There's a long standing hard bug of non-accelerated video on Linux
(not just XO). That hurts hurts HURTS any Linux device. There is some
backstory on that -- it's whether to use Xv or not, whether the video
frames can be grabbed from the Xv pipeline to overlay stuff on top or
not - early
So what is the status of OS15 build that was posted June 15th in Steve
Parrish's directory?
On Jun 6, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
carlos wrote:
Hi guys!
There's a number of different builds up on the OLPC pages right now:
* OLPC 802 (Sugar 0.84)
* OLPC F11 - OS11
* Paraguay F11
Whoops, meant to say posted June 5th, not 15th ...
On Jun 6, 2010, at 11:47 PM, rihowa...@gmail.com wrote:
So what is the status of OS15 build that was posted June 15th in Steve
Parrish's directory?
On Jun 6, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
carlos wrote:
Hi guys!
There's a number
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:47:13PM -0700, rihowa...@gmail.com wrote:
So what is the status of OS15 build that was posted June 15th in Steve
Parrish's directory?
No public announcement seen, but the file is there, and much larger than
os14. A healthy size. ;-)
So what is the status of OS15 build that was posted June 15th in Steve
Parrish's directory?
It works.
mikus
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On 6 Jun 2010, at 21:42, Michael Shiloh wrote:
I'm interested in exploring the use of the microphone jack for other
input devices.
Before I start plugging things in at random, I need to understand what
the circuitry at the input looks like.
I assume the schematics can be found on the
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Michael Shiloh
michaelshiloh1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested in exploring the use of the microphone jack for other
input devices.
Before I start plugging things in at random, I need to understand what
the circuitry at the input looks like.
I assume the
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
In another thread, we've been discussing the issue that Fedora 12
changed base architecture from i586 to i686. The XO-1 processor (Geode
LX) is a i586. Fedora 12 seems to run OK (although I suspect there
will be a few broken
Hi all,
at today's SoaS meeting [1], we agreed on applying the SoaS Activity
Inclusion Criteria [2] as outlined in the wiki to the activity
selection for the upcoming release of SoaS v.4. We'd like to encourage
you to work towards meeting these goals and to submit your proposals
for activities
2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified. It was agreed in
F-12 that the Geode LX would be supported and that decision wasn't
discussed otherwise.
On 7 June 2010 18:33, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
1) I thought we'd moved away from rolling our own distro due to the
amount of time and engineering resources it required that OLPC no
longer had. Has this changed? IE is there an internal thing that has
changed that hasn't been
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified.
Good to hear there's a good chance
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Jon Nettleton jon.nettle...@gmail.comwrote:
2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified. It was agreed in
F-12 that
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:02 AM, John Gilmore g...@toad.com wrote:
There's a long standing hard bug of non-accelerated video on Linux
(not just XO). That hurts hurts HURTS any Linux device. There is some
backstory on that -- it's whether to use Xv or not, whether the video
frames can be
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
A mountain of packages and their corresponding effects on the system,
...
It also invalidates many processes that myself and others have been
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 7 June 2010 18:33, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
1) I thought we'd moved away from rolling our own distro due to the
amount of time and engineering resources it required that OLPC no
longer had. Has this
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:54:45PM +0200, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
at today's SoaS meeting [1], we agreed on applying the SoaS Activity
Inclusion Criteria [2] as outlined in the wiki [...]
You've decided to apply as policy a draft document which describes
itself as not reflecting policy.
I looked at the kernel patch for emulating the missing instruction
(long NOP). It looks like it works, and only needs minor patching-up
for security enforcement. The big argument on the Linux kernel list
was about not having a little kludge like this, which is likely to
grow to emulate many
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 07:19:43PM -0300, Daniel Drake wrote:
In this case, the Fedora packages are now unusable, so rebuilding them
would be needed. I'm not sure that this counts as progressing to
rolling our own distro since the rebuild would be fully automatic,
and that the end result would
john wrote:
I looked at the kernel patch for emulating the missing instruction
(long NOP). It looks like it works, and only needs minor patching-up
for security enforcement. The big argument on the Linux kernel list
was about not having a little kludge like this, which is likely to
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 10:07:07PM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
i agree with john -- we should definitely try the kernel emulation,
and try and gather some statistics on how often it fires, or other
easy metric. i'll bet the cost is low.
Cool, please provide a kernel RPM for testing. ;-)
--
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:49 AM, John Gilmore g...@toad.com wrote:
I looked at the kernel patch for emulating the missing instruction
(long NOP). It looks like it works, and only needs minor patching-up
for security enforcement. The big argument on the Linux kernel list
was about not having a
On 7 June 2010 17:58, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
In this case, the Fedora packages are now unusable, so rebuilding them
would be needed. I'm not sure that this counts as progressing to
rolling our own distro since the rebuild would be fully automatic,
and that the end result
On 7 June 2010 20:05, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
You are placing far more trust in a trivial rebuild than I would. Once
Fedora ceases testing the actual instruction streams we will be using,
we will be providing the testing instead. There are some interesting
classes of bugs that
2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified. It was agreed in
F-12 that the Geode LX would be supported and that decision wasn't
discussed otherwise.
On 06/07/2010 06:46 AM, imm wrote:
On 6 Jun 2010, at 21:42, Michael Shiloh wrote:
I'm interested in exploring the use of the microphone jack for other
input devices.
Before I start plugging things in at random, I need to understand what
the circuitry at the input looks like.
I assume
On 06/07/2010 07:47 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Michael Shiloh
michaelshiloh1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested in exploring the use of the microphone jack for other
input devices.
Before I start plugging things in at random, I need to understand what
the
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote:
Hi all,
at today's SoaS meeting [1], we agreed on applying the SoaS Activity
Inclusion Criteria [2] as outlined in the wiki to the activity
selection for the upcoming release of SoaS v.4. We'd like to encourage
you
29 matches
Mail list logo
