> On 26. 07. 22 17:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> I don't think so:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/1926c37598951ae307...
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1968550
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-925c18db47
Indeed. It
On 26. 07. 22 17:15, Michael J Gruber wrote:
The %java_arches macro mentioned in the change proposal is available on F36 and
up only
I don't think so:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/1926c37598951ae30749eb212b2412973a0300e5?branch=f35
> Next failure is portmidi due to "Drop_i686_JDKs"
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs
>
> I don't know how I missed that change proposal. I cannot even make sense of
> the
> English in those template mails (never got any myself). This is going to be a
> lot of fun
> ...
As a quick and dirty thing I took the f37-needs-rebuild list and the
f37-failed to build list and found things that were only on the
needs-rebuild list.
I then filtered out the ones we don't try and mass rebuild (shim,
kernel, grub2, etc) and the silly ones we have like Fedora-Live-Xfce
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 4:03 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yeah, fixed. I retagged all the things in the signing pending tag.
>
> However, this might cause some really old updates to land...
> so keep an eye out for that.
Will do, thank you!
> Yeah, this the old 'if koji can't rebuild the src.rpm, it
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 02:49:53PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 2:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The packages were signed and the sidetag is through to f37.
> >
> > Also, the signing queue is all caught up.
>
> Can you take a look at gap-4.11.1-5.fc37? It's been in
>
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:43:38PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Can confirm, looks all good now, thanks!
>
> BTW, I'd like to know whatever magic you did to fedora notifications.
> Because it apparently kept chugging on right through the mass rebuild,
> and is now caught up again. :)
Yeah,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 2:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The packages were signed and the sidetag is through to f37.
>
> Also, the signing queue is all caught up.
Can you take a look at gap-4.11.1-5.fc37? It's been in
f37-signing-pending for over 2 days now.
> The only things left for the mass
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:09:50AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> ...snip...
> >
> > So, as long as that sidetag update goes out all should be fine.
>
> The packages were
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:09:50AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
...snip...
>
> So, as long as that sidetag update goes out all should be fine.
The packages were signed and the sidetag is through to f37.
Also, the signing queue is
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > We have had several issues in the last few days sadly.
> > I think your build ran into systemd-oomd running on some builders after
> > I had disabled it and thought I
Thank you Vitaly.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
On 23/07/2022 14:46, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
First, do I need to wait for the FTBFS bugs to be filed before I fix
the packages or can I submit updated builds to the f37-rebuild side
tag myself?
You can build directly to Rawhide without waiting. Mass rebuild will
automatically pick build
Hello,
Two of my packages failed to build due to a trailing "." after the
%cmake macro in the spec file. I have a couple of questions:
First, do I need to wait for the FTBFS bugs to be filed before I fix
the packages or can I submit updated builds to the f37-rebuild side
tag myself?
Second, I
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> We have had several issues in the last few days sadly.
> I think your build ran into systemd-oomd running on some builders after
> I had disabled it and thought I stopped it, but didn't. ;(
>
> Anyhow, the thing to do here if it builds is
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:24:21PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On 22/07/22 09:08AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > notmuch failed to build from source because of a strange test suite failure
> > on ppc64le:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89837091
> >
> > The
On 22/07/22 09:08AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> notmuch failed to build from source because of a strange test suite failure
> on ppc64le:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89837091
>
> The only failing test is a pytest run on the bindings
>
> ```
> T391-python-cffi:
Next failure is portmidi due to "Drop_i686_JDKs"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs
I don't know how I missed that change proposal. I cannot even make sense of the
English in those template mails (never got any myself). This is going to be a
lot of fun ...
notmuch failed to build from source because of a strange test suite failure on
ppc64le:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89837091
The only failing test is a pytest run on the bindings
```
T391-python-cffi: Testing python bindings (pytest)
FATAL:
Richard Shaw wrote on 2022/07/21 10:52:
Looking at brasero I can build "fine" doing a fedpkg mockbuild but adding
"--enablerepo=local" replicates the failure seen in koji[1].
I tried comparing the root logs between the two to see what's different but
I don't find the results particularly
* Bob Mauchin:
> Seems to be related to this post on the ML:
>
> Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LRPFW3IJTM7BWKL6RDSB3VYGAVDDUFR3/
This can't be it, it was never
Hi all,
Per the Fedora f37 schedule[1] we have started a mass rebuild
on 2022-07-20 for Fedora f37. We are running this mass rebuild
for the changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and merged
when
Hi all,
Per the Fedora f37 schedule[1] we have started a mass rebuild
on 2022-07-20 for Fedora f37. We are running this mass rebuild
for the changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and merged
when
23 matches
Mail list logo
