Edit:
BTW - when I left the entry (which my customization had placed there) in
/etc/fstab for my permanent SD card, os6 would not boot
ON THE XO-1
-- it would go into the prompt for emergency mode, then when I ctl-D
would after a while again go into the prompt for emergency mode, etc., etc.
--- On Tue, 4/3/12, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
From: Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com
Subject: Re: 12.1.0 devel build 6 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75
To: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Cc: o...@lists.fedoraproject.org, devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Tuesday, April 3
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
I've already written a ticket saying that on the XO-1, 12.1.0 does not
define any /dev/mmcblk0 (or anything) whose partition could be mounted onto
/bootpart.
Can you provide the ticket number?
Well, on the XO-1, 12.1.0
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Edit:
BTW - when I left the entry (which my customization had placed there) in
/etc/fstab for my permanent SD card, os6 would not boot
ON THE XO-1
-- it would go into the prompt for emergency mode, then when I ctl-D
Which means it's not finding the SD card slot.
There is nothing in /var/log/messages when I connect and disconnect the SD
card on my XO-1.
Is there something else I should try to collect more data?
--
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.
Peter wrote
We're glad of the testing but
ultimately if you need a perfectly stable platform I suggest you stick
with 11.3 for the moment.
I'm a volunteer. I have no __need__ to post here (nor to use the XO).
Which would you prefer - to have me keep quiet about what I encounter -
or may I
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Peter wrote
We're glad of the testing but
ultimately if you need a perfectly stable platform I suggest you stick
with 11.3 for the moment.
I'm a volunteer. I have no __need__ to post here (nor to use the XO).
Which
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Peter wrote
We're glad of the testing but
ultimately if you need a perfectly stable platform I suggest you stick
with 11.3 for the moment.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Peter wrote
We're glad of the testing but
ultimately if you need a perfectly stable platform I suggest you stick
with 11.3 for the moment.
I'm
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Peter wrote
We're glad of the testing but
ultimately if you
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't disagree but ultimately if there's not appropriate bug reports
with all the information needed we can't fix the problems. So
ultimately I appreciate his bug reports but with a non standard
configuration we
I don't disagree but ultimately if there's not appropriate bug reports
with all the information needed we can't fix the problems. So
ultimately I appreciate his bug reports but with a non standard
configuration we need detailed reports to have that information be
useful for those people that
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
I don't disagree but ultimately if there's not appropriate bug reports
with all the information needed we can't fix the problems. So
ultimately I appreciate his bug reports but with a non standard
configuration we need
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:02:56PM -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
[...] But I agree that having such an entry in /etc/fstab is
non-standard -- from now on, I will make sure to NEVER for 12.1.0 to
mention any problems I have with whatever I do that is non-standard.
I'd be happy to continue to
In the case of the /etc/fstab if it's a file system required to boot
it will bork
I don't mind it borking. But the system offered me the choice of
continue. When I took that choice, the system returned to the SAME
bork. I would have preferred it if continue had meant skip this.
You
I've already written a ticket saying that on the XO-1, 12.1.0 does not
define any /dev/mmcblk0 (or anything) whose partition could be mounted
onto /bootpart.
Well, on the XO-1, 12.1.0 build os6 goes one step further -- it does not
define any /dev/mmcblk1 (or anything) whose partition I could
The Ah, I see you have the machine that goes 'ping!'. This is my
favourite. release.
THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE
Some of the notable fixes in this release are:
Fixed bugs:
#11716 Browse activity (and dependent activities) do not start
#11703 USB disk automounting not working
#11380 os883 -
17 matches
Mail list logo
