Xapian 1.4 headed to rawhide

Hi All, Just a heads up that xapian 1.4 is headed to rawhide. Peter ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Xapian 1.4 headed to rawhide

>> Hi All, >> >> Just a heads up that xapian 1.4 is headed to rawhide. >> >> Peter >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > > I tried to rebuild doxygen -

Re: Strange koji failures

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 22.12.2016 v 10:12 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): >> On Thursday, December 22, 2016 9:50:12 AM CET Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >>> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch builders >>> for example?

Re: nothing provides libpython3.6m.so.1.0

>>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:06:03 +0100 >>> gil wrote: >>> from: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17017344 https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7345/17017345/root.log " Error: nothing provides

Re: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Michael Cronenworth <m...@cchtml.com> wrote: > On 12/07/2016 04:29 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> -1 at least for the moment. b > > > Is this due to sugar? Would you accept patches? One of the reasons, and of course, I think if we wa

Re: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Michael Cronenworth <m...@cchtml.com> wrote: >> On 12/07/2016 04:29 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> >>> -1 at least for the moment. b >> >>

Re: a rawhide build not tagged into f27-build

> My build of updated poppler in Rawhide was not tagged into f27-build > automatically, as it used to be in the past: > > $ koji wait-repo --build=`fedpkg verrel` f27-build > Warning: nvr poppler-0.53.0-1.fc27 is not current in tag f27-build > latest build in f27-build is poppler-0.52.0-1.fc26 >

Re: Wifi was broken after latest NM update

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: > tl;dr: Please test your shit better before pushing updates to the > users! There is absolutely no need to use language like that or refer to people's work as such. > Hi there, > I'm a little bit angry about the latest

Re: Voice recognition packages need a new maintainer

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> You can assign pocketsphinx and it's dep sphinxbase to me as I need >> them for a project I'm investigating ATM

Re: Fedora 26 Alpha status update

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Just wanted to let everyone know where we're at with the F26 > Alpha. > > An Alpha RC2 compose request is in, and RC2 should be building at > present. The main change between RC1 and RC2 is a fix for

Re: Question on koji error: SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:661)

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Kai Engert wrote: > On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 01:05 +, Globe Trotter wrote: >> Hi, >> I am trying to build a package on koji using: >> koji build --scratch f25 thaali-0.4.2-1.fc25.src.rpm >> >> and I get: >> SSLError: [SSL:

Re: Voice recognition packages need a new maintainer

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Jerry James wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I am the primary point of contact for a handful of voice > recognition-related packages: > - cmusphinx3 > - irstlm > - openfst > - opengrm-ngram > - pocketsphinx > - sphinxbase > - sphinxtrain > > I

Re: Are we going to do another mass rebuild for ppc64le problems?

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > It looks like the mass rebuild completed. However I have quite a few > packages which failed because of the ppc64le / binutils(?) / > "localentry:0" thing. Are we going to do another mass rebuild to fix > this?

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream. > > That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous > discussion

Re: f27-override tag for glibc-2.25.90-29.fc27

On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > Would the person who tagged glibc-2.25.90-29.fc27 into f27-override be > so kind and remove that tag? I need glibc-2.25.90-30.fc27 to be able to > build curl, which is needed to fix cmake, which in turn will fix a >

Re: ceph build stuck in f27-pending for 12+ hours

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > This ceph build finished building in koji 12+ hours ago: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=942742 > > but it still in f27-pending. Is there something stuck that prevents > it going into

Re: [modularity] First round of Boltron feedback published

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:59:58AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> The thing that jumps out immediately is that respondents _really_ >> prefer the "dnf module install httpd" syntax — 73% love or like that, >> while

Re: State of Sparkleshare

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > As a maintainer of Fedora Design Suite, the state of sparkleshare brought > attention with these outstanding report: > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789 > *

Re: Fedora 25 GRUB security issue

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > security@ and security-team@ have no meaningful activity in at least > the last 6 months so I'm posting this here. Have you tried something as simple as reaching out to the maintainer of grub2? > grub2 incorrectly

Re: Fedora 25 GRUB security issue

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: >>> security@ a

Re: State of Sparkleshare

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga <l...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 01/08/17 01:01 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga >> <l...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >>> As a maintainer of Fedora Design Suit

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 09:36:32AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On 2017-08-03, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> > >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb >> > >> What

Re: Builds stuck in f27-pending

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Hello folks! > > I did some builds on Rawhide / fc27 yesterday and they are still stuck in > f27-pending. Is the signing queue blocked again? There's probably a backlog due to mass rebuild part two being

Re: Arduino in Fedora

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > In attempting to figure out why the lulzbot-marlin-firmware was not > being compiled properly, I noticed that the arduino packages in Fedora > were a bit out of date. To remedy this, I made updated versions of them > and

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Pierre-Yves Chibon [11/07/2017 11:41] : >> >> But it is constructed around the idea that there is only one package for a >> given >> name. > > I'm not sure the assumption is safe to make. A number of perl modules

Re: Fedora 27 mass rebuild at risk

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/07/2017 02:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Besides the glibc downgrade, I'm not aware of anything else we could do >> to get ready for the mass rebuild in time. > > I discussed this with Carlos, and we came up with

Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > I ran into this unannounced change: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels > > If this is accepted, all x86 hardware on which Fedora can run will > support SSE2, and we should reflect

Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:26:03PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> I ran into this unannounced change: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels >> If this is accepted, all x86 hardware

Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 07/11/2017 10:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:26:03PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> >>> I ran into this unannounced change: >>>

Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:43:53PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> >>> If cost is an issue, consider to drop all these ppc, arm, s370 and >>> mips targets. >>> >>> Their user base is like magnitudes smaller than the i686 user base, >>> while these target are having a significant impact (and

Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 12 July 2017 at 16:32, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> To give an example outside of the kernel, the installer 'Reclaim Space' >> function has been broken on i686 for about 10 months, and

Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 07/12/2017 12:16 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > >> I still have my N270 netbook, but I guess even more people still have >> Z6xx-based devices. Still, they're over 7 years old at this point. > > > The

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:05:43AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> > 3. The default landing page for a package shows a message about

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:21:53PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon >> <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jul 0

Re: s390x build failures

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 00:22 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> I'm hitting weird s390x build failures. >> >> Koji says (almost immediately): >> >> URLError: >> >> See a build here: >>

Re: Fedora, apps, and the Flatpak opportunity

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Michal Novotny wrote: >> I am no flatpack expert, but I think that really any container technology >> in question should be just a porter of an rpm or set of rpms and there >> should (could) be packaged ansible scripts

Re: armv7hl builds running out of memory

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > trying to build ceph-12 on f27 armv7hl. > > It builds on everything x86_64, aarch64, s390x, and i686 (w/o java), but > on armv7hl the build fails, reporting out of memory. > > ... > [100%] Built target ceph-osd >

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 07/04/2017 03:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 09:32 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: >>> Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This time >>> it is Robotic [1] , but i've seen

Re: floppy-support being retired (was: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-26))

>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Björn Persson wrote: >>> t...@fedoraproject.org wrote: floppy-support bruno 162 weeks ago >>> >>> So are floppies now definitely a thing of the past according to Fedora? >> >> Well they

Re: Proposed Mass Bug Filing: Renaming "python-" binary packages to "python2-"

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 16:21 +0200, Iryna Shcherbina wrote: >> 2) Using `python-` instead of `python2-` in the dependencies for the >> Python 2 binary RPM [2]. > > I'm not sure this list is terribly useful,

Re: Intel i915 firmwares

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> >> The same upstream which did not release stable version of Xorg Intel >> driver >> for past three years? ;-) >> According to

Re: ARM and AArch64 GCC 7.1 ABI change

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > A severe ABI bug on AArch64 and especially on ARM 32-bit has been > recently discovered and GCC 7.1 is going to have that ABI change in. > For details see http://gcc.gnu.org/PR77728 > gcc-7.1.1-0.16.fc{26,27} which

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:43:51PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote: >> On 04/08/17 18:06, Neal Gompa wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser >> > wrote: >> >> On 2017-08-04 11:12

Re: Long time for package to be tagged into Rawhide

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I built this one 3½ hours ago: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=953201 > > A whole series of builds depend on this but I'm still waiting for it > to get into the buildroot ... Can

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good morning everyone, > > We're now in the final sprint before Pagure over dist-git is a real thing. > This > is a great time and we're very excited to see it happen. > However this change brings other changes with

Re: debuginfo repository matching f27-build

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 08/01/2017 08:42 AM, den...@ausil.us wrote: >> There is no debug repos for the buildroot repos. > > Can we fix this, please? Or offer a tool like “dnf debuginfo-install” > that gets the debuginfo directly from Koji,

Re: build tests failure on non x86_64 archs

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > While trying to update one of my packages (rdkit), I am hitting an > issue with its tests suite, so apparently every non-x86_64 build is > failing. Well if i686 fails too there's a problem > rawhide example:

Re: Deprecated net-tools? Mass bug filing?

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:15:51AM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 17 May 2017 at 08:46, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> > Converting apps from nettools to iproute is often non-trivial piece >>

Re: mp3 encoding now ok

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:35 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > On 15 May 2017 5:15 pm, "Tom Callaway" wrote: > > On 05/04/2017 09:09 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Christian Schaller >

Re: Tool for generating a rootfs for foreign arch (aarch64 on x86_64, for example)?

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm trying to find a way to bootstrap a Fedora rootfs from x86_64 for > aarch64 (similar to debootstrap with "debootstrap --arch arm64 > "), but I can't seem to find any. > > I recall that we added

Re: Fedora Modules & Fedora 27 Server Edition (Changes)

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:06:18PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: >> > Hmmm, so, if I want some random utility (let's say gcal, which I don't >> > package, or calc, which I do) on my server, what are my options? Can I >

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-26)

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:02:25AM +, t...@fedoraproject.org wrote: >> libguestfs (maintained by: rjones, agk, group::virtmaint-sig, mdbooth, >> ptoscano) >> libguestfs-1.36.4-1.fc26.src

Re: Tool for generating a rootfs for foreign arch (aarch64 on x86_64, for example)?

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:29 AM, John Reiser

Re: COPR Arm Builds?

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 25.5.2017 v 04:46 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): >> Longer answer: yeah, we have wanted to do so for a long time, but just >> haven't gotten there. > > I will extend Nirik's answer. > There are old ARM machines which were

Re: Updates not getting pushed to stable

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a couple of updates which are stuck waiting to get pushed to > stable: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e46ec0bbe8 > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-19c1569283 >

Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

I'm not sure how all those people can be co-maintainers of efl. I'm not sure how that's meant to be interpreted but given some of the other responses I think this script as bit rotted some what. Peter > Affected (co)maintainers > alexl: efl > ankursinha: lldb, efl > atkac: efl > bpepple: efl >

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide > composes in a while (13 days as of today). > > This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now > failing composes

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

Greetings. Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide composes in a while (13 days as of today). This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now failing composes that don't have all required release blocking

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On 06/13/2017 03:47 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> For actual artifacts such as cloud/disk/installer images I agree but >> at least pushing out individual packages so people can do "

Re: F26 Mesa update

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a reason for delaying the update for mesa-17.1.2 to F26? > > We're getting buildroot failures for some F26 packages that depend on mesa > (llvm was updated). The mesa update and the buildroot

Re: floppy-support being retired (was: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-26))

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Björn Persson wrote: > t...@fedoraproject.org wrote: >> floppy-support bruno 162 weeks ago > > So are floppies now definitely a thing of the past according to Fedora? Well they definitely are a thing

Re: How to handle broken dependencies in F27?

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi, > > I've got two packages (gala, wingpanel) that have broken dependencies in F27 > because of unfortunate timing: > > 1. GNOME 3.24 prerelease broke builds just in time for the mass rebuild, > 2. upstream took a

Re: Kernel 4.13 rebase plans

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:46 PM, wrote: > Oh boy. :) > > Does anyone know if the fallback is working properly? Because if so, then > everyone is happy and we don't need to be having this discussion. Sounds > like there's a good chance that's the case. (I don't have an

Re: rawhide packages not getting pushed?

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Hi, > > For ca. 3 weeks (or more) buildsys nags me with warning mails on k3d: > ... > k3d has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > On x86_64: > k3d-0.8.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 requires

Re: Merging two updates

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to merge updates in bodhi? The reasons is packages > depends from the same source. For example, LuxRender and YafaRay have > separate updates but depend of Blender and I would like to

Re: Batched updates for development cycles

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Randy Barlow <bowlofe...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 10/12/2017 03:06 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> It seems batched updates is turned on for F-27 [1], surely it makes >> sense for updates to go straight out in the development cycle, t

Re: Batched updates for development cycles

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Randy Barlow <bowlofe...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 10/14/2017 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> Since branched releases have the updates-testing repository enabled by >>> default, won't the effect you desire happen anyway? >>

Re: Batched updates for development cycles

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:06:18AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> It seems batched updates is turned on for F-27 [1], surely it makes >> sense for updates to g

Re: Fedora Modular Server: status and game plan?

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > From devel@lists.fedoraproject.org: > > FWIW, AFAICT the current state of this is that we had some F27 > modular composes that 'succeeded' (the last being 20170831.n.0), but > none of them contained any images

Re: Fedora Modular Server: status and game plan?

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote: > On 08/09/17 15:43, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> >> wrote: >> >>> We're getting to crunch time, here. Shoul

Re: Fedora 27 Beta blocker status mail #1

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Time for an update on the Fedora 27 Beta status. > > tl;dr action summary > > > Accepted blockers > - > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489164 >

Re: rdma -devel packages missing (?) on f27/armv7hl, builds failing

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > I've built glusterfs previously on F27 with these same Build-Requires. Same > package & same .spec build on F28 and F26. > > While trying to build a new version for the last 24 hours I keep hitting > this: > > ...

Re: Shim update breaks booting

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser <besse...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Am 26.08.2017 um 21:16 schrieb Peter Robinson: >> >> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Lars Seipel <lars.sei...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 2

Re: Shim update breaks booting (was: Fedora 27 compose report: 20170825.n.0 changes)

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Lars Seipel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:24:59PM +, Fedora Branched Report wrote: >> Package: shim-signed-13-0.2 >> Old package: shim-signed-0.8-10 >> Summary: First-stage UEFI bootloader >> RPMs: shim-aa64

Re: tcp_wrappers deprecation

> On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 13:58 +0200, Jakub Jelen wrote: >> Hello Fedora devels and users, >> >> more than three years ago, the same topic started discussion if we >> want >> this package in Fedora or not and how [1]. The discussion resulted >> mostly in flames and in the removal of the dependency

Re: F26 and kernel-4.13

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi guys, > > my question: is it planned to make and release kernel-4.13 for F26? I saw > that it has been declared as mainline and stable on kernel.org. The latest stable kernel will always go to the latest

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/06/2017 05:49 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> >> I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts >> are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. Only package >> which depends on

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:51 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > >> Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> >> > I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts >> > are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. > > > I

Batched updates for development cycles

Hi All, It seems batched updates is turned on for F-27 [1], surely it makes sense for updates to go straight out in the development cycle, this affects things getting into the nightly composes for testing in live images and other such things. I feel this should be something that is only used for

Re: Depending on pygobject3 may cause an unnecessary dependency on cairo

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Dear fellow Fedora developers! > I was puzzled by this after upgrading from F25 to F26 on a headless > machine with a pretty minimal set of packages installed (i.e. almost > no libraries related to

Re: Using devtoolset for EPEL builds

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I need/want/would like to build new node 6 for EL6, but gcc is too old. >>> For that reason, I'd like to use devtoolset-4-gcc, but the build fails >>> (obviously) because the

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Reduce Initial Setup Redundancy

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 04:09:25PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = System Wide Change: Reduce Initial Setup Redundancy = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReduceInitialSetupRedundancy >> >> Change owner(s): >> *

Re: Fedora 27 is officially released!

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:39 AM, cornel panceac wrote: > No Linux 4.14 ? The standard process for new kernels, and this has been the case for _YEARS_ is that a new kernel will head to stable releases around the .2 release of said stable kernel. The 27 release went into

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi fedora-release maintainers and fellow developers, > > The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora > version and changes slowly, and it also contains the preset files for > systemd

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:43 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 8, 20

Re: streamlining fedora-release

; On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:23:37PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> > > <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: >> > > > But why? _Any_ package can completely screw up the system with a bad >>

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 November 2017 at 13:50, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: >>>

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote: > We are adding some features to container projects for User Namespace support > that can take advantage of XFS Reflink. I have talked to some of the XFS > Reflink kernel engineers in Red Hat and they have informed me that

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: >> Put the patch name in ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec just before END OF >> PATCHES. >> >> Run rpmbuild -bb kernel.spec >> >> You will have the kernel rpm files in ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64 >> >> The gotchas are left

Re: [fedora-arm] armhfp builder instability

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > Lately, I've seen quite a few spurious build failures. Random SIGBUS is > particularly common, and gcc reports that it cannot reproduce the SIGBUS in > a second compilation, which usually points to a kernel/hardware

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 4:11 PM, stan wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2018 16:24:17 +0530 > Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > >> For the record,I am going with the kernel Lts given that it has >> patches for meltdown & spectre. > > There are recent

Re: NEEDINFO denial of service attack

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > This issue was caused by me as part of post-F26 EOL housekeeping, > following the https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1736#comment-455818 FESCo > decision. If this approach is causing issues we can skip the step > setting "needinfo" flag and leave

Re: [rawhide]: broken fedpkg

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Hi, > > As in is in subject > > $ fedpkg > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/fedpkg/__main__.py", line 84, in > main > sys.exit(client.args.command()) > AttributeError: 'Namespace' object has

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:40 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2 = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2 > > The "how to test" section for this Change seems a

Re: Release criteria proposal: drop kickstart package criterion

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! > > We currently have a Final release criterion that reads as follows: > > "A spin-kickstarts package which contains the exact kickstart files > used to build the release must be present in the release repository. > The included

Re: [fesco] Updated FTBFS package policy

On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Till Maas wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 04:27:15PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 15:46 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default

>> > And in my opinion, it's not simple to say: OK if you have this size >> > ESP to start, you get this layout, and if it's bigger you get this >> > other layout, and if it's BIOS you have this 3rd layout. > > Chris, I have to say I'm glad you're part of the Fedora community - your > input on

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2

>>> I don't think TLS 1.3 will see a wide deployment immediately. Sure, >>> the >>> famous top websites and top browsers will, but enterprises will not. >>> And >>> especially those with any kind of loggin/auditing requirements cannot >>> even allow TLS 1.3 with ephemeral DH on their network. >>>

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 20/06/18 09:46, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> There's also requirements by PCI (Payment Card Industry, not the >> interconnect tech) for sites doing financial transactions to be >> HTTP/1.1 and TLS 1.2 by June 30 too

Re: Fedora 28 is officially here! also available for secondary architectures

>> It's almost Mother's Day, and that means it's time for Fedora 28, >> which is officially released today. >> >> Congratulations to everyone who contributed to this amazingly >> smooth and polished release. You all are awesome. >> >> Read the official announcement at: >> >> *

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >