> I think a memory usage pie graph is beyond excellent. I'm not so sure
> it should show current usage though.
I'm assuming that each activity gets allocated a chunk of the pie
corresponding to how much memory it asks for.
How about using part of the circle to show the fraction of memory alloc
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that more current Linux kernels, such as that in 8.2, are much
> better at being able to account for what process is using what memory.
> It's probably worth a little experimentation after 8.2 ships to see if
> the origi
On September 8th, Michael Stone wrote:
> Kim, Greg, and I have concluded that the instability we experience under
> memory-pressure in 8.2-759 and similar is the single "hard" issue that
> we wish to _attempt_ to address before releasing 8.2 on current
> timeframes.
How did it go?
I was going thr
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Build Announcer v2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/xo-1/streams/8.2/build766
Full changelog at:
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=projects/pilgrim;a=shortlog;h=8.2
http://mock.laptop.org/gitweb/?p=repos;a=shortlog;h=koji.dist-olpc3-test
Carlo Falciola wrote:
> I did not worked for me:
> I've a G1G1 without developer key, already updated to 711.
> I just tried to olpc-update via USB picking up the 765 from the link
> available from wiki.
You didn't tell us the exact command you typed, but "the link on the
wiki" has been "8.2-
The double-clicking problem sounds like
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7876 , "Double clicking an activity in the
home ring causes 2 instances to launch".
I get different results from different apps, e.g. click Memorize three
times, get three icons for three working instances, no doubled menus,
http://pilgrim.laptop.org/~pilgrim/xo-1/streams/8.2/build766
Changes in build 766 from build: 765
Size delta: 0.00M
-sugar-update-control 0.15-1
+sugar-update-control 0.17-1
-olpc-utils 0.87-1.olpc3
+olpc-utils 0.89-1.olpc3
-sugar 0.82.9-1.olpc3
+sugar 0.82.9-2.olpc3
-sugar-toolkit 0.82.11-3.olp
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2499
Changes in build 2499 from build: 2498
Size delta: 0.00M
-libxml2-python 2.6.32-3.fc9
+libxml2-python 2.7.1-1.fc9
-olpc-utils 0.87-2.olpc3
+olpc-utils 0.89-1.olpc3
-dhclient 12:4.0.0-17.fc9
+dhclient 12:4.0.0-18.fc9
-dhcp 12:4.0.0-1
Mel Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Moving to devel at Wad's request, ccing support-gang as they're likely
> to know the URL that I'm referring to.)
>
> Brian (currently at the Rwanda deployment) suggested a knowledgebase for
> XO troubleshooting - iirc, a knowledgebase was started by a volu
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2498
Changes in build 2498 from build: 2497
Size delta: 0.00M
-olpc-library-common 1-21
+olpc-library-common 1-30
--- Changes for olpc-library-common 1-30 from 1-21 ---
+ updated common to include wiki searchbar and devkey/release-not
Note that more current Linux kernels, such as that in 8.2, are much
better at being able to account for what process is using what memory.
It's probably worth a little experimentation after 8.2 ships to see if
the original concept is now viable.
- Jim
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at
(I got a changelog warning when it wasn't picked up but didn't see it
right away.) SJ
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Samuel Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A changelog quirk. the next joyride should have 1-30.
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Bobby Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On
A changelog quirk. the next joyride should have 1-30.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Bobby Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Build Announcer v2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2497
>>
>> Changes in build
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Build Announcer v2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2497
>
> Changes in build 2497 from build: 2495
>
> Size delta: 0.00M
>
> -olpc-library-common 1-29
> +olpc-library-common 1-21
any reason for the large versi
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2497
Changes in build 2497 from build: 2495
Size delta: 0.00M
-olpc-library-common 1-29
+olpc-library-common 1-21
--- Changes for olpc-library-common 1-21 from 1-29 ---
+ updated common to include wiki searchbar and devkey/release-not
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 09:08 -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On 28/09/08 18:46 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > > Ooops. cc'ing to some other people/list in the hope someone more
> > > knowledgeable than me will comment.
> >
> > Thanks. Please Cc me on posts like these to m
I did not worked for me:
I've a G1G1 without developer key, already updated to 711.
I just tried to olpc-update via USB picking up the 765 from the link available
from wiki.
After a long run, the olpc-update command terminated with a message like:
"update aborted: need a development key"...
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2495
Changes in build 2495 from build: 2494
Size delta: 0.13M
-olpc-library-common 1-28
+olpc-library-common 1-29
--- Changes for olpc-library-common 1-29 from 1-28 ---
+ updated common to include wiki searchbar and devkey/release-not
I noticed over the weekend that the touchpad is very jumpy in 765.
Never really had any problems with touchpad previously.
On Sep 29, 2008, at 7:02 AM, Ton van Overbeek wrote:
> What about #7788 (Worse touchpad behavior in 8.2).
> It is still there even in 8.2-765, at least on my XO-1.
> I am n
On 28/09/08 18:46 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > Ooops. cc'ing to some other people/list in the hope someone more
> > knowledgeable than me will comment.
>
> Thanks. Please Cc me on posts like these to make sure I don't miss them.
> No, it doesn't bother me to receive
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:47 AM, S Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey activity maintainers,
>
> I shrank the wasteful junky layout slightly and got rid of all the
> warning triangles for empty values. If you see any yellow triangles
> after updating your activity page, please let me know.
than
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2494
Changes in build 2494 from build: 2493
Size delta: -0.13M
-libxml2-python 2.7.1-1.fc9
+libxml2-python 2.6.32-3.fc9
-olpc-utils 0.87-1.olpc3
+olpc-utils 0.87-2.olpc3
-libxml2 2.7.1-1.fc9
+libxml2 2.6.32-3.fc9
--- Changes for libxml2
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 21:43, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think it would be a good idea for everyone (activity authors in
>> particular) to cross-check the changes in what packages are included
>> i
What about #7788 (Worse touchpad behavior in 8.2).
It is still there even in 8.2-765, at least on my XO-1.
I am not the only one seeing this, Daniel Drake (dsd) complained about this
while developing the bridge activity in the physics jam and I have also seen
other mails on the list.
My hunch is th
>
> Is there any particular reason why Record does not use a single window?
>
>
Record's GUI overlays widgets on top of video windows.
This is how we create the "picture in a picture effect" (using XV in a
window) and also how we add the fullscreen toggle button. GTK doesn't play
well with overl
Whoops - should have sent this to the lists as well. All of these stats
are public and grabbed from Trac.
Original Message
Subject:8.2.0 blockers stats and status
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:40:36 -0400
From: Mel Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: One Laptop Per
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 08:47:36AM -0400, Erik Blankinship wrote:
> > Do you need to do that for each window? Why don't you just listen for
> > that signal in just the main activity window and stop everything when
> > gtk.gdk.VISIBILITY_FULLY_OBSCURED and resume when otherwise?
> >
>
>
> Full scr
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Erik Blankinship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Do you need to do that for each window? Why don't you just listen for
>> that signal in just the main activity window and stop everything when
>> gtk.gdk.VISIBILITY_FULLY_OBSCURED and resume when otherwise?
>
>
> Full
>
> In Sugar, there's always one and only one active activity. You can see
> which it is by looking at the icon below the XO in the favorites view
> or by looking at the selected activity button in the top frame. This
> is the activity that will be brought to the front when you go to the
> Activity
> Do you need to do that for each window? Why don't you just listen for
> that signal in just the main activity window and stop everything when
> gtk.gdk.VISIBILITY_FULLY_OBSCURED and resume when otherwise?
>
Full screen modes in Record completely obscure the main activity window.
We don't just
Hi All,
Here's my weekly report for week ending 9/26.
***
Status against last week goals:
1 - Hound engineers to close all 8.2.0 blockers (see
http://dev.laptop.org/report/28) and get a firm date for the Release
Candidate build. Triage bugs and keep the release on schedule.
G
Cute, but unlike the IPhone, the XO has always had an above-the-board
mechanism for unlocking machines. You don't need to go to Hong Kong to
get an unlocked machine, just ask for a key. This thread is about how
to make that process more transparent and comprehensible.
-walter
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2493
Changes in build 2493 from build: 2492
Size delta: 0.00M
-sugar 0.82.9-1.olpc3
+sugar 0.82.9-2.olpc3
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/joyride-pkgs.html for aggregate logs
See htt
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So UI changes that help make this clearer will probably be a good idea
>> for a 9.1 ... :-/
>
> There was an early sketch of a mechanism similar to the old Home View
> circle, where there was a space allocated to each open
2008/9/29 Erik Blankinship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:02 AM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > On 26 Sep 2008, at 19:31, Arjun Sarwal wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2008/9/26 Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >>>
>> >>> Here's a set of basic Activity test results for
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 2:32 AM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26 Sep 2008, at 19:31, Arjun Sarwal wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2008/9/26 Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Here's a set of basic Activity test results for build 8.2-763, hope
>>> the ASCI
>>> art doesn't get too mangled
36 matches
Mail list logo