X11 lockups the system
I've reported a X11 bug system, I'm using KDE on F15, if you suffers the same problem, it could be great take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726982 Sorry if it's duplicated -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Power and brightness issue
I've read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs/Common#Laptop_screen_dims_when_switching_to_battery_power_or_idle_mode_but_never_brightens_again My system suffers the same symptoms but I use KDE. So it seems that is not GNOME restricted. Using F15 on x86_64 cat /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy default performance [powersave] any ideas? TIA -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: X11 lockups the system
2011/7/31 Rajeesh K Nambiar rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com: On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote: I've reported a X11 bug system, I'm using KDE on F15, if you suffers the same problem, it could be great take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726982 Sorry if it's duplicated I assume you have an Intel graphics card; I can reliably reproduce the issue with an Intel GM45 graphics card This is the modalias device of the card: alias: pci:v8086d0116sv*sd*bc03sc*i - easiest way is to enable OpenGL screensavers. Just test any of the OpenGL screensavers and the system is frozen. Yes... I run a few of them and it was frozed. I've disabled desktop effects but after a while it frozed again. I've tested memory with memtest, I think that is not a failure of hardware. Nothing interesting found in /var/log/messages or /var/log/Xorg.0.log though. Yes the say nothing about crash -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com -- Cheers, Rajeesh http://rajeeshknambiar.wordpress.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Power and brightness issue
2011/8/2 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 15:37 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: I've read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs/Common#Laptop_screen_dims_when_switching_to_battery_power_or_idle_mode_but_never_brightens_again My system suffers the same symptoms but I use KDE. So it seems that is not GNOME restricted. Using F15 on x86_64 cat /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy default performance [powersave] any ideas? That bug certainly was GNOME specific: it was a bug in gnome-power-manager 's logic. There's no way that specific bug could affect KDE, unless somehow you're running g-p-m in KDE. If you're seeing a similar issue in KDE, it must track down to a different bug, so please file it. Be aware, though, that the display dimming somewhat when you disconnect the AC power is 'normal': both KDE and GNOME do this to save battery power. Yes of course Adam, I know it :) The bug in this case was that when you re-connected to AC the brightness did not increase again, but if you then disconnected from AC once more the brightness would decrease further This is the symptom that I'm talking about! - so you got stuck in a descending spiral of darkness until the screen was stuck at its lowest possible brightness setting until you adjusted it manually or rebooted. If the screen dims somewhat (to, say, 50%) when you unplug, goes back up to 100% when you plug back in, then dims back to 50% when you unplug again, that's intended behaviour and not a bug (though if you don't like it, it's configurable). Well in this case when I plug AC, kde applet says Performance, but screen is still dimmed, I have to select again Performance and maximum brigthness come back! So it seems a kde bug, isn't it? Thanks Adam for your help, I remember you since Mandriva days :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Compiler as Require
Hi Is it OK include a compiler (eg gcc-c++) for a -devel subpackage? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fix of License tag in UpTools
I will fix the license of UpTools package, it was mistagged as BSD but is BSD with attribution. -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rpmlint complains about BSD with attribution
Hi, I'd want to notify that rmplint warns about BSD with attribution, I mean it hasn't the complete list of valid licenses of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses. Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rpmlint complains about BSD with attribution
2011/9/19 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu: SB == Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com writes: SB I'd want to notify that rmplint warns about BSD with SB attribution, Please file a bug against rpmlint. OK, I will do it:) - J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
About Feature enhancement Updates Policy
Hi, I've read the examples about updates allowed and I've read in examples section: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Examples Abiword releases a new version that adds compatibility with WordStar 4.0 documents. It also completely updates the user interface to use pie menus. This would be a feature enhancement with a major user experience change, and would not be allowed. Is that requirement honored? Because unless I miss something there is a lot of updates that include only enhancements. Is not my will to create a controversy but perhaps there is something in the guideliness that needs (at the risk of sounding repeating) update And let's say that we have a package foo-5.5 that has libfoo.so 1.0.0 and you make a package 6.0 with library libfoo.so 2.0.0. What should I do: a. Submit foo 6.0 as an update b. Submit foo 6.0 that coexists with foo 5.5 c. Submit foo 6.0 only for rawhide. What is the right option? Sorry if I did 2 questions at once. Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: About Feature enhancement Updates Policy
2011/9/25 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com: On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:19:45 -0300 Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've read the examples about updates allowed and I've read in examples section: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Examples Abiword releases a new version that adds compatibility with WordStar 4.0 documents. It also completely updates the user interface to use pie menus. This would be a feature enhancement with a major user experience change, and would not be allowed. Is that requirement honored? Because unless I miss something there is a lot of updates that include only enhancements. Is not my will to create a controversy but perhaps there is something in the guideliness that needs (at the risk of sounding repeating) update Perhaps you mean 'enforced' ? Yup, I do, I wrote it in a hurry and my english sometimes is not so good :) If there is an enhancement update that adds to, but doesn't change the user experience, thats fine. And let's say that we have a package foo-5.5 that has libfoo.so 1.0.0 and you make a package 6.0 with library libfoo.so 2.0.0. What should I do: a. Submit foo 6.0 as an update b. Submit foo 6.0 that coexists with foo 5.5 c. Submit foo 6.0 only for rawhide. What is the right option? As with most things in life: It depends. ;) Very likely the answer is c. If there's a security bug or serious problem that is solved only in the new version and can't be easily backported to the existing one you could push it in stable releases. You should ask for an exception for that most likely. Note that if other packages depend on this library, you MUST coordinate with all consumers of that library to make sure they work with the new version and push the update at the same time, etc. b would be an option if there's some reason to keep the old version around... ie, consumers aren't updating to work with the new version and won't for a long time. This would also be done in rawhide unless there was a very good reason not to. Thanks for your explanation, it's somewhat better that I can read at wiki :) kevin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
About repo option in kickstart file
Hi, I've created and appended an repo option to a kickstart file, then I've created an iso with livecd-creator and it works fine. Packages of that repo are installed in the ISO file. The problem is that the repo file is not created in the installed system generated from LiveCD. Is that the expected behaviour? Should I download the repo file using a %post section? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Install from ISO file supported
Hi Fedora community, AFAIK fedup only works with DVD iso files not with LiveCD iso files: I was reading the thread at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2013-January/429113.htmlsomething interesting about it ISO files are still useful, for example to test in a quicky way on a Virtual machine, but I don't know you, but I'm sick of burning CDs I think that the best and more confortable method to upgrade the OS should be: 1. Download a LiveCD Fedora.iso (it takes less time than download the DVD iso file) 2. Launch fedup --iso Fedora-LiveCD.iso, that make the job of adjusting GRUB2 i.a. 3. Reboot the system 3. Choose LiveCD entry from GRUB2) Perform the installation as you wish And forget about of burning optical discs Of course this does not cover all cases, for example, you should preserve the partition where ISO image file is. What do you think? Greetings -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Install from ISO file supported
2013/1/20 Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com Hi, 1. Download a LiveCD Fedora.iso (it takes less time than download the DVD iso file) 2. Launch fedup --iso Fedora-LiveCD.iso, that make the job of adjusting GRUB2 i.a. 3. Reboot the system 3. Choose LiveCD entry from GRUB2) Perform the installation as you wish Unfortunately, the way the livecd's currently work, they can't be used to do upgrades. They merely copy the live installation byte for byte to the selected hardisk volumes, blowing away anything that's already there. --Ray -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Good point Ray, but even so I guess that in many of us have a /home directory so we can install the new version freshly... -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Install from ISO file supported
2013/1/22 Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov On 01/20/2013 11:43 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Ray Strodewrote: Hi, I find it easier (and smaller) to download the netinst.iso (like Fedora-18-x86_64-netinst.iso) Loop-back mount and pull the vmlinuz and initrd.img into /boot The vmlinuz and initrd are made available separately here: http://mirrors.kernel.org/**fedora//releases/18/Fedora/** x86_64/os/images/pxeboot/http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora//releases/18/Fedora/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot/ So you can avoid the loop-back mount. It's a good tip, though. Sometimes creating a grub entry is the most straightforward way to get things rolling. Ideally, fedup should do this as a option. If someone wants it, file a RFE I thought fedup does this already? What am I missing here---I just ran fedup for the first time the other day and it created a new default 'Update Fedora' entry during boot. How is it different from what you are discussing here? We're talking about of using a LiveCD ISO file -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
hardlink command
I've found the interesting tool hardlink, supposedly it scans directories looking for duplicates files and eventually can consolidate them using hardlinks Well it doesn't work for me, eg: [sergio@madryn tmp]$ ls /tmp/test1 /tmp/test2 /tmp/test1: alpha /tmp/test2: alpha [sergio@madryn tmp]$ hardlink -n -v -v /tmp/ Directories 11 Objects 25 IFREG 9 Comparisons 0 Would link 0 Would save 0 Only it works if I use the -c option: [sergio@madryn tmp]$ hardlink -c -v -v /tmp/ Linked /tmp//alpha to /tmp//examples/alpha, saved 12 Linked /tmp//test1/alpha to /tmp//test2/alpha, saved 558 Directories 11 Objects 25 IFREG 9 Comparisons 2 Linked 2 saved 8192 [sergio@madryn tmp]$ ls -i /tmp/test1 /tmp/test2 /tmp/test1: 46798 alpha /tmp/test2: 46798 alpha Please tell me if it happens you the same, so I report the bug, don't I? OS and pkg Data: [sergio@madryn tmp]$ cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) [sergio@madryn tmp]$ rpm -q hardlink hardlink-1.0-17.fc19.x86_64 Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
About mtune=atom
Hi, I've read on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros_and_variables that mtune=atom. Just because I'm curious, why? :) Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
About build system used on fedora packages
Hi, I wonder is there out is some statistic about build system for construct the packages. I mean: autotools, cmake, scons, plain makefile, etc. Of course I could download a entire repo and take a look at each package, but I have no enough space ;) I look forward your comments. Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
About build system used on fedora packages (now with some statistics)
Hi, Some time ago, I wondered what package build system is the most used on Fedora, well I took 101 packages at random and I've found the following: 37 packages with autotools: Packages with either configure.ac or configure.in and Makefile.am or Makefile.in 5 packages with cmake: Packages that contains CMakeLists.txt 21 packages with “only” [Mm]akefile, 36 packages with “autotools procedure”: Paquetes that has “./configure make” in its spec file You can read more at: http://www.sergiobelkin.com/2011/03/12/sistemas-de-construccion-de-paquetes-parte-3/ Sorry, is in spanish, all sugesstion are welcome :) HTH -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaning some packages
2011/3/13 Andrea Veri av...@fedoraproject.org: Il giorno 13/mar/2011, alle ore 16.04, Brian Pepple ha scritto: * xchat-gnome I might be interested in adopting this package. I am not really used on how packages adoptions work in Fedora. I wasnt able to find a nice wiki page for that either, so it would be great if someone could show me the right way for doing this. (i.e a wiki page) Andrea -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Hi Andrea, AFAIK, this page is what you are looking for: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package_Procedure HTH -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Package SCM admin requests
Hi Fedora devel community :) I've made yesterday a Package SCM admin request and I haven't received a notification yet. I'm not in a hurry but on earlier requests I had receive answer after a few hours: The ticket is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683684 TIA -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Package SCM admin requests
2011/3/17 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu SB == Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com writes: SB I've made yesterday a Package SCM admin request and I haven't SB received a notification yet. Well, you made your request just after I had processed the queue yesterday and chose to complain before I had processed the queue this morning. Hey, Jason, I don't complain at all, just asking a question :) SB I'm not in a hurry but on earlier requests I had receive answer SB after a few hours: You should be a bit more patient. Perhaps I should, again did you read that I'm not in a hurry, simply I was wondering if it had a problem, because in earlier times the granting after a few hours, no reproach at all, so please relax :) - J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: libmysqlclient soname version bumped by upstream
2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com: On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote: I wrote: The ticket is here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573 You can go ahead and rebuild for rawhide. According to the ticket F-15 builds should be done with fedpkg build --target=dist-f15-mysql As of right now that target seems to not work. Watch the ticket for updates. (Rawhide builds work for me, though.) regards, tom lane It should be working now. -- Marcela Mašláňová BaseOS team Brno -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Hi I've received a mail saying: UpTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: UpTools-8.5.4-11.fc16.x86_64 requires libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16)(64bit) UpTools-8.5.4-11.fc16.x86_64 requires libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit) On i386: UpTools-8.5.4-11.fc16.i686 requires libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16) UpTools-8.5.4-11.fc16.i686 requires libmysqlclient.so.16 Please resolve this as soon as possible. Has this has to do with the topic of this thread? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: libmysqlclient soname version bumped by upstream
2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com: On 03/23/2011 12:46 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: 2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com: On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote: I wrote: The ticket is here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573 You can go ahead and rebuild for rawhide. According to the ticket F-15 builds should be done with fedpkg build --target=dist-f15-mysql As of right now that target seems to not work. Watch the ticket for updates. (Rawhide builds work for me, though.) regards, tom lane It should be working now. -- Marcela Mašláňová BaseOS team Brno -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Hi I've received a mail saying: UpTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: UpTools-8.5.4-11.fc16.x86_64 requires libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16)(64bit) UpTools-8.5.4-11.fc16.x86_64 requires libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit) On i386: UpTools-8.5.4-11.fc16.i686 requires libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16) UpTools-8.5.4-11.fc16.i686 requires libmysqlclient.so.16 Please resolve this as soon as possible. Has this has to do with the topic of this thread? Thanks in advance! Yes, it does. It looks like releng made a mistake and tag it into F-15 buildroot, so dependencies are broken. From ticket: 'the new mysql was tagged into the regular buildroot, its available to everyone.' You could try to rebuild it :-/ -- Marcela Mašláňová BaseOS team Brno -- It's Only for rawhide isn't it? -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: mass rebuild of mysql packages in F-15
2011/3/23 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz: Dan Horák píše v St 23. 03. 2011 v 17:30 +0100: Tom Lane píše v St 23. 03. 2011 v 12:27 -0400: Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com writes: Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed mass rebuild. Of course, all these packages need to be rebuilt in rawhide too. I don't think dhorak is offering to do that, so if you own one of them, please do launch a rawhide build. it's few more lines in the script so I can rebuilt the rawhide branch too The F-15 and rawhide rebuilds are finished now with some failures collectd gmyth grass (f15 only) gstreamer-plugins-bad-free mapserver (f15 only) pure-ftpd ser snort zoneminder (Jason knows about it) FWIW Should We not my dependant package the rest of packages because have been already rebuilt? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: mass rebuild of mysql packages in F-15
FWIW I meant FWIU :) -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: mass rebuild of mysql packages in F-15
2011/3/24 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com writes: FWIW Should We not my dependant package the rest of packages because have been already rebuilt? If you have a package that uses libmysqlclient.so, and it's not already listed in koji list-tagged dist-f15-mysql, Yes it is listed: koji list-tagged dist-f15-mysql | grep UpTools UpTools-8.5.4-12.fc15 dist-f15-mysqlsharkcz Thanks sharkcz :) -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: disabling -Werror on a autotools based build
2011/3/27 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de: On 03/27/2011 11:22 AM, gia...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to rebuild a package with an autotools based toolchain and it's failing because they use -Werror and gcc 4.6 spits out few new warnings on the code. Packages adding -Werror by themselves are poorly designed. Just to learn: Ralf, Why do you say that? :-) -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Different spec for el5
Hi fedora community, I maintain ftop package. I've made fedora and el6 packages. Taking account different requirements for epel5 packages, now I'd want to make an el el5 package. It's not clear what i should do. 1. If I create an new spec with conditionals touch fedora packages and el6 but does make sense increase EVR only for it? 2. If I create a modified spec for el5, should I increase the EVR? Can a package have a different EVR of el6 and fedora ones? Or can an el5 package has the same EVR that el6 and fedora ones but different content? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with libtool archives
2011/4/1 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de: On 04/01/2011 03:17 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi Just a find on my Fedora 15 system for .la files, results in the following. Do we run any routine tests for things like this? is AutoQA meant to improve packaging? I sense a misunderstanding. Though it's right, in general *.la's should not be shipped, there is no rule which is strictly prohibiting shipping *.la's, because there are situations when *.la's can not be avoided to be shipped. Wha situations? :) I.e. blindly rejecting packages which carry *.la's would be wrong. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Interlinux waiting list
Sorry... Did I miss something? -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Changelog entries on older package
Hi,
Let's say that you make a RPM for fedora, and then you want to make
for epel5. Should I keep the fedora entries on changelog?
Second question is somewhat silly, but I make it, just in case. Let's
say that you want to make a epe6 package too.
I've read at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches
that I should add set something as 1%{?dist}.1 on Release to make
older that epel6 package. Should I add the same for the changelog
entry on epel5 package?
I mean:
* Tue Mar 01 2011 Sergio Belkin seb...@fedoraproject.org - 1%{?dist}.1 ?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Changelog entries on older package
2011/5/10 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Tue, 10 May 2011 09:59:12 -0300
Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Let's say that you make a RPM for fedora, and then you want to make
for epel5. Should I keep the fedora entries on changelog?
I usually do, yes. It's history of the package...
Good point
Second question is somewhat silly, but I make it, just in case. Let's
say that you want to make a epe6 package too.
I've read at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches
that I should add set something as 1%{?dist}.1 on Release to make
older that epel6 package. Should I add the same for the changelog
entry on epel5 package?
I mean:
* Tue Mar 01 2011 Sergio Belkin seb...@fedoraproject.org -
1%{?dist}.1 ?
No need.
EPEL doesn't need you to preserve the upgrade path between major
releases like Fedora does. AFAIK in RHEL upgrades between major
releases are simply not supported. You are expected to re-install if
you go from RHEL5 to RHEL6. So, no requirement that the RHEL5 version
be less than the RHEL6 one. ;)
Hopefully I understood your question...
you did
did that help?
Yes it did :)
kevin
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Disable Dependency tracking
Hi, I'd want to know if makes sense disable dependecy tracking at build stage, I mean, put in spec file: ./configure --disable-dependency-tracking Because it speeds build. What do you think? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Disable Dependency tracking
2011/5/13 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee: On 05/13/2011 03:51 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: I'd want to know if makes sense disable dependecy tracking at build stage, I mean, put in spec file: ./configure --disable-dependency-tracking Because it speeds build. What do you think? We already have that in the %configure macro, which you should almost always use instead of just calling ./configure: $ rpm -E %configure [snip] ./configure --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu \ --program-prefix= \ --disable-dependency-tracking \ --prefix=/usr \ --exec-prefix=/usr \ --bindir=/usr/bin \ --sbindir=/usr/sbin \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --datadir=/usr/share \ --includedir=/usr/include \ --libdir=/usr/lib64 \ --libexecdir=/usr/libexec \ --localstatedir=/var \ --sharedstatedir=/var/lib \ --mandir=/usr/share/man \ --infodir=/usr/share/info Hope this helps, Kalev Thanks Kalev, everyday one learn something new! However I've seen that mock when make a build for epel5 does not disable dependency tracking: DEBUG: + ./configure --build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-experimental=no --disable-static LDFLAGS=-L/usr/lib/mysql Is that right? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
License fix in UpTools
Hi, There was an error in License tag in UpTools package it was wrongly mislabeled as BSD with advertisement, it was replaced by BSD with attribution. Fixed on 8.5.4-15 and newer releases. Greets. -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
More than one version of a package
Hi, Let's say I have package X 1.0 I'd want to upload an srpm of X 1.1 and make build a newer version of X but keep the old ones for f13 and f14. Is that similar to upload a new package, I mean for each branch: 1. fedpkg import package.srpm 2. fedpkg commit 3 fedpkg build And 4. fedpkg update Is that right? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: More than one version of a package
2011/5/16 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com: On Mon, 16 May 2011 18:11:15 -0300 Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Let's say I have package X 1.0 I'd want to upload an srpm of X 1.1 and make build a newer version of X but For rawhide/master? Hmmm, yes, is it not mandatory?: Be sure that you build for rawhide (master) branch before pushing updates for any other branches! Otherwise, those updates will get inherited into rawhide, which is almost certainly not what you want. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Check_out_the_module (And sorry for the stupid question: what does stand for module in this context?) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO If you update f13/f14 with a new version, and create an update for it, it would normally then go to updates-testing, then finally to updates I mean: the examples it seems that goes for an update in a all branches in the same way. Let's say that I'd want to keep f13/f14 with 1.0 of X package but upgrade to 1.1 for f15. How can I do that? Or other case you want o submit a maintenance for f13/f14 to 1.0.1. Can coexist both versions? Thanks in advance! kevin -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
How to undo a build
Hi, I made a build with a wrong spec file (shame on me) and I've untagged the builds but when I wan to run fedpkg build, it outputs: Could not initiate build: UpTools-8.5.5-1.fc16 has already been built Is there a way to undo or drop the build and do it again? Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Anaconda won't detect partitions
Hi, I've tried to migrate on my job desktop from Mandriva to Fedora, but I couldn't do it. (I've created a liveusb using liveusb-creator ) But installer fails to detect partitions on hard disk (only can see usb drive) and it outputs something like: The storage device below may contain data and We could not detect partitions or filesystems on this device I've read bug entry at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701130 But my hard disk have no encrypted partition! And the partition utility from F15 that is out of Anaconda can see the partition with no problem. this the hard disk layout: Disco /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 1600 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19452 cylinders Units = cilindros of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0080 Disposit. Inicio Comienzo Fin Bloques Id Sistema /dev/sda1 * 1 3824 30716248+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda2 3825 10438 53126955 83 Linux /dev/sda3 14226 19324 40957717+ b W95 FAT32 /dev/sda4 10439 19452 72404955 5 Extendida /dev/sda5 10439 13009 20651526 83 Linux /dev/sda6 13010 14225 9767488+ 83 Linux /dev/sda7 19325 19452 1028128+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris Las entradas de la tabla de particiones no están en el orden del disco Below it is the message log entries: May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: sdb May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found non-disk device: sdb1 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found non-disk device: sr0 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: sda May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found non-disk device: sda1 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found non-disk device: sda2 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found non-disk device: sda3 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found non-disk device: sda4 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found non-disk device: sda5 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found non-disk device: sda6 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found non-disk device: sda7 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: loop0 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: loop1 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: loop2 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: loop3 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: loop4 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: loop5 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: loop6 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: loop7 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: dm-0 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: dm-1 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: devices to scan: ['sdb', 'sdb1', 'sr0', 'sda', 'sda1', 'sda2', 'sda3', 'sda4', 'sda5', 'sda6', 'sda7', 'loop0', 'loop1', 'loop2', 'loop3', 'loop4', 'loop5', 'loop6', 'loop7', 'dm-0', 'dm-1'] May 26 09:23:14 localhost program: Running... modprobe scsi_wait_scan May 26 09:23:14 localhost program: Running... rmmod scsi_wait_scan May 26 09:23:14 localhost program: Running... udevadm settle --timeout=300 May 26 09:23:14 localhost program: Running... modprobe scsi_wait_scan May 26 09:23:14 localhost program: Running... rmmod scsi_wait_scan May 26 09:23:15 localhost program: Running... udevadm settle --timeout=300 Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Anaconda won't detect partitions
2011/5/26 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at: Sergio Belkin wrote: May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: dm-0 May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath device: dm-1 Try booting the installer with the nodmraid parameter. Kevin Kofler Sadly that didn't help :( So I've opened a bug ticket, if you take more ideas, they will be welcome :) Bug Linkl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708061 -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: GTK apps loog ugly
2011/5/29 Evandro Fernandes Giovanini efgiovan...@gmail.com: Em Dom, 2011-05-29 às 15:43 +0200, Christoph Frieben escreveu: 2011/5/29 Kevin Kofler: For GTK+ 3 applications, there's only one choice at this time: Adwaita, the default theme from GNOME 3. It is disturbing though that Fedora 15/Rawhide do not provide a GTK2 engine matching the GTK3 Adwaita look to make the appearance of respective applications consistent. Unfortunately, GTK2 currently defaults to using the Clearlooks engine. ~C A GTK2 theme that looks a bit more like Adwaita can be found here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1764856 (I recommend the latest one posted by ceramicm). It requires the gtk-murrine-engine package on Fedora. -- Evandro . Thanks guys for your feedback. I've found that fonts hand been affected. Fonts on Firefox looked terrible, I had to set hintstyle to none in ~/.fonts.conf HTH -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Revoking and deleting in Bodhi Web
Hi, What does it occur when an update is revoked and is deleted? I've done an updated version of package, made a build and when I write the name in Package field I've found a bit odd that new build doesn't appear in the combo box. I wonder if I did something wrong... What do you think? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Revoking and deleting in Bodhi Web
2011/6/1 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu Sergio Belkin wrote: What does it occur when an update is revoked and is deleted? I've done an updated version of package, made a build and when I write the name in Package field I've found a bit odd that new build doesn't appear in the combo box. I wonder if I did something wrong... My understanding, is in bodhi: 1. revoke an update 2. wait for next updates push to get processed if you don't wait for 2 before deleting, there's a chance nothing actually happened, and by all accounts, your update is still in the wild (and not revoked). How can I determine that nothing actually occured? koji info: Package Tag Extra Arches Owner --- --- --- UpTools dist-5E-epel sebelk Though, makes me curious, why would you revoke/delete an update, just to re- issue it again with the same build? I've revoked and deleted an update because repoclosure reported that the package had unresolved deps. I didn't reissue, I submit a newer version. Thanks in advance! -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[no subject]
Hi,
I've noted a difference between f15 and f14 on the first one
mentioned, running the following it fails:
./configure LDFLAGS=-no-install
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking how to print strings... printf
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... no
configure: error: in `/tmp/UpTools-8.5.4':
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details
On config.log
you can see:
gcc version 4.6.0 20110530 (Red Hat 4.6.0-9) (GCC)
configure:3617: $? = 0
configure:3606: gcc -V 5
gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'
gcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
configure:3617: $? = 4
configure:3606: gcc -qversion 5
gcc: error: unrecognized option '-qversion'
gcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
configure:3617: $? = 4
configure:3637: checking whether the C compiler works
configure:3659: gcc -no-install conftest.c 5
gcc: error: unrecognized option '-no-install'
configure:3663: $? = 1
configure:3701: result: no
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME UpTools
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME UpTools
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION 8.5.4
| #define PACKAGE_STRING UpTools 8.5.4
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT bugs-upto...@palermo.edu
| #define PACKAGE_URL
| #define PACKAGE UpTools
| #define VERSION 8.5.4
| /* end confdefs.h. */
|
| int
| {
|
| ;
| return 0;
| }
configure:3705: error: in `/tmp/UpTools-8.5.4':
configure:3707: error: C compiler cannot create executables
The same script doesn't fail on F14.
Do you have any idea?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Different behaviour on gcc 4.6?
Sorry, I was typing on a netbook :P and the mail it was sent without subject -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Different behaviour on gcc 4.6?
2011/6/10 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
Sergio Belkin wrote:
| int
| {
|
|;
|return 0;
| }
This is not a valid C program. Maybe GCC 4.5 accepted this junk?! GCC 4.6 is
right to error on it.
Kevin Kofler
--
Thanks Kevin, but not so fast ;) !
it was my fault, I've copied bad the snip, below is the right one,
and that is indeed a valid C program, please take a look (I wonder if
LDFLAGS=-no-install is no more valid, perhaps someone may want to
test against some source) :
gcc version 4.6.0 20110530 (Red Hat 4.6.0-9) (GCC)
configure:3618: $? = 0
configure:3607: gcc -V 5
gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V'
gcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
configure:3618: $? = 4
configure:3607: gcc -qversion 5
gcc: error: unrecognized option '-qversion'
gcc: fatal error: no input files
compilation terminated.
configure:3618: $? = 4
configure:3638: checking whether the C compiler works
configure:3660: gcc -no-install conftest.c 5
gcc: error: unrecognized option '-no-install'
configure:3664: $? = 1
configure:3702: result: no
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME UpTools
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME UpTools
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION 8.5.5
| #define PACKAGE_STRING UpTools 8.5.5
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT bugs-upto...@palermo.edu
| #define PACKAGE_URL
| #define PACKAGE UpTools
| #define VERSION 8.5.5
| /* end confdefs.h. */
|
| int
| main ()
| {
|
| ;
| return 0;
| }
configure:3707: error: in `/tmp/UpTools-8.5.5':
configure:3709: error: C compiler cannot create executables
End of snippet
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re:
2011/6/11 Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz: Hello, On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote: ./configure LDFLAGS=-no-install snip configure:3659: gcc -no-install conftest.c 5 gcc: error: unrecognized option '-no-install' Do you have any idea? -no-install, which the command explicitly includes, is a libtool option, but not a valid gcc option. I don't know why it is necessary to use -no-install, but if you do need it, you can probably patch Makefile* to include it in such a way that the operation of ./configure is not disrupted. Mirek -- I've found an example here: It's useful if someone wants to avoid the wrappers generation (look at the end): http://www.flameeyes.eu/autotools-mythbuster/libtool/wrappers.html Perhaps ./configure LDFLAGS=-no-install is somewhat heterodox -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Sparc test machine
I'd like to port UpTools package to sparc architecture. By chance is some test sparc machine there running Fedora? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
FSF address fix and timestamps
Hi Fedora community, I know that I can fix the new address of sources files with sed (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Wrong_FSF_address). I think that timestamp should not be preserved because it's a change, a really small change, but a change after all , what do you think? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: FSF address fix and timestamps
2012/6/20 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com: On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:59:26 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi Fedora community, I know that I can fix the new address of sources files with sed (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Wrong_FSF_address). I think that timestamp should not be preserved because it's a change, a really small change, but a change after all , what do you think? I think Fab who added that to the Wiki page should revert the edit. Read this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address -- So I will informe upstream about it... -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: How long can a package be in pending status?
2012/6/24 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com: On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:09:34 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, Just I am somewhat surprised that I submitted package cdw for testing and still is in status In Pending status I meant :) (I remember in previous updates that in a few hours it went to testing) . It's not a reproach, only a question, if something is wrong... Thanks in advance... It has been my experience that quite a lot of people like to have a few days off over the weekend. That also affects the not-fully-automated tasks like starting a repo compose. Ok I am waiting :) -- Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.4.3-1.fc17.x86_64 loadavg: 0.64 0.55 0.73 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: How long can a package be in pending status?
2012/6/25 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:49:54 -0300 Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/6/24 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com: On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:09:34 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, Just I am somewhat surprised that I submitted package cdw for testing and still is in status In Pending status I meant :) (I remember in previous updates that in a few hours it went to testing) . It's not a reproach, only a question, if something is wrong... Its a process manually run by humans, it happens when it happens. we try to do daily pushes but sometimes that doesnt happen when we hit corner cases. I guessed that Thanks in advance... It has been my experience that quite a lot of people like to have a few days off over the weekend. That also affects the not-fully-automated tasks like starting a repo compose. Ok I am waiting :) the signing and pushing process is manual. its run by Kevin Fenzi and myself, Kevin normally pushes on weekends but he is on Holiday so he did not do it, I stayed away from the computer on the weekend. there is a push in progress now. Thanks Dennis for your answer! Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/oaQwACgkQkSxm47BaWfcKbwCfZOO3GTcXKCwasGn0nqS9GnPh DL0An1IyG/zAIXbcaiFtITESVejoJB9C =cb3T -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Question about commiting the sources
Perhaps and stupid question: After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added to .gitignore: Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file I don't understand! By default it add sources files to .gitignore and then it asks for commit them? Is it something that I misunderstood? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Question about commiting the sources
2012/3/16 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: Perhaps and stupid question: After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added to .gitignore: Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file I don't understand! By default it add sources files to .gitignore and then it asks for commit them? Is it something that I misunderstood? It just tells you not to forget to commit the file named 'sources'. The file changes when you execute new-sources and should be commited, because it contains an md5sum of the source tarball. The message is somewhat misleading, because the 'sources' file gets staged automatically after new-sources, so if you do fedpkg commit, it gets commited anyway. The upload puts the new sources in the lookaside cache, which is outside of git, and updates the sources file, but doesn't commit it to git, because the assumption is that your have other changes to make, like updating the spec, new patches perhaps, etc. -J Hope this explanation is not even more confusing:) Best regards, -- Jan Synacek BaseOS team Brno -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org Thanks everyone for the explanation! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Question about commiting the sources
2012/3/16 Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2012 02:33 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: Perhaps and stupid question: After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added to .gitignore: Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file I don't understand! By default it add sources files to .gitignore and then it asks for commit them? Is it something that I misunderstood? It just tells you not to forget to commit the file named 'sources'. The file changes when you execute new-sources and should be commited, because it contains an md5sum of the source tarball. The message is somewhat misleading, because the 'sources' file gets staged automatically after new-sources, so if you do fedpkg commit, it gets commited anyway. It's also a bit unclear in that the thing that was added to .gitignore is the tarball file name (you don't want to check it into the VCS - that's what the lookaside is for). Maybe it would be more explicit to output a line like: Uploaded and added fooble-1.2.3-rc3-git1.tar.gz to .gitignore: Should be a quick simple patch. Regards, Bryn. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9jUWsACgkQ6YSQoMYUY95kswCgvJTVh/o5YSeY/Bv6sfOSKLwC 7BAAnA3N+i0zu9rL3BzY0D501OfTk5nL =lrjK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel +1 -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora
2012/3/23 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com: Dne 23.3.2012 16:24, Sergio Belkin napsal(a): I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat risky... What exactly are you talking about? Could you provide the URL you found? Michal -- Sorry I explained it bad, I'm talking about that latest release available of kernel for f16 is kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.x86_64 and stable is 3.2.12 -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora
2012/3/23 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: Dne 23.3.2012 17:23, Sergio Belkin napsal(a): Sorry I explained it bad, I'm talking about that latest release available of kernel for f16 is kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.x86_64 and stable is 3.2.12 That does not mean that 3.3 is somehow unstable. It is supposed to be generally usable and not dangerous. But of course there are always some bugs. That's why every $major.$minor release gets its stable branch with backported fixes. ...-- 3.2 --- 3.3-rc1 --- 3.3-rc2 --- ... --- 3.3 --- 3.4-rc1 --- ... \ \ \--- 3.2.1 --- ... --- 3.2.12 \--- 3.3.1 --- ... http://kernel.org/faq/#stablekernels And to be clear, 3.3.0-4 is a build of 3.3.0 final. It is not an rc build. kernel team builds rc kernels for early pre-releases and Rawhide, but not for stable releases. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net Thanks Adams and the rest, so all in all it's a matter of outdated information of kernel linux isn't it? -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora
2012/3/23 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: Am 23.03.2012 19:00, schrieb Konstantin Ryabitsev: On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: http://kernel.org/faq/#stablekernels I'm pretty sure that FAQ entry is a bit outdated by now, too. Basically, if it came from linux-stable.git and doesn't have an -rc in the tag, it's a stable kernel release. https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=summary PS: Ignore what it says on www.kernel.org -- those guys need to fix their script. ;) it would also help if people are using google before write and generally read one or two IT newstickers at all where you found the articles at release day and could watch building on koji - great job what the kernel-maintainers are doing the last months! simply type kernel 3.3 released or whatever kernel version in the last years came out _ http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/19/linux-kernel-3-3-merged-android-code/ Linux kernel 3.3 released with merged Android code and more http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/18/132 Subject Linux 3.3 release http://www.tomshardware.com/news/linux-linus-torvalds-kernel-3.3,15048.html Linux Kernel 3.3 Released http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/news/linux-3-3-kernel-released-by-linus-torvalds/ Linux Kernel 3.3 released by Linus Torvalds http://www.heise.de/open/meldung/Linux-Kernel-3-3-freigegeben-1467641.html Linux-Kernel 3.3 freigegeben http://techie-buzz.com/foss/linux-kernel-3-3-released-android.html Linux Kernel 3.3 Released with Merge of Kernel Code from Android http://www.webosnation.com/linux-standard-kernel-33-released-android-trapping-tow Linux Standard Kernel 3.3 released, Android trappings in tow Oh Yes my fault! But one expects the news is on upstream site, but ok, you're right -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Torque support in openmpi package
Hi, I've installed openmpi I wonder if openmpi has support for torque. If I issue the command ompi_info say nothing about torque/openpbs. Also I've taken a look to spec file and I've found an early entry: * Wed Oct 17 2007 Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com - 1.2.4-1 - Update to 1.2.4 upstream version - Build against libtorque But I think that torque support was removed somewhen I've found this too: http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/torqueus...@supercluster.org/2009-12/msg00167.html Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: Broken upgrade path(s) detected for: yaml-cpp
2012/4/18 Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 13:41 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24:18PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16... +1, I think something is wrong with the reporting tool. I just got upgrade broken emails for all of my packages, and they all appear to be ok from what I can see. Looks like the reporting tool is pulling the wrong nvr's for packages in the f16 repo. -- Forwarded message -- From: build...@fedoraproject.org I tried to reply/report the issue to the buildsys but that address bounces. Could the script be fixed to use an address that works? Thanks, Mark I've received a mail about broken upgrade path of UpTools package too. UpTools has the same EVR to both F15 and F16 too. So was it a bug of check-upgrade-paths.py isn't it? How often is run that test? Today I've followed instructions from http://jlaska.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/fedora-package-maintainers-want-test-results/ is that right? I've run: autoqa-optin UpTools F-15 Tell me if I'm wrong TIA -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
About cron files and rpmlint
Hi, rpmlint complains about cron files, is that a bug? For example: tmpwatch.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: About cron files and rpmlint
Thanks guys 2013/2/19 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com On 02/19/2013 03:43 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, rpmlint complains about cron files, is that a bug? For example: tmpwatch.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-**file /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. I raised this question two month ago: http://lists.fedoraproject.**org/pipermail/packaging/2012-** November/008749.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2012-November/008749.html But do not expect conclusion :) -- Miroslav Suchy Red Hat Systems Management Engineering -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/develhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
About /dev/console!
Hi, What is used /dev/console! file for (note exclamation mark) ? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: About /dev/console!
2013/4/27 Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, What is used /dev/console! file for (note exclamation mark) ? Thanks in advance! It's documented, type man console to get the ancient and well respoceted notes better than we can explain it here. -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Shame on me, thanks, it happens man-pages were not installed :P -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: About /dev/console!
2013/4/27 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 06:56:03PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: 2013/4/27 Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote: What is used /dev/console! file for (note exclamation mark) ? It's documented, type man console to get the ancient and well respoceted notes better than we can explain it here. Shame on me, thanks, it happens man-pages were not installed :P Do you have a file literally called /dev/console! (with exclamation mark) ? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Yup: ls -l /dev/console\! -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 abr 27 13:55 /dev/console! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: About /dev/console!
2013/4/28 Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.comwrote: On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 07:13:59PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: ls -l /dev/console\! -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 abr 27 13:55 /dev/console! That's strange. My copy of the console(4) man page doesn't mention this, and that's not exactly surprising since what you've got there is a regular file, not a char device like /dev/console. Yes when I read Nico Kadel-Garcia post, I think that it was talking about the right man page, but it wasn't: http://linux.die.net/man/1/console is about an appl (section 1 of manual !) and it says : The type of console. Values will be a '/' for a local device, '|' for a command, '!' for a remote port, '%' for a Unix domain socket, and '#' for a noop console. So got the misunderstanding, but it has nothing to do with special device /dev/console Best guess is this is the result of a rogue script or broken udev rule. Any idea what program you ran around at 13:55 yesterday? Rich. I'd vote broken shell script that was trying to write to /dev/console, and got it wrong, on April 27. Doing ls -ld /dev/console* will show a /dev/console that is a character device, not a plain file. I rebooted the system and in fact /dev/console! is not there, I didn't find nothing suspicious, if it appears again I'll take a look to udev rules... Thanks -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
About /run/media
Hi folks, In this case is not my will express my complains about why removable devices are mounted on /run/media but I'd want to know how udisks/udev/systemd/whoever chooses where it will mount the device, and even took a look to logs, udev and udisks monitor, nothing, nothing at all I was looking for through udisks/udev/systemd and I haven't found nothing at all, apologise my ingnorance, but how that task is performed? Please could you enlighten me? Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Somewhat OT: About modules coresize
Hi, I know that is somehat OT, but I was looking for trying to discover what does mean the size column of lsmod. Some people says is memory used by the module, but if I run strace lsmod I found that it takes a look to coresize files at /sys and read /usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-3.9.2/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-module and it says Module size in bytes but if I see the filesize using ls don't match So what does really mean coresize? TIA -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Somewhat OT: About modules coresize
2013/5/21 Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov On 05/21/2013 08:50 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: I know that is somehat OT, but I was looking for trying to discover what does mean the size column of lsmod. Some people says is memory used by the module, but if I run strace lsmod I found that it takes a look to coresize files at /sys and read /usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-3.9.**2/Documentation/ABI/testing/** sysfs-module and it says Module size in bytes but if I see the filesize using ls don't match So what does really mean coresize? Modules drop unused memory after initialization so their core resident size doesn't have to correspond to filesize. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/develhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel So is it memory used by the module? -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
About volatile udev directory
Hi folks, I've found the following in Fedora 18 [root@mpinode02 sergio]# LANG=C ls /run/udev/rules.d ls: cannot access /run/udev/rules.d: No such file or directory I haven't found anything in the changelog about a change about it, is there no more that directory ? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: /usr/lib64/udev/rules.d/ actually processed?
2013/6/24 Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com Does udev/systemd actually process files in rhis directory? I found a couple of files in that directory, from the isdn4k-utils package and from libwacom-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64. The lib64 directory isn't mentioned in udev(7), and I can't find it in the /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd binary. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/develhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Also, you can verify with: udevadm test $SYSPATH for example: udevadm test /sys/class/net/wlan0 HTH -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Scratch Builds
Hi folks, Just in case, let's say we have the package foo-1.0 if I make a scratch build of package foo-1.1, that doesn't count at all, isn't it? I mean can I send an update foo-.1.1 completely different of the foo-1.1 sent as a scratch build, can't I? Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
NetworkManager forget user network configurations: bug or feature?
Hi Fedora folks, Since NetworkManager I suffer the same issue, release after release, ok, it's not a Fedora issue If I preserve the home partition and perform a newly installation, eg f19-f20 NetworkManager configurations per user are lost. I think that NM should respect the user settings and not happily send them to trash. But what do you think? What is the rationale of saving user configurations in the /etc directory? What do you think? -- Sergio Belkin Certificado Linux LPIC-2 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: NetworkManager forget user network configurations: bug or feature?
2014-03-25 16:20 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:19 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi Fedora folks, Since NetworkManager I suffer the same issue, release after release, ok, it's not a Fedora issue If I preserve the home partition and perform a newly installation, eg f19-f20 NetworkManager configurations per user are lost. I think that NM should respect the user settings and not happily send them to trash. But what do you think? What is the rationale of saving user configurations in the /etc directory? What do you think? Um. Are you sure this is what is happening? Are you sure these aren't set as systemwide connections? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Adam, I've found that by default when I create a user, the checkbox in NetworkManager that says All users may connect to this network is checked! If I uncheck anyway the network configuration files are in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ Really I don't understand this behavior (using mate-desktop on F20) -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: NetworkManager forget user network configurations: bug or feature?
El 26/03/14 12:45, Stephen John Smoogen escribió: On 25 March 2014 13:53, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com mailto:seb...@gmail.com wrote: Adam, I've found that by default when I create a user, the checkbox in NetworkManager that says All users may connect to this network is checked! If I uncheck anyway the network configuration files are in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ Really I don't understand this behavior (using mate-desktop on F20) I believe the reason for this is due to various users who have their home directories on network mounted systems (even if only the user is the only one to set up the network connection.) If the data was stored in the home directory then the network could not start to thus mount the home directory to get the account. A similar problem occurs if the /home is encrypted separately from the root partition. In general, I just make sure that /root /etc and /home are backed up when I move from OS version to OS version so that I don't lose stuff I might need later. -- Stephen J Smoogen. Hmmm... but NetworkManager should think in desktop users (ok, somewhat power desktop users) that install a new release/distro and a user configuration should be completely independent. Or at least give the chance to save either systemwide or userwide. Anyway thanks for your answers and ideas, I understand that all of this is somewhat Off-Topic :) Cheers -- Sergio Belkin Certificado Linux LPIC-2 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
kdenlive and ffmpeg
Hi folks, I am using 0.9.6 on Fedora 20 with ffmpeg-2.1.4-1. Gui crashes when using ffmpeg The settings of ffmpeg (Normal MPEG) are: Code: Select all http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=265t=120391# f=mpeg acodec=mp2 ab=128k ar=48000 vcodec=mpeg2video minrate=0 vb=4000k If I do the following steps 1. Go to Record Monitor tab in Clip Monitor 2. Select FFmpeg in combo box 3. Select either Video or Audio 4. Click on Record button 5. Click on Stop button then kdenlive GUi freezes [image: :(] The only useful information is [wav @ 0x7f676015cc40] Encoder did not produce proper pts, making some up. And I have to send a signal to term the process... The Screen grab works fine... any ideas? Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Half-OT: Secure boot and thirdy party kernel modules
Hi Fedora folks, I've found that Oracle VirtualBox kernel module are not signed so I have to disable secure boot. Oracle says that is not a VirtualBox bug. And Fedora cannot sign it because of license, can it? So, the question is: Is it worth signing my own kernel? Of course I can circunvent this problem simply by disabling secureboot... what do you think, is there a simple way of doing that, or should I spend a weekend doing all of it? I've found this: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/blogs/browse/2013/09/booting-self-signed-linux-kernel Can I sign only the virtualbox kernel module, or should I recompile the entire kernel and sign it? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Half-OT: Secure boot and thirdy party kernel modules
2014-07-08 5:47 GMT-03:00 Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com: On 07/08/2014 10:19 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2014-07-07, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote: Note that Microsoft's current policy may not allow unrestricted virtualization (KVM or Virtualbox—does not matter) because that permits launch of another operating system instance after execution of unauthenticated code—the wording is rather unclear. If Microsoft clarifies that this is forbidden, a future Fedora update will remove this functionality, so you will be forced to disable Secure Boot at this point anyway if you want to continue to use virtualization. Could you elaborate more what unauthenticated code is in this case? I think it's code that is not cryptographically tied (indirectly) to one of the Secure Boot trust roots. However, I don't really know what Microsoft means. It's conceivable that they assume we sign all of user space (not just for installation purposes), and they might have a wrong idea about what we can implement in our system. Is it a userspace tool for controlling in-kernel virtualization (e.g. qemu in case of KVM)? Because KVM as a kernel module is signed. It's unclear. One possible interpretation is that virtualization acts as a barrier because it does not provide access to real ring 0 on the host. It sounds reasonable, but it doesn't really match Microsoft's wording I quoted above (from a public blog post). -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Thanks everybody for enlighten me about this obscure topic :) -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Samba as AD DC
Hi, Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain Controller? I mean is that page current: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4#Current_status ? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Samba as AD DC
Thanks! 2014-09-07 14:58 GMT-03:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com: On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain Controller? I mean is that page current: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4#Current_status ? Thanks in advance! It is current, and Samba in F20 will never have the AD bits. Maybe F22, or perhaps even F21, the work to replace Heimdal with MIT is proceeding well enough. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Fedora 22 Dispplay with stripes
Hi, I'm trying Fedora 22 and shows randomly stripes, my info: Video card: Slot: 00:02.0 Class: VGA compatible controller Vendor: Intel Corporation Device: 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller SVendor:Elitegroup Computer Systems SDevice:Device 1b76 Rev:02 Driver: i915 Module: i915 Version drivers: filename: /lib/modules/4.0.1-300.fc22.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko.xz xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.917-6.20150211.fc22.x86_64 Thaanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 22 Dispplay with stripes
2015-05-12 12:16 GMT-03:00 Samuel Sieb sam...@sieb.net: On 05/12/2015 07:29 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: I'm trying Fedora 22 and shows randomly stripes, my info: It didn't do this with F21? Can you describe the effect more or take a picture? I have some weird background image distortions on a similar video controller with F21. This machine had installed before Ubuntu. Video card: Slot: 00:02.0 Class: VGA compatible controller Vendor: Intel Corporation Device: 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller SVendor:Elitegroup Computer Systems SDevice:Device 1b76 Rev:02 Driver: i915 Module: i915 What did you use to get this list? It's different than the lspci output. lspci identifies mine as: Intel Corporation 82865G Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) lspci -v -mm -k ;) Nice, isn't it? It's a bit weird I've reenabled the composite in KDE and problem it went away... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Intel driver pain
Well, I was not crazy: http://fedoramagazine.org/solution-graphics-issues-intel-graphics-chipsets-fedora-22/ HTH 2015-05-29 7:57 GMT-03:00 kendell clark coffeekin...@gmail.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 hi Well, I don't know about the OP, but for me there are no symptoms. I just get the error at every startup, but the system functions normally Thanks Kendell clark drago01 wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Could you tell me if anyone else is having this kind of issues: [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Memory usable by graphics device = 2048M [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] fb: switching to inteldrmfb from EFI VGA [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Replacing VGA console driver [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013). [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query. [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20150130 for :00:02.0 on minor 0 [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] fbcon: inteldrmfb (fb0) is primary device [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm:intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting [i915]] *ERROR* uncleared pch fifo underrun on pch transcoder A [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm:intel_pch_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* PCH transcoder A FIFO underrun [vie may 29 07:01:23 2015] i915 :00:02.0: fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device What exactly is your problem? What are the symptoms? Also bugzilla is a better place for those kind of things. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVaEYcAAoJEGYgJ5/kqBTdyT0QAIE+8Xl2t3k4v/FREgej7YGQ k/Kc0qHU+PvDChJCuTETsvChOeHRgHifZtk2Yqev2ZURe3g1A2XU5YxcnjOb2ckO 3NEI9Z5+4QcKD0TxTsCxmlP6EBnKrNFEq8VfNPltzVhMqAB0CsfSMDRXVoD6KdhB sq3XkaPOqE/0MbVUVoIyAvXL+S1bgx0ExxkVC8DLc4oxbovdn6//BB+OLF3oBcj6 elZ2hM8Aw/PcNT66Mv/5kRm7OYqC9MXTsN860s78eva3lCHzmMMrh/tFzRybU3a0 Fpra7oOiare65rRwIxB09WiGv+Akg3u3sCyGdHG9KDHm4epVUrc+7eWz5cY5EZbc 88FLK14Z2mNyfaq7WpxOeaEN9gjaCDwCp2Bn8Aa9dVSh/Uvp0mIG3aFQkEIvgwst eOLI/ZHKUCKSonIp90v1cVnVORpYDeldhwU+OKr2GxKhD2UzoQxfAF4RD4/wJ98F 39a1lBNcrfHVEkao4e4lm3DR3RDPI2Hi0eTwsT12Fbx2jAub9wB09AFbVG9x5R+I ya0V6UZvVt1Q52a0TI8v1q9CZS24EsPdkQ+CZG0mh19Oyc7KjAj8BihlKoDnI+yb Qd+7zS3CTFfPQ3ZcbrrgqYiBoM2y7DCLCEyVSmhmQEJINzzeFMHziRpwcJzQYZ6Q /xJreevltz3I3bafY3nr =n0Pa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Intel driver pain
2015-06-16 11:30 GMT-03:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: Am 16.06.2015 um 16:14 schrieb Sergio Belkin: Well, I was not crazy: http://fedoramagazine.org/solution-graphics-issues-intel-graphics-chipsets-fedora-22/ well, you did not mention your hardware nor any issues you just showed some log warnings Yes, you're right I tought that it was an issue for every graphic Intel chipset, but this issue involve only old Intel video cards... Anyway the problem with Intel driver does exist, and it's great that it was detected and fixed... 2015-05-29 7:57 GMT-03:00 kendell clark coffeekin...@gmail.com mailto:coffeekin...@gmail.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 hi Well, I don't know about the OP, but for me there are no symptoms. I just get the error at every startup, but the system functions normally Thanks Kendell clark drago01 wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com mailto:seb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Could you tell me if anyone else is having this kind of issues: [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Memory usable by graphics device = 2048M [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] fb: switching to inteldrmfb from EFI VGA [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Replacing VGA console driver [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013). [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query. [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20150130 for :00:02.0 on minor 0 [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] fbcon: inteldrmfb (fb0) is primary device [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm:intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting [i915]] *ERROR* uncleared pch fifo underrun on pch transcoder A [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm:intel_pch_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* PCH transcoder A FIFO underrun [vie may 29 07:01:23 2015] i915 :00:02.0: fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device What exactly is your problem? What are the symptoms? Also bugzilla is a better place for those kind of things -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Intel driver pain
Hi, Could you tell me if anyone else is having this kind of issues: [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Memory usable by graphics device = 2048M [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] fb: switching to inteldrmfb from EFI VGA [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Replacing VGA console driver [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013). [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query. [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20150130 for :00:02.0 on minor 0 [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] fbcon: inteldrmfb (fb0) is primary device [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm:intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting [i915]] *ERROR* uncleared pch fifo underrun on pch transcoder A [vie may 29 07:01:22 2015] [drm:intel_pch_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* PCH transcoder A FIFO underrun [vie may 29 07:01:23 2015] i915 :00:02.0: fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 22 Dispplay with stripes
2015-05-12 12:27 GMT-03:00 Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com: 2015-05-12 12:16 GMT-03:00 Samuel Sieb sam...@sieb.net: On 05/12/2015 07:29 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: I'm trying Fedora 22 and shows randomly stripes, my info: It didn't do this with F21? Can you describe the effect more or take a picture? I have some weird background image distortions on a similar video controller with F21. This machine had installed before Ubuntu. Video card: Slot: 00:02.0 Class: VGA compatible controller Vendor: Intel Corporation Device: 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller SVendor: Elitegroup Computer Systems SDevice: Device 1b76 Rev: 02 Driver: i915 Module: i915 What did you use to get this list? It's different than the lspci output. lspci identifies mine as: Intel Corporation 82865G Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) lspci -v -mm -k ;) Nice, isn't it? It's a bit weird I've reenabled the composite in KDE and problem it went away... Hi, any news, ideas, with about this topic, driver is working terrible, I thought that was a KDE issue, but in MATE it happens either... -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fedora 22 Dispplay with stripes
2015-05-27 13:16 GMT-03:00 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de: On 05/27/2015 05:27 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: Video card: Slot: 00:02.0 Class: VGA compatible controller Vendor: Intel Corporation Device: 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller SVendor:Elitegroup Computer Systems SDevice:Device 1b76 Rev:02 Driver: i915 Module: i915 What did you use to get this list? It's different than the lspci output. lspci identifies mine as: Intel Corporation 82865G Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) lspci -v -mm -k ;) Nice, isn't it? It's a bit weird I've reenabled the composite in KDE and problem it went away... Hi, any news, ideas, with about this topic, driver is working terrible, I thought that was a KDE issue, but in MATE it happens either... Today, a similar issue happened to me with the Fedora installer, when installing F22 on my old netbook. When the installation started, initially a couple of horizontal strips appeared, which gradually accumulated until the display was entirely unreadable and distorted. Video card: Slot: 00:02.0 Class: VGA compatible controller Vendor: Intel Corporation Device: Mobile 945GSE Express Integrated Graphics Controller SVendor:Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. [MSI] SDevice:Device 0110 Rev:03 Driver: i915 Module: i915 Ralf I've managed for reduce failures appending the kernel parameter i915.enable_ips=0, but it didn't disappear completely, but at least, I can work using this graphic card. -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Problem with bluetooth in Fedora 22
I've finally get connected using bluedevil in KDE. I don't know exactly how this was happened... anyway error messages persist: journalctl -f jul 10 09:30:10 newhope.belkin.home obexd[1859]: CONNECT(0x0), (null)(0x) jul 10 09:30:10 newhope.belkin.home obexd[1859]: CONNECT(0x0), (null)(0x0) jul 10 09:30:11 newhope.belkin.home obexd[1859]: PUT(0x2), (null)(0x) jul 10 09:30:14 newhope.belkin.home obexd[1859]: PUT(0x2), CONTINUE(0x10) jul 10 09:30:23 newhope.belkin.home obexd[1859]: DISCONNECT(0x1), (null)(0x) jul 10 09:30:23 newhope.belkin.home obexd[1859]: DISCONNECT(0x1), SUCCESS(0x20) jul 10 09:30:23 newhope.belkin.home obexd[1859]: disconnected: Transport got disconnected jul 10 09:30:23 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Unable to get io data for Object Push: getpeername: Transport endpoint is not connected (107) systemctl status bluetooth ● bluetooth.service - Bluetooth service Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/bluetooth.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since vie 2015-07-10 09:14:49 ART; 16min ago Docs: man:bluetoothd(8) Main PID: 738 (bluetoothd) Status: Running CGroup: /system.slice/bluetooth.service └─738 /usr/libexec/bluetooth/bluetoothd jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home systemd[1]: Starting Bluetooth service... jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Bluetooth daemon 5.29 jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home systemd[1]: Started Bluetooth service. jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Starting SDP server jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Bluetooth management interface 1.8 initialized jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Failed to obtain handles for Service Changed characteristic jul 10 09:15:14 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.36 path=/MediaEndpoint/A2DPSource jul 10 09:15:14 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.36 path=/MediaEndpoint/A2DPSink jul 10 09:30:23 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Unable to get io data for Object Push: getpeername: Transport ...107) Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full. Your comments will be appreaciated! 2015-07-10 9:20 GMT-03:00 Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com: Hi community, Bluetooth does not work in Fedora 22: [root@newhope sergio]# systemctl status bluetooth ● bluetooth.service - Bluetooth service Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/bluetooth.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since vie 2015-07-10 09:14:49 ART; 1min 9s ago Docs: man:bluetoothd(8) Main PID: 738 (bluetoothd) Status: Running CGroup: /system.slice/bluetooth.service └─738 /usr/libexec/bluetooth/bluetoothd jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home systemd[1]: Starting Bluetooth service... jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Bluetooth daemon 5.29 jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home systemd[1]: Started Bluetooth service. jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Starting SDP server jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Bluetooth management interface 1.8 initialized jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Failed to obtain handles for Service Changed characteristic jul 10 09:15:14 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.36 path=/MediaEndpoint/A2DPSource jul 10 09:15:14 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.36 path=/MediaEndpoint/A2DPSink [root@newhope sergio]# rfkill list 0: hci0: Bluetooth Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no 1: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no [root@newhope sergio]# hciconfig hci0: Type: BR/EDR Bus: USB BD Address: 0C:84:DC:02:4D:40 ACL MTU: 1022:8 SCO MTU: 183:5 UP RUNNING PSCAN ISCAN RX bytes:1262 acl:0 sco:0 events:79 errors:0 TX bytes:3290 acl:0 sco:0 commands:79 errors:0 Any idea? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Problem with bluetooth in Fedora 22
Hi community, Bluetooth does not work in Fedora 22: [root@newhope sergio]# systemctl status bluetooth ● bluetooth.service - Bluetooth service Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/bluetooth.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since vie 2015-07-10 09:14:49 ART; 1min 9s ago Docs: man:bluetoothd(8) Main PID: 738 (bluetoothd) Status: Running CGroup: /system.slice/bluetooth.service └─738 /usr/libexec/bluetooth/bluetoothd jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home systemd[1]: Starting Bluetooth service... jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Bluetooth daemon 5.29 jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home systemd[1]: Started Bluetooth service. jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Starting SDP server jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Bluetooth management interface 1.8 initialized jul 10 09:14:49 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Failed to obtain handles for Service Changed characteristic jul 10 09:15:14 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.36 path=/MediaEndpoint/A2DPSource jul 10 09:15:14 newhope.belkin.home bluetoothd[738]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.36 path=/MediaEndpoint/A2DPSink [root@newhope sergio]# rfkill list 0: hci0: Bluetooth Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no 1: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no [root@newhope sergio]# hciconfig hci0: Type: BR/EDR Bus: USB BD Address: 0C:84:DC:02:4D:40 ACL MTU: 1022:8 SCO MTU: 183:5 UP RUNNING PSCAN ISCAN RX bytes:1262 acl:0 sco:0 events:79 errors:0 TX bytes:3290 acl:0 sco:0 commands:79 errors:0 Any idea? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Cannot install Fedora 23 from iso file
Hi,
I have the following options in "/etc/grub.d/40_custom":
#!/bin/sh
exec tail -n +3 $0
# This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries. Simply type
the
# menu entries you want to add after this comment. Be careful not to change
# the 'exec tail' line above.
menuentry 'Live Fedora 23' --class fedora {
set isofile=/boot/Fedora-Live-KDE-x86_64-23-10.iso
loopback loop (hd1,gpt3)$isofile
linuxefi (loop)/isolinux/vmlinuz0 iso-scan/filename=${isofile}
root=live:CDLABEL=Fedora-Live-KDE-x86_64-23-10 rootfstype=auto ro
rd.live.image quiet rhgb rd.luks=0 rd.md=0 rd.dm=0
initrdefi (loop)/isolinux/initrd0.img
}
It boots fine, but I cannot install it says:
"blivet.errors.DeviceError: ('cannot replace active format', 'sdb3') "
/dev/sdb3 es my current rootfs
I've reported the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284187
In the mean time, please could you tell me that if a grub2 misconfiguration
in 40_custom file?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Cannot install Fedora 23 from iso file
Well,
I think that I've found the solution: the problem was that iso fiile was in
the very root partition, because of that, Liveinst refused to unmount it.
I've verified moving iso file to another partition and this error went away.
HTH
2015-11-21 15:53 GMT-03:00 Sergio Belkin <seb...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following options in "/etc/grub.d/40_custom":
>
> #!/bin/sh
> exec tail -n +3 $0
> # This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries. Simply type
> the
> # menu entries you want to add after this comment. Be careful not to
> change
> # the 'exec tail' line above.
>
> menuentry 'Live Fedora 23' --class fedora {
> set isofile=/boot/Fedora-Live-KDE-x86_64-23-10.iso
> loopback loop (hd1,gpt3)$isofile
> linuxefi (loop)/isolinux/vmlinuz0 iso-scan/filename=${isofile}
> root=live:CDLABEL=Fedora-Live-KDE-x86_64-23-10 rootfstype=auto ro
> rd.live.image quiet rhgb rd.luks=0 rd.md=0 rd.dm=0
> initrdefi (loop)/isolinux/initrd0.img
> }
>
> It boots fine, but I cannot install it says:
>
> "blivet.errors.DeviceError: ('cannot replace active format', 'sdb3') "
>
> /dev/sdb3 es my current rootfs
>
> I've reported the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284187
>
> In the mean time, please could you tell me that if a grub2
> misconfiguration in 40_custom file?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Sergio Belkin
> LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
>
--
--
Sergio Belkin
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Cannot build live iso using livemedia-creator
Hi,
I've tried to create a Live ISO using livemedia-creator, and followed the
steps from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Livemedia-creator-_How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD
.
But I cannot do it, these is the errors:
sudo livemedia-creator --ks
/home/sergio/Descargas/Pagure/flat-fedora-live-base.ks --no-virt
--resultdir /home/lmc --project Fedora-Rescate-Silicon --make-iso --volid
Fedora24-Rescate-Silicon --iso-only --iso-name F24-R-R-Silicon.iso
/usr/lib64/python3.5/optparse.py:999: PendingDeprecationWarning: The
KSOption class is deprecated and will be removed in pykickstart-3. Use the
argparse module instead.
option = self.option_class(*args, **kwargs)
2016-09-29 15:23:19,900: disk_img = /home/lmc/lmc-disk-flpdk287.img
2016-09-29 15:23:19,901: Using disk size of 5122MiB
2016-09-29 15:23:22,380: Running anaconda.
2016-09-29 15:23:24,103: Processing logs from ('127.0.0.1', 51634)
2016-09-29 15:23:27,388: The 'logging' function is not a part of DNF API
and will be removed in the upcoming DNF release. Please use only officially
supported API functions. DNF API documentation is available at
https://dnf.readthedocs.org/en/latest/api.html.
2016-09-29 15:23:27,388: Starting installer, one moment...
2016-09-29 15:23:27,389: terminal size detection failed, using default width
2016-09-29 15:23:27,389: anaconda 24.13.7-1 for Fedora-Rescate-Silicon 24
(pre-release) started.
2016-09-29 15:23:27,389: The 'logging' function is not a part of DNF API
and will be removed in the upcoming DNF release. Please use only officially
supported API functions. DNF API documentation is available at
https://dnf.readthedocs.org/en/latest/api.html.
2016-09-29 15:23:29,478: Running anaconda failed: process '['anaconda',
'--kickstart', '/home/sergio/Descargas/Pagure/flat-fedora-live-base.ks',
'--cmdline', '--dirinstall', '--remotelog', '127.0.0.1:46181']' exited with
status 1
2016-09-29 15:23:29,478: Shutting down log processing
2016-09-29 15:23:29,650: Install failed: novirt_install failed
2016-09-29 15:23:29,652: Removing bad disk image
2016-09-29 15:23:29,684: ERROR: Image creation failed: novirt_install failed
Am I doing something wrong?
system info:
[root@hope sergio]# uname -a ; rpm -qa | egrep 'kickstart|lorax'
Linux hope.belkin.home 4.7.3-200.fc24.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Sep 7 17:31:21 UTC
2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
lorax-templates-generic-24.20-1.fc24.x86_64
fedora-kickstarts-0.24.6-1.fc24.noarch
python3-kickstart-2.25-4.fc24.noarch
spin-kickstarts-0.24.6-1.fc24.noarch
lorax-24.20-1.fc24.x86_64
pykickstart-2.25-4.fc24.noarch
custom-kickstarts-0.24.6-1.fc24.noarch
[root@hope sergio]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four)
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Cannot build live iso using livemedia-creator
Hi Adam, Thanks for your clarifications You can take a look at http://pastebin.com/U3RPX0qK (Anaconda log) Meanwhile I will use system-config-kickstart Greetings 2016-09-29 19:13 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>: > On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 15:08 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > That error means the anaconda install failed. The way livemedia_creator > > works is that it actually runs an anaconda install using the kickstart > > specified - using its 'install to a directory' method if you pass --no- > > virt, otherwise in a VM - then creates an image file from the resulting > > installation. > > ...well, okay, that's a lie. It actually creates the image file, then > either attaches it to a VM and runs the install in the VM (virt mode) > or mounts it and runs an anaconda directory install into the mounted > path (novirt mode), so either way, the image now contains an installed > system. Once anaconda is done it twiddles about a bit more with the > image. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Cannot build live iso using livemedia-creator
2016-09-30 19:04 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>:
> On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 23:53 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > > You can take a look at http://pastebin.com/U3RPX0qK (Anaconda log)
> >
> >
> > Here's your error:
> >
> > > File "/usr/lib64/python3.5/site-packages/pyanaconda/nm.py", line
> 762, in
> >
> > nm_device_setting_value
> > >raise SettingsNotFoundError(name)
> > >
> > > pyanaconda.nm.SettingsNotFoundError: SettingsNotFoundError('
> vboxnet0',)
>
> ...which looks like you used a kickstart intended for installing to
> VirtualBox or something. The live media kickstarts are kind of a
> specific layout and it's really best to start from one of the official
> kickstarts when building a live image, rather than starting from a
> typical system installation kickstart.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
I've taken the example from Fedora Wiki and made litlle customizations:
http://pastebin.com/MWDczEis
VirtualBox was opened at moment of running lmc, but then I even closed and
the errors persisted...
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: keyboard is partially honored in kickstart
2016-10-12 10:54 GMT-03:00 Sergio Belkin <seb...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I'm trying to remasterize a Fedora Spin, but keyboard options is not > working. > > I've configured as follows: > > keyboard --vckeymap=latam --xlayouts='latam' > > > The option " --vckeymap=latam" works fine. But --xlayouts='latam' is > ignored. > > If I boot from LiveCD, in Xorg I get: > > setxkbmap -query > rules: evdev > model: pc105 > layout: us > > Any ideas? > > You may take a look at kickstart file here: > > http://pastebin.com/vuQjXqi2 > > Thanks in advance! > > Sorry for insist on it... Is just me? or is a bug? Only way I've found is adding in ks file: echo "setxkbmap latam" >> /home/liveuser/.bashrc Thanks in advance! > -- > -- > Sergio Belkin > LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org > -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Cannot build live iso using livemedia-creator
Thanks, by now I will go back to livecd-creator! Greetings 2016-09-30 21:19 GMT-03:00 Brian C. Lane <b...@redhat.com>: > Looks like this is similar to > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245960 > > and probably depends on something unique in your environment. As adam > said, running it inside a mock is safer, or if you have libvirt setup > you could use that with a f24 boot.iso to further isolate things. > > -- > Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
keyboard is partially honored in kickstart
Hi, I'm trying to remasterize a Fedora Spin, but keyboard options is not working. I've configured as follows: keyboard --vckeymap=latam --xlayouts='latam' The option " --vckeymap=latam" works fine. But --xlayouts='latam' is ignored. If I boot from LiveCD, in Xorg I get: setxkbmap -query rules: evdev model: pc105 layout: us Any ideas? You may take a look at kickstart file here: http://pastebin.com/vuQjXqi2 Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Preferred way of creating a Fedora Spin
Hi folks, How is the best way to create a custom spin of fedora nowadays? Is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Livemedia-creator-_How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD the right way? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Difference between pungi and livemedia-creator
Hi, I was using livemedia-creator but I'd want to understand well what's the differences between both pungi and livemedia-creator. Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
About insert again a package
Hi! I am package maintainer of UpTools: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11676 Some years ago I lost contact with upstream so could not maintain in a proper way, so AFAIK the package was retired, . I recovered contact with upstream. I would like to add it again to Fedora, what steps should I take? Is as with new package? Or is as in an update? Please could you help me to do it? Thanks in advance... -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
