think it is good.
>
> Rolf
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org]
> >On Behalf Of George Bosilca
> >Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 12:49 PM
> >To: Open MPI Developers
> >Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RF
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: hide btl segment keys within btl
>
>Looks good to me. I would add some checks regarding the number and size of
>the segments and the allocated space (MCA_BTL_SEG_MAX_SIZE) to make
>sure we never hit the corner case where there are too many segments
>
Looks good to me. I would add some checks regarding the number and size of the
segments and the allocated space (MCA_BTL_SEG_MAX_SIZE) to make sure we never
hit the corner case where there are too many segments compared with the
available space. And add a huge comment in the btl.h about the
This sounds like a good thing to me. +1
On Jun 13, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> What: hide btl segment keys from PML/OSC code.
>
> Why: As it stands new BTLs with larger segment keys (smcuda for example)
> require changes in both OSC/rdma as well as the PMLs. This RFC makes will
What: hide btl segment keys from PML/OSC code.
Why: As it stands new BTLs with larger segment keys (smcuda for example)
require changes in both OSC/rdma as well as the PMLs. This RFC makes will make
changes in segment keys transparent to all btl users.
When: The changes are very
