On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:48:23PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> cgnslib seems to be missing in pkgdb for some reason.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/cgnslib/
Though search for all should have returned it, I'm fixing that bug.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproj
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 05:36:45PM +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I thought maybe it was a problem with dropbox but I uploaded my srpms to
> > fedorapeople.org and builds are still failing to download...
> can you provide link?
I hav
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:54:16PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> ... another set of broken links:
>
> When entering a package's "updates" GUI
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
> the "Package Database" link returns "Not Found"
>
> Real world example:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:46:30PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 22.5.2014 16:17, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> >
> >user: silfreed changed point of contact of package: gpsbabel from:
> >silfreed to: corsepiu on branch: f20
> >
> >To make changes to this package see:
> >https://admin.fedoraproject.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:29:08AM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:27:22PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:22:31PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sáb, 2014-05-17 at 09:27 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > &
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 06:47:54PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 06:25 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >On Wed, 21 May 2014 18:18:12 +0200
> >Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Before pkgdb2 it was possible to retrieve a plain text CSV list of
> >>package/owners pairs.
> >>
> >>Wha
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:17:37AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2014-05-20, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:00:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >> Why there is a limit on http:// and https:// URI schemata?
> >
> > I was pointed out by the p
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:00:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2014-05-16, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > * Finally, the form used in bugzilla to do SCM requests has been updated and
> > now asks for the `Upstream URL` to be specified next to the `Package Name`
> > a
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 05:50:16AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/19/2014 11:50 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:00:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >>On 2014-05-16, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>>* Finally, the form used in bugzil
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:22:31PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sáb, 2014-05-17 at 09:27 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:44 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > > There are many broken redirect links, please fix asap.
> >
> > It&#x
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:16:30AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 09:39:23AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sat, 17 May 2014 09:30:59 +0200
> > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
&g
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:00:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2014-05-16, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > * Finally, the form used in bugzilla to do SCM requests has been updated and
> > now asks for the `Upstream URL` to be specified next to the `Package Name`
> > a
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:41:06AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 19.5.2014 07:53, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:35:25PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>I am curious about this as well. The URL should be taken from RPM and
> >>refreshed with
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:35:25PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I am curious about this as well. The URL should be taken from RPM and
> refreshed with every update of the package. The same applies for Summary and
> Description.
Very simply, there is work in progress to write a cron script that will
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 09:49:42AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 05/17/2014 02:30 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >There is a ticket opened for this [1] that I am thinking to fix by
> >adding a confirmation step on the "Request Commit Access" button asking
> &g
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 09:39:23AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 17 May 2014 09:30:59 +0200
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:18 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Note t
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:18 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Note that 'fedpkg retire' happens to be broken at the moment
> (bug 1098462) so I cannot retire this package at the moment.
You can do it via the UI directly.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 09:35 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > It seems it is not possible to request commit access in a single
> > branch? It's all or nothing now?
>
> The UI is not very clear...
>
> Click on "Manage the committers" to request a single branch.
>
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:44 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> There are many broken redirect links, please fix asap.
It's not that there are many broken redirect it's that we didn't put in
place any redirect atm :)
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
Dear all,
Here is some information regarding the consequences of deploying pkgdb2:
* The first and most annoying one is that PkgDB2 having a new API, it needs
a new packagedb-cli [1] which is necessary to have `fedpkg retire` working.
There is already a bug opened for it [2] but the solution is s
After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
pkgdb is the application that manages package metadata for Fedora, including
commit access for packagers, bugzilla assignment, and scm changes notifications.
A few of the m
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:34:42PM -0400, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Flavio Leitner"
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:29:07 PM
> > Subject: fedpkg update returning internal server error
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 08:53:30AM +0200, Honza Horak wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is related to the new pkgdb2 effort, but may be.
>
> The problem I had the last days was that the old pkgdb seemed broken
> for me and at least one other guy I asked. Today I found the reason
> -- it seems that URL
Dear all,
A while ago I introduced you the dev instance of pkgdb2. Since then, I have been
working some more on it.
I recently updated pgkdb-cli to work with the new API [1] as well as writing
a python module for those that want to script against said API [2].
On March 10th, pkgdb2 made it to sta
Dear all,
Today, Ralph and I braced ourselves and went onto the fedora-meeting,
fedora-meeting-1 and fedora-meeting-2 calendars on fedocal and moved all the
meetings in there into other calendars.
With the introduction of the meeting location, having a dedicated calendar for
the irc chans does no
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:23:03PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:13:32PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > My question is thus, is there anyone here that is using
> > RHEL5/CentOS5 to do packaging for Fedora/EPEL? If so, and if you
> > rel
Hi everyone,
As you may know I am working on updating our package database (pkgdb) to a new
version named pkgdb2. In this process, pkgdb-cli has got re-writen and now ships
a pkgdb2.py python module that can be used as an interface to query the pkgdb2
API.
The thing is that fedpkg relies on pkgdb-
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 04:59:23PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:39:44AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:00 AM, wrote:
> >
> > > Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
> > > ===
> >
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:17:18AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > Hi,
> >
> > See:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063259
>
> It's not, and it's probably just an oversight. Feel free to cherry-pick the
> updates
> from F20 into master.
If
Hi,
Do we have someone coordinating the Fedora project for the GSOC of this year?
I may have an idea for a project but my google-fu do not return a wiki page for
2014.
Thanks,
Pierre
pgpH3zlfxN7lG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:10:39PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Planned Outage: Fedocal outage for update - 2014-01-30 10:30 UTC
>
> There will be an outage starting at 2014-01-30 10:30 UTC, which will last
> approximately 1 hours, possibly less.
>
> To convert UTC
Planned Outage: Fedocal outage for update - 2014-01-30 10:30 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2014-01-30 10:30 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hours, possibly less.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:20:33AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 23.01.2014 19:26, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
> > wrote:
> > The packaging guidelines are very daunting. Automating as much of
> > that as possible, either through spec c
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 01:00:29AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:53:47PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:26:24 -0800
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I think ideally any process around this should have at least two parts:
> >
> > a) an
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 01:23:13AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> > IMHO you're absolutely wrong. Fortunately it seems that not so much
> > people agree with you since I see a lot of activily on a given
> > third-party proprietary web service (compared with a dead silence at
>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:45:22PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 12.12.2013 14:42, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >>>On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are
> >>p
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 09:55 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Dan Mashal [10/12/2013 11:29] :
> >
> > Can we get a "my packages" button? Or am I blind and not seeing one?
>
> There's a "Restrict to owner:" form where you can enter your FAS username.
Also works if you just click on your nick on th
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:52:58PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 02:20 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> >> So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do,
> >> but don't
> >> forget to report how you did it a
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are
> passing
> and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be
> a
> good time to call for testers and collect
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:07:55AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Hey,
>
> recently, I saw a few requests to update python-django to Django-1.6,
> the corresponding bug is [1].
>
> As there are quite a few changes, I'd expect this update to be harmful,
> at least
> - python-django-openstack-auth
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 01:48:53PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > You're forgeting, patch/code reviews,
> >
> > Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tra
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > You're forgeting, patch/code reviews,
>
> Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the
> maintainer, apply it with git am and push it; where's the pr
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:34:19PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>By using github you are also eliminating the possibility of some people to
>contribute to your project. I personally won't create an account on
>github. Just because I believe that open projects should be hosted on open
>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:34:28PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > The reason is simple. Fedorahosted lacks features, is unplesant and need
> > byrocracy even to create a repository.
>
> Creating a repository is actually the only time "bureaucracy" is required.
> Giving write
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:19:35AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:42AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > One thing which is probably an issue with the import process: I looked at
> > the package kdelibs-experimental which has been retired, as
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:42AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> One thing which is probably an issue with the import process: I looked at
> the package kdelibs-experimental which has been retired, as seen on pkgdb1:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/kdelibs-experimental
> (see Stat
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:16:53AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Yesterday I updated the production servers to fedocal 0.3.0.
I just pushed a small 0.3.1 update allowing to edit meeting that have already
occured.
> This new version is available as before on:
> https://apps.fedorapr
Yesterday I updated the production servers to fedocal 0.3.0.
With it comes a number of features and bugfixes:
* Select the timezone when adding a new meeting
* Pre-view of the meeting description (allows Markdown -> html)
* iCal export link easier to find/copy for mobile devices
* Calendar can be d
Yesterday I updated the production servers to fedocal 0.3.0.
With it comes a number of features and bugfixes:
* Select the timezone when adding a new meeting
* Pre-view of the meeting description (allows Markdown -> html)
* iCal export link easier to find/copy for mobile devices
* Calendar can be d
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:57:38PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:52:27 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > The development instance of pkgdb2 is at:
> >
> > http://209.132.184.188/
>
> That page says "Version 1.0.0" at the
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:05:10PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dne 13.11.2013 14:52, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
> >don't
> >forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you hav
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 03:20:30PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > - The idea of "owner" of a package disapear. There are only maintainers on
> > which
> > one of them appears to be
Dear all,
I have been working for some time on the next version of packagedb/pkgdb [1].
I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are passing
and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be a
good time to call for testers and collect bug re
Hi,
I have just tagged, build and pushed a new fedocal update, 0.2.0, available as
before at:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/
With this update comes a number of improvements:
- Move to OpenID (and more specifically FAS-OpenID)
- Redesign of the home page (no more one calendar by defaul
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:18:35AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:12:31PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > Error: Auth was requested but no way to perform auth was given.
> > Please set username and password or session_id before calling this
> > function with auth=True
> > Coul
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 10:58 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200
> > > Jakub Filak wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200
> > Jakub Filak wrote:
> > > a bugzilla ticket [1] requiring a better Bugzilla summary field text
> > > produced by abrt has been filed.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:56:03PM +0600, Malintha Adikari wrote:
> * Hi,
>
>I am a student who is participating GSOC 2013 for Fedora organization. I
>am developing a web application for fedora ambassadors. I want to give
>users to login facility with FAS. I could found that the F
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:55:51AM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >> On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, "Matthew Miller" wrote:
> >> > What if we made this like the "I voted" stickers -- you ca
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:08:21PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:59:40AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, "Matthew Miller"
> > > wro
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:59:40AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, "Matthew Miller" wrote:
> > > What if we made this like the "I voted" stickers -- you can get one by
> > > checking a box in the voting app? (
> Application should request the ports to be opened and the firewalld
> layer should then confirm with the user stating which ports and
> which app requested said ports. The app can't lie if the firewall
> layer is the one asking for confirmation.
But a malicious app can pretend to be another one
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 09:56:06AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 09:33:59AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
>
> > > Here's my favourite bugbear: https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/243
> > >
> > >
> > > I have no idea wh
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 01:10:07PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> [subsurface]
> subsurface-3.1.1-2.fc20.i686 requires libosmgpsmap.so.2
This is going to be hard to fix for the moment.
lib-osm-gps-map has been updated to the version 1.0 which is gtk3+ while
subsurface is gtk2 only.
T
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 08:31:41PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I didn't say GSoc can't get help from others.
>
> But it's hard to understand the context of a self-introduction with
> gitlab(Ruby?) then with GSoC?
As you are removing all context from your emails: yes.
And I am not the first o
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:52:59PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> You shouldn't mention gitlab as it's a GSoC project.
I do not understand this, maybe I'm missing something, some context (that is
missing from your email).
Plus, even for a GSoC project one can get help from the community.
Pierr
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:49:45PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
> > ===
> >
> > 39 packages were orphaned
>
> This is an amazing report. Thanks again to the guys who create it.
>
> The many orphans are too
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 02:40 -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > python2 and python3 are separate languages. There is a lot of
> similarity
> > between the two and with recent enough versions of python2 (2.7) and
> python3
> > (python3.4) and some external libraries (python-six) and by sticking
> to
On , Ding Yi Chen wrote:
Even if you do, you cannot change the exist tutorial, blog, and forums
that
refer /var/log/messages.
Image the following scenario:
Suppose a Fedora newbie (or linux newbie) encounters a problem,
most of the search results state: Check /var/log/messages
He/She will be v
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 21:25 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 20:48 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:14:46 + (UTC), nobody fedoraproject org wrote:
> >
> > > 9 packages were orphaned
> >
> > > ph
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +, nob...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
> > ===
>
> To whoever is creating these messages:
> Please add a message about wh
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:23 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +, nob...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
>
> How about changing the report time to to last 48-216 hours, then ongoing
> ownership transfers would be recognised as
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 18:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:00:04AM +, nob...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
> > ===
>
> To whoever is creating these messages:
That would be me (and infra)
>
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 20:48 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:14:46 + (UTC), nobody fedoraproject org wrote:
>
> > 9 packages were orphaned
>
> > php-pecl-apc [devel] was orphaned by remi
> > APC caches and optimizes PHP intermediate code
> > https://admin.fedo
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 15:55 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
[...]
In a community of volunteers there are two ways to treat someone's work
when you are no satisfied with it:
a) tell him/her, his/her work matters and push him/her to improve where
you think it should be improved (eventually by
On , Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
Hi,
It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted
with the latest version in upstream?
Officially, it is a SHOULD (as pointed out by Volker), practically it is
pretty much consider as a MUST unless there is/are valid reason(s) not
to.
The
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 14:58 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> 3) reports on source url which don't work - havent been done in a
> llong time afaik and needs to be automated and way to silence them in
> known cases in a per package way (by checking in a file into the git
> repo for that package for ins
On , Eugene Pivnev wrote:
27.05.2013 17:26, Peter Lemenkov пишет:
2013/5/27 Eugene Pivnev :
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/leechcaft
You made a typo in the name here but that does not matter actually (see
below)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/leechcraft
This packa
On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 22:05 +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> R-RUnit:
> f19 > f20 (R-RUnit-0.4.26-7.fc19 R-RUnit-0.4.26-6.fc20)
>
> R-Rcompression:
> f19 > f20 (R-Rcompression-0.93.2-8.fc19
> R-Rcompression-0.93.2-7.fc20)
These two are fixed.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 20:12 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Quoting Rahul Sundaram (2013-05-15 19:55:17)
> > On 05/15/2013 01:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > As you can see from the output at the end of my email, not everyone does
> > > it ;-)
> >
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 13:15 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/15/2013 12:59 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Would it be of interest to have a daily mail with the ownership changes
> > that happened over the last 24h (or make it bi-daily and 48h or
> > weekly...)?
&
Dear all,
Ian Weller and Ralf Bean have pushed to producation datagrepper two days
ago [1]. This is basically a public API to query messages that went on
the fedmsg bus thus given a way to make some statistics and provide some
information.
I have been playing with it with the idea that not all pa
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 09:59 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 05:32 AM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > It is a webapp that allows users to upvote/downvote tags on packages as
> > well as rate packages themselves. The data will end up getting pulled into
> > yum repo metadata by the bodhi masher
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
> > make decisions and if you don't like it "too bad".
>
> Even if that is true, what is your point?
That
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 15:22 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
> > Hidden by default and showing it on demand is likely to still be a
> > hindrance to people who may not know they type their password wrong
> > ( because I think most assume that it will work fine, we are not to
> a
> > point where people a
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 17:48 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:55:02 +0200
> Rave it wrote:
>
> > Am Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:37:34 +
> > schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> >
> > For me as compiz maintainer those info's are complete useless whithout
> > having more i
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 16:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:08:24PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Please tell me, what's wrong with pkgdb and feel free to suggest how it
> > could be fixed.
>
> I don't know if "pkgdb&
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 07:43 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> > Is there any guidance as when to trim %changelog down to size? Some
> > packages have thousands of lines of spec file dating back over 15
> > years which seem kinda redundant now we're using git.
>
> To me, common
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 12:34 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> ownership of a package by a group
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 05:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> It would be nice to be able to change acls without having to enable
javascript.
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 03:29 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> 1) It's slow.
On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 15:28 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> It returns you to pkgdb to set acls and the relationships tab gives an
> error. I was mainly looking at it to manage permissions (right now).
Packages is not meant for this
> And when I meant functional I meant FULLY functional, meaning I
> w
On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 02:39 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > John5342 wrote:
> >> I think searching applications by default is a stupid idea when that
> >> web app is mostly used by packagers
> >
> > I think it's a stupid idea, period. The default
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 04:48 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
> Please undo this change immediately and wait more than 2 days before
> you split such a massive group of important packages.
Maybe you could say what you find problematic with these changes instead
of this aggressive tone?
Pierre
--
devel
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 11:04 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> In that situation my first instinct would be to go into the control
> panel and poke around and see if there was something I could fix
> there, and maybe search online for an answer. My first instinct would
> not be to reboot the system and g
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 07:09 +, Clive Hills wrote:
> Spot's poll is interesting - I see SecureID hard tokens leading the
> hard
> tokens featured (7am UTC Thursday) but how does an individual buy one?
If you are referring to
https://sparkslinux.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/poll-what-multi-factor-au
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 11:49 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Wrong list, please.
How so?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 23:39 -0700, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> can I use my existing openid? kurt.seifried.org.
If you run your own openid server then of course you can use your openid
to login on website that requires *an* openid (ask.fp.o, stackoverflow,
pypi...).
However, in the futur, a number of t
Hi,
For the record, I took over the ownership of the following package from
Sandro (aka red):
R-ROC
R-affydata
R-fibroEset
R-hgu133acdf
R-hgu95av2cdf
R-statmod
R-timeDate
R-xtable
Pierre
___
r-devel mailing list
r-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 12:35 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > uses something different, XFCE has its own,
> >> gnome fallback goes EOL in F19... I see LXDE installs it, but it
> could
> >> probably switch to one of the alternatives?
> >
> > Looking over guake, I believe it just requires *a* notification
>
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 21:55 +0200, Onuralp SEZER wrote:
> Also why did you enable "test" repository ? Is there any reason for to
> do that ?
Is there a reason not to do it? As in, if one wants to test and report
the problem as they appear, enabling testing seems like a good thing to
do. Also, the
801 - 900 of 993 matches
Mail list logo
