Am 26.06.2008 um 00:49 schrieb Stevens:
Hi Bert, all,
I changed the script (OperaActivity.py) posted on the wiki
(http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Opera
).
This is the old script:
import logging
from sugar.activity import activity
import sys, os
import gtk
class
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:13 PM, K. K. Subramaniam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 25 Jun 2008 12:08:44 am Albert Cahalan wrote:
*All the source code* for *every* piece of byte code in the
image is available, and not only that, we even *ship* it
No. This is not true. You ship a
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2076
Changes in build 2076 from build: 2074
Size delta: -0.26M
-kernel 2.6.25-20080619.1.olpc.279b9db99a30fe6
+kernel 2.6.22-20080523.1.olpc.28f4cb6e780db07
-python-jinja 1.2-2.fc7
+python-jinja 1.2-1.fc9
--- Changes for kernel
Am 26.06.2008 um 01:22 schrieb John Gilmore:
The activity start script should configure Opera to put its
configuration file in $SUGAR_ACTIVITY_ROOT/data instead of
$HOME/.opera. Also it should set umask to 0002 so the config file is
group-writable (otherwise the next activity instance cannot
But /etc/udev/rules.d is executed as root, so your activity would still
need excessive privilege.
--
James Cameronmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://quozl.netrek.org/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
Albert,
Before drifting to a new topic, let me make sure one thing; did you
get convinced that FSF's definition of software freedom doesn't
contradict with a binary image file with right tools to fully
explore/understand/modify it?
If not, please explain. If so, I understand that you
Am 26.06.2008 um 02:55 schrieb Build Announcer v2:
+perl 4:5.10.0-27.fc9
I re-opened #234 to get this fixed.
- Bert -
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Am 26.06.2008 um 05:12 schrieb Bernie Innocenti:
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
If we manage to make DBus entirely optional, the initial effort
of porting a Linux applications to Sugar would be greatly
simplified.
As far as I know this is already the case. The only non standard bit
are a
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build2076
Changes in build 2076 from build: 2073
Size delta: -0.39M
-kernel 2.6.25-20080619.1.olpc.279b9db99a30fe6
+kernel 2.6.22-20080523.1.olpc.28f4cb6e780db07
-python-jinja 1.2-2.fc7
+python-jinja 1.2-1.fc7
--- Changes for kernel
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, is there a way around this requirement too? A few days ago
someone here at OLE Nepal bundled up Firefox 2 and was disappointed
to get the infamous circle icon. For them, changing the code and
rebuilding from
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other than the circle icon, do you have any major issue? If it's just
that, adding _NET_WM_ICON support to the sugar shell should be really
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before drifting to a new topic, let me make sure one thing; did you
get convinced that FSF's definition of software freedom doesn't
contradict with a binary image file with right tools to fully
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Bill Bogstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused. Won't the XS servers always have swap/paging space?
Paging is tolerable for batch processes, or for interactive stuff that
is not
As you may know, OLPC got GSoC students again this summer. I am one
of them, and my project is Vision Processing. That is, a library to
use the webcam for more than capturing images. I am implementing this
by adding v4l2 and computer vision functions to pygame.
My code is available at
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Other than the circle icon, do you have any major issue? If it's just
that, adding _NET_WM_ICON support to the sugar shell should be really
easy.
I'm not sure... Surendra has been working on it.
Added him to cc in case he has comments.
I'm planning to work on a
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Bill Bogstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure but any process that is waiting for a file to appear in the
filesystem seem more like a batch process to me. There is no way to
know how long it will take (and thus your timeouts).
Bill,
everything you say makes
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 17:36 -0700, Brian Pepple a écrit :
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 01:12 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
Can we enable the OLPC-specific patches and config in telepathy-salut
in F-9? We're rebasing OLPC
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 17:03, Guillaume Desmottes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:01 +0200, Morgan Collett a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 17:36 -0700, Brian Pepple a écrit :
On Wed,
Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:23 +0200, Morgan Collett a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 17:03, Guillaume Desmottes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:01 +0200, Morgan Collett a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mardi 24
shivaprasad wrote:
But I got one more question for you, now to install the activity and having
it running I have to copy the rules file into /etc/udev/rules.d folder. How
can I do this while installing the activity itself. ( I need to make sure
that when I unzip my activity .xo file the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Deepak Saxena wrote:
| I agree with Paul that we need to have a solution to these
| cases iff we want to support running arbitrary software and
| hw combinations on the XO. The other option is to limit the
| scope of the system to a very specific set
benjamin m. schwartz wrote:
Deepak Saxena wrote:
| I agree with Paul that we need to have a solution to these
| cases iff we want to support running arbitrary software and
| hw combinations on the XO. The other option is to limit the
| scope of the system to a very specific set of sw
... to install the activity and having it running
I have to copy the rules file into /etc/udev/rules.d folder.
The preferred short answer seems to be NO. But if an Activity
(application) *does* need something to be put into the operating
system, should the Sugar environment provide a way to
Am 26.06.2008 um 10:53 schrieb Albert Cahalan:
This idea of applying patch collections is disturbing. It reminds
me of the terrible mess that Minix was back in 1991, when the
license permitted people to share patches but not code with
the patches applied. Here you have a technical limit
Benjamin M. Schwartz writes:
There is a planned design to allow the user to grant extra privileges
to different Activities, but those privileges will probably never
extend to loading arbitrary kernel modules.
VMWare-1.xo
It's the only way to get usable performance on a system that
doesn't
I'm tracking Fedora 9 issues here:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC-3
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 11:50 -0500, Mark Bauer wrote:
I upgraded my G1G1 as I have many times to the latest joyride build
(2072). The touchpad is almost impossible to use, about 0.5 of
movement will send the pointer all the
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Mark Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I upgraded my G1G1 as I have many times to the latest joyride build
(2072). The touchpad is almost impossible to use, about 0.5 of
movement will send the pointer all the way across the display. Then
it locks up the
Am 26.06.2008 um 20:32 schrieb Bobby Powers:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Mark Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I upgraded my G1G1 as I have many times to the latest joyride build
(2072). The touchpad is almost impossible to use, about 0.5 of
movement will send the pointer all the way
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2078
Changes in build 2078 from build: 2076
Size delta: -0.13M
-olpccontents 2.2-0
+olpccontents 2.3-1
--- Changes for olpccontents 2.3-1 from 2.2-0 ---
+ Repackage as proper F9/olpc3 rpm, which should fix the dependency
--
This
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:20:49PM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Am 26.06.2008 um 20:32 schrieb Bobby Powers:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Mark Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I upgraded my G1G1 as I have many times to the latest joyride build
(2072). The touchpad is almost
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 26.06.2008 um 10:53 schrieb Albert Cahalan:
This idea of applying patch collections is disturbing. It reminds
me of the terrible mess that Minix was back in 1991, when the
license permitted people to share patches
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Chris Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Scott,
Unfortunately, after I boot up the custom kernel, the X server
fails to start because /home is mounted read-only.
It's a bug in the master series kernel RPMs (or rather, in the initrd
that accompanies
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:33 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Chris Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Scott,
Unfortunately, after I boot up the custom kernel, the X server
fails to start because /home is mounted read-only.
It's a bug in
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 05:01:04PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
I asked Dennis about branching salut, and he recommended we try keep
everything in F-9 if possible. Is it feasible to put the rainbow
specific patches in such that they are enabled with a runtime option,
if built with
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:53:47AM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Am 26.06.2008 um 01:22 schrieb John Gilmore:
The activity start script should configure Opera to put its
configuration file in $SUGAR_ACTIVITY_ROOT/data instead of
$HOME/.opera. Also it should set umask to 0002 so the
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2079
Changes in build 2079 from build: 2078
Size delta: 0.39M
-bootanim 0.17-0
+bootanim 1.0-1
-kernel 2.6.22-20080523.1.olpc.28f4cb6e780db07
+kernel 2.6.25-20080625.2.olpc.744e740861edba9
--- Changes for bootanim 1.0-1 from 0.17-0 ---
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Deepak Saxena wrote:
On Jun 25 2008, at 14:01, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger was caught saying:
On 25.06.2008 08:07, Michael Stone wrote:
We have an activity that wants superuser privilege in order to poke
kernel memory.
Hello? Please take the poor activity out back and
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Deepak Saxena wrote:
| I agree with Paul that we need to have a solution to these
| cases iff we want to support running arbitrary software and
| hw combinations on the XO. The other option is
Edgar,
According to the release notes:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_8.1.0_Software_Release_Notes
official-703 is a reference OS release which contains no activities.
Luis needs to follow the instructions in that page to install activities
or he needs to install a derivative build such as
Am 26.06.2008 um 22:13 schrieb Albert Cahalan:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Am 26.06.2008 um 10:53 schrieb Albert Cahalan:
This idea of applying patch collections is disturbing. It reminds
me of the terrible mess that Minix was back in 1991,
Dear world,
In yesterday's software status meeting, we formulated some conventions
for using Trac for the next few months. They are:
1. The release team - presently including me, Greg Smith, and Kim Quirk
will occasionally tag a ticket as 'blocks:8.2.0' to indicate that it
blocks the 8.2.0
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. People should indicate the release they _wish_ that changes would
land in via the Milestone field.
I tend to think the Milestone should be set by the bug owner (or by
other developers in its team) and not by the bug
Albert,
The very foundation of the Linux development community
(which Squeak developers are asking to be accepted by)
includes an expectation that software can be handled in
certain ways.
I don't know if it is *very* foundation, yeah there is an
expectation. I know it because I was one
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other than the circle icon, do you have any major issue? If
Thank you Michael,
We will give it a try tomorrow.
Regards,
Edgar
- Original Message -
From: Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Edgar Ceballos
Cc: Michail Bletsas [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Luis Fernando Sanchez Hurtado [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Luis Fernando
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 01:31:24AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. People should indicate the release they _wish_ that changes would
land in via the Milestone field.
I tend to think the Milestone should be set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There have been periodic suggestions, including some by potential OLPC
buyers, that they would be more interested if the project offered a GUI
that more closely resembled the environments to which they are accustomed.
~ I strongly disagree with these
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2080
Changes in build 2080 from build: 2079
Size delta: 0.00M
-olpcrd 0.43-0
+olpcrd 0.44-0
+olpcsudo 1.3-0
-olpcupdate 2.8-0
+olpcupdate 2.9-1
-telepathy-salut 0.2.3-1.fc9
+telepathy-salut 0.2.3-2.fc9
--- Included olpcsudo version
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm glad that Debian didn't break the rules for etoys.
You're claiming to be open source, yet you've LOST the
source code decades ago.
This turns out not to be the case. All of the source code for the
parts of Etoys
Hi,
There have been periodic suggestions, including some by potential
OLPC buyers, that they would be more interested if the project
offered a GUI that more closely resembled the environments to which
they are accustomed.
There's another use case, unmentioned, which is the G1G1
Hi Bert, all --
On Jun 25, 2008, at 11:37 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Sure. Do not use the Python script. You don't want to run a Python
activity but a native one - otherwise you get two windows, the
empty one opened by Python and the real one by Opera. Instead, you
only need a tiny
On Friday 27 June 2008 1:59:16 pm Chris Ball wrote:
Instead of (or as well as) preparing a separate disk image, we could
prepare a Desktop activity which launches an Xfce session and includes
some office tools, the standard NetworkManager applet, a configurable
CUPS installation, and so on.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Ball wrote:
| Instead of (or as well as) preparing a separate disk image, we could
| prepare a Desktop activity which launches an Xfce session and includes
| some office tools, the standard NetworkManager applet, a configurable
| CUPS
Hello,
Sorry for causing some email traffic last a few days.
We, everybody who are participating the project, including Albert,
John, Bert and myself, are working for a greater cause; that is to
empower children all over the world via computer technology and
education. There are some
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I gathered from my experiments, I think it makes sense for
us to go with Metacity + maximus. That would require no code changes
in metacity and minor changes in sugar. If we want to support activity
icons
From: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
postprocess.py now provides hardlinked timestamped
directories, and maintains a symlink pointing to
the latest transferred directory.
The timestamped directories are maintained with a resolution
of the nearest minute - we don't expect to have more
than one
From: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
client/ds_backup.py |8 +---
client/ds_backup.sh |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/client/ds_backup.py b/client/ds_backup.py
index 60d0be2..089a2e9 100755
--- a/client/ds_backup.py
+++
57 matches
Mail list logo
