Hello,
recently, we were suggested an improvement for %pyproject_buildrequires
-r/-x.
We could read the project's runtime dependencies (if they're not marked
as `dynamic`) from pyproject.toml [project] table directly, without
calling prepare_metadata_for_build_wheel or building the wheel to
Hello,
ever wanted to add Zuul CI to your Fedora packages in dist-git but then
got discouraged by having to edit the yaml file[0] manually?
I created zuul-config-generator[1], a small script to find all the given
username's or group's packages and generate `fedora-distgits.yaml` with
them
Hello fellow Fedorans,
As many of you know, there's an ongoing yearly effort of integrating a
new Python version to Fedora taking place in Copr[0]. This time we aim
to rebuild over 4000 packages and we couldn't possibly do it without you.
There have already been over 300 of bugzillas[1]
n*" to indicate my domain of interest. It has no
meaning outside of the context of that event.
Hope this clarifies things.
Karolina Surma (she/her/hers)
Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Best regards,
Karolina Surma (she/her/hers)
Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
ject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Karolina Surma (she/her/hers)
Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
On 11/16/22 08:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hello,
The standard invocation of the Python dependency generator will be
changed to always run with option like `--fail-if-version-zero`. (This
is the subject of the current proposal.)
Based on your concerns, an opt out mechanism would
` (or equal versions like `0.0` or `0.0.0`) is
probably technically valid, in most cases this indicates a packaging
error.
We propose to prevent this error from happening by explicitly failing
the RPM build instead of generating such provides.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Ksurma|Karolina Surma]]
* Email: ksu
On 11/15/22 12:42, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:35:32PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
On 11/15/22 08:37, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 15/11/22 00:23, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 6:03 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
So let me sum up
o`. (This
is the subject of the current proposal.)
Based on your concerns, an opt out mechanism would be added:
If you wanted to bypass the option, you could define a macro in the
specfile, eg.
`%{!?__python_dist_allow_version_zero:--fail-if-version-zero}`
This would allow to build RPMs without bothering w
(Originally posted in python-devel@fp.o, cross-posting for better
visibility).
Hello maintainers,
We'd like to add all the non-retired Fedora's packages (co-)maintained by
@python-packagers-sig and the members of Python-maint team to the Zuul
CI[0] configuration.
Please find the full list of
> Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
> Pronouns: He/Him/His
>
>
--
Karolina Surma (she/her/hers)
Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pytho
Hello maintainers,
We'd like to add all the Fedora's packages (co-)maintained by
@python-packagers-sig and the members of Python-maint team to the Zuul
CI* configuration.
You can see the full list of added packages in this PR:
https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/227
I intend to
.
If you're a maintainer of such package, please take a look at it.
Lastly, in case of troubles feel free to reach me through this thread or
ping on #fedora-python on libera.chat (ksurma). I'll try to be of help
as much as I can.
Cheers,
Karolina
On 6/30/22 17:34, Karolina Surma wrote:
> He
aiskup copr-keygen
qulogicpython-pikepdf python-sphinx-panels
rdopiera python-django
rsroka liblognorm
salimmapython-django
sgallagh python-django
zdohnalkea python-pikepdf
zfridric liblognorm
Cheers,
Karolina Surma
[0] https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/changes.html
[1]
Hi,
On 6/30/22 17:44, Bob Mauchin wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2022, 17:35 Karolina Surma, <mailto:ksu...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello packagers,
>
> The new major version of the popular documentation framework Sphinx has
> been recently released[0]. It bring
aiskup copr-keygen
qulogicpython-pikepdf python-sphinx-panels
rdopiera python-django
rsroka liblognorm
salimmapython-django
sgallagh python-django
zdohnalkea python-pikepdf
zfridric liblognorm
Cheers,
Karolina Surma
[0] https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/changes.html
[1]
Hello,
I've just orphaned python-readthedocs-sphinx-ext[1].
In the communication with the upstream we discovered this extension was
used as an internal tool for the readthedocs builders. We concluded it
shouldn't be needed in Fedora at all.
Three packages in Fedora BR it, all of them received
-setuptools's license string has changed as some new libraries are
vendored by the package.
The new license is: 'MIT and ASL 2.0 and (BSD or ASL 2.0) and Python'
(was: 'MIT and (BSD or ASL 2.0)').
Happy packaging,
Karolina Surma
___
python-devel mailing
-setuptools's license string has changed as some new libraries are
vendored by the package.
The new license is: 'MIT and ASL 2.0 and (BSD or ASL 2.0) and Python'
(was: 'MIT and (BSD or ASL 2.0)').
Happy packaging,
Karolina Surma
___
devel mailing list
On 2/11/22 21:45, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> It was actually announced:
>>
>>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/FV53ADNJB5STFN3YAEEXEVHMIA6DMXCN/
>>
>> But for reasons I don't understand, it was pushed to rawhide
Hi all,
thank you Miro for the check of the dependency chain.
Jerry, feel free to transfer the ownership to me:
python-readthedocs-sphinx-ext -> ksurma
python-sphinx_rtd_theme -> ksurma
Have a great weekend,
Karolina
On 2/10/22 19:17, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 09. 02. 22 16:38, Jerry James
Hey Mattias,
On 1/5/22 09:39, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> would it be too late to upgrade Django for Fedora 36 to version 4.0.x?
> It may require some more package updates, not just Django itself.
>
> The releasenotes are here[1], We have version 3.2 in Fedora 35, which
> is a
%pyproject_save_files.
Happy packaging,
Karolina Surma
[0]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros/blob/rawhide/f/README.md
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le
Hey Jerry,
I've taken python-pytest-datadir and python-pytest-regressions which I
started to work on independently.
Cheers,
Karolina
On 7/14/21 1:02 AM, Jerry James wrote:
A new version of python-networkx is out. In order to keep building
documentation for it, the following new packages
.
Feel free to reach me through this thread or ping on #fedora-python on
libera.chat (ksurma).
Cheers,
Karolina Surma
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sphinx4
Maintainers by package:
Mayavi chedi orion
ansible kevin toshio wzzrd
ara
the Sphinx update, see the associated Fedora
Change [0].
Having questions or in need of help? Don't hesitate to contact me.
You can reply to this thread or find ksurma on #fedora-python IRC
channel (libera.chat).
Best regards,
Karolina Surma
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sphinx4
the Sphinx update, see the associated Fedora
Change [0].
Having questions or in need of help? Don't hesitate to contact me.
You can reply to this thread or find ksurma on #fedora-python IRC
channel (libera.chat).
Best regards,
Karolina Surma
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sphinx4
28 matches
Mail list logo
