What: Sugar / Android
What is the same:
Application complexity: Simple (Activities) / Simple (Activities)
Data storage: Ditch filesystem (central Journal) / Ditch filesystem (app
specific SQLite storage)
UI: Simple (ugly) / Simple (cool)
Computer experience of target audience: Low (children) /
John Watlington wrote:
Can someone point me to a PDF version of the
FLOSS manual for the XO-1 ?
http://en.flossmanuals.net/publish/PDF/g1g1_2.pdf
http://www.lulu.com/content/4439260 (slightly revised, and $18 on paper)
But quite honestly these web options are superior:
http://laptop.org/ma
On Dec 24, 2009, at 6:59 AM, NoiseEHC wrote:
> ...
> debug. You know, Android OS solves exactly the same problems Sugar has
> been created to solve just it is faster, uses less memory, much
> prettier, has an usable developer environment...
Actually, I would argue that an operating system that d
Can someone point me to a PDF version of the
FLOSS manual for the XO-1 ?
Thanks,
wad
Begin forwarded message:
> From:
> Date: December 24, 2009 1:06:40 AM EST (CA)
> To:
> Cc: , ,
>
> Subject: RE: User Manual of CL1B
>
> Dear John:
> Sorry to disturb you during your vacation.
>
> After che
I'm with Bert. What problems has Android solved that Sugar was created to
solve, in your opinion?
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 24.12.2009, at 12:59, NoiseEHC wrote:
> >
> > You know, Android OS solves exactly the same problems Sugar has
> > been created to solve
On 24.12.2009, at 12:59, NoiseEHC wrote:
>
> You know, Android OS solves exactly the same problems Sugar has
> been created to solve
O RLY?
<>
- Bert -
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
I download the patch, then run rpm-ivh but there is a problem
with the files:
file / etc / NetworkManager / dispatcher.d / mpp.py from install of
NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.14.svn3246.olpc3.i386 conflicts with file from
package NetworkManager-0.6.5-0.11.svn3246.olpc3.i386
XO NetworkManager: NetworkMa
> I hadn't looked closely enough to see the detailed licensing. But I'd
> seen the news stories about Google cease-and-desists to the guys making
> improved free versions. Is a useful fully-free version readily
> available, as a practical option?
>
>
The guy bundled the not free Google applic
> What makes you think that this will be a proprietary version of Android?
> Android is licensed Apache 2.0 with kernel patches as GPLv2[1], although
> there have been some proprietary apps and customizations on top.
I hadn't looked closely enough to see the detailed licensing. But I'd
seen the n
