Re: debug facilities

2017-12-08 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 10:17 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > I still don't quite understand why only some packages have the  > debuginfo/debugsource split (I counted ~10k debugsources to ~30k  > debuginfo). Is that an automatic process that just needs to happen > over time, or do the maintainers n

Re: debug facilities

2017-12-08 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 12/08/2017 06:29 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 15:47 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: The bottom line is that it's pretty tricky to figure this out, which is a pity because easy debuggability is one of the important cultural features of Fedora and FOSS. It's a regression: GDB

Re: debug facilities

2017-12-08 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 15:47 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > The bottom line is that it's pretty tricky to figure this out, which is  > a pity because easy debuggability is one of the important cultural  > features of Fedora and FOSS. It's a regression: GDB used to point to  > integrated .debuginf

Re: debug facilities

2017-12-04 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 12/01/2017 05:36 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: On 01/12/17 22:33, Samuel Sieb wrote: If you do "rpm -qi soundfont-utils" you will find a line like this: Source RPM  : gt-0.4-23.fc26.src.rpm That means that this package is a sub-package of gt.  That's where you'll find it in bugzilla and the package

Re: debug facilities

2017-12-01 Thread Tom Hughes
On 01/12/17 22:33, Samuel Sieb wrote: If you do "rpm -qi soundfont-utils" you will find a line like this: Source RPM  : gt-0.4-23.fc26.src.rpm That means that this package is a sub-package of gt.  That's where you'll find it in bugzilla and the package database.  That's also probably where th

Re: debug facilities

2017-12-01 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 12/01/2017 12:51 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: I know that we started splitting the source packages off---but unfortunately there doesn't seem to be soundfont-utils-debugsource anywhere. In fact, the sounfount-utils package is a little bit of a mystery: I couldn't find it on the Fedora packag

Re: debug facilities

2017-12-01 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 12/01/2017 04:39 PM, John Reiser wrote: I ran into a problem with midi-disasm from soundfount-utils. I tried to debug it but installing soundfont-utils-debuginfo only brings in  the symbol tables, not sources. Perhaps the problem is particular to that rpm, or similar ones? Is soundfont-util

Re: debug facilities

2017-12-01 Thread John Reiser
I ran into a problem with midi-disasm from soundfount-utils. I tried to debug it but installing soundfont-utils-debuginfo only brings in  the symbol tables, not sources. Perhaps the problem is particular to that rpm, or similar ones? Is soundfont-utils one of several rpms that belong to the sa

debug facilities

2017-12-01 Thread Przemek Klosowski
I ran into a problem with midi-disasm from soundfount-utils. I tried to debug it but installing soundfont-utils-debuginfo only brings in  the symbol tables, not sources. I know that we started splitting the source packages off---but unfortunately there doesn't seem to be soundfont-utils-debugs