OLPC is looking to add multi-touch to our interface over
the next year --- it is certainly necessary for a tablet.
But "multi-touch" describes a huge range of parameters.
Before taking a first pass at a spec. document, I'd like to
stir up some discussion. Here are the parameters that
I think sho
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> at today's SoaS meeting [1], we agreed on applying the SoaS Activity
> Inclusion Criteria [2] as outlined in the wiki to the activity
> selection for the upcoming release of SoaS v.4. We'd like to encourage
> you to work towar
On 06/07/2010 07:47 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Michael Shiloh
> wrote:
>
>> I'm interested in exploring the use of the microphone jack for other
>> input devices.
>>
>> Before I start plugging things in at random, I need to understand what
>> the circuitry at the
On 06/07/2010 06:46 AM, imm wrote:
>
> On 6 Jun 2010, at 21:42, Michael Shiloh wrote:
>
>> I'm interested in exploring the use of the microphone jack for other
>> input devices.
>>
>> Before I start plugging things in at random, I need to understand what
>> the circuitry at the input looks like.
> 2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
> issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
> upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified. It was agreed in
> F-12 that the Geode LX would be supported and that decision wasn't
> discussed otherwise.
On 7 June 2010 20:05, James Cameron wrote:
> You are placing far more trust in a trivial rebuild than I would. Once
> Fedora ceases testing the actual instruction streams we will be using,
> we will be providing the testing instead. There are some interesting
> classes of bugs that this would in
On 7 June 2010 17:58, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> In this case, the Fedora packages are now unusable, so rebuilding them
>> would be needed. I'm not sure that this counts as progressing to
>> "rolling our own distro" since the rebuild would be fully automatic,
>> and that the end result would only ha
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:49 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
> I looked at the kernel patch for emulating the missing instruction
> (long NOP). It looks like it works, and only needs minor patching-up
> for security enforcement. The big argument on the Linux kernel list
> was about not having a little kl
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 10:07:07PM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
> i agree with john -- we should definitely try the kernel emulation,
> and try and gather some statistics on how often it fires, or other
> easy metric. i'll bet the cost is low.
Cool, please provide a kernel RPM for testing. ;-)
--
Ja
john wrote:
> I looked at the kernel patch for emulating the missing instruction
> (long NOP). It looks like it works, and only needs minor patching-up
> for security enforcement. The big argument on the Linux kernel list
> was about not having a little kludge like this, which is likely to
>
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 07:19:43PM -0300, Daniel Drake wrote:
> In this case, the Fedora packages are now unusable, so rebuilding them
> would be needed. I'm not sure that this counts as progressing to
> "rolling our own distro" since the rebuild would be fully automatic,
> and that the end result
I looked at the kernel patch for emulating the missing instruction
(long NOP). It looks like it works, and only needs minor patching-up
for security enforcement. The big argument on the Linux kernel list
was about not having a little kludge like this, which is likely to
grow to emulate many other
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:54:45PM +0200, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> at today's SoaS meeting [1], we agreed on applying the SoaS Activity
> Inclusion Criteria [2] as outlined in the wiki [...]
You've decided to apply as policy a draft document which describes
itself as not reflecting policy. Sug
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 7 June 2010 18:33, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> 1) I thought we'd moved away from rolling our own distro due to the
>> amount of time and engineering resources it required that OLPC no
>> longer had. Has this changed? IE is there an internal t
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> 2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
>> issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
>> upstream for F-14 or at the very least cl
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > A mountain of packages and their corresponding effects on the system,
> ...
>
> > It also invalidates many processes that myself and others have been
> > training in the field, such a
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:02 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
> > There's a long standing hard bug of non-accelerated video on Linux
> > (not just XO). That hurts hurts HURTS any Linux device. There is some
> > backstory on that -- it's whether to use Xv or not, whether the video
> > frames can be grabbed
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Jon Nettleton wrote:
> > 2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
> > issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
> > upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified. It was agreed in
> > F-12 that the Geode LX wou
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> 2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
> issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
> upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified.
Good to hear there's a good chance that F14 will sup
On 7 June 2010 18:33, Peter Robinson wrote:
> 1) I thought we'd moved away from rolling our own distro due to the
> amount of time and engineering resources it required that OLPC no
> longer had. Has this changed? IE is there an internal thing that has
> changed that hasn't been announced external
> 2) FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committee) is dealing with the
> issue upstream [1][2] in Fedora with the view of getting it fixed
> upstream for F-14 or at the very least clarified. It was agreed in
> F-12 that the Geode LX would be supported and that decision wasn't
> discussed otherwise.
Hi all,
at today's SoaS meeting [1], we agreed on applying the SoaS Activity
Inclusion Criteria [2] as outlined in the wiki to the activity
selection for the upcoming release of SoaS v.4. We'd like to encourage
you to work towards meeting these goals and to submit your proposals
for activities and
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> In another thread, we've been discussing the issue that Fedora 12
> changed base architecture from i586 to i686. The XO-1 processor (Geode
> LX) is a i586. Fedora 12 seems to run OK (although I suspect there
> will be a few broken packages), b
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Michael Shiloh
wrote:
> I'm interested in exploring the use of the microphone jack for other
> input devices.
>
> Before I start plugging things in at random, I need to understand what
> the circuitry at the input looks like.
>
> I assume the schematics can be foun
On 6 Jun 2010, at 21:42, Michael Shiloh wrote:
> I'm interested in exploring the use of the microphone jack for other
> input devices.
>
> Before I start plugging things in at random, I need to understand what
> the circuitry at the input looks like.
>
> I assume the schematics can be found on th
> So what is the status of OS15 build that was posted June 15th in Steve
> Parrish's directory?
It works.
mikus
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
26 matches
Mail list logo
