Shameful doublepost because I missed the link: I'm a fool. I'll try the new
spin once I get a chance to grab a stick to flash it.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ)
wrote:
> I personally have a Mid 2014 MacBook Pro Retina with hybrid graphics. I
> did not
I personally have a Mid 2014 MacBook Pro Retina with hybrid graphics. I did
not observe this bug, though I did not have Wi-Fi or power control. I did
not dare keep Fedora running on my Mac for very long because it was getting
very hot very quickly. I have not tried with updated packages. I'd love t
M, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:16:27PM -0500, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
>
> > I'm honestly surprised that Fedora doesn't offer this little piece of
> > flexibility. I would think that this would be in Fedora and RHEL, because
> > of how usef
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Jan Silhan wrote:
> > On 10. 11. 2014 at 10:31:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > 3. The page says "The depsolver may offer to treat the weak like very
> > > weak relations or the other way round" does dnf do that? or not?
> >
> > DNF doesn't do
What does it mean?
On May 10, 2014 12:16 PM, "Dennis Gilmore" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096434 the license of
> fedora-release has changed from gplv2 to MIT
>
> regards
>
> Dennis
> -BEGIN PGP SIGN
I agree with this completely. Functional capability matters quite a lot and
we seem to forget this a lot lately.
On Apr 21, 2014 7:35 AM, "Stephen Gallagher" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Lately, I've been thinking a lot about Fedora's Foundations: “Freedom,
> Frien
So a friend of mine has been wrangling with suexec trying to configure it
for his needs, and he has become quite furious over the fact that suexec
isn't configurable.
Then he finds out that Debian actually has a version of suexec[1] that lets
you use a conf file to configure suexec. My question is
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2013-02-04, 19:52 GMT, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > It's an outdated article and not much relevant to the current
> > discussion (you see, it says "the Symphony repository"...).
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > The Symphony code is like everything else in
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:15:43AM +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> > 01.02.2013 00:17, drago01 wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Adam Williamson <
> awill...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 14:20 +01
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 02:48:26PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 11/08/2012 02:31 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > >What kind of structure would you imagine such a SIG having?
> >
> > Sorry not following?
> >
> > I assume this
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 05:44 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 06:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > The new anaconda UI and related features are mo
Oh my goodness. This is the highest amount of slippage I've seen in quite
some time. What is wrong with Fedora? The slippage is getting worse each
and every single release. I love Fedora and all, but this is absolutely
ridiculous...
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Jarosla
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Same rules apply for any packages that want to get rolled into the
> 2.5.92 update: Please add the builds to the spreadsheet and they will
> get rolled up into the mega-update.
>
> The spreadsheet URL is:
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreads
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Kellerman Rivero Suarez wrote:
> > You Right, but in OSS exists multiple browsers, multiple desktop
> > managers, multiple media players, and stop count! In this case, I love
> > gedit, but is more matter of taste. I think so.
> >
>
> Y
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:26 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com <
tim.laurid...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Damian Ivanov
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> awn has been orphaned in F17 because latest bzr fails to build
>> (0.4.1-XXX), though latest stable (0.4.0) builds fine.
Hello,
This morning, I woke up to the news that a group of developers have managed
to successfully make Ubuntu's Unity Desktop work on Fedora 17[1]. What kind
of work would be needed to get these people to be able to bring their work
into the Fedora repository so that everyone can easily choose to
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > On 05/14/2012 10:06 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I would like to know if there are still issues with CDDL packages in
> Fedora.
> >>
> >> It is not my intention to sta
I agree with Toshio on this. Depending on how the VCS behaves with
checkout/cloning, it will be difficult to get predictable results in a
usable way through a script. Commenting in the spec file is the best way to
go in my opinion.
On May 14, 2012 9:22 AM, "Toshio Kuratomi" wrote:
> On Mon, May 1
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > How is that possible to implement with a:
> > 1. Show GUI, write kickstart.
> > 2. Process kickstart.
> > design?
>
> We're not literally going to have one program that you use to construct
> a kickstart file, write the file out, and then s
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 20:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey, folks. We made a fairly significant call at the blocker review
> > meeting today, and agreed to notify devel list and FESCo (I'll file a
> > FESCo ticket also) so everyone's
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 17:43 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 16:39 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >>
> >>> I believe Fedora 17 has an add user to admin group check
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 11:18 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500
> > Tom Callaway escribió:
> > > On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > > I just didn't know if there was any "filtering" going on for t
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 23:43:58 +0200
> Christoph Wickert wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> > So what can we do to improve the situation?
> > 1. Can we bring back the language packs as part of the packages?
> > 2. Can the FF maintainers make su
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 04:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > if there would be much more care by introducing new features/replacements
> > my understanding for the fear of update thmen after that would be much
> higher
> >
> > as long fedora is shootin
Eerm, I mean recommended as not usable. Using padevchooser breaks most
PulseAudio environments even now, so don't use it.
2011/10/8 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ)
> There were a lot of changes[1], but the only program I know of that would
> absolutely break from those changes is padevchooser
There were a lot of changes[1], but the only program I know of that would
absolutely break from those changes is padevchooser, which has long since
been recommended and not usable, since avahi takes care of that quite
nicely.
[1]: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Notes/1.0
On S
How would someone go about doing that, anyway?
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated version of
> > OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
> >
> > What happen
It might be better to make a case to bend the rules for PulseAudio and have
it included in Fedora 16. It could be problematic if more programs have
issues like wine where they won't work with pre-1.0 PulseAudio properly or
reliably.
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>
> > I mi
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Andy Grimm wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Douglas Myers–Turnbull [2011-07-25 20:53]:
> >> > I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
> >> > over the Feature and doing all the work if you're fine wi
Most Ubuntu and Debian packages, are indeed silent by default. However, the
fact that RPM's own post-install capabilities are atrocious compared to
dpkg's is completely the fault of the RPM developers and maintainers, and
has a lot to do with distro policies, in particular Fedora. It is something
t
I don't think it would have been too late for Fedora 14. It isn't a core
package that needs to be available in a spin, afaik...
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> heyyas,
>
> ogre3d, one of the most important 3d engines we have in fedora is
> already lagging behind over half
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 02:46 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 08/30/2010 01:01 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > >
> > > Interesting. I can understand not wanting to promote a proprietary
> > > search engine on the Fedora start page, but if t
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 08/03/2010 01:08 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
>> > 2010/8/3 Jon Ciesla:
>> >>> Also I think
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
> > 2010/8/3 Jon Ciesla:
> >>> Also I think that with
> >>> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged
> >>> into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3?
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/31/2010 12:41 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> >
> > Uhh... Firefox 4 GA is before F14 even goes into GA stage. So, that
> > isn't true. Firefox 4 could be included in Fedora 14, and it should be.
>
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:13 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 14:12 -0500, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
>
> >
> > So here's the question:
> >
> > will someone often be doing:
> > yum-config-manager --add-repo=fp:spot/
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 11:51 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > > On 07/30/2010 11:49 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > >> On 0
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 08:58 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > I'm also working on a set of Firefox 4 packages (split between firefox4
> > and xulrunner) that more closely match the Fedora firefox packages, but
> > are able to be installed without
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 23:28 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
>
> > Speaking of which, is there any chance to split ffmpeg into free (which
> > could be included in fedora) and nonfree part? IIRC we've done something
> > like that with xine-lib-
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:16 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
> No disagreement here ... in fact this is a not really a "baby step"
> but "have something usable and start from there" which makes a lot of
> sense.
>
>
As much as I want Chromium to be in Fedora, I don't want it in the
repository if it is going
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> On 7/27/10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 07/28/2010 04:06 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > > According to this two year-old post, it's possible to build Firefox
> > > with gstreamer support:
> > >
> > >
> http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2008
I just got a new report from Koji saying there were errors recorded in
root.log for the build of OggConvert on the PPC machines.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2344902&name=root.log
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:55 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:04 -0400, Dav
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to recommend a Go compiler be included with Fedora 14. We
> would have two options:
>
> 1) GCC-GO (Included in GCC 4.5?)
>
> 2) Google's Go Compiler. (One is made by Conrad Meyer, he mentioned it
> wouldn't be too easy to ad
OggConvert made a release today that adds support for Web-M and fixes Dirac
support, so that will allow people with the WebM enabled in GStreamer to
convert to it... At least now we have a working free software converter that
can be included in Fedora.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> +1
>
> -AdamM (from Android )
>
> On May 20, 2010 1:50 PM, "Jesse Keating" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul...
>
> And with the amount of coordination needed to m
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 05/09/2010 10:03 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> >> Dne 9.5.2010 06:53, Chen Lei napsal(a):
> >>> For them, we can simply:
> >>> 1. Simply orphan those application from repos which have de
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sir Gallantmon (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> > Though, there are some instances where the prevailing opinion should be
> > ignored, when there is no solid evidence to back it up, e.g. Mono and the
> > like.
>
> Indeed, I also
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You will have noticed by now that my FESCo term is about to expire, that
> the
> nomination period for FESCo just closed and that my name does not show up
> on the
> list of candidates. No, this is not an accident or negligence, the de
But it should be explicitly stated anyway. Legalese isn't English.
Note: IANAL
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 16:15 -0500, charles zeitler wrote:
> > i looked at this (and the MIT license) didn't see any explicit reference
> > to source code! (e.g.
49 matches
Mail list logo
