On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Bill Bogstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I need to make myself more clear. I'm not telling developers
> not to be involved in support mailing lists.
> Nor am I suggesting that users shouldn't be allowed to "drink from the
> development firehose" if they de
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Martin Langhoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Bill Bogstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can I suggest instead a new mailing list for server SUPPORT be
>> created as opposed to DEVELOPMENT? And what about doing XO support on
>> com
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 18:05 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Another query, what is the reason in a number of packages to drop the
> gtk-docs option from some packages? I can't see the difference in
> files between packages, just wondering what the reasons are?
And for these cases, it might be worth
>> Not sure but I'll add it to my list. The other thought that had come
>> to mind. Is there a plan for this release to move from gnome-vfs to
>> gio/gvfs (does OLPC even use it?).
>
> It feel off the radar but it's a good idea. Should be easy because we
> don't use gnome-vfs that much. A ticket on
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure but I'll add it to my list. The other thought that had come
> to mind. Is there a plan for this release to move from gnome-vfs to
> gio/gvfs (does OLPC even use it?).
It feel off the radar but it's a good idea. S
>>> That said, we might package 0.83.x releases in debian unstable and
>>> thus ubuntu jaunty with a view to landing 0.84 without a large delta
>>> when it does release, because that might be after the ubuntu feature
>>> freeze.
>>
>> Cool, so sounds like something that will
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Bill Bogstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can I suggest instead a new mailing list for server SUPPORT be
> created as opposed to DEVELOPMENT? And what about doing XO support on
> commmunity-support rather then devel? I think that both server-devel
> and devel are
Hi,
this one boots into sugar just fine.
Regards,
Tomeu
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Build Announcer v2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2549
>
> Changes in build 2549 from build: 2548
>
> Size delta: -52.95M
>
> -SDL_mixer 1.2.8-9.fc10
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 17:58 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I did this comparison from Fedora mainline to joyride 2514 for a 8.2
> > comparison, I guess quite a bit of it will be still relevant.
> > https://www.redhat.com/a
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2549
Changes in build 2549 from build: 2548
Size delta: -52.95M
-SDL_mixer 1.2.8-9.fc10
+SDL_mixer 1.2.8-9.olpc4.1
-hippo-canvas 0.3.0-3.fc10
+hippo-canvas 0.3.0-5.20081014svn.olpc4
-hippo-canvas-python 0.3.0-3.fc10
+hippo-canvas-python
Hi Tomeu,
Great!
I can handle the translation between the spanish teachers and the french
developers if the need arises.
Podré apoyar las comunicaciones entre los profesores de Uruguay, Panama y Peru
por una parte, y los desarroladores en Paris, por si alguien necesita.
Bests, saludos
Samy
Hi,
>> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2548
>>
>> Changes in build 2548 from build: 2547
> this makes four joyride updates today.
> is there a reason why these needed to be seperate releases? or
> should some of them been batched up a bit?
As Tomeu
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For distro packaging, we should focus only on the stable release
>> branches: 0.82.x, and once it's out next year, 0.84.x.
>>
>> That said, we might package 0.83.x releases in debian unstable and
>> th
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Martin Langhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Bill Bogstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Responding to ds-backup issues first:
>
> Great summary -- should we move this to devel and/or server-devel?
The above was from what was an off-
Yes! Done, and cc'd on this email, so future reply-alls will hit the
right places.
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/server-devel/2008-November/002479.html
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/server-devel/2008-November/002480.html
Carry on. Thanks for the reminder, Martin.
-Mel
Martin Langhoff w
(Continuing to forward conversation to server-devel. This is the 2nd of
2 forwarded messages.)
Hey Mel!
thanks for your attention to our needs.
Actually, I am much more interested in consistent performance and
behavior from ejabberd and idmgr. Backup is important, but I still have
limited confi
(Forwarding conversation to server-devel list.)
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Mel Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding in Bryan Berry of OLE Nepal, who wants to know the status of
> XS testing, particularly ds backup-restore. Can you folks please fill
> him in, and let him know how to be
Hi Lionel and all OLPC France,
excuse me if this comes too late or isn't to the point, but would like
to propose to hack on a mind mapping activity during the CodeCamp in
Paris.
I think this project has the appeal of being in direct connection to
the needs in the field. Teachers from Uruguay, Per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi folks,
I'm seeing some stuff on the XO when booting with latest Fedora live cd.
* if you set txpower to 20 via iwconfig it drops back to 10ish after a while.
* on some XOs ifwconfig eth0 reports a bit rate of 1/2 Mb/s not 54. you can
easily set i
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:52 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Build Announcer v2 wrote:
>
>> Subject: New joyride build 2548
>>
>> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2548
>>
>> Changes in build 2548 from build: 2547
>
> this makes four joyride updates
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Build Announcer v2 wrote:
> Subject: New joyride build 2548
>
> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2548
>
> Changes in build 2548 from build: 2547
this makes four joyride updates today.
is there a reason why these needed to be seperate releases? or s
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Martin Langhoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, if we can talk about at least some of these things in a
> parenthesis -- avoiding all the distractions -- let's do it.
> Otherwise, I'm happy to just have a beer with you. Let's make the most
> of what we have.
Look
22 matches
Mail list logo
