On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 2:49 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>
> I very much appreciate the work to support the various SBC devices like
> Raspberry Pi and workalikes. But I'm a little lost with this proposal.
>
> > Am 05.07.2022 um 23:16 schrieb Ben Cotton :
> > The work around Raspberry Pi 4 has been on goi
On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 2:17 PM Vipul Siddharth
wrote:
>
>
> == Feedback ==
>
> This change was previously submitted for Fedora 34 and feedback were
> collected in the following [https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2516 FESCo
> ticket].
> The 2 main feedback received are either addressed or in the proce
On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 8:52 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > The e-mail address reaches nowhere
>
> or actually, does it still work? Have you tried it? I assume that the fact
> that the Bugzilla account was disabled means he has left Red Hat and hence
> the @r
On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 12:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2022, 1:54 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Linux_Firmware_Minimization
>
>
> This proposal has been withdrawn by the owners.
All my hopes and dreams dashed with this statement. :(
--
真実は
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 1:57 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Linux_Firmware_Minimization
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will on
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 2:10 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 1 2022 at 01:54:58 PM -0400, Ben Cotton
> wrote:
> > A DNF plugin will be written to make use of the `Supplements` metadata
> > to automatically install the appropriate firmware packages based on
> > the hardware present on t
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 8:11 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 12:42:07PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 30/06/2022 12:33, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> > > That being said, what about allowing users to set this preference by
> > > themselves?
> >
>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 2:09 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 29/06/2022 18:47, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > I don't see how you got there. Nowhere does it say that the
> > maintainer(s) are removed - just that one is added, and made contact for
> > EPEL bugs.
>
> Newly added EPEL maintaine
On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 3:06 PM Vipul Siddharth
wrote:
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
> by the Fedora Engineering Steerin
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 7:59 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 07:46:29AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 4:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 08:43:18PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrot
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 4:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 08:43:18PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 4:14 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/25/22 07:56, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > >
On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 4:14 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 6/25/22 07:56, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > On 6/19/22 22:54, Sharpened Blade via devel wrote:
> >
> >> Use unified kernel images by default for new releases. This can allow for
> >> the local installation to sign the kernel and the in
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 8:25 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
>
> Hi, Miro,
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 12:15 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 18. 06. 22 13:05, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> > > Hi, all,
> > >
> > > I'd like to discuss how we can add Build tag in the RPM.
> > >
> > > As one of the k
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:51 AM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Ah, I was afraid of that, seems like a lot of trouble to remove the “-“, but
> I understand why the process is necessary.
>
You could just add the other name as an alias using "Provides" if you want.
Provides: swiftlang = %{version}-%{releas
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:25 AM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Hey all, is it possible to rename a spec file? I tried to submit a build
> using “swiftlang.spec” where previously it had been “swift-lang.spec”, and
> Koji complained that it couldn’t find swift-lang.spec when trying to build
> the SRPM:
>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 3:28 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Ben Cotton:
>
> > The creation of the VM disk image, uses the same kickstart files and
> > installation groups as the standard full installation, except of
> > course for the hardware-specific items. The image is optimized for
> > KVM.
>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 8:19 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> I'm definitely in favor, but a couple of questions...
>
> What format image is to be produced? qcow2? or raw.xz? or something
> else?
>
> I assume this will not be release blocking at least at first?
>
If it's for regular KVM, I assume qcow2.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 6:28 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:15 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 3:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Aleksandr
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 3:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> > We'd like to introduce Build Number/Tag/Id in the rpm metadata.
>
> I agree with Vitaly: %rpmautospec+%rpmautorelease seem to cover
> most of this functio
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 9:41 AM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 6/10/22 07:45, Martin Stransky wrote:
> > On 6/10/22 11:44, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> >> On 10/06/2022 05:08, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> >>> I admit I have not checked, but does ffmpeg-free include
> >>> the hardware GPU suppor
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 7:40 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> python-cairosvg ngompa, orion, orphan, ralph 2 weeks ago
Taken over this now.
> python-sqlalchemy1.3 infra-sig, orphan, python-sig0 weeks ago
Taken over again and fixed the build.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Al
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 1:43 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 09:50:17AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > However, gnome-initial-setup is a bit late because currently
> > anaconda uses hostname to name your btrfs subvolumes. :(
>
> Changing the subject because I've caused th
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:29 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 12:53:19PM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
> > Given that cloud-init, for example, can configure a system as fine-grained
> > as Anaconda, I think it's more about whether a system is running in a
> > managed or unmanaged en
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:53 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 14.06.2022 um 06:25 schrieb Matthew Miller :
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 11:08:21PM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
> >> So we might have to handle this differently for desktop type and server
> >> type systems.
> >
> > I think the key diff
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:11 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:10 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 04:01:03PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > openSUSE uses a randomly generated suffix for default hostnames, which
> &
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:10 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 04:01:03PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > openSUSE uses a randomly generated suffix for default hostnames, which
> > neatly solves this problem. It makes autodiscovery and other things
> > ac
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 3:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 03:27:43PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FallbackHostname
> > The proposal here is to enable variants of Fedora Linux to configure
> > their default/fallback hostnam
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:10 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 8:33 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 05/06/2022 10:02, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > > We should really start thinking about this.
> >
> > Yes. Patents for algorithms hinder the development of hu
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 9:32 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-06-09 10:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:26 AM Luya Tshimbalanga
> wrote:
>
> On 2022-06-09 01:33, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:51 AM Luya Tshimbalanga
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:32 PM David Sommerseth wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to complete the OpenVPN 3 Linux v18_beta release in my
> Fedora Copr repository for EPEL-9. But there seems to be something odd
> going on here. I tried to reach out on IRC earlier today but didn't get
> much f
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:09 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've recently seen a package that was imported into Fedora without a package
> review. I've noticed this because the packages doesn't even install and I
> wanted to check if this could have been caught in the package review but I
>
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 2:03 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 09/06/2022 19:27, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > In your spec, I see you have this: "-D_ffmpeg_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/include"
> > It should be: "-D_ffmpeg_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/include/ffmpeg"
>
>
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:26 AM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-06-09 01:33, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:51 AM Luya Tshimbalanga
> wrote:
>
> Building Blender 3.2.0 with ffmpeg support failed on the following lines:
>
> -Wno-unused-functio
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:44 AM Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> On Sunday, June 5, 2022 10:36:19 AM CEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > H.264 is supported through OpenH264, and H.265 is not a popular codec.
> > Aside from Apple services (which are not available to Linux users
> > an
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 12:48 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > Pairs of Bodhi updates which probably should be combined so the
> > packages go out together:
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8f775872c9 &
> > h
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 6:43 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 09/06/2022 10:33, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It also seems to fail to find libavdevice, which means you need
> > libavdevice-free-devel too.
>
> That's why splitting ffmpeg into multiple subpackages
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:51 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
> Building Blender 3.2.0 with ffmpeg support failed on the following lines:
>
> -Wno-unused-function -Wno-type-limits -Wno-int-in-bool-context -Wno-switch
> -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-implicit-fallthrough
> -Wno-error=un
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 1:43 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 8:59:21 AM CDT Petr Pisar wrote:
> > The problem is that RPM Fusion only targets Fedora.
>
> It also targets RHEL, CentOS Stream, and the various RHEL rebuilds.
>
For all practical purposes, that is effective
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022, 12:04 AM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Could it be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089986 ?
> >
> > There's an update fixing it, so please test:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/update
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 4:40 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
>
> > That is also blatantly false. The idea was posted by Andreas on
> > rpmfusion-developers list in November 2021 and I (one of the FFmpeg
> > maintainers) was the only one who responded. The other maintainers made
> > no comments in that thre
On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 9:37 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 04/06/2022 22:43, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> > But the question is, what needs to be done so that ffmpeg-free will not
> > suffer, either.
>
> ffmpeg-free is a special stripped version. Popular codecs H.264 and
> H.265 were remove
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 12:19 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 02.06.2022 um 22:42 schrieb Neal Gompa :
> >
> >
> > It's not standard at all. We don't even test for this setup regularly.
> > It's not a test case, and it's not even suppo
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:27 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 02.06.2022 um 19:20 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > :
> >
> > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 09:18:27AM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> And even those who can continue to use Fedora Server via update are under
> >> the
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 6:50 AM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> Am 31.05.22 um 12:44 schrieb Felix Schwarz:
> > Hi *,
> >
> > I'd like to orphan python-cairosvg. This package was required by older
> > WeasyPrint releases but WeasyPrint v53 (Fedora 35+) stopped using cairo
> > so I don't use this package
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 2:57 AM Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 May 2022 20:52:51 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >On 28/05/2022 19:31, drago01 wrote:
> >> That's incorrect. They can be outdated, but there is no inherit reason
> >> why they have to be.
> >
> >Most upstreams don't care about bundled l
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 3:42 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 7:16 PM Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
> > Fedora uses 'BSD' for a variety of licenses, many of which have specific
> > SPDX identifiers. MIT and BSD are the most common problem areas for this
> > situation.
>
> Right,
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:14 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> V Thu, May 26, 2022 at 08:49:16AM -0500, Richard Shaw napsal(a):
> > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 8:46 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > > Dne 25. 05. 22 v 14:40 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
> > > > E, please no. Apps need to know whether a gi
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:35 AM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa writes:
>
> > I think people assume we do more with the License tag than we actually
> > do.
>
> I think this is correct.
>
> > We have no active automated auditing or validation of p
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:34 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 09:25:01AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 8:40 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:49:15AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:38 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/25/22 15:28, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:17 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/24/22 22:02, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 24,
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:17 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/24/22 22:02, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 5:03 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >> I replied it already in that thread, but happy to repeat:
> >> It will help, but less then it seems so.
> >> Now we can drop 8. Soem legacy
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 8:40 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:49:15AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 25. 05. 22 v 2:44 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> > > 2) There are tags that might mean slightly different things in each
> > > notation. E.g. MIT. Is this package licens
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 7:28 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/20/22 14:57, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 20/05/2022 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >> wait, what? What do you mean? And waht give you this impression?
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MoveFedoraJDKsToBecomePortableJDKs:
>
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 8:13 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> For years, Red Hat Linux / Fedora systems have had a umask of 0002 for
> regular users as part of the "user private group" scheme [*]. Basically the
> idea is that you can set a directory group-sticky and use it as a common work
> area for
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:27 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 18. 05. 22 v 15:51 David Cantrell napsal(a):
> > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 02:51:33PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> On 17. 05. 22 21:49, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>> On 17. 05. 22 17:06, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 17. 05. 22 v 16:59
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:33 PM jiri vanek wrote:
>
> Hi Neal!
>
> We are participating on Wakefield too. Why do you think JDK in feora should
> miss it ?
> It does nto metter if it is static or dynamic one, it will just run correctly
> under wayaland. Or do I miss something?
The runtime libra
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:55 AM jiri vanek wrote:
>
> You can imagine TCK as gigantic and pretty good testsuite, runing 24hours
> with quite complicated setup. The pull and setup and run is completely
> autoamted, but it is a lot of HW you need (all architecures x all oses x all
> jdks). In a
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:28 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 18.05.2022 um 16:36 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > :
> >
> > On 18/05/2022 11:27, Peter Boy wrote:
> >> We didn’t lost Eclipse, we switched from RPM to another distribution
> >> method. The same with Netbeans.
> >
> > No RPMS i
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 9:49 AM Mario Torre wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:52 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > I'm confused how this would not negatively impact the user experience,
> > because things like FreeType and HarfBuzz in Fedora have features and
> > co
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:22 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 17. 05. 22 17:19, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:11 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 17. 05. 22 v 17:01 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >>>
> >>> Is this going
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:19 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 17. 05. 22 17:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:02 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 17. 05. 22 16:52, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >>> Dne 17. 05. 22 v 16:18 Miro Hrončok napsa
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:09 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 04:20:56PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 02:11:03PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > > First - our burden. We ahve to certify each binary. This is quite long
> > > > and leng
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:11 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 17. 05. 22 v 17:01 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >
> > Is this going to be part of phase 1? Could you please explicitly say that
> > in the change proposal?
>
> No, it is not part of phase 1. Sorry for the confusion. I meant, yes we will
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:02 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 17. 05. 22 16:52, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 17. 05. 22 v 16:18 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >> So, is it actually allowed to use SPDX identifiers when this phase is
> >> activated, or not?
> >
> > SPDX identifiers will be allowed when al
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 8:33 AM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 16 May 2022 at 23:18, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 9:54 PM Andrew Hughes wrote:
>> >
>> > On 19:36 Tue 10 May , Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > > * Vita
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 9:54 PM Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> On 19:36 Tue 10 May , Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> >
> > > On 10/05/2022 15:29, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >> This is initial step to move JDKs to be more like other JDKs, to build
> > >> proper transferable images,
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 8:27 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 5/10/22 06:29, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > According to developers, the non-portbale JDK is causing upredicted
> > behavior different from other JDK vendors
>
> Similar to what Kevin has mentioned, I've also been using the Fedora
> openjdk build
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 6:55 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > > This sounds fascinating. Can anyone share details about this? On the
> > I'm aware of some codecs, which are built in Fedora, then the binary is
> > sent to .. cisco(?), and if passed, they are repacked in
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 9:25 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> > This simplifies our default code path by using the same partitioning
> > scheme as UEFI systems and aligns us more to how Fedora variants that
> > are delivered as disk images, which all use a similar setup. It
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 1:21 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 10:27 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIOSBootISOWithGrub2
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals are publicly announced i
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 5:20 PM Robert Relyea wrote:
>
> On 5/10/22 6:29 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/JdkInTreeLibsAndStdclibStatic
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals are publicly announced in order
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:42 AM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> No, it’s not available in RHEL nor in CentOS 8 and Stream 8; if I used the
> rhel tag would that include those?
>
Either is fine. %rhel and %el8 are both defined for all EL8 platforms.
Using %rhel is mostly useful if you want to handle multip
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:01 AM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Hey all-
>
> I got a bug report about installing Swift on RHEL 8 where nothing provides
> binutils-gold. I think this will fix it:
>
> %if 0%{?el8}
> Requires: binutils
> %else
> Requires: binutils-gold
> %endif
>
> But was hoping
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 7:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 01:21:53PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 1:13 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 09:45:55PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 1:13 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 09:45:55PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> > Ondrej Nosek kirjoitti 4.5.2022 klo 18.01:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > A few months ago fedpkg introduced a change which avoids downloading
> > > source
> > > files (from dist-
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:38 AM Brian C. Lane wrote:
>
> After the recent discussions about xorriso I realized that I could
> vastly simplify mkksiso, AND make it work as a normal user :) So I did.
>
> The PR is here:
> https://github.com/weldr/lorax/pull/1228
>
> It only depends on xorriso and im
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:17 AM Jered Floyd wrote:
>
>
> This package is now up for review in BZ:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374
>
> There's also a GitHub repo for the packaging:
> https://github.com/jeredfloyd/rpm-trafficserver
>
> I've tested it on f35, and have my copr
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:38 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 4/28/22 07:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:08 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/27/22 07:40, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 09:03:45PM -0500, Carl George wro
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 8:51 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
>
> Hi, Adam,
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:50 AM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > OK, so this is a bit meta, but I couldn't resist :P
> >
> > Since the Fedora 37 proposed Changes got posted, we have got the now-
> > inevitable round of n
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 7:35 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> This upstream fix, which is basically a single line addition:
>
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1825/files
>
> is very important to us because it broke livecd-creator and we're
> trying to build live CDs on F35. I
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 5:17 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > If this fixes the boot issues with the XPS 15 then it's probably worth
> > using this instead of the 'clean' GPT method and then revisit later once
> > BIOS support finally goes away.
>
> (Now i am not sure
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 7:51 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 10:51 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> > 2) Standalone script does not solve the main issue and that is a way CI
> > could obtain the tarball. Of course you mentioned "with support for
> > extraction in spectool", but t
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:32 PM Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
>
> Hi. My package sstp-client (a SSTP VPN client) can be used on it's own,
> but usually it is recommended to have also the NetworkManager-sstp
> plugin. "Recommends" seems to be a good idea here as NM is usually
> available by default.
>
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 9:54 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> what would it take to allow non-packagers to push to dist-git forks without
> fedpkg?
>
> The instructions at
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/pull-requests/#_you_are_not_a_packager
> assume they run Fedora (or anot
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 3:24 AM Aurelien Bompard
wrote:
>
> Hey folks!
>
> We're having a look at FMN these days, and we're trying to design its
> replacement in our Fedora Messaging enabled world.
> The current FMN has the following shortcomings:
> - too slow at runtime
> - slow at startup time
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:01 AM Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022, at 7:19 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > - dnf-daemon would be dbus-activated and exit-on-idle after a suitable
> > timeout
>
> This is how rpm-ostree has worked for about 5 years now:
> https://gith
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 6:56 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 20. 04. 22 v 8:55 Jaroslav Mracek napsal(a):
>>
>>
>> I've gotta ask... How much memory does the new dnf daemon take while idle?
>
>
> We do not have any measurements right now. Please feel free to test it. We
> have a repository with
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 3:07 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> Apologies for the delay here, but I've updated the change proposal
> page based on the feedback in this thread. Please let me know what you
> think.
>
You noted Parallels Desktop, which is actually a fair point I forgot about.
Fortunately,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 11:26 AM Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> I'm not a Fedora developer, just a long time interested user, so take
> this for what it's worth. I'd like to suggest an alternative approach
> to the BIOS boot (and potentially other similar boot issues), or at
> least suggest that this app
Hey all,
I've orphaned mustache-d[1]. It currently FTBFS[2], but I don't know
of anything using it anymore (appstream-generator no longer uses it).
If someone wants it, feel free to take it.
[1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mustache-d
[2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20467
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 8:27 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> So after all the boot discussion, I was updating my net boot setup to
> handle all the modes (BIOS PXE, UEFI PXE, UEFI HTTP, with UEFI loading
> shim for Secure Boot support). I got it all working for Fedora, then I
> tried to boot CentOS. I
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 2:29 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 14.04.2022 um 20:20 schrieb Chris Adams :
> >
> > Once upon a time, Robbie Harwood said:
> >> Given there is consensus that legacy BIOS is on its way out
> >
> > I don't think this statement is true, unless Fedora doesn't want to be
>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 8:58 AM JadoNena wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > On Thursday, April 14th, 2022 at 8:43 AM, Neal Gompa
> > wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for your reply. You are one of those several people that
> we have been reading has some good sense for us
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 8:18 AM JadoNena via devel
wrote:
>
> > The question is: how many users do we want to leave behind? Or: how many
> > users must we leave behind because we can’t do the job.
>
> We are just users. Our expert development is for other professions than
> writing drivers and
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 7:40 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > I've gotta ask... How much memory does the new dnf daemon take while idle?
>
> As I understand it, the new DNF daemon would mostly only replace/upgrade the
> already existing dnfdaemon, for users of tools l
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:45 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Hans de Goede wrote:
> > As the Source0 provider for the packages and then next to:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2
> >
> > Add a:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2-bios
> >
> > And moving the build o
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 7:52 PM Brian C. Lane wrote:
>
> A huge thanks to Thomas Schmitt for posting xorrisofs arguments :)
>
> Here is a lorax PR switching to grub2 for BIOS and changing the layout
> of the iso as described in his post:
>
> https://github.com/weldr/lorax/pull/1226
>
> And a Fedor
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:07 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 12/04/22 22:54, Ben Cotton ha scritto:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MajorUpgradeOfMicrodnf
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > A major upgrade of Microdnf is the first step in the evolution of
> > package management in Fedor
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:06 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 1:27 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > Windows 11 *does not matter* here.
>
> (Windows) Desktop as a Service (DaaS)[0] may
> change that faster than some expect (or faster
> than some hope)
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 7:08 PM Gabriel Ramirez wrote:
>
> On 4/10/22 16:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 4:37 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > wrote:
> >> On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 16:14, Zamir SUN wrote:
> >> [...]
> &g
601 - 700 of 2328 matches
Mail list logo
