On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 08:31:12AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Hi, just seen that sos package is starting to fail on rawhide with
> following error:
>
>
> Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb
> --target noarch --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/sos.spec'] with env
On 11/04/2013 11:32 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> Just see how others does this. Linux Kernel is one example, Django is
> another. This two projects from very different corners are able to
> provide stable API/ABI for some longer time period. I really appreciate
The kernel does not provide sta
On 08/07/2013 04:12 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
>> On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 17:23 -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
>>> I have installed Fedora 17/18/19 (selected Minimal installation) from
>>> DVD and it completed successfully, however there is no
On 07/16/2013 12:41 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 10:42 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> FWIW this change caused a segfault in OpenStack
>
> This phrase is very dramatic. I'd say "triggered a double free in an
> untested libguestfs error path" is more accurate and less d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/29/2013 10:09 PM, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
> This is simply not true.
>
> There are hundreds of thousands of older desktops that are not
> technically servers that have lots of older interfaces.
Evidence is better than unsupported claims. Altho
On 01/29/2013 04:32 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
In a Fedora context, when you do this it's because the old motherboard
failed unexpectedly, you bought a new one. It's a great relief to see
plugging the old drive on the new mobo just works. There is no prep in
advance and old and new mobo have seve
On 01/29/2013 03:45 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
I guess it was in the short while I switched to Ubuntu, because from my
memory I used to change hardware on my machines and always be extremely
happy at how Linux was resilient to hardware changes between boots and
automatically detected new hardware with
On 01/29/2013 03:24 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Wow this brings me back to Windows 95/XP antifeatures where changing
hardware even a little bit strands you to not be able to boot and having
to go to rescue mode.
Actually this is how mkinitrd/nash worked by default for many years
(pre-dracut, i.e. RH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/20/2012 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 00:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:30 +0100, Miloslav Trma? wrote:
Probably
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Feature
On 19/12/12 21:35, Adrian wrote:
> *From*: Bryn M. Reeves On 19/12/12 17:30, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> Probably http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
>>Mirek
> So why does this bug not show itself on Suse, and any of the Debian based
> bui
On 19/12/12 17:30, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> On Fedora the following command fails:
>>
>> g++ -I/usr/include/freetype2 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
>> -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -pipe -Wall -
On 19/12/12 15:12, Adrian wrote:
> -Wl,-z,relro -lfltk
Which is pretty close to what you get on current Ubuntu:
root@u1210-vm1:~# grep PRETTY /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu quantal (12.10)"
root@u1210-vm1:~# dpkg -s libfltk1.1 | head -2
Package: libfltk1.1
Status: install ok installed
root
On 10/09/2012 03:19 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> While "less" helpfully wraps your log lines at the edge of your terminal
> journalctl unhelpfully truncates them or, if -a is used, makes you use
> left/right cursor to scroll back and forth in an attempt to read the
> lines. Especially since it fully
On 07/17/2012 12:42 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> … which can be used to reset the
> application, so that it knows that it's been updated.
Because that is a common need across many packages.
Apparently being notified of a prelink is not such a common need. Even
if such a thing did exist it coul
On 07/17/2012 12:01 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Andrew Haley writes:
>> Yes, it's the pathname that started this process. Yes, that pathname
>> may point to file that no longer exists. That's UNIX.
>
> No, that's Linux with prelink installed.
And a number of other common configurations for e.g
On 07/17/2012 03:02 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Mike Manilone wrote:
>
>> I think we can create a new repo called "security" like Debian. Push all
>> the security updates to it.
>
> Uhm, we have that. It is called RHEL
Not quite although RHEL errata are also categorised as
On 07/17/2012 12:38 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Jan Kratochvil writes:
>
>> On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:00 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>> And I wouldn't be so presumptions as to state authoritatively what
>>> is or is not a bug, in something whose purpose is not known to me.
>>
>> Non-existing /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2012 01:31 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> I wouldn't back this change either but that's not the behaviour of
> nullglob. If nothing matches the glob the word remains unchanged
> (i.e. *.foo -> *.foo):
Eh, nevermind.. no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2012 01:06 PM, Scott Schmit wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 01:56:29PM +0200, Roman Rakus wrote:
>> Hi, I have a question about nullglob bash's shell option. I want
>> to hear opinions. The behavior is nicely described in bash
>> reference ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/19/2012 02:47 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Bryn M. Reeves wrote: On 06/19/2012 02:01 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>>> This is rediculous. I liked the idea of 775 when it was
>>>> introduced, since it did solve an annoyance wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/19/2012 04:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> Jun 19 09:44:41 nbecker5 sshd[25418]: Authentication refused:
>> bad ownership or modes for directory /home/nbecker
>
> Looks like a new change in OpenSSH then, which is IMHO a
> regr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/19/2012 02:01 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> This is rediculous. I liked the idea of 775 when it was
> introduced, since it did solve an annoyance with the old unix
> groups. But then we should make the default fedora install work by
> setting the ss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2012 06:53 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> For all available firmware vendors and models?
>
> For the ones that end users are actually likely to have, which
> aren't that many. There are much fewer BIOS vendors than hardware
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2012 01:51 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> Actually, with enough PCI USB port cards, USB hubs, and thumb
>> drives, you could use MD RAID and possibly LVM to make a
>> poor-person's SAN. Hot-swappable drives and all.
And with LIO in the kernel you c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 10:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 15:07 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
Yes, all these would currently support what I'm suggesting.
>>> Actually, if you're willing to flip a lot of switches, you
>>> could probably
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 08:03 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> I wasn't responding to MJG, I was responding to Peter— who said I
> was wrong in the message where I was stating that a freedom is
> being lost, and has subsequently spoken more clearly on the
> position
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 07:21 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> Not yet. But HDD technology is changing rapidly. Just look at
> hybrid drives, SSD.
>
> No reason they could not add this capability.
Not really. Both of these have been in development for years and have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 05:16 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 12:13 PM, Miloslav Trma? wrote:
>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Gerry Reno
>> wrote:
>>> http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement
>>>
>>>
>>>
SecureBoot is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 03:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> I thought I'd pay him the respect of sleeping on it and giving
> someone in support of this rather secretive move time to post about
> it and discuss it, so that people wouldn't be learning about it
> fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 02:48 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> From Fedora 18 on, Fedora will no longer include the freedom to for
> a user to create a fork or respin which is the technological equal
> of the Project's output. Instead, this freedom will be available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/15/2012 07:20 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> Try disabling it via /etc/profile.d/PackageKit.sh (and starting a
> new login shell to ensure it's not inherited from your old
> environment) to make sure it's PK and then file a bug.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/15/2012 07:10 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> A bit of sloppy cut and paste gave me this insightful result:
>
> $ 0.e+00] bash: 0.e+00]: command not found...
> Failed to search for file:
> GDBus.Error:org.gtk.GDBus.UnmappedGError.Quar
On 04/25/2012 06:22 PM, Chris wrote:
> 2012/4/25 Josef Bacik :
That's because Btrfs is way more stable than ext4,
>>>
>>> [citation needed]
>>>
>>
>> https://twitter.com/#!/josefbacik/status/195190540529184768
>
> Is this a joke? Btrfs more stable than ext4??? Not really???
I think the tongu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/05/2012 01:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> Detecting and mounting the file systems is straightforward and
>> that's what anaconda does. I read the request as wanting to also
>> make the live e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 06:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> On 04/04/2012 06:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> What I think would be really helpful would be a menu item (next
>>> to the liveinst one) on the live
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 06:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> This should work as long as the rescue CD finds all your file
>> systems and mounts them in the right place (inc. bind mounts for
>> /proc, /sys, /dev). If not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 12:13 PM, Mike Manilone wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 12:05 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> This can be done with install dvd, troublshoot > recsue installed
>> system chmod /mnt/sysimage (iirc) startx
> If there's a grub entry will be mor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 12:06 PM, Mike Manilone wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 11:59 +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> Maybe it would be an idea to extend livecd-tools to allow a live
>> image to be installed to the hard disk and booted via gru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 12:05 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 04/04/12 11:38, Mike Manilone wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I think if there's a "Graphical Rescue Mode" ("GRM"),
>
> This can be done with install dvd, troublshoot > recsue installed
> system chmod /mnt/s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 11:38 AM, Mike Manilone wrote:
> I think if there's a "Graphical Rescue Mode" ("GRM"), that would
> be great and friendly to end-users. I know many users who can't
> rescue their systems from a shell. The work needs a lot of
> knowledge a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2012 04:56 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> Good point. I don't visit those sites, and it's important for me
> to mention that. No p0rn, period, and many of the moral reasons are
> in
There are a lot of perfectly family-friendly websites whose
administ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2012 01:15 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Bryn M. Reeves
> wrote:
>> You're allowing the local sandbox user to connect to the local X
>> server so any process running in one of your s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/16/2012 02:33 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> Perhaps and stupid question:
>>
>> After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added
>> to .gitignore: Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/17/2012 04:01 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> No, it really should use the system version. If it's not in
> Fedora, submit it as a review for a new package.
>
> -J
>
If I read correctly there is no system version since the code
discussed is not a lib
On 10/24/2011 04:05 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> There is a project named SOS in Fedora collection on Transifex. I'd
> like to know if there is anyone maintaining it, because it seems like
> it needs to be translated, but there is no maintainer assigned in Tx
> and no translation team creation requ
On 08/12/2011 04:40 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:27:13AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> Rightly or wrongly, upstream libfoo-1.0 has some additional utilities that
>> access the PrivateData. Because the utilities are built from the libfoo
>> source, they can include
On 07/28/2011 03:50 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> My understanding of the history of /usr/local's nomenclature is that it
> was intended to be "local" to the machine (and thus not NFS mounted).
I always understood it to be site local rather than machine local - the FHS
states that it may be used fo
On 07/28/2011 01:22 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:00:28 +0100
> "Bryn M. Reeves" wrote:
> It is nevertheless an *added* avenue to do some phishing. And for what
> benefit?
No, it's not; at the very most it's making something very slightly le
On 07/28/2011 01:41 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 07/28/2011 07:53 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> On 07/28/2011 12:46 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>>> This is a good point. Especially when you start on a 64 bit box and
>>> login to a 32 bit (or other arch) - bin n
On 07/28/2011 12:54 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:24:48 +0100
> "Bryn M. Reeves" wrote:
>> There are already quite a few things that may place executables
>> under . prefixed paths in home. Java web start (javaws) for instance
>> will
On 07/28/2011 12:46 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 07/28/2011 06:17 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>
>>
>> However, I find ~/.local an odd name. To whom or what is it 'local'? If
>> you have home directories mounted via NFS and log into two different remote
>> hosts via SSH - the only base is "loc
On 07/27/2011 03:14 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:54:09 +0200
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> If you don't hide ~/.local and ~/.config then users who are less savvy
>> than us might wonder what thzat stuff is and delete it and nothing
>> will stop them and then all their configur
On 07/27/2011 11:43 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 07/27/2011 01:23 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:07 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>>> We track autofs issues for fedora, upstream and RHEL and seems to work well
>>> in
>>> the field.
>>>
>>> What specifically does systemd do that
On 07/20/2011 11:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> hopefully systemd will aslo live for 40 years as sysvinit
> did or the next replacement will be finished BEFORE release
> including the correspondending parts of the distribution
Just to be clear as this has been mentioned several times in recent thre
On 07/14/2011 05:48 PM, JB wrote:
> Good. Perhaps a weekly snapshot CD, with the latest BTRFS and related utils,
> so that the testing would be more up-to-date and meaningful.
> JB
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
Regards,
Bryn.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On 07/14/2011 05:26 PM, JB wrote:
> Now just a loud thinking ...
> Have you thought about first preparing a CD (even a live CD) with BTRFS and
> some extra preinstalled software like VirtualBox etc just for testing ?
What, you mean like the live and non-live Fedora ISOs that have had btrfs
support
On 06/02/2011 08:28 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Maybe I'm not understanding your question correctly, but a filesystem
> is more general than LVM. You can create directories corresponding to
> your current VGs and files for your LVs, with the advantage that you
> can nest directories which you
On 05/14/2011 08:35 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> lör 2011-05-14 klockan 19:33 +0200 skrev Xose Vazquez Perez:
>
>> default is 24010, but it was reduced to 1024 by
>> user(included root) in: /etc/security/limits.d/90-nproc.conf
>> to prevent accidental fork bombs(see rhbz #432903).
>>
>> Is it sti
On 05/10/2011 03:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 21:14 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> Sorry... Did I miss something?
>
> I'd imagine someone signed an interlinux address up to the list, and
> that was an automated response.
Right - that was my assumption too. I met the owner
On 05/01/2011 11:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 01.05.2011 09:56, schrieb David Timms:
>
>> Should I be suggesting to upstream to attempt to detect CPU before
>> running non-available instructions, eg as part of app startup ?
>> Can that even be done (reliably)?
>
> ffmpeg has since years a
On 04/14/2011 04:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 09:15 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I experienced a small loss of power during commiting to a git repo.
>
> I can't resist...how does a 'small' loss of power differ from a 'large'
> loss of power? :)
Haha only-s
On 04/14/2011 04:38 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> 2011/4/14 Jason D. Clinton :
>> 2011/4/14 Bruno Wolff III
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 16:53:00 +0200,
>>> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
"Fixed a rare condition that could cause the drive to reset and clear
the data"
I begin to
On 03/30/2011 02:08 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 02:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Wed, 30.03.11 18:04, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>
>> Also, can somebody point me to the place where the FHS would say "no
>> other directories below / are allowed"? I can't fi
On 03/30/2011 01:11 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 02:10 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> 2011/3/30 Ralf Corsepius:
>>> On 03/30/2011 01:54 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya,
I just uploaded a new version of systemd into F15, which establishes a
directory /run in the
On 02/08/2011 02:22 AM, Roberto Spadim wrote:
> hi guys, i made some changes to md raid1 software, could fedora test
> it? for me it work very nice =)
> the raid1 new code is based in kernel 2.6.37
> here is the new and old code:
> www.spadim.com.br/raid1
>
> just read_balance changed (4 modes: ne
On 10/26/2010 10:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 14:07:53 -0700,
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>
>> That's only if you give root the right to disable or load new selinux
>> policy.
>
> And the policy is tight enough. You need to not allow
On 09/15/2010 05:06 PM, Robert Spanton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently had to link a fair amount of my work statically so that
> it'll run on a cluster of RHEL machines. Unfortunately, I am just a
> user of these machines, and so I don't have the power to get them to run
> Fedora or even to get th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/24/2010 09:39 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 16:36 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:14:33AM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
Why is the systemd executable in /bin instead of /sbin?
>>> Without looking t
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 19:11 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> > MultiGHz, Multicore CPUs consume magnitudes more power than HDs.
>
> Not always. A typical 3.5" harddrive consumes about (max):
> 0.65A * 5V = 3.25W
> 0.50A * 12V = 6.00W
> which totals 9.25 Watts, and less when not transferri
On 02/14/2010 04:59 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Any truth here?
>
> http://www.osnews.com/story/22872/Linux_Not_Fully_Prepared_for_4096-
> Byte_Sector_Hard_Drives
>
One-line-summary: googling common search terms for Linux help may lead
you to some out-of-date HOWTOs.
This passes as news these days
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 23:16 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 02:59:37PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > I've finally been sufficiently pestered to fix this ;)
> >
> > Is anybody using any of these static libs from e2fsprogs?
> >
> > -%{_libdir}/libe2p.a
> > -%{_libdir}/libext2
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 17:47 +0200, Slava Zanko wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > My bikeshedding opinion is /lib/init/state might be better. But if
> > it's just to be temporary, why isn't /dev/.initramfs OK?
> +1.
>
> After starting udev daemon old content of /dev catalog will be hidden
> (/de
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 23:38 -0800, Eric Smith wrote:
> Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > You could probably package up libbsd for inclusion:
> > http://libbsd.freedesktop.org/wiki/
> >
> That's exactly the kind of thing I was hoping to find. I've submitted a
> package for review:
>
> https://bug
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 17:44 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Bryn M. Reeves" writes:
>
> > [ may be a built in but then again (as its presence
> > in /usr/bin implies) it may not be :).
>
> Like any other command.
But unlike '[[' which is the point
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 16:44 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Garrett Holmstrom writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> >> It's cute isn't it? I had the biggest grin the day I realised that '['
> >> was just anot
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:41 -0800, Cleaver, Japheth wrote:
> > Denis Leroy
> > what about '/usr/bin/[', part of cureutils... had never
> > noticed this one before.
> >
> > -denis
>
>
> Isn't that simply what makes "if [ (blah) ]" work?
It's cute isn't it? I had the biggest grin the day I reali
76 matches
Mail list logo
