Re: Strange issue with keymaps

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 07:01:35AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 03:48:16PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > Hello. > > > > We found a strange issue with non-US keymaps. If the kbd-legacy > > package is not installed (not

Re: HEADS UP: OpenEXR 3.X coming soon!

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:01:50PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > So I've spent about 40 hours pushing through build problems in the COPR[1] > I've set up beating what packages I could into submission and moving the > ones I couldn't (or shouldn't) port to the openexr2 compat package. > > Some of th

Re: Why so long for EPEL-8?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 07:59:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 07:06, Björn Persson wrote: > > > > Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > On 18/07/2021 13:38, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > 1. People don't give feedback and only complain after the fact. > > > > > > On Fed

Re: Strange issue with keymaps

On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 03:48:16PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > Hello. > > We found a strange issue with non-US keymaps. If the kbd-legacy > package is not installed (not installed on F34 by default[1]), the > system will hang on boot due to the "Failed to start Setup Virtual > Console

Re: F35 Change: libffi 3.4 (late System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 02:28:20PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 7/15/21 6:52 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:28:50PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LIBFFI34 > >> > >> == S

Re: F35 Change: libffi 3.4 (late System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:28:50PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LIBFFI34 > > == Summary == > Rebase libffi in Fedora 34 from libffi 3.1 to libffi 3.4 (released > June 28 2021), and provide a libffi3.1 compatibility package to handle > the library SONAME transit

Re: F35 Change: tzdata-minimal (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 01:20:47PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/tzdata-minimal > > == Summary == > Split the tzdata package into two parts - tzdata and tzdata-minimal. > tzdata will require tzdata-minimal. tzdata-minimal provides the > minimal files needed to

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-07-12)

> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 1:39 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > > FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on > > irc.libera.chat. > > >

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-07-12)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-07-12 19:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be dis

Re: F35 Change: Remove SHA-1 from Sqlite (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:13:20AM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Am 09.07.21 um 17:45 schrieb Ben Cotton: > >== Detailed Description == > >The use of SHA-1 is no longer permitted for Digital Signatures or > >authentication in RHEL-9. Due to this reason, there is a need to > >remove SHA-1 extensi

Re: guile22 -> gnutls -> lots of virt packages

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 06:21:08PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > What would be considered sufficient research about usage of guile? If > package provides it as optional feature among many other features, how > should package owner test one feature is still demanded? Do we have any > best practice? Is

Re: guile22 -> gnutls -> lots of virt packages

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 02:27:39PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Fabio Valentini: > > > If it turns out that really actually nobody uses this, why not drop it > > upstream, and have the guile support removal come with the next GNU > > toolchain Change for Fedora? > > Guile support in GNU packa

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 10:03:09AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 4:50 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 05. 07. 21 15:14, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > 0ad failed: > > > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > >File > > > > > "/builddir/build/BUILD/0ad-0.0.24b-alpha/libra

Re: How to (better) deal with library major API changes

On Sun, Jul 04, 2021 at 09:04:55PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 07. 21 16:49, Richard Shaw wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 12:25 PM Miro Hrončok >> wrote: > > > >On 01. 07. 21 18:20, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 11:11 AM Miro Hrončok

No schedule for today's FESCo Meeting (2021-07-05)

There are no topics marked with 'meeting', so I'm cancelling today's meeting. It's also the weekend with July 4th in the US, and holidays in Czechia, so it's seems better to not have the meeting anyway. = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = #2625 F35 Change: Python Packaging Guidelines overhaul

Re: armv7 maintainer test instances back online

On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 11:01:54AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Sun, Jul 04, 2021 00:52:21 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Friday, 02 July 2021 at 23:21, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Greetings. > > > > > > I'm happy to announce that: > > > > > > armv7-test01.fedorainfracloud.or

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 09:12:51AM -, Paweł Marciniak wrote: > > I submitted a pull request that mashes your patch, Colin Walter's > > earlier pull reuqest, and some stuff I had worked on before into > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20047. > > Ok. Thanks, but you meant https://githu

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:57:18PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Wednesday, June 30, 2021 5:43:10 AM EDT Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > >radamsa huzaifas, mrniranjan > > > >Fedora 32> > > > Has no bugzillas,

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 08:11:38AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 3:40 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 03:13:10PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:09 PM Zbigniew Jędr

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 02:03:22PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:40 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > > Our definition of source-git is: > > > * upstream release tarball > > > * downstream code changes applied as

Re: F35 Change: Third-party Software Mechanism (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 02:09:19PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 30. 06. 21 v 13:52 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > >For packaged stuff, please do: > > > > s|/etc/fedora-third-party.conf|/usr/lib/fedora-third-party.conf| > > > >We shouldn't ad

Re: F35 Change: Third-party Software Mechanism (System-Wide Change proposal)

> == Technical implementation == > > * There is a fedora-third-party package with a > fedora-third-party script with > enable/disable/refresh/query subcommands. The status is > stored in /etc/fedora-third-party.conf > * Packages like fedora-workstation-repositories that > include third-party repos

Re: F35 Change: Memory Constraints macros for RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:46:59PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 30. 06. 21 v 12:29 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > >The OP talks exclusively about "RAM". And I think RAM is what we need > > From: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/open

Re: F35 Change: Memory Constraints macros for RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:08:44PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 29. 06. 21 v 22:25 Ben Cotton napsal(a): > >When this proposal is implemented, they can instead declaratively > >specify the amount of RAM needed per build thread, e.g. > > > > %limit_build -m 8192 > > > >for declaring a build

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 01:36:40AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 30. 06. 21 1:32, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >Dear maintainers. > > > >Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > >will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before > >branching (August 2021

Re: F35 Change: Memory Constraints macros for RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 04:25:13PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros > > == Summary == > Introduce macros, similar to openSUSE's > [https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/memory-constraints > memory-constraints]), for option

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 03:13:10PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:09 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 03:48:54PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >

Re: F35 Change: Rebase firewalld to upstream v1.0.0 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:57:46PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/firewalld-1.0.0 > > == Summary == > Firewalld upstream is about to release v1.0.0. As indicated by the > major version bump this includes behavioral changes. A major new version sounds good… New f

Re: [ELN] Rebuild ordering and side-tag support

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 08:34:06PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On 6/28/21 5:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make > >the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off > >rebuilds. I'm soliciting feedbac

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 04:39:16PM -, Paweł Marciniak wrote: > I've written a code heavily based on the above-mentioned PR:15957 but I've > added some missing code (new option StatusUnitFormat=combined). > > Now you can set StatusUnitFormat=combined in the configuration file or as a > kern

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:31:09AM -, Paweł Marciniak wrote: > > What log analysis tools is this change likely to break? > If you set StatusUnitFormat to "name" or "description", then nothing will > change and it will work as always. Also, you can't base "analysis tools" on the Description st

Re: Missing package build for Fedora 34

On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:30:47AM +0530, Rajeesh K V wrote: > Hello package wranglers, > > I maintain the python-cffsubr package for Fedora. It was added to the > repo and built on 2021-03-17 (during the beta freeze timeline of > Fedora 34). > > The package was built for f33, f34 & f35; see [1].

Re: No schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-06-28)

On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 05:35:37PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > There are no topics to be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on > irc.libera.chat. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto > > or run: > d

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:52:48PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, at 6:21 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > systemd has systemd.status_unit_format= / [Manager].StatusUnitFormat= > > / -Dstatus-unit-format-default= op

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 05:23:08PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:21:05AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > systemd has systemd.status_unit_format= / [Manager].StatusUnitFormat= > > / -Dstatus-unit-format-defaul

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:43:17AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:04 AM Frédéric Pierret > wrote: > > > > > > > > Le 6/25/21 à 2:51 PM, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 3:43 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > &g

use unit names in systemd output by default?

Hi, systemd has systemd.status_unit_format= / [Manager].StatusUnitFormat= / -Dstatus-unit-format-default= option to use unit names instead of the Description in messages on the kernel console and in logs: - Jun 20 22:04:48 krowka systemd[1]: Started Rule-based Manager for Device Events and Files

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:51:11AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > > I think we should try to push upstream to sign git tags, instead or in > > addition to tarballs. For upstreams, this is actually much easier > > (just 'git tag&#x

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 03:49:23AM +, Dan Čermák wrote: > > > On June 24, 2021 9:22:51 PM UTC, "Miro Hrončok" wrote: > >On 24. 06. 21 23:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >> Dne 24. 06. 21 v 15:48 Tomas Tomecek napsal(a): > One thing to consider is that the upstream tarballs might be > >crypt

Re: Fedora Source-git SIG report #1 (June 2021)

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 03:48:54PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 24. 06. 21 11:16, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > > > ## Choosing git forge to host source-git repositories > > > We need to find a home for all the source-git repositories. This

Re: Fwd: glibc gconv package split

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:10:52AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > >> glibc-gconv-extra is recommended by glibc, so a regular update or > >> default installation should pull in glibc-gconv-extra and there should > >> be n

Re: Fwd: glibc gconv package split

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:18:09AM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > [Fixing up my mailing list settings and re-sending] > > Hello, > > Apologies for the delayed announcement but as of > glibc-2.34.9000-13.fc35, the glibc package has been split to create a > new package glibc-gconv-extra to hold

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 07:34:03AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Bodhi has a config setting ('automatic_updates_blacklist') which can > avoid specific users/bots to automatically create updates. > > If those bots are supposed to only test Koji builds, but not pushing > updates we can list

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:55:00AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:45 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > I think this is a good idea. This particular bot has a history of > > misbehavior > > and rather than banning all the well behaving bots (that be definition we > > don'

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:37:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20 2021 at 07:29:16 AM -0400, Neal Gompa > wrote: > >Most of our rules are designed to make sure there's someone ultimately > >responsible for everything going into Fedora. Unfortunately, bots are > >the opposite of t

Re: debugging pipewire & root access to systemd userspace

out how to trigger it at will. > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 8:36 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 01:38:08AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > > Should gdb be able to read from a sound device? > > > > It sh

Re: RFC: Banning bots from submitting automated koji builds

On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 10:18:45PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide) > becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the > existing Updates Policy [1] to make it explicit that bots are not > allow

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210619.n.0 changes

On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 03:44:11PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 2:52 PM Fedora Rawhide Report > wrote: > > > > = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = > > Package: crun-0.19.1.13-0.15.git63400f2.fc35 > > Old package: crun-0.20.1.3-0.14.git9dec366.fc35 > > Summary: OCI

Re: debugging pipewire & root access to systemd userspace

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 01:38:08AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > Apologies if you find the subject line vague or misleading, I couldn't > figure out what to write. I've been trying to debug a transient > pipewire issue so that I can file a bug report, but I keep stumbling > from

Re: x86_64-v2 in Fedora

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:02:23PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 9:52 PM Benjamin Beasley > wrote: > > > > At the risk of overextending an already well-elaborated thread, I would > > like to point out that my main workstation, for Fedora packaging and other > > purposes

Re: F35 Change: Broken RPATH will fail rpmbuild (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:58:13PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 6/16/21 2:11 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 1:56 AM Tom Stellard >> wrote: > > > >On 5/7/21 10:48 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Chan

Re: Fwd: OpenSceneGraph and gdal need to be rebuild for Fedora 34

Björn answered the other part, so I'm responding to this part: On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 07:53:11PM +0200, Jiri Kucera wrote: > Can some proven packager add me please to gdal, > OpenSceneGraph, and vtk as a co-maintainer so I can do rebuilds for libgta? This is a misconception: provenpackagers can

Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-06-15)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-06-15 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be d

Re: Self Introduction: Tiago d'Almeida

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 01:20:40AM +0100, Tiago d'Almeida wrote: > Hello everyone! > I'm a newbie in these lists, but I have been using the Fedora OS since 2010 > (more or less). > I'ḿ a primarily web programmer, but I also like to help in open source > projects. > My presentation begins in this i

review swap: plocate

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931141 I'd be happy to do some reviews in return. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: h

Re: caret in package version?

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:44:01AM +0200, Maxim Burgerhout wrote: > Hi all, > > Just quickly checking before I file a bug. > > The package containing ag (called "the_silver_searcher") currently has a > caret symbol (^) between the version and the snapshot info. The guidelines > seem to say about

Re: F35 Change: Make btrfs the default file system for Fedora Cloud (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:29:50AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:19 AM David Duncan wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 4:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 06:52:40AM -, David Duncan wrote:

Re: F35 Change: Make btrfs the default file system for Fedora Cloud (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 06:52:40AM -, David Duncan wrote: > Bumping this for technical discussion. We are planning to put this in action > if there are no technical objections. Please wait until the FESCo has approved the Change. Zbyszek ___ devel

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2021-06-08)

Meeting started by zbyszek at 17:00:06 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-06-08/fesco.2021-06-08-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary --- * init process (zbyszek, 17:00:07) * New meeting time? (zbyszek, 17:03:00) * ACTION: zbysz

Re: [HEADS UP] libgta SONAME bump in Fedora 34

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 05:43:37PM +0200, Jiri Kucera wrote: > Hello, > > I am planning to fix the FTBFS bug of libgta also for Fedora 34, which > bumps its SONAME. The list of affected components is below There should be no need to rebuild indirect dependencies. If those indirect dependencies we

Re: [cdparanoia] License field fix awaiting to be merged

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 06:27:17PM +0200, Jiri Kucera wrote: > Hi Zbyszek, > > reply inline > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 5:42 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:31:15PM -, Benjamin Beasley wrote: >

Re: F35 Change: Use yescrypt as default hashing method for shadow passwords (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:18:10PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Di., 8. Juni 2021 um 14:35 Uhr schrieb Richard W.M. Jones > : > > > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:59:54PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > == Dependencies == > > > * anaconda: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/3431

Schedule for today's FESCo Meeting (2021-06-08)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-06-08 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be di

Re: F35 Change: Use yescrypt as default hashing method for shadow passwords (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:59:54PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > == Feedback == +1 > == Benefit to Fedora == > == Dependencies == > * anaconda: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/3431 > * authselect: https://github.com/authselect/authselect/pull/253 > * libuser: WIP ongoing > * shadow-utils

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 03:51:59PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: > I have landed rpmlint 2.0.0 in rawhide, along with Mirek Suchý's toml > configs (with updates for the licenses.toml). PRs, bug reports, and > suggestions welcome. Thanks for doing this! I gave it a go: > systemd.spec: E: specfile-err

Re: [cdparanoia] License field fix awaiting to be merged

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:31:15PM -, Benjamin Beasley wrote: > > So, it doesn't really matter if two source files are distributed under the > > GPLv2+ license. > > The resulting binary (i.e. /usr/bin/cdparanoia) will always be GPLv2. > > […] > > But Licensing Guidelines make clear that the Li

[CANCELLED] Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-06-01)

We would have the meeting today, but there are no tickets on the agenda. The meeting is cancelled. The next meeting is scheduled a week from now. I'll chair the next meeting. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: New Fedora Packages Ready For Testing

On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 09:38:46PM -0500, Brendan Early wrote: > Hi all, > > Fedora Packages Static is intended to replace the old Fedora > Packages app and is now available for testing at > https://packages.stg.fedoraproject.org. Any feedback would be > appreciated here or on Pagure at > https://

Re: Automation/gating for handling soname bumps? (was Re: Unannounced soname bump: libgta)

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 05:44:28AM -0400, Jiri Kucera wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Richard Shaw" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 2:06:34 PM > > Subject: Unannounced soname bump: libgta > > > > Looks like a long standin

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:19:25PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 09:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > - DNF Count Me support for Fedora CoreOS [6]. > > > > A

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > - DNF Count Me support for Fedora CoreOS [6]. Are the count stats visible somewhere? Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..

Re: F35 Change: More flexible use of SSSD fast cache for local users (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 10:47:37AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexibleLocalUserCache > > == Summary == > Allow to switch SSSD’s fast cache for local users on and off at runtime. Could you please also amend the summary to say how the default will change? > c

Re: [ELN] Creating a process for ELN-specific changes

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:01:39AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 17. 05. 21 v 10:39 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > > >Dne 14. 05. 21 v 16:58 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > >>On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:53 AM Vít Ondruch > >> wrote: > >>... > Maintaining a separate branch for ELN requires us to

Re: [ELN] Creating a process for ELN-specific changes

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 06:38:33PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I wouldn't say so. I'd say "package both versions as separate > > non-modular RPM packages with unique names" is the general answer > > when different versions of the

Re: f34 - llvm12 update

On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 08:42:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Serge Guelton wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > we're preparing an update of the LLVM package from 12.0.0rc1 to 12.0.0. > > > > In addition the package the llvm team maintain, the following

Re: F35 Change: Drop the the "Allow SSH root login with password" option from the installer GUI (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 07:25:26AM -0400, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 5/14/21 2:05 AM, Juha Tuomala wrote: > >>here, > > > >Sure. But this is devel list. Are developers themselves the target audience? > >:) Hopefully not. Is it defined somewhere? > > by 'here', I meant my company environment, not just t

Re: plocate?

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:22:46PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote: > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 1:25 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > > > I agree. Plocate/mlocate is useful technology, but it's not important > > enough to just

Re: F35 Change: Broken RPATH will fail rpmbuild (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:44:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Some random questions about this: > > - How many existing packages are affected? Can this be analyzed and > the maintainers notified? There's a list of packages at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Broken_RPATH_will_fa

Re: Upgrading Rawhide yesterday set hostname to localhost.localdomain

On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:28:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 09:16:38AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I assume you had 'localhost.localdomain' in /etc/hostname, and now > > you have 'pick.home.annexia.org' aft

Re: Upgrading Rawhide yesterday set hostname to localhost.localdomain

On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 10:03:29AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 09:41:48AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > No idea what particular component / update caused that though, > > or even how to find out. > > So it started with: > > localhost.localdomain systemd-

Re: plocate?

On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 03:07:47PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 8:21 PM Dominique Martinet > wrote: > > > > (added mlocate maintainer msekleta in Ccs; hopefully that's a still > > valid address) > > > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

Re: [Input Requested] Preset support for third-party services

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:07:14PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 21:14, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I originally raised this as a question to FESCo[1], but I was asked to > > bring it up on the Fedora Devel list. My apologies for taking so long > > to

Re: [Input Requested] Preset support for third-party services

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:19:31AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > For a specific example: suppose that a particular VM host provides its > > guest tools only as a closed-source binary that they ship. Do we > > permit them to request the inclusion of their servic

Re: F34 update experience

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:04:34AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > Updated F33 -> F34. Mostly went well, except there is one thing which > could be better. This is not new to F34 but has been there since the > dnf system-upgrade. > > Running on a pretty decent laptop (core i7, 8GB, SSD). The issue

Re: F35 Change: CompilerPolicy Change (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 07:24:28PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 23.04.2021 17:18, Ben Cotton wrote: > >The goal is to give the packager the ability to use their own > >technical judgement to choose the best compiler. > > +1 for this change. Same here. I like the no-nonsense policy

Re: F35 Change: CompilerPolicy Change (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 12:35:34PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 12:32 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > > > The proposed changes[1] to the packaging guidelines does require packagers > > document their reasons in bugzilla, but that's it. > > > At the risk of getting too bikesheddy, w

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 03:15:23PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > Björn Persson writes: > > >> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27758 > > > > The design you propose there won't improve anything for anyone. If the > > hash is computed on the debuginfo server, then an attacker w

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:26:10AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > Björn Persson writes: > > > > > · How is it verified that files received from debuginfo servers have not > > > been tampered with? > > > > Following up further to this, we're planning to add optional

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2021-04-20)

= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = #2595 F35 Change: Erlang 24 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2595 APPROVED (+5, 0, 0) = Meeting Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-04-20/fesco.2021-04-20-17.01.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2

Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-04-20)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-04-20 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be d

Re: Disabling BZ `fedora_requires_release_note` flag

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:01:09PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:40 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > I will disable the flag on Friday 16 April unless there's a good > > reason to keep it. > > > This is done. Farewell `fedora_requires_release_note` and long live > https://pagure.

Re: F35 Change: Switching Cyrus Sasl from BerkeleyDB to GDBM (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:32:29PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > == Detailed Description == > This change switches the default backend Key-Value DB used by sasldb > plugin from BerkeleyDB to GDBM and provides a migration tool for > automatic conversion from old to new format. To clarify: will both ba

Re: F35 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:47:42AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:30 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:44:42AM +, Matthew Almond via devel wrote: > > > On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 23:10 +0200, Lennart Poet

Re: F35 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:44:42AM +, Matthew Almond via devel wrote: > On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 23:10 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Or in other words: packaging metadata are sources too. If they change > > (and a version bump constitutes a change) the output might change, > > and > > that'

[CANCELLED] Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-04-13)

We would have the meeting today, but there are no tickets on the agenda. The meeting is cancelled. The next meeting is scheduled a week from now. I'll chair the next meeting. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: F35 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:57:30PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 12.04.21 16:14, David Malcolm (dmalc...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > So I want to push back on the idea that a single package can be > > associated with a coredump, or be the one responsible for the crash: > > any or all of t

Re: Grub 2 protected packages

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 09:04:09PM -, Filippe LeMarchand wrote: > > This shouldn't be the case. Unless there's a bug, grub2 may be > > installed an unused. If it interferes with sd-boot, please file > > a bug. > > The grub2-efi-x64 package contains directory > /boot/loader/entries. AFAICT this

Re: Grub 2 protected packages

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 08:26:02PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > Hello. > > Today I found[1] that the grub* and shim* packages are now protected > in Fedora 34 and cannot be removed by dnf. I think this change > should be reverted before the F34 release, because some users don't > use G

Re: Storing package metadata in ELF objects

[I'm forwarding the mail from Luca who is not subscribed to fedora-devel] On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 01:38:31PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: Hello, Cross-posting to the mailing lists of a few relevant projects. After an initial discussion [0], recently we have been working on a new specification [0

Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 07:33:42PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:42 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > --- > > A quick update: > > I have created the missing bodhi updates where the packagers obviously > just forgot to file one, or missed the announcement of the > updates-

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >