On Aug 24, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Richard A. Smith wrote:
On 08/24/2010 10:13 AM, Reuben K. Caron wrote:
Consider the benefits of using open source software versus our closed
source firmware and partnering with communities like Freifunk whose
network is ~ 800 node, guifi.net is almost 10k
On Aug 24, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Richard A. Smith wrote:
On 08/24/2010 10:13 AM, Reuben K. Caron wrote:
Consider the benefits of using open source software versus our closed
source firmware and partnering with communities like Freifunk whose
network is ~ 800 node, guifi.net is almost 10k
) bouncing off the walls
etc. 802.11n thrives off these multipath effects.
As I said - first solve layer 1 2 issues and then think about layer 3 meshing.
I hope I could help.
Best regards,
L. Aaron Kaplan
(OE1SYS)
PS: please forward my answers to the list or allow me to post to the list. I am
(...)
BTW Richard, as far as I remember the problems with 802.11s seemed to be:
1) the standard is not a standard and it was intentionally crippled
2) the drivers were very b0rked and broken (and Marvel did a terrible job
with the driver software)
Scalability to less than 30 laptops
On Aug 24, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Reuben K. Caron wrote:
On Aug 24, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Richard A. Smith wrote:
The largest of our mesh problems did not have to do with scalability on
sheer number of nodes but rather scalability in density. Is there any
information available on how these
On Aug 24, 2010, at 7:20 PM, Richard A. Smith wrote:
On 08/24/2010 01:01 PM, L. Aaron Kaplan wrote:
Well - the issue is IMHO that OLPC always sold the public on the mesh
idea. So it is somewhat of a bummer that the mesh is gone now.
Let me re-phrase what I said before all the rumors
On Aug 24, 2010, at 7:32 PM, Reuben K. Caron wrote:
On Aug 24, 2010, at 1:29 PM, L. Aaron Kaplan wrote:
Hm well, you at least got me thinking how we can make a small dense
indoor mesh working without APs interesting challenge. Like think about
replacing those smart APs
would it make sense to at least enter that request into the projectdb
since that is what it was made for?
(apart from the feature requests which will be taken care of at some
time, it does hold the data and hence it can help in tracking the XOs)
On a different note: in larger mesh networks
On Jun 6, 2008, at 10:31 PM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
In the spirit of escalating collaboration/communication use cases to
more realistic scenarios, I 'd like to propose creating the following
multihop network testbed.
This testbed will involve about 70 nodes, but most are already
This is mainly an outdoor test with indoor nodes ;-) The idea is be
as realistic as possible and try to replicate the actual village
environment, only in its worst possible form: Including the high
radio noise levels of MIT. We should not enforce connectivity by
means of external
On May 5, 2008, at 8:38 PM, NoiseEHC wrote:
I have registered on said page but when I click to my projects it
goes to wiki.laptop.org and all I can see an empty page. Are those
people over
dang! thanks, you found a bug. Actually a regression. It already worked.
Will have to investigate.
On Apr 27, 2008, at 8:53 PM, Robert Withrow wrote:
Aaron Kaplan wrote:
there *are* open source layer 2 and layer 3 mesh software
solutions out there.
Not to forget Open80211S.org (http://www.open80211s.org/).
yup!
what is the current status on that actually
On Apr 24, 2008, at 2:26 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Looking at trac, wireless is one of the biggest sources of bugs and
the
community can hardly do anything about it. Normally, somebody who
complains can be told to fix the code, but with a closed wireless
firmware, complaining is
On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:25 AM, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
By my judgment, I'm glad Richard Stallman isn't running OLPC. He would
have delayed the launch until we have a GPL'd replacement for the mesh
firmware. As it is now, we have a laptop which is more pure license-
wise
than any other
On Apr 2, 2008, at 5:24 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Meshes of access points don't tend to change topology over time.
The laptop mesh very well might. The need to handle this is one
of the problems causing congestion.
Anybody find new algorithms for mobile meshes ?
As well there are plenty
What about a second camera and tracking head movements? Sonar? Can't I
just point with my nose?
http://www.olpcaustria.org/mediawiki/index.php/Headtracker
working on it...
a.
---
there's no place like 127.0.0.1
___
Devel mailing list
Running activities in the jhbuild (sugar-emulator) environment
on Ubuntu is going to be tough. We've not done much to support
running Sugar on distros other than Fedora 7. That could be an
interesting project, but certainly it would require you to
upgrade at least to something like Feisty
very interested over here as well...
Would it be out of the way to post the original proposal?
BTW - on a side note: polychronis: great work with the mesh view!
Simon Dorner mentioned that having small faces of the kids in the
mesh view would be even better.
Humans tend to remember faces
groups.
I strongly believe that the local groups over the long run can have
an important impact to the whole project.
So let's get started!
thanks for your attention,
Aaron Kaplan.
---
C.O.S.H.E.R. - Completely Open Source Headers Engineering and Research
19 matches
Mail list logo
