Re: Announcing the OLPC OS 10.1.0 final release!

2009-12-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:47, Sameer Verma wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Chris Ball wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm very pleased to announce build os64 as the final 10.1.0 release >> build for XO-1.5 laptops.  Here are its release notes: >> >>   http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_note

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
#x27;t been initialized properly. http://www.unknownroad.com/rtfm/gdbtut/gdbtoc.html Good luck, Tomeu > Regards, > > PS: If attaches to the mailing list is not allowed, please let me know. > > On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:55:05 -0200, Tomeu Vizoso > wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 18:08, César

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
please let me know. Don't see any attachment, mailman ate it? Regards, Tomeu > On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:55:05 -0200, Tomeu Vizoso > wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 18:08, César D. Rodas >> wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 16

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 18:08, César D. Rodas wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 16:33 +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> >> > I'm looking forward to read clues about how to fix it. >> >> >> >> >> >> It sounds suspiciously like a Xv issue. That could be anything from a >> >> >> missing k

Re: [Sugar-devel] Technique to extract all records from xapian DB?

2009-12-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 20:21, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 17:48, Martin Langhoff >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> Yeah. It's a very c

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 17:36, César D. Rodas wrote: > Hi, > > The problem with the camera seems to be the xf86-video-geode package. > The cafe_ccic module is loaded automatically. Cheese and recordactivity > crashed right before show any picture. Then I tested remotely with ssh > -X and it worked

Re: [Sugar-devel] Technique to extract all records from xapian DB?

2009-12-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 17:48, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> I think it's worth trying, but not sure if worth merging and >> deploying. 0.82 didn't used directly the python xapian bindings, but >> some wrapper

Re: [Sugar-devel] Technique to extract all records from xapian DB?

2009-12-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 12:49, Martin Langhoff wrote: > I am trying to add minimal support on 0.84 for the old "0.82" format > in which JE metadata was saved on external disks. > > By minimal I mean read-only, fail-safe, and generally with small > impact on the codebase. I sure don't want to reimpl

Re: Swap to SD cards: performance and burnout test

2009-12-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 15:05, Emiliano Pastorino wrote: > Thanks for all your replies. > I'll show you the results when we're done. > >> What's most important to the user is probably going to be the latency >> (pointer "sluggishness", UI reaction time), though, and I don't have an >> idea how to t

Re: Renpy: Rapid Development for Interactive Roleplay / Avatar based learning with the XO

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Mike, how is this going? Is there anything on which people can give feedback? Anything the Sugar community could help with? Regards, Tomeu 2009/11/11 Mike Dawson : > Hi All, > > Sometime ago we had the idea to try and create skill trainers using > interactive roleplay on the XO - recently di

Re: [IAEP] Help Activity on XO-1.5 [was: List of Sugar activities for the XO-1.5]

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Adam, is this moving forward? Regards, Tomeu 2009/11/29 Holt > > Brian/Seth > Sandy raised a critical issue on our Support call today-- how much work would > it be to upgrade your great Help Activity from Sugar 0.82.1 to Sugar 0.84.x > for the XO-1.5? > > And how can experienced Support p

Re: configuring Socksproxy for Jabber Server on the XO-1 or XO-1.5

2009-12-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/19 Manusheel Gupta : > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> 2009/11/18 Manusheel Gupta : >> > We did try to search around but have not been able to make much progress >> > towards configuring socks proxy on the XOs. Are you aware

Re: [Server-devel] Proxy auto-configuration

2009-11-30 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 09:52, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Andrew McMillan wrote: >> I run WPAD here with Mozilla, and it works well.  It will generally be >> through DNS since that's the more reliable way of finding it, but it >> does require the browser to make a

Re: Proxy auto-configuration

2009-11-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 14:54, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 03:41:22PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: > >> - The DHCP payload must contain a url to the PAC file - this is the >> WPAD protocol, and what Pia was playing with. > > Sure, but for that the browser must send a DHCP reques

Re: [IAEP] Sunflower for Science on XO

2009-11-27 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:50, Danny Kodicek wrote: >  Hi, Tomeu, thanks for your reply > >> > 1) Screen resolution >> > The biggest problem we have is that the screen res of the XO seems >> > unnecessarily high and can't be changed. This leads to two >> big problems, one >> > of readibility (whic

Re: [IAEP] Sunflower for Science on XO

2009-11-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 17:16, Danny Kodicek wrote: > Hi there > > I just wanted to write to let people know we've been experimenting with some > success with getting our Sunflower for Science product > (www.sunflowerlearning.com) running on an XO. It's a Windows/Mac product but > I've got it runn

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSM/CDMA Modems support (part II)

2009-11-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 14:47, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 09:36 -0500, Martin Abente wrote: >> Would a patch that extends the allowed connection types be accepted in the >> 0.84 branch (that will be shipped with F11) ? > > Depends on the patch, but in general one requirement I've

Re: Importing images in Write documents makes file huge

2009-11-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:32, Philipp Kocher wrote: > The conversion to PNG was a general Abiword "feature", but it got solved > last July with Abiword 2.7.6 (see link below). > On my XO libabiword-2.6.4-6.olpc3 is installed (build 802). > > Is it possible to install an libabiword-olpc rpm of ver

Re: Testing summary - 7 November 2009 Wellington, NZ

2009-11-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/7 Tabitha Roder : > Testing summary - 7 November 2009, Wellington NZ > > Who: Alastair, Mike C, Grant, Tabitha, Mike A, Shane, Mike G, Gavin, Jess > > Randoms asked about what we are doing and played with some XOs, nice > > Tested Australia list with mostly XO 1.0s on 0.82. here are brief n

Re: configuring Socksproxy for Jabber Server on the XO-1 or XO-1.5

2009-11-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
tell Browse to use a SOCKS server to access web pages? Thanks, Tomeu > Copying Morgan on the thread. > > Regards, > > Manu > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> 2009/11/15 Manusheel Gupta : >> > Dear al

Re: configuring Socksproxy for Jabber Server on the XO-1 or XO-1.5

2009-11-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/15 Manusheel Gupta : > Dear all, > > Do we have documentation somewhere on the steps involved in configuring > socksproxy for jabber server on the XO-1 or XO-1.5? Please let us know. Hi Manu, have you done any progress on this since then? Thanks, Tomeu > Thank you. > > Regards, > > Ma

Re: Generating pot file for I18N

2009-11-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/9 Henning Bredel : > Sorry, for replying myself. > > On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 16:54 +0100, Henning Bredel wrote: >> I debugged the code and it seems that bundlebuilder.py is only >> collecting filenames instead of taking possible relative paths >> of each file within a submodule. > > I meant s

Re: Why does Sugar mount removable volumes ?

2009-11-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/18 John Watlington : > > As 1.5 and other portable devices are using SD as their main storage: > What is a removable volume ? > > On Nov 18, 2009, at 1:10 AM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: We are going with whatever the system says is a removable volume. On recent fedoras, we are using gio for th

Re: [Sugar-devel] Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

2009-11-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:01, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 11:50 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> For past stable releases, deployers are the ones who should know best. >> If you are talking about 0.82, then we should go back to use >> simplejson. If this is 0.8

Re: Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

2009-11-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/13 Martin Langhoff : > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Right now just using the json module in python 2.6 may be best as the >> parser is a C module (AFAIR). >> >> Is because of a bug in cjson why those files aren't being parsed?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

2009-11-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/11/12 Lucian Branescu : > The json module (simplejson) has only the parser written in C, so it's > still slower overall than cjson. Not by a lot, but measurable. Well, we don't really care about overall slowness, but only if it's fast enough for our actual use of it. In this case, we only car

Re: Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

2009-11-12 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 15:59, Martin Langhoff wrote: > This commit > http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar/repos/mainline/commits/ee4535c98ae74347e7072909d49dcf8a5e16ca7b > breaks importing Journal Entry Bundles, and I think it's just the tip > of the iceberg. > > The commit msg is pretty fact

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sudo in Fedora release 9

2009-11-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 15:24, Daniel Castelo wrote: > I have the version "OLPC release 9 (Joyride)" of Fedora, I want to configure > the sudoers file to allow users to run some commands as root using sudo. But > I couldn't do it. As I see it, the sudoers file in this fedora has been done > by OLP

Re: Generating pot file for I18N

2009-11-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 14:06, Henning Bredel wrote: > I'm trying to enable I18N in my activity using the guide here: > >  http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Internationalization_in_Sugar > > Unfortunately I get an error when running `./setup.py genpot' > in my source directory. The error: > > ,

Re: OOM conditions

2009-11-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:06, Martin Dengler wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 04:50:53PM +0000, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 14:16, Martin Dengler >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:22:13PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct

Re: [Sugar-devel] On Sugar 0.84 - status of the "Chat/collab leader" issue...

2009-11-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
several places. Any bugs at each layer can cause the unreliability we see. Regards, Tomeu > regards, > David van Assche > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 13:16, Benjamin M. Schwartz >> wrote: >> > Martin L

Re: [Sugar-devel] On Sugar 0.84 - status of the "Chat/collab leader" issue...

2009-11-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 15:07, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Martin Langhoff wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Gary C Martin wrote: >>> Other activities that support some form of collaboration like Chat, Browse, >>> Etoys, TurtleArt, Arithmetic, Maze, Pippy, etc, etc, don't care who starte

Re: [Sugar-devel] In gconf-based Sugar, how do I read config values (nickname, etc)...

2009-11-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 09:55, Martin Langhoff wrote: > from bash / commandline scripts that may not be executing in the user > session. For example > >  - olpc-netstatus may be invoked from a VT running as root >  - ds-backup scripts are invoked from from cron If it's only for reading, I think th

Re: open 80211s on XO 1.5

2009-11-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 18:02, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Also, I think using salut is much worst in the mesh case than gabble? > > I suspect so, but I have never measured it (or seen it measured). Sorry to be speaking from memo

Re: open 80211s on XO 1.5

2009-11-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 17:40, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Ed McNierney wrote: >> Under a tree, using mesh networking is pointless (unless, I suppose, >> it is an extraordinarily large tree).  Mesh networking allows packet > > You guys are both right. At the SF meetin

Re: DrGeo4Sugar download

2009-11-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 20:02, Hilaire Fernandes wrote: > One month ago Stephane pointed me DrGeo was downloaded more than > 60'000 times. I did not noticed that. Now it has been for more than > 90'000. Any idea from where it come from? My first guess is Uruguay, linked from wiki.laptop.org. Reg

Re: OOM conditions

2009-10-30 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 16:58, Richard A. Smith wrote: > In a LWN discussion thread on how google uses the kernel I found the > following: > > == > 2) Mike asked why the kernel tries so hard to allocate memory - why not just > fail to allocate if there is too much pressure. Why i

Re: Sharing files among several XO

2009-10-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 00:57, DancesWithCars wrote: > Good question, I that some one from Cambridge > said you could share files, but maybe that is from > our other machine peer to peer file sharing mentality, > and not really implemented on the XO, > or did I miss something? Sugar supports dire

Re: os33 - video regression ?

2009-10-27 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 05:20, Jon Nettleton wrote: > On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 22:42 -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: >> James wrote: > >> But this is a hang - which leaves the XO-1.5 completely unresponsive >> to operator input (except for the power button).  So I do not have >> my normal opportunity t

Re: the importance of providing swap space

2009-10-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 15:10, Tiago Marques wrote: > It seems you got lucky, the most common behavior is for it to "crash". > > I've been an advocate of "SWAP for the XO" since I got one, even > things like browsing become many times faster. It becomes even more > important on the XO OS because i

Re: [Testing] first play with new XO 1.5 machines

2009-10-22 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:31, Martin Dengler wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:36:50PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: >> One of the biggest headaches we have to deal with, even >> when we have infrastructure networks, is the bug where every XO has a >> different set of neighbours on the neighbourho

Re: [Testing] first play with new XO 1.5 machines

2009-10-22 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:03, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/10/22 Martin Langhoff : >> They are -- but it's pretty awkward to activate. I am arguing that >> ad-hoc networking with a preset ESSID, and Salut should be the >> transparent fallback. Just like the mesh was on earlier releases. > > We alre

Re: [Testing] first play with new XO 1.5 machines

2009-10-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 21:11, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > >   > But I don't know if NetworkManager and Sugar are fully organized >   > to do "Ad Hoc" networking, presence, messaging, file sharing, etc >   > in the absence of an access point. > > They

Re: [Testing] first play with new XO 1.5 machines

2009-10-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 20:54, John Gilmore wrote: >> On Oct 20 2009, at 19:04, Tabitha Roder was caught saying: >> > no mesh network showing in neighbourhood >> >> My understanding is that mesh is not currently supported in the >> WLAN firmware for the new chips. I am not sure what the plan of >>

Re: Bug specific to Fedora 11 on both XO-1 and XO-1.5

2009-10-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 20:28, Manusheel Gupta wrote: > Tomeu, > > Mikus reported an interesting bug on both the XO-1 and XO-1.5 running F11 - > Color Deducto activity comes up without color. Please find the logs attached > - http://pastebin.com/m7fb5ca12 . > > Wish if you could suggest pointers t

Re: [IAEP] Alpha release - Deducto and Color Deducto activity

2009-10-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 19:47, Manusheel Gupta wrote: > Dear all, > > I am delighted to announce the alpha release of the Deducto and Color > Deducto activities. Congratulations to all involved! Do they have localization setup? Seems like they have been downloaded hundreds of times already, and

Re: XO-1.5 follow-on impression

2009-10-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 17:52, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 16:44, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: >> Was able to use the XO-1.5 (os32) at another location, connected without a >> proxy.  My opinion - this is a quite nice machine. >> >> The principal user-

Re: XO-1.5 follow-on impression

2009-10-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 16:44, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > Was able to use the XO-1.5 (os32) at another location, connected without a > proxy.  My opinion - this is a quite nice machine. > > The principal user-perception experience where improvement would still be > welcome is video support.  Changes

Re: [Sugar-devel] incremental activity update

2009-10-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:43, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > At OLE Nepal we have difficulties with updating activities because our > main educational activity is so huge. Aayush Poudel implemented an > incremental activity update which I have now merged with the standard > software updater. When

Re: [IAEP] sugar live cd for windows

2009-10-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
f performance is better on SoaS than in XO-LiveCD, then we have a clue about where to investigate. Do you have a big interest in using XO-LiveCD ? Regards, Tomeu > Regards, > > Manu > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Tue

Re: [IAEP] sugar live cd for windows

2009-10-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Manu > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 18:59, Manusheel Gupta wrote: >> > Dear all, >> > >> > Wish to ask you for pointers to improve the performance of SocialCalc >> > activity while run

Re: [IAEP] sugar live cd for windows

2009-10-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 18:59, Manusheel Gupta wrote: > Dear all, > > Wish to ask you for pointers to improve the performance of SocialCalc > activity while running it on Sugar Live CD for Windows. SocialCalc works > very well on the native installation of Sugar. Please suggest. Hi Manu, can you

Re: complex langs/scripts in abiword

2009-10-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 08:35, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/10/5 Daniel Drake : >> Hi, >> >> I've been working on various bugs related to Nepali/Sanskrit text in >> AbiWord which likely fall over to other languages too. There were >> several pretty big bugs before, and now it is much more usable. >>

Re: Error running socialcalc on sugar live cd

2009-09-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 23:47, vijit singh wrote: > Hello all, > Some of my co-developers are facing some issues running socialcalc on sugar > live cd. A ZipExtractException is being reported in the log. I am attaching > a photo log with this mail. Kindly give your suggestions about what could be

Re: 0.84 for XO-1 (was Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94)

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 19:08, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> - switch to ubifs for new installs (ok, not necessary, but this is so >>> easy it's worth doing -- all info is on the wiki) >> >> Advanced li

Re: 0.84 for XO-1 (was Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94)

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 17:56, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/9/18 Tomeu Vizoso : >> Great, thanks for the kind offer. >> >> I think the effort is already underway, leaded by Fedora's Steven M. Parrish: >> >> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 >> >&

0.84 for XO-1 (was Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 11, Issue 94)

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 16:57, Jim Simmons wrote: > Tomeu, > > You can put me down as an XO owner that is willing to try new images > and file bug reports.  I don't have any immediate plans to enhance my > three Activities so I should have time for other work. Great, thanks for the kind offer. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] How to make a SoaS (or liveCD) from scratch

2009-09-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 04:04, Martin Dengler wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 03:01:47AM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 06:43:31PM -0300, Andrés Nacelle wrote: >> > Hi guys, basically I'm trying to do a SoaS or a live CD with the image we >> > are using now on the XO, whi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem installing and running hulahop on ubuntu 8.10

2009-09-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 21:22, vijit singh wrote: > Hello Tomeu, > > >> >> It is a warning, but I don't see why you think it isn't related to the >> exception. > > I might be missing some point or might be unable to interpret this warning > properly. >> >> Removing 2.4 is not enough, you need to reb

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem installing and running hulahop on ubuntu 8.10

2009-09-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 23:37, vijit singh wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > >> >> # >> /var/lib/python-support/python2.5/xpcom/xpt.py:72: RuntimeWarning: >> tp_compare didn't return -1 or -2 for exception >> >> I think this is due to some python C modules being compiled with a >> python version and others wit

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem installing and running hulahop on ubuntu 8.10

2009-09-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 19:15, vijit singh wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > Thanx for replying. > > >> >> You still get this error if you run this? >> >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.6 python -c "import hulahop" > > Well, running this command was still giving errors, I mean it didn't started > the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem installing and running hulahop on ubuntu 8.10

2009-09-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 18:45, vijit singh wrote: > Hello all, > > I am facing problem in installing and running hulahop on ubuntu 8.10. Here > are the steps taken- > > 1. Firstly, I build the req xulrunner and xpcom libraries, though xulrunner > was already installed by default, anyways it was upgr

Re: Smile activity version 1

2009-09-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 18:31, Tony Anderson wrote: > I posted version 1 of the Smile activity to activities.sugarlabs.org. It > matches the code posted on gitorious. > > The Smile activity implements the open source Ambulant SMIL3 player. It > plays a variety of media types. More importantly it can

Re: SarynPaint: a Java program packaged for the OLPC

2009-08-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 16:56, Jeffrey Kesselman wrote: > Honestly,  I think the lack of Java on the XO has more with python > defensiveness then anything else. Honestly, I don't think so. Most or all of the Sugar developers had zero python experience when joined the project. And we are way too bu

Re: Extracting and analysing journal data

2009-08-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 21:59, David Leeming wrote: > Hello, > > > > In the Solomon Islands a formal evaluation is taking place this month of the > 3 trials http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Solomon_Islands > > > > The independent evaluator wants to extract and analyse journal data. The > schools do n

Re: SarynPaint: a Java program packaged for the OLPC

2009-08-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:29, Ben Wiley Sittler wrote: > A friend of mine wrote a hand/eye coordination game called SarynPaint > and recently released the source code. SarynPaint is written in Java, > so you'll need to install OpenJDK to use it. I just checked in minimal > support for launching it

Re: [Sugar-devel] The ARM is near

2009-08-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:56, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Benjamin M. > Schwartz wrote: >> If you have the hardware to test these features, and the interest to make > > (cc'ing de...@l.l.o -- snipped Ben's outline of why it's important to > get Sugar distros running o

Re: [Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1 users in Uy

2009-08-25 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 17:42, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Martin > Langhoff wrote: >> On olpc-sur we're seeing reports of "my journal contents disappeared >> after reboot". (Thread starts at >> http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-sur/2009-August/004177.html ) > > S

Re: [Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1 users in Uy

2009-08-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff : > 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso : >> Should be kept in a subdir in there, from: > > Damn! I wish I had known about this! So 3 old dirs are kept - excellent. > >> But anyway, the failure to read the DS would be in the first boot >> where the jou

Re: [Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1 users in Uy

2009-08-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff : > 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso : >> 2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff : >>> 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso : >>>> Yes, though if we manage to get the logs dir of a machine just after >>>> the DS was "lost", there's lots of chances w

Re: [Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1 users in Uy

2009-08-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2009/8/21 Martin Langhoff : > 2009/8/21 Tomeu Vizoso : >> Yes, though if we manage to get the logs dir of a machine just after >> the DS was "lost", there's lots of chances we are going to be able to > > The ones on the ramdisk? :-( Is ~/.sugar/default/logs in

Re: [Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1 users in Uy

2009-08-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 07:46, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Andrés Ambrois > wrote: >> I'll help in any way I can. Would an upload webservice similar to Sacha's for >> uploading the necessary datastore bits help? We can then distribute a simple >> cli tool that upload

Re: [Sugar-devel] RFH - Journal corruption reports fom 8.2.1 users in Uy

2009-08-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 18:56, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On olpc-sur we're seeing reports of "my journal contents disappeared > after reboot". (Thread starts at > http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-sur/2009-August/004177.html ) > > This reminds me a lot of the issues we saw earlier in developmen

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fix Sound activity

2009-08-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:34, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > All OLPC OS releases including 8.2.1 have an annoying issue, where > activities can trash sound mixer settings. The result is that all > Sugar activities lose the ability to play sound (they are muted) and > sugar's volume control does no

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO wireless interface problem when AP down

2009-08-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Andres, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 15:50, Andrés Nacelle wrote: > Hello, I´ve been working recently with something like 70 XO and during the > tests where I had 2 Access Point working, it happened that the electric > supply from one of this failed without me realising. So I keep trying to > associ

Re: [Sugar-devel] ESSIDs and BSSIDs, NM and Sugar

2009-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 16:19, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Following the "let's make Sugar more deployable" theme that Daniel > started a while ago, I am looking at something that Reuben mentioned > last week he discovered in the field. Apparently, the Sugar + NM > combination we ship (on XO OS 802) ca

Re: [Sugar-devel] activity not getting installed with sugar-install-bundle

2009-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 14:20, sumit singh wrote: > Hello all, > > The xo bundle of my activity is not gettting installed on the xo using > the sugar-install-bundle command, however, when i unzip the xo bundle > in the /home/olpc/Activities folder , it is gettng installed > correctly. The error I am

Re: Getting a gtk.image from the get_preview function

2009-08-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
be/20216 >> . The log error can be found at --- http://pastebin.be/20214 . Kindly >> give your suggestions. >> >> Regards, > >> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 13:05, sumit singh wrote: >>>>

Re: Getting a gtk.image from the get_preview function

2009-08-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
self.window. Regards, Tomeu > Regards, > VIJIT > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 13:05, sumit singh wrote: >>> Hi Tomeu, >>> >>> Thanx for your reply. I tried using the it , but it doesn't s

Re: Getting a gtk.image from the get_preview function

2009-08-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
ntation: http://www.pygtk.org/pygtktutorial/sec-pixmaps.html http://www.pygtk.org/docs/pygtk/class-gdkpixmap.html http://tronche.com/gui/x/xlib/pixmap-and-cursor/pixmap.html HTH, Tomeu > Regards, > sumit > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 03

Re: Getting a gtk.image from the get_preview function

2009-08-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 03:06, sumit singh wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to ask what is the best way to get a gtk.Image from the > data returned by get_preview function of activity.Activity fn of > sugar. I want to make an image buttton using this data. Currently, I > am doing it by saving the d

Re: Can I use the keep or title_set_by_user key of metadata to store info about my activity

2009-08-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 03:09, sumit singh wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > This is in continuation with our chat yesterday. The write/report > activity would be having 3 states , I mean whether the user is working > on a blank document , designing a new template or using a previously > designed template. So,

Re: New F11-for-XO1 build is available and needs testing

2009-08-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 22:23, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: >> This build "OS3"  includes the pretty boot >> animations, and also replaces olpcsound with csound. >> I would apprectiate testing and feedback. > > Disclaimer:  perhaps off-topic Usability report : > > Was running Firefox 3.5 (*not* the Activi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Call for Help: SoaS & Display Manager (Auto-Login)

2009-08-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 16:48, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I could use a hand with auto-login on SoaS. We've been using slim so far > but will switch in the near future (in fact, I already committed a > change in GIT), as we also need to login automatically after killing / > resta

Re: [IAEP] The Next Wave of Activity Sharing

2009-07-25 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:31, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 10:45:32AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> [adding IAEP to cc] >> >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 10:09, Bastien wrote: >> > Joshua Eddy writes: >> > >> >> This is what Sug

Re: The Next Wave of Activity Sharing

2009-07-25 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
[adding IAEP to cc] On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 10:09, Bastien wrote: > Joshua Eddy writes: > >> This is what Sugar Labs DC wants to bring to the table.  For a more >> detailed description of this idea, please visit my blog: >> http://joshstechjournal.blogspot.com/ > > Nice idea!  Thanks for sharing

Re: new F11-for-XO1 images available for testing

2009-07-24 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 00:27, James Cameron wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:16:45PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: >> 2009/7/24 James Cameron : >> > 1. ?font size changed on console during boot, but it went back to normal >> > before X started, >> >> What do you mean by "normal"? I assume  it went

Re: [Sugar-devel] help about the get_preview function of activity.Activity class to take screenshots

2009-07-22 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 15:51, sumit singh wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > Thanx a lot for the function. I would be using it as of now while creating > the infrastructure for the activity, would try to provide support to both > the new as well as the previous builds. I would be testing the function on > my

Re: [Sugar-devel] help about the get_preview function of activity.Activity class to take screenshots

2009-07-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 01:08, sumit singh wrote: > Martin and Tomeu, > > Martin, thanx a lot for such a detailed answer. I have got what you want to > say. But the problem with me right now is that I think the get_preview > function is available only in the latest release of sugar 0.84 because I a

Re: creating your own templates in write activity

2009-07-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:28, Manusheel Gupta wrote: > Tomeu, > > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> That sounds great, how do you plan to deploy it? Are you going to >> integrate your changes into the existing Write activity or w

Re: hyperactivity...

2009-07-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 21:45, Sameer Verma wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 20:08, Sameer Verma wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Martin Langhoff >> >

Re: hyperactivity...

2009-07-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 20:08, Sameer Verma wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Martin Langhoff > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: >> > Are there any specific instructions on using hyperactivity >> > (http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/daf/hyperactivity/) othe

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proper use of self.set_canvas function

2009-07-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 14:10, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 14:06, sumit singh wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I would like to discuss about the set_canvas function of the >> activity.Activity class, I can understand that it is used to define the >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proper use of self.set_canvas function

2009-07-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 14:06, sumit singh wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to discuss about the set_canvas function of the > activity.Activity class, I can understand that it is used to define the > current working area of our activity. But , I want something of the sort > that when I start

Re: Testing summary - 18 July 2009 Wellington, NZ

2009-07-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 13:31, Walter Bender wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Tabitha Roder wrote: >> Testing summary - 18 July 2009, Wellington, NZ >> >> Who: Tim, Tabitha, Grant, Uli, Stella, Leah, Becs, Brenda, Callum, Dave, Sigi >> >> Putting dev keys in the last XOs to be updated. >>

Re: creating your own templates in write activity

2009-07-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 21:25, Manusheel Gupta wrote: > Tomeu, > > Nice to hear from you. > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> I think Martin's answer has been very complete, are you already set on >> this one? I recommend y

Re: creating your own templates in write activity

2009-07-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 19:18, Manusheel Gupta wrote: > Tomeu, > > Hope all is well. > > We have been working on developing a template builder tool in write > activity, and wish to have your pointers on certain features- > > 1. Text box - We realize that the text box tool is missing in the current

Re: Performance hit while working with screen depth 16

2009-07-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
gt; On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:24, James Cameron wrote: >> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:08:13PM +0530, shivaprasad javali wrote: >> >> Sorry, I didn't understand the question. If you are talking about w

Re: Performance hit while working with screen depth 16

2009-07-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:24, James Cameron wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:08:13PM +0530, shivaprasad javali wrote: >> Sorry, I didn't understand the question. If you are talking about where my >> activity is for you to download, I am sorry I cannot provide you the activity >> itself. > > No,

Re: XO-1 Camera in F11?

2009-07-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:43, Martin Dengler wrote: > Has anyone seen the XO-1 camera working (or even just detected) in > Record or Cheese with F11? > > I'm using the latest kernels with this change, so I don't think it's > (just) that: > > http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2009-May/024363.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >