On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 4:13 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 20:42 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > > * ...the Shiny New Stuff does not appear to be available on EPEL *at
> > > all* yet - not even EPEL 8. This makes it a bit of a non-starter if you
> > > want to use the same
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 8:42 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> Hey folks!
>
> So, I caught an interesting story on LWN today:
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/813254/
>
> it appears the FSF is planning to run a forge and contribute to
> whatever project they use, and Pagure is currently their leading
> co
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 4:31 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> I have too many packages that I am the maintainer for and need help. If
> you would like to help out by either becoming a co-maintainer or
> becoming the primary maintainer, please let me know. The full list
> follows. Many of these I ju
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 6:03 AM Guido Aulisi wrote:
>
> Hi,
> can we create a pkgconfig file for libraries that do not ship one?
> I did not find anything about that in our packaging policy.
>
> A bug was filed [0] about a missing pkgconfig file for zita-convolver
> library and I'm thinking og crea
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:46 AM clime wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 12:05, Nicolas Mailhot via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > If you don’t keep things decentralized you’ll be in a word of pain when
> > the scm or buildsys needs to be changed for another implementation (not
> > to mention, that’s not a
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:23 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I would like to add to Ankur's point: while I understand that many of us are
> doing Fedora work voluntarily and the expectations should be set accordingly,
> I believe we should be open to accept help when we realise that
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:10 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28/02/2020 10:00, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 17:07:21 -0500, Dakota Williams via devel wrote:
> >> On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >>
>
> Would you like help? I'd be willing to be a co-maintainer
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 07:03:01PM +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > I'm pleased to announce start of DNF 5 development. We are planning
> > to deliver a module stream or a COPR repo during Fedora 33
> > developm
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:58 AM Martin Kolman wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 08:56 +0100, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 07:44 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, 00:55 Martin Kolman wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Messa
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 7:06 AM Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
>
> W dniu 04.03.2020 o 19:03, Daniel Mach pisze:
> > Hello everyone, I'm pleased to announce start of DNF 5 development.
>
> > microdnf
> > Microdnf is becoming important because it's part of
> > many containers due to its small footprint.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:29 AM Daniel Mach wrote:
>
>
>
> Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> >> Are you going to use sd-bus for the dbus library?
> >>
> >
> &g
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:00 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:29:38PM +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > >On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:02 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:35 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:29 AM Daniel Mach wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > &g
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:09 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:02:47AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:00 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:34 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 05. 02. 20 12:32, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > In Fedora 32, we have updated Python to 3.8:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8
> >
> > There are last 13 packages that were still not successfully rebuilt with
> > Python
> >
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:51 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
> > We've managed to drop a lot of redundant code across the whole DNF stack
> > in the past years, but we have reached a point when it's nearly
> > impossible to consolidate the code any further without breaking the
> > API/ABI. Especially
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:21 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
> from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of issues in asio 1.14.0. Even
> if you patch for the issue, it may be completely untested upstream.
> That is why it is so v
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 9:02 AM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> W dniu 07.03.2020 o 13:53, Neal Gompa pisze:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:21 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
> >
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 11:47 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 07/03/2020 10:32, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> > In any case, Fedora is a more bleeding edge distro than Debian/Ubuntu
> > (First one of the foundations), so I am not sure how realistic it is to
> > be waiting for Debian/Ubuntu to include s
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:54 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:42 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-32.md
> > > Report with
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:23 PM Pat Riehecky wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:48 AM Robbie Harwood wrote:
> >
> > Daniel Mach writes:
> >
> > > Dne 12. 03. 20 v 19:26 Pat Riehecky napsal(a):
> > >
> > >> I realize I'm thinking about the Pie in the Sky, but:
> > >>
> > >> Would it be possibl
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Dakota Williams
wrote:
>
> On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
> >> prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
> >> https://sr
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 6:23 AM Guido Aulisi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m going to ask a FESCo exception for python2 for package ardour5.
> Python2 is only needed to build the package using the WAF build system.
>
> Ardour has been undergoing a complete rewriting for 2 years, no stable
> versions have
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:24 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sqlite_Rpmdb
>
> == Summary ==
> Change format of the RPM database from Berkeley DB to a new Sqlite format.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:pmatilai| Panu Matilainen]] [[User:ffesti|Florian Festi]]
> * E
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 7:32 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> The trigger for this line of thinking was this comment I ran across
> this morning:
>
> https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/phoronix/latest-phoronix-articles/1166100-fedora-32-beta-released-with-earlyoom-by-default-gnome-3-36-desktop?p=1
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:37 PM Ty Young wrote:
>
>
> On 3/19/20 2:18 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >
> > On 12/03/2020 22:34, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 11:33:04PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >>> It is very, very wrong and I don't feel I should have to make a public
> >>> r
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 6:42 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
>
> On 15/03/2020 13:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Dakota Williams
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
>
Hey all,
I have orphaned containers[1], a D language library for extended
"containers" concept in D based on std.experimental.allocator.
I have no use for it anymore. If you're interested in D language
stuff, feel free to take it.
There is a newer version available from upstream[2], which would
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:06 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 3/16/20 6:25 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > I'm glad to *finally* see this happen, so congratulations to the RPM
> > team for finally making this a reality! I look forward to trying this
> > out in Ra
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 11:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 9:59 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I've been trying to get Pagure into EPEL 8 for a couple of months now
> > so that we can upgrade our Pagure instances
Hello all,
I've been trying to get in touch with Pete Walter for a few months now
w.r.t. python-pygit2[0]. Unfortunately, he hasn't been responding to
my emails[1][2][3] (he was CC'd to all of those) or the bug I filed
requesting pygit2 for EPEL 8[4].
I've also filed the requisite non-responsive
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote:
>
> For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I
> am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment.
>
In that case, I'd be happy to take on co-maintainership (admin) or
even take over the package entirely
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote:
>
> For months!? This is the first email I get from you.
>
That's really surprising. I had CC'd you on each email requesting for
assistance on getting pagure's dependencies into EPEL 8 from December
through now, and I filed the bug asking for an
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:55:49PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:42:07PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > The dist-git is now emitting the messages via fedmsg. Whenever new upload
> > > has been done.
> > >
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:33 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
>
> The RPM variables:
>
> * `%{fedora}` will return `.fcXX` (where XX is the Fedora version
> represented by Rawhide).
This will break things. %fedora has always returned an integer, why do
you want to change it to return a "DistTag"-ish
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:08 PM Jeff Fearn wrote:
>
> On 27/11/18 02:06, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > * Neal Gompa [26/11/2018 11:01] :
> >>
> >> Out of curiosity, does anyone know where the source code for Red Hat
> >> Bugzilla actually is? I tried to find
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:27 PM Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
> On 11/16/18 7:50 AM, Paul Frields wrote:
> [snip]
> > We should skip the F31 release cycle and leave F30 in place longer in
> > order to focus on improving the tooling and testing changes. These
> > tooling changes will improve the overall
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:08 AM John Florian wrote:
>
> On 11/26/18 3:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The one issue I see off hand is that koji
> > tags are kind of expensive so we can't just tag everything the way we
> > may want
>
> Can you please elaborate a bit on this? What makes them expensiv
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:57 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:22 AM Paul Frields wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:47 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 27. 11. 18 v 17:04 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > > >> In other words, the "technical debt" we are trying to solve
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:14 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> The upgrade of bugzilla.redhat.com has been delayed a week. It will
> now be done on 9 December 2018 from 0:00 to 12:00 UTC.
>
Aww, anyone know why?
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:39 PM Clement Verna wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to get feedbacks on the following proposal. Use OSBS to
> build the fedora container base image, indeed OSBS has the capability
> to build a base container image using a kickstart file.
> To do this OSBS needs a Docke
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:54 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:12 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> > I'm worried that this kind of pointless work makes it hard to attract
> > talent.
>
> Florian, you might want to check out rdopkg.
> https://github.com/softwarefactory-project/rdopkg . It
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:59 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > The problem with merged source trees (aka source-git) is that it
> > implies forking projects.
>
> But that's true for *any* distribution that wants to integrate things.
> I guess y
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:06 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> On 12/10/2018 07:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > It is versioned, actually. The 1.x API is `pkconfig(modulemd)` and 2.x
> > is `pkgconfig(modulemd-2.0)`. The source of the conflict between the
> > two -devel subpackages is that they both
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:30 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any news ?
>
> "But I guess nothing's getting released, for some reason? fedora-review has
> been on version 0.6.1 since May 2016; all package activity since then has
> been housekeeping rebuilds. "
>
> may you add me as admin to F
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 2:34 PM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> for long time we have problem if you have some arch-specific
> BuildRequires, you still get one src.rpm from one of arches (not sure
> how koji chooses that one) which might not work for your architecture.
>
> For example if
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 2:50 PM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 2:34 PM Igor Gnatenko
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello folks,
> > >
> > > for long time we have pro
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 3:09 PM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> That makes sense that we can do something like this from DNF code..
> However, it would be kinda hard to do any dependency resolution
> checks..
>
> Although we already have one which is module(platform:$PLATFORM_ID)
> which is automatically
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 3:10 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Hi, (sorry for duplicates I sent from wrong email before)
>
> Nothing happened last week .
>
> Can you add me to https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/ and to
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-review please .
>
> My fas user is sergiomb ,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 5:17 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 20-12-18 10:54, Raphael Groner wrote:
> >> So what process should I use? Pull Requests or just removing obsolete
> >> stuff?
> >> I'm ready to do either way. Should I leave this to FESCo?
> >
> > My vote would go for Pull Request
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:35 AM Avram Lubkin wrote:
>
> Looks like the dependency generator was turned on in rawhide. Igor has been
> making pull releases against packages because this is now creating duplicate
> requires for some packages. That would seem reasonable, but he never pushed
> the
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:38 PM Avram Lubkin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:55 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>>
>> Well, now that this has been enabled, it is likely that there already
>> are packages which make use of this functionality, and disabling the
>> generator again wo
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 1:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 28. 12. 18 18:58, Avram Lubkin wrote:
> > Especially since there is no test code!
>
> And this is the only thing when I agree with you.
>
> Neal, where would be the best place to add some tests for the generator?
> I can scratch something
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 4:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 28. 12. 18 22:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 1:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 28. 12. 18 18:58, Avram Lubkin wrote:
> >>> Especially since there is no test code!
&
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:30 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 12/30/18 12:26 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 19:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnablingPythonGeneratorsByDefault
> >>
> >> = Enabling Python Generators by default =
> >
> > No
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2:41 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
>
> When I wasn't looking, asymptote grew a new dependency, which means I
> have two new packages that need reviews.
>
> python-speg: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663036
> python-cson: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dennis Gregorovic wrote:
>
> Forwarding info I got from Tomas off-line...
>
> """
> oz should be py3-ready according to clancellete (not tested by me). I've
> started some work on ImageFactory, but didn't get too far as there were other
> priorities. It seemed to b
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 4:16 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> I'm going to push multiple commits to packages (I'll send list later)
> which execute scriptlets which are not needed anymore for Fedora.
>
> However, people tend to keep same spec for Fedora and EPEL which makes
> everything much more compli
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:23 AM Randy Barlow
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 08:34 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Was
> > there some kind of design rationale for them? Or were they just added
> > because 'hey, fedmsg is cool'?
>
> I don't know because they were added before my tenure, though I
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:52 AM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 10. 01. 19 v 20:47 Artur Iwicki napsal(a):
> > > - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg
> > > fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit
> > > my-fas-acco...@my-dom
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 1:59 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
> things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1].
>
> I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which
> have arisen from the
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:19 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:42:05PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * non free submissions. What if someone submits non free content and we
> > build and host it? That would not be great.
>
> Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach a
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 5:42 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 11:05:33 +0100
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 12. 01. 19 19:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On 1/12/19 5:59 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >> On 12. 01. 19 14:19, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >>> Dan Horák wrote:
> > This is a rem
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 8:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> * Buildbot (Python 3)
> * Jenkins (Java)
> * Vespene (Python 3)
> * GoCD (Java + Ruby)
> * Zuul (Python)
>
> Of the four listed above, only the first two are packaged in Fedora.
> Buildbot is up-to-date in Fedo
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 10:08 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Well, strictly speaking, this is really only a problem for IBM
> > architectures (ppc64le and s390x) because there's no economical way
> > for anyone to be able to care for them.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:19 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:37 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >
> > On 1/11/19 9:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach as currently used in
> > > Copr?
> >
> > I'd rather have a licensing sign-off
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:17 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> [This proposal was submitted after the deadline. I am announcing it
> for community discussion and will leave the decision on whether or not
> to grant an exception to FESCo]
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC9
>
> == Summary ==
> S
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:17 AM Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
>
> Why is this Self-Contained Change and not a System Wide Change?
>
> It seems, at least to me, that it should be System Wide Change, according to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy#Complex_system_wide_changes .
>
Is it r
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 9:23 AM Georg Sauthoff wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> so I wrote dracut-sshd - a dracut module that adds sshd to the
> initramfs such that one is able to remotely access early
> userspace for e.g. unlocking an encrypted root filesystem or
> dealing with the dracut emergency shell:
>
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 9:49 PM Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Nico Kadel-Garcia"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 11:06:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0
> >
> >
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 9:55 PM Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Frantisek Zatloukal"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 4:16:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0
> >
> >
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 10:01 PM Siteshwar Vashisht
wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Neal Gompa"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Cc: "Mikolaj Izdebski" , "Michael Simacek"
&
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> Remove packages from the distribution:
> [...]
> * python-urlgrabber
>
We don't actually have to drop this one. One of the SUSE guys
submitted a pull request to port it to Python 3:
https://github.com/rpm-software
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:33 PM John Harris wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 5:29:58 AM EST Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Fedora has determined that the Server Side Public Licensev1 (SSPL) is
> > not a Free Software License.
>
> For what reason is SSPL considered non-free? As I see, it's essentiall
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:05 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 02:43:39AM -0500, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > I agree that it would be much safer to target it for Fedora 31. I have no
> > objection if we change target release.
>
> What about building it as a module, with Bash
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:23 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 03:01:55PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > But wait also: can't the module just refer to the release-branch (base)
> > > dist-git? Why maintain two copies?
> > Well, they can. But someone needs to build it twice: o
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:07 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:06:25PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Please don't do that. You'll basically break the distribution for all
> > third-party packagers. Modules are not supported by anyone at all, a
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:58 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 07:28, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>>
>> Problem №1: Build-only packages
>>
>> Rawhide gating makes this much more complicated because builds appear in
>> buildroot slower, updating group of packages would need si
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:59 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le jeudi 31 janvier 2019 à 19:52 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit :
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:58 PM Stephen John Smoogen > > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 07:28, Igor Gnatenko <
> > >
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 10:23 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> koji-builder, mash and repoview are ready to work without yum ?
>
There's a pending PR for fixing koji-builder:
https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/1117
Mash is dead and not used in infra anymore, so it doesn't matter.
RepoView just needs
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 10:37 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:19 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:58 PM Stephen John Smoogen
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 07:28, Igor Gnatenko
> > > w
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 6:19 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 01. 02. 19 v 13:21 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a):
> > - builds failing due to failure to download packages from official
> > Fedora mirror dl.fedoraproject.org
>
> This is not first time I hear this. So I will open discussion to (again)
>
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 3:51 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:37 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote:
> > Right.
> >
> > Yes, I'm trying to test the installation from the mirrors. There will
> > be a delay.
> >
> > Buildroot repo != compose repo.
> > That's where I was mistaken.
> >
>
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:14 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 1/31/19 4:52 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> > COPR was supposed to be that outlet, but no one gives a damn about it.
> > Everyone complains that the service is "bad" and that the design is
&
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 9:34 PM Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
>
> On 2/1/19 10:23 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 10:23 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >>
> >> koji-builder, mash and repoview are ready to work without yum ?
> >>
> >
> > Ther
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 9:52 PM Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:36:50AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 18:32 Ben Cotton >
> > > ** add SWID metadata awareness to createrepo (but this will not be
> > > used in Fedora, only enabled for user use), agreeing m
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 9:22 PM Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>
> > I don't read repodata manually, libsolv does it for me. Using libdnf and/or
> > libmodulemd is not something what (for example) OBS would do. They rely on
> > libsolv for all dependency solving operations. And unless it will support
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:58 AM Ron Yorston wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >In the past few weeks, it has come up regularly that future
> >"module-only" packages are orphaned (and hence will soon be retired),
> >and nobody stepped up to fix this issue - especially for non-leaf
> >packages. I
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:09 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> On 13/02/2019 08:05, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:58 AM Ron Yorston wrote:
> >
> >> What is a "module-only" package?
> >
> > These are packages that move from the
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:34 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> On 13/02/2019 09:11, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:09 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think that second consequence is entirely true.
> >>
> >> As I understand the t
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:07 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 2/5/19 1:37 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-02-04 at 09:56 -0600, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
> >> What's the replacement?
> >
> > Bodhi switched from mash to pungi, and I think Bodhi might have been
> > the last thing using mash.
>
> Th
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 5:32 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> On 13/02/2019 12:58, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:51 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13/02/2019 09:48, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:34 AM Tom Hughes
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 3:59 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Making 'dnf --best' the default has been proposed to FESCo in
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2088,
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Default_Best.
>
> Comments, opinions?
>
It's probably a smarter behavior. We're a
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 4:11 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 08:10:09AM -0500, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> > I have opened a Change Request to change the defaults for Fedora 31 to
> > Cgroups V2. I am looking for what packages will be affected by this
> > change. Bas
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:46 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Fabio Valentini:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:23 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>
> >> * Fabio Valentini:
> >>
> >> > In the past few weeks, it has come up regularly that future
> >> > "module-only" packages are orphaned (and hence will
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:43 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 13. 02. 19 15:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:23 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>
> >> * Fabio Valentini:
> >>
> >>> In the past few weeks, it has come up regularly that future
> >>> "module-only" packages are orpha
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:31 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> Would there be some way to opt out of this? In some cases, %{name}-devel
> Requires only %{name}-libs and not %{name}.
>
Perhaps it's not obvious, but the idea here is that RPM will "sense"
what the name of the subpackage it depends on is,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:36 PM Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:21 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
> >
> > = BuildRequires Generators =
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:05 AM Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>
> Greetings packagers,
>
> I know how important RPM is to the Fedora Project, but it breaks
> everything downstream and we'd be better off using DPKG as we should
> have from day one.
>
> I'm calling this initiative fedpkg: Fedora Embraces
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:06 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > Greetings packagers,
> >
> > I know how important RPM is to the Fedora Project, but it breaks
> > everything downstream and we'd be better off using DPKG as we should
> > have from day one.
> >
> > I'm calling this initiative fedpkg: Fedora
801 - 900 of 2673 matches
Mail list logo
