Yes, and due to Microsoft’s requirements it could only boot from a very
specific make and model (and perhaps even production batch) of SD card. AFAIK,
the XO is still the only computer that could (legitimately) boot Windows XP
from removable media. Please don’t spend any time on this - it’s ju
Microsoft Windows XP was released for the XO-1 and XO-1.5 laptops. Both were
special projects done for a limited number of users, and were never maintained
beyond the initial release. Neither version is or was generally available.
- Ed
> On Apr 25, 2015, at 9:41 PM, Jhon Diaz wrote:
Windows XP on the XO-1 loads and works just about the same as on any other
machine. Microsoft did the implementation, primarily by replacing Open
Firmware with Insyde BIOS, a standard proprietary x86 PC BIOS. There’s nothing
you’d learn from it that you wouldn’t learn from studying XP booting
Sridhar -
I agree with Richard's concern about finding the problem. Have you tried to
differentiate between problems with collaboration and problems with networking
in general? Have you tried different 3G modems and seen different results?
I'm just a little skeptical about assuming we know w
Richard (et al.) -
Please keep in mind that early ramp units of XO-1.5 were sent to Australia, and
they are different (specifically with respect to the heat spreader) than all
the production units that follow.
- Ed
On Jan 23, 2012, at 7:54 AM, Richard A. Smith wrote:
> On 01/23/2012
Tony -
Due to our battery-management system, it is impossible to charge an XO laptop
in less than about 110 minutes. With a few breaks, I have personally fully
charged an XO-1 laptop with a Freeplay hand crank charger in 110 minutes, and I
am by no means "an adult athlete", especially when it
No, "whew, I think".
- Ed
On Aug 25, 2011, at 8:41 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
> chris wrote:
>> http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/456217/25261a3982aee26d/
>>
>> Sympathetic coverage, I think. :-)
>
> whew. :-)
>
> =-
> paul fox, p...@laptop.org
> ___
raw NAND chips.
- Ed
Ed McNierney
CTO
One Laptop per Child
e...@laptop.org
+1 (978) 761-0049
On Aug 16, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
> wrote:
>>
>> I always wondered why not put an SD of 2 instead
Daniel -
Thanks to everyone who worked hard to make this happen. It's a great
improvement and a fine job!
- Ed
On Jul 22, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 11.2.0 for XO-1 and
> XO-1.5. Details of new features, known iss
was in, and
> adapt its parameters to it), but no progress has been made, and its
> impact may be very small now, even if it is ever out of the drawing
> board.
>
> I agree that successful mesh networks are mostly static, but we
> thought that the very mobility of the network (whic
John -
While I am not familiar with the Mesh Potato, I have spent some time trying to
figure out whether wireless mesh networking is really as hard as the OLPC
universe seems to find that it is.
I have come to believe that both wired and wireless mesh networks are really
doing pretty well out
Sridhar -
Yes, that's correct. Multiple valid keys weakens security, since the same
rights can be obtained from multiple sources.
Handling your own key-issuing authority is something we fully support, but it
is a complex and substantial undertaking. It requires a reasonable commitment
to bot
We recently turned on that feature in trac due to increasing amounts of ticket
spam from unverified addresses.
- Ed
On Feb 2, 2011, at 7:58 PM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> Received an email from bugtrac...@laptop.org, asking me to verify my new
> email address. Since I have been using th
Just make sure you keep in mind the difference between the specification and
what is likely to be acceptable. One value is better suited to personal
tinkering, the other to widespread propagation.
- Ed (who was disappointed to learn this weekend that "Zener" is not in
the official Scra
From the XO-1.5 hardware spec at
http://wiki.laptop.org/images/f/f0/CL1B_Hdwe_Design_Spec.pdf
"2.7.4 External Microphone Input
A stereo jack is provided on the laptop for connecting an external microphone,
switch, or other sensor. This jack is connected to the audio codec’s microphone
input,
Sridhar -
Yes, there's no problem as long as you're not suggesting using a different make
or model of card (i.e. swapping only cards originally shipped with XO machines,
not new ones). You can also do that, too, but many microSD cards fail our
qualification testing and may fail much more quick
Naz -
Thanks for the thoughts!
> IMHO it's better to delay the release of the 1.75 and force putting in
> a touchscreen.
It's not a matter of time, it's a matter of the price deployments are willing
to pay for it. The feedback we've heard so far is that since the XO-1.75
without a touchscreen
Marvell's Armada SoC family is complicated. There are multiple product lines,
and multiple products in each product line, with new ones coming along all the
time. So it's hard to nail down just which device is the "latest and greatest"
at any time.
OLPC is (unsurprisingly) doing something a l
On Nov 11, 2010, at 7:32 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 11.11.2010, at 12:49, Ed McNierney wrote:
>
>> [...] we're talking about XO-1.75 right now, which is a laptop. An OLPC-3
>> tablet is a long way away and it's not really useful to discuss/speculate on
&
> Two questions:
>
> 1.
> Here (under Tech Specs)
> http://bit.ly/bdr0Cz
> it specs the 10" tablet with an ARMADA 168. Why did not you go with that
> processor? Would not that be cheaper?
That's a Marvell product platform page, not OLPC's.
>
> 2.
> What happened to the bigger display and the
Mikus -
Well, there's a reason Linus called them BogoMips, isn't there?
- Ed
On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> I notice in the dmesg printout that the BogoMips for this initial
> XO-1.75 version is less than for the G1G1 XO-1.
>
> mikus
>
>
Folks -
Thanks for getting the discussion rolling. Although it may be obvious, I want
to point out one aspect of OLPC's "mesh" needs that has complicated matters.
Our XO laptops are used at home, in a sparse network environment, and at
school, in a dense network environment, and all levels of
ent then. Counterfeiting may be your
> problem.
>
> Best regards,
> Tiago
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Ed McNierney wrote:
>
> >
> > Directly from the OEM or on the open market?
> >
>
> Both.
>
>- Ed
>
>
___
>
> Directly from the OEM or on the open market?
>
Both.
- Ed
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:21 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>> Thanks for the update. Can you disclose the brands of the mentioned SD cards?
>> It's always useful to know what not to buy.
>
> I probably could, but variations between models from one manufacturer
> may be greater than variations between ma
"Every member of the OLPC technical staff is on the de...@laptop.org mailing
list, and we all see bugs filed in trac."
Sorry - that's not correct. I forgot that Mitch Bradley unsubscribed from
de...@laptop.org last December, as he found "the noise level has gotten out of
control". He does, ho
here at all, we won't know there's a
problem to fix.
- Ed
On Aug 8, 2010, at 6:00 PM, Brenda Wallace wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Christoph Derndorfer
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 8, 201
> So if you please go back to the original mail and answer any question you
> think you can so tickets can be filed.
No, no reflexes - the only other question in that email I can answer
immediately is, no, there is planned printing support in 10.1.2 or later. I
have not heard of anyone interes
I just saw Walter's reply, and things in Uruguay do indeed seem to work
well. Those sorts of processes are what's needed in large deployments.
On Aug 8, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Ed McNierney wrote:
> Instructions
Yioryos -
You asked for instructions for "the olpcnews.com/forum/ kind of people", and
that's the information I provided. I wasn't dismissing or ignoring anything;
if we widely disseminate those instructions and they are followed, bugs will be
far less likely to be dismissed or ignored. But a
On Aug 8, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> (instructions for the olpcnews.com/forum/ kind of people would be
> appreciated...:-)
Instructions:
1. Report bugs at http://dev.laptop.org/newticket - if necessary, register
first at http://dev.laptop.org/register (as mavrothal kin
Martin -
Just another note of advice - I discovered a normal-looking USB key that
*wasn't* working had a single FAT partition on it, but it had been erased on a
Mac and had a GUID partition table. Reformatting with an MBR fixed it.
- Ed
On Jul 30, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Martin Langhoff wr
Martin -
We've done some quick testing here in the office. It appears that collection
keys on Q3A40, Q3A42, and Q3A46 work, provided the laptop is secure-booting.
If your machines are not secured, you need to hold down the "x" game key while
booting. Remember that with prettyboot enabled, an
Sameer -
Yes, tell your browser to trust it. The activation server uses a self-signed
certificate that your browser doesn't know to trust by default. All XO laptops
trust it.
- Ed
On Jul 7, 2010, at 8:41 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> activation.laptop.org is throwing a SSL error.
>
> "
Jacob -
The Linux kernel question is easy, as it's largely GPL v2; the Fedora one is by
no means easy. The Fedora Project maintains a list of software licenses which
are considered acceptable for software to be packaged in Fedora. That doesn't
mean *all* these licenses are in use in any parti
nical work with Plan Ceibal) to pick
up the ball and try again. If Brett's not the right person to do that, just
let Martin know.
- Ed
Ed McNierney
CTO / VP of Engineering
One Laptop per Child
e...@laptop.org
+1 (978) 761-0049
On Jul 7, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Eben Moglen wrote:
>
Sridhar -
There are a few things happening at once here, and we should distinguish
between the general case (what's been enabled in the design) and one particular
instance of that case (machines for Spanish-speaking high-school students).
From an engineering perspective, we have:
1. Redesigne
Javed -
The best way to get support for your efforts is to work through OLPC's country
support team, since we have a working relationship with the Afghan MOE. I will
follow up with contact information so you can get the support you need. Thanks!
- Ed
Ed McNierney
CTO
One Lapto
Folks -
Below is the text version of the press release OLPC and Marvell issued this
morning, announcing our agreement to work together on the tablet-based efforts
we've been calling "XO-3.0" and Marvell has been calling "Moby" (both
previously announced). The link takes you to the same documen
Folks -
I've acquired two of these machines - for those of you in or near 1CC, you can
find them on my desk and are welcome to play with them. I ordered one for $99
with Linux and one for $119 with Windows CE (there is no difference in the
hardware). I removed the case from the Linux model an
Folks -
We should keep in mind that these keyboards were primarily intended for a
particular audience (as pgf has mentioned) and that they're also designed to be
usable by Sugar, GNOME, and Windows users (something that was not a design goal
previously). There's no guarantee that there will ev
Folks -
It's my impression that the boot animation in grayscale is an equally important
part of the XO design. IIRC, we went to some effort to use a non-standard
Fedora badge in order to retain the grayscale color scheme. So if we're going
to add a Sugar Labs graphic we should keep to the sam
But please don't claim we're
not listening if you aren't willing to use the public trouble-reporting system
we rely on.
- Ed
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Tuukka Hastrup wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Ed McNierney escribió:
> > No, you're quite r
rom deployments".
>
> Also, the larger issue of how to get the "silent majority" to speak up is
> something
> we are constantly working hard from the field to improve. Its hard, any
> suggestions
> on where exactly to aggregate info from the field, in a way t
#x27;t think we know. As they say in some courts of law,
"Not Proven".
We can certainly make an effort to inquire specifically about this and attempt
to get good input from existing users.
- Ed
On Apr 15, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 201
Paul -
This issue has bubbled up from time to time over the last 18 months or so
(judging from my email archives). It is not at all clear to me that there is
indeed a "consensus from deployments"; some like it, some don't. We tend to
(unsurprisingly) hear little or nothing from the people who
Folks -
Our data center space at MIT is being shut down and we need to move all our
servers to a new server rack at the Media Lab. Chris Ball and I are planning
to make the move this Thursday morning, April 8 (i.e. about 12 hours from now).
This will take all our public-facing services - the
for doing the legwork to
> get that accomplished.
>
> Reuben
>
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Ed McNierney wrote:
>
>> Folks -
>>
>> OLPC already has a license from Adobe to redistribute Adobe Flash. We can
>> provide that to any deployment that requests it
Folks -
OLPC already has a license from Adobe to redistribute Adobe Flash. We can
provide that to any deployment that requests it; if a deployment decides they
need it, we don't need to force them to install it themselves.
However, Adobe pointed out that since OLPC's Linux distro (a Fedora Rem
(dropping Fedora list)
Yes, it worked for me, too, on an unmodified ramp unit.
- Ed
On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Reuben K. Caron wrote:
> The same procedure worked correctly for me on a ramp unit that has the
> solar modification by Wad.
>
> On Mar 10, 2010, at 10:44 PM, Mikus Grinbe
On Mar 10, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> You are clearly an Adobe licensee, which means Adobe has a
> responsibility to give you support so you can use their runtime on our
> platform.
Well, no. Fedora 11 is a supported Adobe platform - the XO is not. If you
report a problem on t
Milan -
> 1) After reboot, or after a brief period of inactivity, the system
> sometimes does not connect to network, or disconnects from the
> network, and shows nothing on the network neigborhood screen (many
> dots button), only the middle xo symbol, while there are many wireless
> networks aro
Franco -
Thank you for the testing! All XO-1.5 B2 laptops (i.e. all of those out in the
field) have a hardware problem that prevents wireless from recovering from a
resume. We've tried to make this widely known. The problem has been fixed in
B3 and later machines, but anyone who is testing o
Mikus -
Chris is very good about emailing build announcements when they're ready. If
there hasn't been an announcement, and you happen to discover a few files lying
about in an HTML-accessible place, please don't expect them to be of any
particular use.
When OS 58 has been reasonably checked
Bastien -
Moon photos are a problem for just about any kind of astrophotography. In
addition to anything else you might try in software, the best bet is to add
some kind of neutral-density filter over the scope. You might try some scrap
anti-static wrap (the gray, translucent kind). It might
Bastien -
Yes. I'm not sure how "massive deployments" are relevant, but we currently
have one standard software image that is installed at the factory on all XOs.
You are suggesting that we create unique software images, one for each SKU, to
be managed and installed separately by OLPC and Qua
he case of Cambodia with many small deployments (educational
> NGOs got XOs donated from G1G1/OLPC or other donors), no signed builds
> probably means that the XOs don't get updated anymore.
>
> Best regards,
> Philipp
>
> On 12/01/2009 08:04 PM, Ed McNierney wrote:
&
Philipp -
An OS image signed by OLPC can be booted by any XO-1.0 laptop in the world,
except for those which have been reconfigured by a deployment to only respect
software signed by other security keys. That implies a higher level of testing
and certification than an image that can be selecti
around for
> some time, but I'm guessing
> the XO is one of the bigger
> (~1 million XOs out there somewhere)
> publicly known implementations
> in that arena.
>
> So if someone / laptop.org
> wants to set the record straight
> and give definitive info, that would be
>
De : Ed McNierney [mailto:edmcnier...@gmail.com] De la part de Ed
McNierney
Envoyé : vendredi 30 octobre 2009 15:12
À : LASKE, Lionel (C2S)
Cc : OLPC Devel
Objet : Re: XO 1.5 hang on "Type your name" screen
Lionel -
Step 1 is to take Mitch's advice of earlier today and upgrad
On Oct 30, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> scenarios of a handful of XOs in the under-a-tree model
Sameer -
Under a tree, using mesh networking is pointless (unless, I suppose,
it is an extraordinarily large tree). Mesh networking allows packet
forwarding from node A to node B, whe
On Oct 30, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> to allow for meshing a la XO1
Sameer -
Are you in fact using 802.11s mesh networking on XO-1 machines? Or
are you rather using ad-hoc networking and collaboration features?
Mesh networking is exceptionally difficult to use properly on an X
Lionel -
Step 1 is to take Mitch's advice of earlier today and upgrade to q3a15:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Firmware_q3a15
- Ed
On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:06 AM, LASKE, Lionel (C2S) wrote:
Oops, sorry.
Post to the wrong devel list :-(
Lionel.
De : LASKE, Lionel (C
On Oct 21, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Tiago Marques wrote:
> Hasn't mesh proved useful in deployments?
No, it hasn't. We actively discourage anyone from using it, and I'm
not aware of any successful applications of it except in test and
demonstration situations.
I suspect you are, like many, many pe
One can also check the 1.5 tickets at http://dev.laptop.org/1.5
- Ed
P.S. Remember - if it's not in trac, it doesn't exist. If you find a
problem, check trac and open a ticket if it's not already there.
Tabitha correctly labeled this thread as "playing" with 1.5, which is
fine and
Tiago -
Thanks, please do put that into trac.
Folks, in general it's time to start filling up trac. If you find
anything odd and it's not readily fixed through a quick inquiry,
please open a trac ticket for it. We're moving into the 1.5 endgame
process and trac will be the main tool we'll
ng off topic(better to post another
> mail?) but I couldn't find any description on the wiki about the flash
> controller. Are you still using one - and if so which - or are you
> just using the microSD card's FTL?
>
> Best regards,
> Tiago Marques
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 20
Tiago -
Sure, but what kind of elaboration would you like? These are pre-
production machines and have an assortment of problems, this being one
of them. I think the description is pretty clear; if you have a
question about it please let us know - thanks!
- Ed
On Oct 3, 2009, at
Folks -
This is a friendly reminder that, especially as we get close to having
XO-1.5 B2 machines scattered among developers around the world, we
should try keep development discussions on the devel@lists.laptop.org
list whenever possible. The techteam list should be used only for
discuss
Folks -
In 30 minutes Boston Properties is scheduled to turn off power to
OLPC's 1CC office for some electrical equipment maintenance. All mail
addressed to laptop.org addresses is routed through an anti-spam/anti-
virus appliance (spam.laptop.org) located at 1CC. Power is expected
to be
Steven -
While Chris sets you up on dev.laptop.org for space I'm working on a
new F11 build machine for this project and I'll let you know as soon
as that's available.
- Ed
On Jul 25, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been in discussions with Daniel Dra
is
> content development and the bulk of the deployment work. (The points
> of overlap are in regard to managing some aspects of security and
> updates.)
>
> -walter
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Ed McNierney wrote:
>> Folks -
>> We've tried many times t
Folks -
We've tried many times to make the very simple story about Windows
support on the XO clear. The conspiracy theorists don't really care.
If you don't live in a fact-based universe, facts are irrelevant.
Mitch is quite right, but we've said just about all of that before to
little
John -
Thanks for keeping this on the radar. I have a pair on order (one
with keyboard, one without) in the hopes of both doing some
experimenting and trying out that USB host/host connection glue, too.
I'll let the list know when we get them here at 1CC to play with -
they're pre-ordere
Right - the Contributors' Program is not intended to provide equipment
for pilots or small deployments.
Sameer, which small deployments are you talking about?
- Ed
On Mar 16, 2009, at 12:01 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
>> What's t
ok enable-security SHF73300042
Since we are moving to "security is off by default" , we added the
serial number argument to make it harder for children to do
something that would make their machine stop working.
_______
Devel mailing l
Congratulations to everyone - very nice job!
- Ed
On Mar 5, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> On 03/05/09 10:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>> So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on,
>>> we
>>> could do a bug fix sprint during
Folks -
We're on for our regular meeting at 4 PM, #olpc-admin on freenode,
today. I've been a bit out of touch with what our current/urgent
issues are, so please email any agenda items you'd like covered. I'll
look over last week's minutes, but I'd rather not just re-hash the
same issues
Wiki is back. A cabling error caused our upstream connection to
automatically shut off the entire 1CC network, and we had to wait
until someone with the appropriate magic powers was available to reset
it.
- Ed
On Feb 6, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Yes, still down.
>
> --
>
David -
The "9.1" release was a very specific release planned for the first
half of 2009 - see http://wiki.laptop.org/go/9.1.0 for one set of
details - following OLPC's stated plan of two major releases per
calendar year. That specific event is not going to happen. That's
not at all the
This is a reminder of the weekly VIG meeting at 4 PM EST in #olpc-
admin on oftc.
I have had a few things come up and I will be unable to attend or
chair the meeting today. Henry has generously volunteered to serve as
our secretary; if someone else would like to step in to chair today's
me
This is a reminder of the weekly VIG meeting at 4 PM EST in #olpc-
admin on oftc. I've edited the draft agenda at
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC:VIG
but further updates are welcome.
- Ed
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://
Gabriel -
No, there are no current plans to shut down any services on
dev.laptop.org. OLPC has an 8.2.1 release underway and we'll continue
to maintain those services in the future.
On the other hand, anyone working on Sugar efforts such as Activity
development should be encouraged to put
Victor & Scott -
Sorry - I made a comment about this on an earlier email, but I just
realized that that message wasn't sent to the devel list.
Scott's quite right. I firmly believe that whenever possible a layoff
is handled with a face-to-face conversation with your manager. It
isn't fun
Victor -
Thanks! I agree with Ben that connecting with the Sugar Labs
community is the right start and an excellent focus. If you do need
to have XO-specific conversations as well, I would be happy to be the
contact person to do that.
- Ed
On Jan 9, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Benjamin M.
t; tickets available already.
- Ed
P.S. If you're also responsible for tweaking the Trac query for report #38,
thanks.
On 12/22/08 4:12 PM, "C. Scott Ananian" wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Ed McNierney wrote:
>> Are we able to promptly and regularly ge
Michael -
Are we able to promptly and regularly generate 8.2.1 builds that
reflect the work being done? From last week's reports I get the
impression that various bits of progress are being made, but we've had
no 8.2.1 builds since the first one.
If there is anything you (or anyone else) c
¹ll keep an
eye out on #olpc-devel for anyone who¹s looking in the wrong place. Thanks.
- Ed
On 12/11/08 1:04 PM, "Ed McNierney" wrote:
> Folks -
>
> We¹re trying to get a very focused 8.2.1 release wrapped up to address a small
> number of problems affecting o
the tickets we will be considering for 8.2.1 inclusion. At the
moment I believe it is an inclusive list but I expect we will decide not to
fix all of them for 8.2.1.
- Ed
On 12/11/08 2:11 PM, "Michael Stone" wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:50:58PM -0500, Ed McNierney wro
OK, someone made a boo-boo. Some time in the last hour or two Trac got
"updated" with 308 new Milestone=8.2.1 tickets. I'd appreciate anyone who's
recently made bulk updates reconsider their actions. Thanks!
- Ed
On 12/11/08 1:48 PM, "Deepak Saxena" wrote:
> On Dec 11 2008, at 13:38, p
Folks -
We¹re trying to get a very focused 8.2.1 release wrapped up to address a
small number of problems affecting or blocking key country deployments of
8.2. A few bugs have been tagged for an 8.2.1 milestone (fifteen of them),
and we have hit one critical enough to merit triggering a release (
And then Mitch tosses the next ball to Daniel to catch.
On 12/9/08 12:22 PM, "Jim Gettys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 07:05 -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
>
>>> Where do we go with this? Who's adventurous enough to test it? Dare we
>>> put it in joyride? Any suggestions
I see that the tickets for 8.2.1 seem to be all labeled for the 9.1
milestone, ³per edmcnierney¹s request² and that wasn¹t my request.
Tickets 8976, 8745, 9044, 9045, 8982, 8155, 8767, and 8451 should all be
tagged as for the 8.2.1 release, and those are the ONLY tickets that should
be so labeled.
Folks -
I went to take a look at Trac to clean up Milestones and make sure that only
the bugs identified on the 8.2.1 ECO page at
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Eco/8.2.1#Relevant_Trac_items are labeled with
that Milestone. That is, those are the only 8 tickets that should be fixed
and closed for us t
Thanks, Mitch! Nice stuff.
- Ed
On 12/5/08 3:53 AM, "Mitch Bradley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The multicast NAND reflasher - AKA NANDblaster - is ready for serious
> testing.
>
> See http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Multicast_NAND_FLASH_Update for instructions.
>
> Mitch
>
> ___
Chris -
Thanks; I think your thoughts are rather similar to mine and I am trying to
get information on what the actual user need (or perceived need) is. While
there are obvious storage and RAM constraints involved, we need to be sure
we're providing what most users will want (users of this deskto
Mikus -
I'd be happy to help, but I'm not sure I understand your suggestion. I
don't understand what legal consequences you're thinking about - if you can
give me more details I can try to investigate.
But your statement sounds like what I was trying to say: the community of
people who rely on w
12:55 AM, "Michael Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:47:02PM +1800, David Farning wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> David -
>>>
>>> I don't understa
this morning and we will work together to put
together clearer procedures and policies for work that affects our public
Web services so modifications to those services are made more appropriately
in the future.
- Ed
On 12/4/08 12:30 PM, "Bernie Innocenti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Bernie -
>>
>> We should *never* take our public-facing Web services offline deliberately
>> without scheduling that event in advance and sending warni
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
