Re: MATE Desktop support?

Once upon a time, Pavel Solovev said: > MATE follows the even stable / odd unstable versioning system. 1.27 is an > under development,pre-release. Ahh, my mistake then! Sorry about that. I guess I run into that type of versioning less these days, so it didn't cross my mind. Now if I can just

Re: MATE Desktop support?

MATE follows the even stable / odd unstable versioning system. 1.27 is an under development,pre-release. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Mate desktop environment update

On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, Greg Bailey wrote: I think I tried building Mate 1.22 on CentOS 7 but ran into issues where it needed a newer GCC than CentOS 7 provides, and I wasn't up for the complexity challenge of building it using a different toolchain...  :) CentOS 7 has the softwarecollections

[EPEL-devel] Re: Mate desktop environment update

On 6/5/20 10:35 AM, H wrote: On June 5, 2020 11:21:07 AM EDT, Greg Bailey wrote: On 6/5/20 2:21 AM, Menanteau wrote: Hi there, is there a plan to update Mate in EPEL ? There was a demand to update to Mate 1.8 years ago but I didn't see any answer.  Mate 1.24 is currently available. Thanks

[EPEL-devel] Re: Mate desktop environment update

On June 5, 2020 11:21:07 AM EDT, Greg Bailey wrote: >On 6/5/20 2:21 AM, Menanteau wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> is there a plan to update Mate in EPEL ? >> >> There was a demand to update to Mate 1.8 years ago but I didn't see >> any answer.  Mate 1.24 is currently available. >> >> Thanks > >I run

[EPEL-devel] Re: Mate desktop environment update

On 6/5/20 2:21 AM, Menanteau wrote: Hi there, is there a plan to update Mate in EPEL ? There was a demand to update to Mate 1.8 years ago but I didn't see any answer.  Mate 1.24 is currently available. Thanks I run Mate on both CentOS 7 and CentOS 8. For CentOS 7, I run Mate 1.20 using

[EPEL-devel] Re: Mate desktop environment update

On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 05:21, Menanteau wrote: > Hi there, > > is there a plan to update Mate in EPEL ? > > EPEL is not a distribution and does not have 'plans' to produce things for certain releases. Nobody is paid to work on EPEL versus paid to work on Fedora so the packages here are those that

[EPEL-devel] Re: Mate desktop environment update

If you (or others) haven't already done so, a bugzilla requesting an update might be best. Many times packagers aren't on the epel-devel mailing list, and/or have it filtered. On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:22 AM Menanteau wrote: > > Hi there, > > is there a plan to update Mate in EPEL ? > > There was

[EPEL-devel] Re: MATE Desktop in EPEL repository

On 17 May 2017 at 04:32, Arnold Fabian1 wrote: > Dear Team > > I would have a question regarding EPEL repository for RHEL 7.x > I can see, that the MATE Desktop 1.18 released in 2017-03-13 > but in the EPEL repository, it is not available yet, only the 1.16: >

[EPEL-devel] Re: MATE Desktop in EPEL repository

You can open bugs against the specific packages in bugzilla.redhat.com requesting they be updated, but note that having the newest/latest packages in EPEL is secondary to maintaining stability. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_incompatible_upgrades_policy

Re: mate-desktop 1.8

On Mar 14, 2014 7:52 AM, Brian Millett bmill...@gmail.com wrote: What is the prospect of getting mate 1.8 for fedora 20? Prospect is good. We're QAing on Rawhide at the moment. Dan Sent from my Google Nexus 5 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: mate-desktop 1.8

On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:09:42 -0700 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 14, 2014 7:52 AM, Brian Millett bmill...@gmail.com wrote: What is the prospect of getting mate 1.8 for fedora 20? Prospect is good. We're QAing on Rawhide at the moment. Dan Sent from my Google Nexus

Re: Mate-Desktop

On 2012-08-27 22:08, Michael Scherer wrote: Le lundi 27 août 2012 à 17:48 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit : On 2012-08-24 13:49, Rave it wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you

Re: Mate-Desktop

On 28/08/12 07:08, Michael Scherer wrote: Just stating facts as well, that's slightly wrong. Wolfgang aka raveit use the login niceandgently on github. The one who accuse Dan mashal of calling him portuguese noob is ketheriel, aka Nelson Marques, on 23-07-2012. He also reuse the

Re: Re: Mate-Desktop

Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I don't accept it. Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he (and I with him) are working on. I personally don't feel it helps taking your greivances public, as

Re: Re: Mate-Desktop: please moderate

Stefano Karapetsas wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I don't accept it. Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he (and I with him) are working on. I personally don't feel it helps

Re: Mate-Desktop

On 2012-08-24 13:49, Rave it wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your future endeavors. -- rex No mercy, no thanks. Why do

Re: Mate-Desktop

Le lundi 27 août 2012 à 17:48 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit : On 2012-08-24 13:49, Rave it wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made,

Re: Subject: Re: Mate-Desktop

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your future

Re: Mate-Desktop

Rex Dieter wrote: I don't accept it. Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he (and I with him) are working on. I personally don't feel it helps taking your greivances public, as now Dan's perception of you (and now potentially others) will be colored as hostile. Sorry, for me is

Re: Mate-Desktop

On 08/23/2012 04:53 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Rave it wrote: For your information. I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project for f18 because I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive

Re: Mate-Desktop

Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your future endeavors. -- rex No mercy, no thanks. Why do you Mr. Rex Dieter as sponsor accept rude

Re: Subject: Re: Mate-Desktop

Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your future endeavors. -- rex No mercy, no thanks. Why do you Mr. Rex Dieter as

Re: Mate-Desktop

Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your future endeavors. -- rex No mercy, no thanks. Why do you Mr. Rex Dieter as sponsor accept rude

Re: Mate-Desktop

Rave it wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your future endeavors. No mercy, no thanks. Why do you Mr. Rex Dieter as

Re: Mate-Desktop

Rave it wrote: For your information. I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project for f18 because I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble communicating and working together. I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in your future

Re: Mate-Desktop

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote: Ri == Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de writes: Ri For your information. I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project Ri for f18 because for me it is imposssible to to work together with Ri Dan Mashal. One of the

Re: Mate-Desktop

On 08/21/2012 11:50 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: As a reminder, everyone working within the Fedora project is expected to abide by the code of conduct (http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct). If there's an interpersonal conflict that can't be resolved by the individuals or the specific subset

Re: Mate-Desktop

Brendan Jones wrote: I understand Dan's fairly new to Fedora - perhaps his sponsor should have a word with him. Would it be enough to CC Rex? Or should we open a ticket on a trac of one of the Fedora committees? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Mate-Desktop

Ri == Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de writes: Ri For your information. I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project Ri for f18 because for me it is imposssible to to work together with Ri Dan Mashal. One of the reason for my decision is this last talk with Ri Dan Mashal today. I've watched a

Re: Mate-Desktop

As a reminder, everyone working within the Fedora project is expected to abide by the code of conduct (http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct). If there's an interpersonal conflict that can't be resolved by the individuals or the specific subset of the project involved, please feel free to

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

Richard W.M. Jones wrote: [Reviving an old thread ...] Indeed this seems to be not just vapourware: http://cinnamon.linuxmint.com/?p=119 I don't buy the arguments that MATE is vapourware, but building a new Gnome-2-like desktop on the Gnome 3 underpinnings obviously is easier and in the

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:24:08PM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: On 12/09/2011 12:50 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba.

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-10 16:36 keltezéssel, Rahul Sundaram írta: On 12/10/2011 03:30 PM, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: u Not so fast, there was a point in time when the whole Linux development community was Linus Torvalds. Live and let live. You would have a better point there if MATE was a new desktop

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 11:34 keltezéssel, Kevin Kofler írta: and there is a development community. LOL, a community called Timothy Pearson… Don't make me laugh. Kevin Kofler Not so fast, there was a point in time when the whole Linux development community was Linus Torvalds. Live and let live.

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

Hi. On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:00:55 +0100, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote Not so fast, there was a point in time when the whole Linux development community was Linus Torvalds. Live and let live. Yes, there was. But it was a) rather short, and b) did not have a codebase even remotely comparable to the

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

On 12/10/2011 03:30 PM, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: u Not so fast, there was a point in time when the whole Linux development community was Linus Torvalds. Live and let live. You would have a better point there if MATE was a new desktop environment trying to grow a community. GNOME 2.x is a

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2011, 19:50 -0800 schrieb Eric Smith: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2. MATE is just replacing gnome with mate everywhere, whether or not it was

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

Hi, What do you think about Trinity Desktop? I liked KDE3. Is there a chance to include this DE in Fedora? Unlike the MATE, TD is well maintained and there is a development community. -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

On 09/12/11 07:03, Eric Smith wrote: I tried switching to Xfce, and found it to be a lot better than Gnome 3, but it was still missing a lot of things I'm accustomed to in Gnome 2. I'm not trying to start another advocacy thread. I'm just trying to package up an alternative for people like

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

Michał Piotrowski wrote: What do you think about Trinity Desktop? I liked KDE3. Is there a chance to include this DE in Fedora? Please NO! We worked hard on making kdelibs3 apps work well in KDE Plasma 4 sessions. Trying to support Trinity sessions too is going to make a big mess. Another big

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

On 12/09/2011 04:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package the remaining MATE packages. Would anyone

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

On 12/09/2011 05:17 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 12/09/2011 04:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2.

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

On 12/09/2011 11:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: one developer? I am worried about sustainability. How can you be worried about maintainability given that we already have unmaintained and poorly maintained packages in the distribution? When you have problems, the solution is to fix

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

On 12/09/2011 12:50 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

On 12/09/2011 05:42 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 12/09/2011 11:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: one developer? I am worried about sustainability. How can you be worried about maintainability given that we already have unmaintained and poorly maintained packages in the

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

Rahul Sundaram wrote: It is not useful to generalize. There are lots of software components which aren't actively maintained but are useful to have in the distribution and all distributions have them however a desktop environment is a lot of work to maintain (as seen for instance in

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 10.12.2011 01:20, schrieb Kevin Kofler: So I'm sceptical about MATE (seeing what's going on with Trinity) and I can only strongly discourage attempting to package Trinity. I agree to that point of view. IMHO MATE is a waste of time and

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package the remaining MATE packages. Would

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

Hello 2011/12/9 Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba.  MATE is a fork of GNOME 2.  I expect that it will take me a few months to package the remaining MATE packages. Mate is

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 09:24 +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Hello 2011/12/9 Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

Peter Lemenkov wrote: I'd rather help others with transition to Gnome3, as some active members of our local community (Russian Fedora) does. I've spent months trying to get used to Gnome 3, and had lots of help from various people, and I still can't stand it. Yes, I know that there are