On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:01:33 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:03:30 +0800
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take
over other's packages.
If FESCo member could give consent of adding
On 26.07.2014 19:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote
Sorry for the long delay here. ;( There was a issue with the pkgdb2 api
to do this, then I was traveling, etc.
It's now been done.
The following packages are looking for a new point of contact on at
least one branch:
(Note that many of them have
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 00:15 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Given that Deji Akingunola is maintainer of a couple of high-profile
packages, I'd like to double-check whether really no-one knows how to
reach him. The packages he is maintainer for are:
atlas
babl
bibletime
cln
clucene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/26/2014 12:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
atlas babl bibletime cln clucene exaile exempi galternatives gegl
gparted grads libctl libibverbs libmlx4 libmthca libqalculate
mpich mpich2 nautilus-actions ncview netcdf o3read qalculate-gtk
On 07/26/2014 11:17 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Sorry for the long delay here. ;( There was a issue with the pkgdb2 api
to do this, then I was traveling, etc.
It's now been done.
The following packages are looking for a new point of contact on at
least one branch:
(Note that many of them
2014-06-24 13:50 GMT+04:00 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com:
Hello All!
As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in his
private email). So it's time to change a poit of contact for the only
package Hubert maintained - RabbitMQ server.
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:55:23 +0400
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-06-24 13:50 GMT+04:00 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com:
Hello All!
As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in
his private email). So it's time to change a poit of contact for
the only
2014-07-01 21:58 GMT+04:00 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:55:23 +0400
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-06-24 13:50 GMT+04:00 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com:
Hello All!
As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in
his private
On 06/26/2014 10:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:19:32 +0200
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Given that no-one seems to know how to contact deji, I'd like to
request the takeover of scotch.
as a fesco member I can ack this.
We will be orphaning his packages and
My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take over
other's packages.
If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not
the point of the contact) of a package instead of orphaning lots of
packages, that will be helpful.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:03:30 +0800
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take over
other's packages.
If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not
the point of the contact) of a package instead of
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:19:32 +0200
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Given that no-one seems to know how to contact deji, I'd like to
request the takeover of scotch.
as a fesco member I can ack this.
We will be orphaning his packages and you can pick up scotch.
kevin
Hi,
Given that no-one seems to know how to contact deji, I'd like to request
the takeover of scotch.
Thanks,
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hello All!
As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in his
private email). So it's time to change a poit of contact for the only
package Hubert maintained - RabbitMQ server.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rabbitmq-server/
I propose myself (FAS name: peter)
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 01:50:31PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in his
private email). So it's time to change a poit of contact for the only
package Hubert maintained - RabbitMQ server.
Hi,
Given that Deji Akingunola is maintainer of a couple of high-profile
packages, I'd like to double-check whether really no-one knows how to
reach him. The packages he is maintainer for are:
atlas
babl
bibletime
cln
clucene
exaile
exempi
galternatives
gegl
gparted
grads
libctl
libibverbs
Hi,
I've filed this bug [1] in scotch nearly one month ago, the issue being
that the scotch libraries are under-linked and have undefined symbols. A
tentative patch is attached in the BZ. Since this is a blocker for the
salome packaging, I'd like to see this resolved.
Attempts to contact
I haven't been able to get in touch with Silas Sewell (silas) by email or by
bugzilla. He is the owner of quite a few packages but I'm primarily only
interested in two. They are redis and python-redis. They are both out of date
and I'd like to see them get updated in EPEL. Here links to the
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com a écrit:
Hi, Dodji. It's now been two months since you said you were planning to
test the latest version. Since then another version has been promoted to
RC.
Indeed. And I have been testing that 6.5.5 rc version. And it didn't
eat any of my emails. I
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 03:29:45PM +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com a écrit:
Hi, Dodji. It's now been two months since you said you were planning to
test the latest version. Since then another version has been promoted to
RC.
Indeed. And I have been
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com a écrit:
[1]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=466672
Installed and it works for me.
OK.
I had to add configuration options for certificate fingerprints and
it's all good.
Yeah, that option is mandatory with SSL now.
+1 on the
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:01:37PM +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com a écrit:
BZ#848774
This bug is nearly a year old, requesting that package offlineimap be
upgraded to what was then the latest release (6.5.4, now it is
6.5.5-rc2). There has been no
I'm having troubles contacting Anthony Green (username green). I'd
like to comaintain the autogen package. There is a number of bugs
which should be addressed [1], but my request for commit access is
unanswered. I didn't get any reply on email or IRC. The last commit he
made in the autogen package
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 11:19:36 AM
Subject: Non-responsive maintainer: Anthony Green
I'm having troubles contacting Anthony Green (username green). I'd
like to comaintain the autogen package. There is a number of bugs
which should be addressed [1], but my request for commit access
-responsive maintainer: Anthony Green
I'm having troubles contacting Anthony Green (username green). I'd
like to comaintain the autogen package. There is a number of bugs
which should be addressed [1], but my request for commit access is
unanswered. I didn't get any reply on email or IRC. The last
Hi,
Since all attempts to contact the mingw-proj maintainer have failed, and
it's been three weeks since filing bug #983759, I'd like to request to
take over mingw-proj.
For reference, here are the other packages maintained by adsllc:
drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts -- A Latin typeface
On 30 July 2013 02:24, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Christopher Meng
Ping Rahul. Please see Kevin's comment.
He is inactive now, no matter how many packages he has owned we should
think if he really wants to go ahead.
I have contacted him off list. If he doesn't
Oh...
lynis
unhide
gnucap
code2html
taken.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 07/30/2013 02:15 AM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
On 30 July 2013 02:24, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Christopher Meng
Ping Rahul. Please see Kevin's comment.
He is inactive now, no matter how many packages he has owned we should
think if he really wants to go ahead.
在 2013-7-26 AM11:44，Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com写道：
He has left Red Hat (although his Fedora work was voluntary) and gone
back to school and I don't think he has the time to take care of this
packages. Might be better to expedite the process and fix the issues that
haven't been handled
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Christopher Meng
Ping Rahul. Please see Kevin's comment.
He is inactive now, no matter how many packages he has owned we should
think if he really wants to go ahead.
I have contacted him off list. If he doesn't respond, I guess you can
orphan the packages
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 23:44:38 -0400
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
HI
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984776
Rakesh Pandit aka rpandit at redhat.com, hasn't replied any of
unhide
Hi,
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984776
Rakesh Pandit aka rpandit at redhat.com, hasn't replied any of unhide
emails I've sent to him since Jul 1st.
In Mar 2012, unhide author asked if he could push an update for this
package[1], and after a year, it still remains like
Once upon a time, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com said:
Rakesh Pandit aka rpandit at redhat.com, hasn't replied any of unhide
emails I've sent to him since Jul 1st.
I'll go one better: I reported a buffer overflow in up-imapproxy, with a
patch supplied, on 2008-11-05, and he still hasn't
HI
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984776
Rakesh Pandit aka rpandit at redhat.com, hasn't replied any of unhide
emails I've sent to him since Jul 1st.
He has left Red Hat (although his Fedora work was
So I think it's time to release his packages to people who have time now.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I've filed bug #983759 [1] concerning updating mingw-proj to the latest
version and enabling the mingw64 package two weeks ago, but have
received no response since. This is blocking my review request #984248
[2]. I've tried contacting adsllc directly via email, but have received
no
BZ#848774
This bug is nearly a year old, requesting that package offlineimap be
upgraded to what was then the latest release (6.5.4, now it is
6.5.5-rc2). There has been no response from the maintainer.
I posted a bug comment on 01 July asking for something from the package
maintainer and
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com a écrit:
BZ#848774
This bug is nearly a year old, requesting that package offlineimap be
upgraded to what was then the latest release (6.5.4, now it is
6.5.5-rc2). There has been no response from the maintainer.
I posted a bug comment on 01 July asking
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:01:37PM +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com a écrit:
BZ#848774
This bug is nearly a year old, requesting that package offlineimap be
upgraded to what was then the latest release (6.5.4, now it is
6.5.5-rc2). There has been no
On 02/15/2013 05:11 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Ping.
I'd like to finish up the NRM process.
What have I not done? Do I need to CC FESCo members directly? Create a
trac ticket?
The current maintainer has gone without replying to my messages for a
month now. My FAS name is mooninite
On 25 February 2013 06:37, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
On 02/15/2013 05:11 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Ping.
I'd like to finish up the NRM process.
What have I not done? Do I need to CC FESCo members directly? Create a trac
ticket?
I believe you need to file a trac
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I believe you need to file a trac ticket. That should get this on a
FESCo meeting agenda and get this dealt with.
Created. Thanks.
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1091
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I'd like to finish up the NRM process.
What have I not done? Do I need to CC FESCo members directly? Create a trac
ticket?
The current maintainer has gone without replying to my messages for a month
now. My FAS name is mooninite and I have
On 25 February 2013 13:28, Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I'd like to finish up the NRM process.
What have I not done? Do I need to CC FESCo members directly? Create a
trac ticket?
The current maintainer has gone without replying to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:31:18 -0700
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2013 13:28, Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I'd like to finish up the NRM process.
What have I not done? Do I need to CC FESCo
On 08/02/13 01:36 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Feb 8, 2013 12:54 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
mailto:smo...@gmail.com wrote:
. Two the fix is to upgrade to a very new
version which will break everyone who upgrades until they (or the
first person who gets to the website :) ) runs
On 15/02/13 03:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 08/02/13 01:36 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
I haven't poked at mediawiki in a while, so please correct me if I'm
wrong, but isn't it fairly self contained? I recall copying the content
from /usr/share/ to /var/www/ then localizing. Having a new version
On Feb 15, 2013 5:34 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/02/13 01:36 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
.
I haven't poked at mediawiki in a while, so please correct me if I'm
wrong, but isn't it fairly self contained? I recall copying the content
from /usr/share/ to /var/www/ then
On 15/02/13 05:44 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 15/02/13 03:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 08/02/13 01:36 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
I haven't poked at mediawiki in a while, so please correct me if I'm
wrong, but isn't it fairly self contained? I recall copying the content
from /usr/share/ to
On 15/02/13 09:49 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
Interestingly, 'repoquery -l' does show some of the mediawiki packages
owning files in /var/www/. Whether grandfathered, broken, or just
misconception, I'll keep further comment to myself until I can play with
a VM.
There are cases when there really
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:24:31AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 15/02/13 05:44 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
You're both kind of right - the README.RPM file that comes in the
mediawiki package tells you to run mw-createinstance path to create
an instance and that sets up a document root in the
On 02/08/2013 08:46 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
The mediawiki package is severely outdated. I have attempted to contact
the maintainer and received only one reply in a couple of weeks. He has
ignored my requests for co-maintainership.
I commented on the NRM bug[1] two weeks ago with no
On 15 February 2013 12:24, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On 15/02/13 05:44 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 15/02/13 03:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 08/02/13 01:36 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
I haven't poked at mediawiki in a while, so please correct me if I'm
wrong, but isn't it fairly
The mediawiki package is severely outdated. I have attempted to contact
the maintainer and received only one reply in a couple of weeks. He has
ignored my requests for co-maintainership.
I commented on the NRM bug[1] two weeks ago with no response. The bug
itself is months old, but he pops in to
Hi
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
At this point it is time for someone to update the package as it
is currently a security hazard. I have already built the latest
mediawiki package and have it ready to rock-and-or-roll once the NRM
procedure is finished.
There
On 8 February 2013 12:15, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
At this point it is time for someone to update the package as it
is currently a security hazard. I have already built the latest
mediawiki package and have it
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
This package is a bit difficult to fix. One it has custom patches
that upstream doesn't accept. Two the fix is to upgrade to a very new
version which will break everyone who upgrades until they (or the
first person who gets to the website :) ) runs the upgrade
On 8 February 2013 13:15, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
This package is a bit difficult to fix. One it has custom patches
that upstream doesn't accept. Two the fix is to upgrade to a very new
version which will break everyone who upgrades until they (or
On Feb 8, 2013 12:54 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
. Two the fix is to upgrade to a very new
version which will break everyone who upgrades until they (or the
first person who gets to the website :) ) runs the upgrade mode..
which might not work due to either custom changes
I've handed up with this question when I first request for an upgrade of
mediawiki.
I remember someone told me that upgrading may cause errors of custom css or
custom theme,is it true?
在 2013-2-9 AM5:37，Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com写道：
On Feb 8, 2013 12:54 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
I've handed up with this question when I first request for an upgrade of
mediawiki.
I remember someone told me that upgrading may cause errors of custom css or
custom theme,is it true?
在 2013-2-9 AM5:37，Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com写道：
On Feb 8, 2013 12:54 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
On 11/11/2012 10:01 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/06/2012 06:07 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
And please, please, please could we trim quotes to relevant ones? Thanks!
Ohmahgerd, thank you for saying that. I am all for bottom posting but
the
On 11/06/2012 06:07 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
And please, please, please could we trim quotes to relevant ones? Thanks!
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.
Apparently the current owner doesn't care. You can compare the
version
history in koji [2] and [3] and if he doesn't care about one package,
it
is reasonable
Dne 6.11.2012 16:40, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/06/2012 04:32 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed usage of
the script in Johann's ticket
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by
email about every change in your package, so you'll be able to catch
such activity pretty soon and act accordingly.
To be the devil's advocate, you do get the email
Dne 7.11.2012 09:52, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 6.11.2012 16:40, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/06/2012 04:32 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed
Dne 7.11.2012 10:00, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by
email about every change in your package, so you'll be able to catch
such activity pretty soon and act accordingly.
To
: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.
Apparently the current owner doesn't care. You can compare the
version
history in koji [2] and [3] and if he doesn't
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 10:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 7.11.2012 10:00, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by
email about every change in your package, so you'll be able to
...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.
Apparently the current owner doesn't care. You can compare the
version
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Come on, there are the same alarmist who think that Wikipedia will be
hijacked and destroyed but have it happened any time?
Edit wars often break out on Wikipedia. That's not something I would
like to see in Fedora.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lamest_edit_wars
Dne 5.11.2012 10:22, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 10:28:11 AM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
Dne 5.11.2012 10:22, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 10:28:11 AM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
Dne 5.11.2012 10:22, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06
@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 12:55:27 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
I don't know what are you reading in my response, but I definitely
did
not propose anything like noone wants people that are ready to do
one
thing in a year.
Vit
Dne
: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
I don't know what are you reading in my response, but I definitely
did
not propose anything like noone wants people that are ready to do
one
thing in a year.
Vit
Dne 6.11.2012 09:52, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
Where is the community spirit? What
Is it really that hard for you people to follow our mailing list
guidelines[1]?
JBG
1.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#If_You_Are_Replying_to_a_Message
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 12:55:27 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
I don't know what are you reading in my response, but I definitely
did
not propose anything like noone wants people that are ready
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 12:55:27 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
I don't know what are you reading in my response, but I definitely
did
not propose anything like noone
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me
Dne 6.11.2012 14:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well
On 11/06/2012 02:24 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 6.11.2012 14:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed usage of
the script in Johann's ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/967#comment:7 Imho it might be
better to give acl to more people, then
On 11/06/2012 04:32 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed usage of
the script in Johann's ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/967#comment:7 Imho
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 16:04:39 +0100,
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
When I do not react upon requests, I usually either missed or forgot
about the request or deliberately do not yet want to approve.
That said, what I feel is missing in Fedora's pkgdb web-forms is an
option to
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?=
johan...@gmail.com
On 11/05/2012 09:22 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
You are using your use-case for everyone. If you insist on automatic
process, then the metric should work with more data.
It's good that we elected FESCO to find out and decide which appropriate
metric data should be used to determine that...
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 9:20:05 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Wrong. Do you know how
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 06:12:02PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:05 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, they might simply have had nothing to do. Sometimes
applications are stable, have no releases, and have no bugs files
against them.
sigh
Then those individuals would
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?=
johan...@gmail.com writes:
On 11/02/2012 03:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:12:56PM +,
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?=
johan...@gmail.com writes:
On 11/02/2012 03:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 17:57:57 +,
\Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\ johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Surely if an individual has not logged into for several months into
our infrastructure he must be inactive no?
Not necessarily. You can watch things without having to login to
infrastructure. Unless
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
On 11/02/2012 06:05 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, they might simply have had nothing to do. Sometimes applications
are stable, have no releases, and have no bugs files against them.
sigh
Then those individuals would simply respond to the email that that was
the case and they are still alive
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 7:57:57 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Wrong. Do you know how few of the problems we see in Eclipse land don't need
fixes upstreams? And some of these issues require man/months (years sometimes)
upstream before there is smth to show in Fedora. Don't make your assumptions
based on
Once upon a time, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com said:
Surely if an individual has not logged into for several months into our
infrastructure he must be inactive no?
I maintain just a couple of low-overhead packages, and I haven't changed
either in a couple of years. The only time
Bug here, with no response: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861970
Gavin isn't responding to bugs or to email.
Note that also note that Jaroslav Škarvada has an updated package in
testing, has asked to become a co-maintainer, and in fact has been trying to
get a response for almost
601 - 700 of 879 matches
Mail list logo
