Le mercredi 23 juillet 2008 à 12:38 -0400, Ankur Verma a écrit :
>
> I can run a bash/python script upon the reception of the message with
> the message parameters. This makes it flexible enough to call any
> application.
>
Then I think you should write a Python application which connect to the
On Jul 23 2008, at 22:30, Ton van Overbeek was caught saying:
> Hello,
>
> My xo-1 is currently on build 708.
> For testing joyride-2200 I did not want to reflash yet, but boot from a
> USB stick instead.
> So I downloaded the image from
> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/xo-1/streams/joyride/bu
I get the same result on Joyride 2202 (manually upgraded to 2203).
What is happening is that in Terminal on my XO certain keypresses
(e.g., up-arrow, right-arrow, end) are not being recognized.
mikus
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http:
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2203
Changes in build 2203 from build: 2202
Size delta: 0.13M
+PolicyKit-olpc 1.1-1.fc9
-olpc-utils 0.79-1.olpc3
+olpc-utils 0.80-1.olpc3
--- Included PolicyKit-olpc version 1.1-1.fc9 ---
--
This mail was automatically generated
Se
Just added a ticket for this myself:
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7617
Seems to affect quite a number of keys – at least on my XO B4 with
Spanish overlay (worked fine in 2174). I'd previously added ticket
(Journal search and frame key have no effect):
http://dev.laptop.org/ti
Hello,
My xo-1 is currently on build 708.
For testing joyride-2200 I did not want to reflash yet, but boot from a
USB stick instead.
So I downloaded the image from
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/xo-1/streams/joyride/build2200/devel_ext3/xo-1-olpc-stream-joyride-devel_ext3.img.bz2,
unzipped
Am 23.07.2008 um 22:11 schrieb Albert Cahalan:
> The allowed set
> of characters was undocumented, has recently changed (breaking an
> existing activity) without notice, and is still undocumented AFAIK.
It is documented:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activity_bundles#.info_File_Format
- Bert -
_
Am 23.07.2008 um 20:28 schrieb Daniel Drake:
> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 19:20 -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
>> I do most of my work with CLI from the Terminal.
>>
>> On my XO with Joyride 2201 there is no "bash history" accessible in
>> Terminal -- hitting up-arrow at the prompt does NOT call up wha
FYI, the Tux Paint port is mine. I have CVS commit rights to
the main Tux Paint code base. Probably 5% to 10% of the code
is mine.
Mitch Bradley writes:
> The filesystem layout for the tuxpaint activity has a lot of
> boilerplate that contributes to it taking up a lot of space on NAND.
> In some
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 8 - Use the same NAND space.
>
> > *Tough*. The F6-to-F9 upgrade means we're over OS footprint budget.
> > Dennis Gilmore knows more about this.
>
> Not so:
>
> 703: 309M .jffs2
> 2202: 298M .jffs2
>
> Credit d
Hi,
>> 8 - Use the same NAND space.
> *Tough*. The F6-to-F9 upgrade means we're over OS footprint budget.
> Dennis Gilmore knows more about this.
Not so:
703: 309M .jffs2
2202: 298M .jffs2
Credit due to Daniel Drake for chasing out every last extra dependency.
(And then Perl
> > 2) Sugar would run more smoothly on-XO if jhbuild were retired.
> I think this is a good point in the abstract. Do any frequent contributors
> *not* have an XO?
I approve of retiring jhbuild, and handing out XO's to Sugar
contributors, but you've really got the question backwards:
=> Do
Gary C Martin wrote:
Pushing the back to devel@
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 23 Jul 2008, at 23:37, Richard A. Smith wrote:
>> These 2 are going to be really hard to quantify in hard yes or no terms.
>> We can't reproduce the problem with any regularity. Without a
>> repeatable method of causing the
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 8 - Use the same NAND space.
*Tough*. The F6-to-F9 upgrade means we're over OS footprint budget.
Dennis Gilmore knows more about this.
> 9 - Always boots up, especially when there is no space on NAND
"Always" is a tricky on
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2202
Changes in build 2202 from build: 2201
Size delta: -12.71M
-pyabiword 0.6.0.svn20071127-1
+pyabiword 0.6.1-4.olpc3
-libabiword 1:2.6.4-5.olpc3
+libabiword 1:2.6.4-6.olpc3
-perl 4:5.10.0-30.fc9
-perl-Module-Pluggable 1:3.60-30.fc9
-p
On Jul 22, 2008, at 7:43 PM, Nirav Patel wrote:
>
> 2. Play pong with your hand: Have the user step out of the field of
> view of the camera, save the image. Now threshold between the saved
> image and the images currently being captured. This results in just
> showing the differences between
Richard A. Smith wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
>
>
>> 3 - Cursor control the same, including number of XOs where it moves
>> without input or moves without correlation to finger on touchpad
>>
>
>
>> 13 - No new cases where the cursor stops responding (AKA hangs) for more
>> than 30 seconds
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 19:20 -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> I do most of my work with CLI from the Terminal.
>
> On my XO with Joyride 2201 there is no "bash history" accessible in
> Terminal -- hitting up-arrow at the prompt does NOT call up what had
> been previously entered at the prompt. ["
I do most of my work with CLI from the Terminal.
On my XO with Joyride 2201 there is no "bash history" accessible in
Terminal -- hitting up-arrow at the prompt does NOT call up what had
been previously entered at the prompt. ["bash history" is
accessible from the text console (alt-ctl-F1).]
m
The filesystem layout for the tuxpaint activity has a lot of boilerplate
that contributes to it taking up a lot of space on NAND.
In some NAND images from Uruguay that I analyzed today, over 5000
directory entries - nearly 50% of the total number of dirents in /home -
were from tuxpaint.
For ex
I've just uploaded a more detailed treemap image to the wiki, it has
some of the larger files annotated. Some of this is probably getting
stale already (based on joyride-2174), but it's still quite a nice way
to get a feel for the size of various components.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go
Greg Smith wrote:
> 3 - Cursor control the same, including number of XOs where it moves
> without input or moves without correlation to finger on touchpad
> 13 - No new cases where the cursor stops responding (AKA hangs) for more
> than 30 seconds.
These 2 are going to be really hard to quantify
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> After a chat with the team this week I tried to come up with a
> definition of what is "good enough to release" for 8.2.0.
Thanks.
> This is just a starting point and I'm sure we'll talk about it again.
>
> Pleas
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2201
Changes in build 2201 from build: 2200
Size delta: 0.00M
-sugar-journal 94-2.200807015git814c37616b.fc9
+sugar-journal 95-1.fc9
-libabiword 1:2.6.4-4.olpc3
+libabiword 1:2.6.4-5.olpc3
-sugar 0.81.6-4.20080715git8137d5c37f.fc9
+sugar
Hi All,
We could especially use verification of these items:
http://dev.laptop.org/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=milestone&next_action=qa+signoff&order=priority
The developers have marked those as ready for QA sign off so any
Hi All,
After a chat with the team this week I tried to come up with a
definition of what is "good enough to release" for 8.2.0.
This is just a starting point and I'm sure we'll talk about it again.
Please comment, edit and augment as needed. I may be missing some
important areas...
When the
As part of our gradual stabilization program, each week, we're going to
nominate
"the newest non-disqualified Tinderbox-approved joyride build available
as of 9:00 AM EDT on Wednesday"
as the "joyride-weekly" test candidate for people who are unable to
contribute test results against joyride-
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 21:04, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Build Announcer v2 wrote:
> | +perl 4:5.10.0-30.fc9
> | +perl-Module-Pluggable 1:3.60-30.fc9
> | +perl-Pod-Escapes 1:1.04-30.fc9
> | +perl-Pod-Simple 1:3.05-30.fc9
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Build Announcer v2 wrote:
| +perl 4:5.10.0-30.fc9
| +perl-Module-Pluggable 1:3.60-30.fc9
| +perl-Pod-Escapes 1:1.04-30.fc9
| +perl-Pod-Simple 1:3.05-30.fc9
| +perl-libs 4:5.10.0-30.fc9
| +perl-version 3:0.74-30.fc9
LOL.
- --Ben
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2200
Changes in build 2200 from build: 2179
Size delta: 7.47M
-sugar-update-control 0.3-1
+sugar-update-control 0.4-1
-etoys 3.0.2050-1
+etoys 3.0.2059-1
-kernel 2.6.25-20080718.1.olpc.192d0b5a36442b2
+kernel 2.6.25-20080722.2.olpc.d8698
[This does not fit the 'Subject:', but is still worth remarking.]
Walter wrote:
> It is clear from even a casual review of the devel and sugar lists and trac
> that much of the frustration experienced by both users and developers
> resides not in the details of, for example, dbus or Python, but ra
Currently, there is no way to upload a Write file with images. I will
try to get some kind of support for uploading it, but it is an area in
itself. The upload format is not easy to convert to xhtml as far as I
know. I was not aware of a lot of the issues in this area since the
information o
I can run a bash/python script upon the reception of the message with the
message parameters. This makes it flexible enough to call any application.
For more details, Please see http://wiki.laptop.org/go/SMS
Thanks
Ankur
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Guillaume Desmottes <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 11:15 -0500, Mark Bauer wrote:
> Any progress on joyride builds ? builds 2188 -> 2199 are all
> Build Incomplete.
2200 is my lucky number. Give it an hour or two...
Daniel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http:
Any progress on joyride builds ? builds 2188 -> 2199 are all
Build Incomplete.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 19:49 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> After mild provocation, Marco and Tomeu asked me to publish some of my
> reactions to sugar's architecture, design, and implementation. Here are
> a few initial comments.
Michael, many of your observation are correct...as are many of
respon
Michael,
First, thank you for launching this discussion thread. It is important
to get our heads out of the trenches on occasion, even if everyone is
overwhelmed with the details of the day-to-day task of getting 8.2 out
the door.
I have to echo the point made by Martin: in fact, despite no livin
meta-comments: 1) I think all this discussion should be interpreted in
the spirit of "how can we do better, and what can we be focused on in
the next year", rather than "this is why things are bad" (because
they're not). I'm not sure a casual reader would understand this.
2) I'll leave more invol
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 12:28 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
> I wouldn't encourage http :-)
>
I actively discourage http It conceptually mixes layering in a
horrific fashion...
HTTP does have some major features: in particular, that the default
behavior allowing extensions is to ignore w
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:03:42PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Simon Schampijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sure, some guidance is needed.
[...]
> Tomeu, Simon and Eben has been much more proactive and, what matters
> most, more *succesfull* than anyone
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 09:36 +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
> Write, Read, TamTam, Paint, Record, Memorize to name a few have been
> really struggling lately. There are probably various reasons for that
> - one might be I that the activities have been taken out from the base
> system another one
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:33:38AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Martin Dengler wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:36:27AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> >>For sugar core - I don't think that 'small fixes' need more than
> >>python skills.
> >
> >I agree. Of course people also need "the kno
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Simon Schampijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Dengler wrote:
> Sure, some guidance is needed. I hope we have done a decent job to guide you
> to the
> places to provide your great fixes :)
>
> for example:
> http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=sugar;a=commit;h=4030
Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:36:27AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> Michael Stone wrote:
> [...]
>>>Evidence: Non-extensible aspects of Sugar like activity launching,
>>>home view layout, frame contents, and the presence service have
>>>stagnated.
> [...]
>> For
I have added some new commands to the OFW source; they will appear in
the next
firmware that I release. They may be of some value in debugging "nand
filled up"
problems - but on the other hand, they might not, because JFFS2 can fill
up in ways
that don't show up in directory listings. (Some fi
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:36:27AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Michael Stone wrote:
[...]
> >Evidence: Non-extensible aspects of Sugar like activity launching,
> >home view layout, frame contents, and the presence service have
> >stagnated.
[...]
> For sugar core - I don't think th
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, Tomeu, What's the state of #7220? It's still open, but I thought
> this was already taken care of by including a "default" activities.default
> in the build, so that even if the country doesn't supply one, kids do
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, circumventing the
> layers altogether has not been an option either as it would brake
> "backwards compatibility" with existing activities (Sugar is a two-year
> old experimental project an
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [2]: I consider web-browsers and Unix shells to be "fluent translators"
> for the programmers who I expect to be hacking on Sugar as opposed to
> the dbus-introspection tools which currently seem to me to be like
> "novice
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Simon Schampijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Stone wrote:
>> After mild provocation, Marco and Tomeu asked me to publish some of my
>> reactions to sugar's architecture, design, and implementation. Here are
>> a few initial comments.
>>
>> 1) Sugar could be
Le mardi 22 juillet 2008 à 18:36 -0400, Ankur Verma a écrit :
>
> Message is in the format Nick_Name:Message. Though its true that
> Nicknames are not unique across a school, but it is the only way to
> specify XO in a user-friendly manner.
>
> If XO is not currently connected, a SMS autoreply w
Michael Stone wrote:
> After mild provocation, Marco and Tomeu asked me to publish some of my
> reactions to sugar's architecture, design, and implementation. Here are
> a few initial comments.
>
> 1) Sugar could better hold contributors if it (and its web presence)
> were designed to be extended
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:14 AM, Martin Langhoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Michael's analysis is useful inasmuch we can read it going forward. As
>> Michael, I wasn't here 2 years ago, but I have been on the ground on
>> many projects under tight deadlines. It's
53 matches
Mail list logo
