Anything planned on this?
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> We need to submit patches upstream at some point after Update.1.
>
> Marco
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 3:44 PM, Reinier Heeres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jani,
>>
>> That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like
>> this w
Reinier Heeres wrote:
> Jani,
>
> That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like
> this was possible. I made only minor adjustments to the latest source.
> The biggest changes are in configure.ac and Makefile.am: there are new
> options --disable-binary and --enable-embed
We need to submit patches upstream at some point after Update.1.
Marco
On Dec 19, 2007 3:44 PM, Reinier Heeres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jani,
>
> That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like
> this was possible. I made only minor adjustments to the latest source.
> Th
Jani,
That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like
this was possible. I made only minor adjustments to the latest source.
The biggest changes are in configure.ac and Makefile.am: there are new
options --disable-binary and --enable-embed to just build things
relevant fo
Reinier Heeres wrote:
> Jani,
>
> Which upstream are you referring to? The newer evince version is already
I was referring to the GNOME svn upstream, and whether plain evince
tarballs will be usable for wrapping in sugar if built with certain
configure options. I'd like to reuse as many of the
Jani,
Which upstream are you referring to? The newer evince version is already
in joyride, and Read is updated there to use it. When it's nicely tested
there it will probably go in the update.1 build.
The Read modifications necessary (a few lines) to work with the newer
evince are already in gi
Reinier Heeres wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Pushed the patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Reinier
Hi Reinier,
are the Sugar changes suitable for upstream inclusion?
thanks
Jani
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Thanks!
Pushed the patch.
Cheers,
Reinier
Dan Krejsa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just got an error
>
> sugar-jhbuild update: dependent module "evince-olpc" not found
>
> from ./sugar-jhbuild.
>
> The following change seems to fix it:
>
> $ git diff
> diff --git a/build-scripts/sugar-platform.modules
>
Hi,
I just got an error
sugar-jhbuild update: dependent module "evince-olpc" not found
from ./sugar-jhbuild.
The following change seems to fix it:
$ git diff
diff --git a/build-scripts/sugar-platform.modules
b/build-scripts/sugar-platform
index 0c36b2f..da2cd79 100644
--- a/build-scripts/su
