11:11 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 02. 11. 22 10:48, Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote:
> > Thanks, that did the trick!
I concur.
With setuptools_rust, you're pretty much already set up, just look at
whatever python-cryptography is doing.
Sadly the other popular build tool for Rust
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 7:07 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> On 11/1/22 10:40, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> For intra-project dependencies (i.e. bevy components depending on
> >> exact versions of bev
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 3:40 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > I'll respond inline.
>
> Me too -- and apologies for the delay.
>
>
> > > I fundamentally disagree with Kevin on a deep level about
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:53 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> On 11/1/22 13:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >> Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden writes:
> >
> >> Right now you can't test them since they haven't been migrated to
> >> testing yet.
> >
> > You can download the packages directly from k
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, 16:47 Kalev Lember wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 3:44 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 3:17 PM Kalev Lember
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I went ahead and picked up fragments and gnome-feeds. If anyone else is
>&g
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 3:17 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> I went ahead and picked up fragments and gnome-feeds. If anyone else is
> interested in them even a tiny bit, please let me know. I'd appreciate
> co-maintainers a lot here.
I think fragments has recently been rewritten in Rust? You might
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:12 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Miro Hrončok:
>
> > On 19. 10. 22 17:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:49:33PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:31 AM Florian Wei
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 10:51 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> I will be updating flatbuffers in Rawhide from 2.0.8 to 22.10.26[1] on
> 2022-11-05 or later. Upstream has switched to a new year-based
> versioning scheme, and since the .so version is derived from the major
> version number, the .so version
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:03 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 10. 10. 22 16:32, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > For the last 20 years or so, RPM has used a home-grown OpenPGP parser
> > for dealing with keys and signatures. That parser is rather infamous
> > for its limitations and flaws, and especially in re
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:31 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> I'm going to push a branch to dist-git for very few packages (so far gcc
> and redhat-rpm-config) which will be used by COPR builds to port Fedora
> to C99 and later language standards.
So you only plan to trigger COPR builds from these b
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:25 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> I _very much_ appreciate all the work you and the other Rust SIG folks
> (Igor and Zbyszek in particular but I'm sure others as well!) have put into
> packaging rust apps and crates and all of the systems around that.
I'll respond inline.
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 4:58 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 8:39 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>> >
>> > I opened an issue in the dashboard repo for the same reason some weeks
>> &
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 9:23 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:10:48PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:57 PM Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > It looks like "fedpkg update&qu
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:57 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> It looks like "fedpkg update" in Fedora 37 requires you to copy some
> string into a browser. I'm pretty sure it used to use Kerberos or ssh
> authentication which was somewhat more sensible.
>
> I've got a bunch of scripts that now
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 3:31 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> The dependency on LLVM is not even the worst issue in my eyes. LLVM is also
> used by other core projects, e.g., mesa, these days.
>
> The worst issue I see with Rust is the way libraries are "packaged", which
> just implies install
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 08. 22 23:46, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > even if the advice is: "yes, retire the packages, rather
> > than leave them broken, they can be added back once they have been
> > fixed"
>
> Knowing n
Hi all,
I have orphaned a few Rust applications that ended up unmaintained
after Igor dropped his packages. I use none of these applications
myself, having a maintainer that actually uses these packages would be
great.
However, some of the orphaned packages have dead upstreams - it might
be good
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
>
> Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for
> particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want to
> resolve it? Commands has multiple options and some of them could be unused.
> Spe
Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:04 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 10:58:58PM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
> > > There's another potential upgrade issue: We have multiple choices of
> > > how to upgrade from the nodejs package to the nodejsXX packages:
> > > 1) Upgrading from
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:11 AM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> Some of mine:
>
> - `dnf repoquery` -- Currently, `dnf5 repoquery` nowhere near meets the
> capabilities of the old version. This is the most important to me.
I agree, repoquery is an absolutely essential tool for me.
Without it, it
Hi all,
I retired some packages from f37 and rawhide on Tuesday and Wednesday,
but their retirements were no longer processed correctly. After
looking at the F37 schedule, the Final Freeze for Fedora 37 should
have started two days ago (14:00 UTC on 2022-10-04), which might
explain this (at least
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 9:24 AM Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
>
> New version of libharu is building for rawhide with coresponding soname bump.
> Only vtk should be affected right now.
I see that you have already built libharu-2.4.2-1.fc38.
Did you also handle rebuilding dependent packages, or sho
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 4:58 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Downgraded packages (only considering Version): (42)
Thanks to everyone who fixed their own packages, the list has shrunk
from 42 to 39. Yay.
I now spent time to file bugs for botched updates / launch missing
builds / file missing
Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 8:39 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> I opened an issue in the dashboard repo for the same reason some weeks ago.
> It turns out there's a limitation on detecting these cases, so Fabio
> maintains a whitelist.
Yup :( This is due to the fact that architecture-specific
BuildRequires
Hi all,
Yup, it's that time of the semi-year again. Included below is the list
of package downgrades from Fedora 36 -> Fedora 37 as of today (split
into two lists: one only considering the package's Version tag, and
one looking at the entire NEVR).
There's a lot of golang and python downgrades, t
Hi all,
I plan to retire rust-ffsend (a "Firefox Send" client) from Fedora 37+
before the start of the Final Freeze. I recently discovered that the
official Firefox Send servers have been offline since 2020 and that
ffsend has been using "unofficial" third-party servers since then,
which is not id
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 1:36 PM Marcin Szydelski wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six)
>
> KDE Spin
>
> With a history of upgrading since Fedora 28
(snip)
> Error:
> Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
> libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers ca
301 - 400 of 1075 matches
Mail list logo
