Re: [OMPI devel] parallel make install

Hello Ralph, * Ralph Castain wrote on Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:59:07PM CEST: > Very interesting. Don't know if it's the same problem, but I noted an issue > quite a while ago where make -jN all/install would fail when traversing > opal. I built a workaround that was just a script that does make all

[OMPI devel] some Makefile.am questions

Hello, perusing the OMPI source tree a bit more, I stumbled over a couple of things: 1) This is from test/Makefile.am: --- snip --- # This should be libsupport.a, not libsupport.la. Automake doesn't # support check_LTLIBRARIES, as technically you have to install a # shared library before you ca

Re: [OMPI devel] some Makefile.am questions

* Jeff Squyres wrote on Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 03:21:03AM CEST: > On Jun 4, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > 1) This is from test/Makefile.am: > > > > --- snip --- > > # This should be libsupport.a, not libsupport.la. Automake doesn't > > # support

Re: [OMPI devel] libdir not propagated to contrib/vt/vt ??

Hello, * David Daniel wrote on Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:34:23PM CEST: > Building against recent heads (r18643) it appears that libdir (as set > by ./configure --prefix=$PREFIX --libdir=$PREFIX/lib64 for example) is > not propagated to ompi-trunk/contrib/vt/vt. ompi/contrib/vt/configure.m4 is r

Re: [OMPI devel] autogen error

Hello Leonardo, * Leonardo Fialho wrote on Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 04:29:30PM CEST: > [Running] aclocal -I config > /usr/local/bin/m4:config/mca_no_configure_components.m4:9: ERROR: end of > file in string > autom4te: /usr/local/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1 > aclocal: autom4te failed with exit

Re: [OMPI devel] autogen error

* Jeff Squyres wrote on Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 05:50:43PM CEST: > Ralf: if it's more correct to also quote the m4_define first argument, > I'll do that, too. Yes, please. Several instances in autogen.sh.

Re: [OMPI devel] Help on building openmpi with "-Wl, --as-needed -Wl, --no-undefined"

* Funda Wang wrote on Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 05:29:57AM CEST: > I'm currently building openmpi 1.2.6 under Mandriva cooker, and its > default LDFLAGS is "-Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined". > > But openmpi 1.2.6 builds failed with: > libtool: link: g++ -shared -nostdlib > /usr/lib/gcc/i586-manbo-li

Re: [OMPI devel] Help on building openmpi with "-Wl, --as-needed -Wl, --no-undefined"

Hi Jeff, * Jeff Squyres wrote on Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 03:54:50PM CEST: > > Is the attached patch what you're talking about? > > If so, I'll commit to trunk, v1.2, and v1.3. Can you verify that it work with a pristine build? The dependencies as such look sane to me, also the cruft removal, but I

Re: [OMPI devel] Need v1.3 RM ruling (was: Help on building openmpi with "-Wl, --as-needed -Wl, --no-undefined")

* Brian Barrett wrote on Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:28:45PM CEST: > When I looked at the same problem in LAM, I couldn't get the > dependencies right between libraries when only one makefile was used. It > worked up until I would do a parallel build, then would die because the > libraries weren't

Re: [OMPI devel] Need v1.3 RM ruling (was: Help on building openmpi with "-Wl, --as-needed -Wl, --no-undefined")

* George Bosilca wrote on Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:44:04PM CEST: > I was hoping we can get some hints/help from Ralf, but unfortunately his > email address is not CC to the emails and I don't know if he's reading > the devel mailing list. I'll resend my email with. I read the list, but reading la

[OMPI devel] some configury nits

Hello, I tried to build OpenMPI trunk on my Debian stable/testing mix, and to make things more interesting, today my /bin/sh is dash, and while gcc is version 4.3.1, g++ remained at 4.1.3. I needed the following patch in order to get configure to finish ("test ... == ..." is a bash extension). T

Re: [OMPI devel] TRUNK error ( MAN page ) since r19120

* Tim Mattox wrote on Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:11:20PM CEST: > As this thread is making clear, not everyone saw and/or heeded the > note that we were upgrading the GNU autotools used for building Open MPI's > nightly tarballs. See http://www.open-mpi.org/svn/building.php the the > version > matrix

Re: [OMPI devel] MPI ABI on Linux

Hello Jeff, all, if you allow me my two cents, * Jeff Squyres wrote on Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:44:28PM CEST: > > At the MPI Forum meeting in Dublin, the MPI ABI meeting was... er... > shall we say, "spirited." :-) Both the benefits and drawbacks of an > MPI ABI are widely contended (it's a

Re: [OMPI devel] MPI ABI on Linux

* Jeff Squyres wrote on Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:07:24PM CEST: >> On Sep 9, 2008, at 6:23 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: >>> On Sep 9, 2008, at 2:45 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >>> >>>> An MPI ABI will have to be versioned in >>>> the same way that th

Re: [OMPI devel] gdb libmpi.dylib on Leopard

Hello Aurélien, * Aurélien Bouteiller wrote on Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:32:11PM CEST: > I have been facing a weird problem for several month now (I guess since I > upgraded from Tiger to Leopard). I am unable to debug Open MPI using gdb > on my mac. The problem comes from gdb not being able to lo

Re: [OMPI devel] Upgrade GNU auto tools?

Hello OpenMPI developers, on Darwin/OS X, recent Libtool has some debugging symbols issue fixed. I think that was even raised on this list a short while ago. Also, an issue with recent Intel compilers on Linux has been fixed. Absoft support is not yet in Libtool, but Lahey is. Hope that helps.

Re: [OMPI devel] gdb libmpi.dylib on Leopard

* Aurélien Bouteiller wrote on Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:02:40PM CEST: > Thanks Ralf for the support. I upgraded to libtool 2.2.6 and it didn't > solved the problem though. Still looking for somebody to confirm that > its working or not working on their Mac. Did you rerun autogen.sh? All I know

Re: [OMPI devel] gdb libmpi.dylib on Leopard

bs/libmpi.lax/libdatatype.a/convertor.o" - no debug >> information available for "convertor.c". >> warning: Could not find object file "/data/jsquyres/svn/ompi/ >> ompi/.libs/libmpi.lax/libdatatype.a/copy_functions.o" - no debug >&g

Re: [OMPI devel] Should visibility and memchecker abort configure?

Hello, if you allow me my 2 cents: At configure time, it is possible to distinguish between several different user inputs: - the user typed --enable-foo, - the user typed --disable-foo or --enable-foo=no, - the user typed --enable-foo=ARG (ARG is available for further inspection), - the user us

Re: [OMPI devel] adding new functions to a BTL

Hello Jeff, Eugene, > Jeff Squyres wrote: > >> We use lt_dlopen() to open the plugins (Libtool's wrapper for a >> portable dlopen). It opens all plugins (DSOs) in a private scope. >> That private scope is kept deep in the OPAL MCA base and not exposed >> elsewhere in the code base. So

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: libopen-rte --> libompi-rte

Hello, * Jeff Squyres wrote on Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 07:49:23PM CET: > On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote: > >>> WHY: ORTE is really quite specific to OMPI. We decided long ago >>> that ORTE would not split off from OMPI, and it has been >>> specifically tailored for OMPI. Ind

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: libopen-rte --> libompi-rte

* Jeff Squyres wrote on Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 08:48:44PM CET: > On Nov 6, 2008, at 2:42 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> Hmm, OpenMPI seems not to use versioning for its shared libraries. > > That was on the to-do list for this release, but it just didn't happen. > :-\

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add SunStudio/Libtool helper script for post-configure

Hello Ethan, * Ethan Mallove wrote on Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 04:11:23PM CET: > There are a couple issues with SunStudio and Libtool: Which Libtool version are you using? If not 2.2.2 or newer, then please retry with 2.2.6. If the problem persists, then we should fix Libtool rather than patching O

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: merge windows branch into trunk

I'm probably going to come across as ignorant, and I'm obviously biased on this matter, but: * Tim Mattox wrote on Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:53:13PM CET: > > Although I don't use windows myself, I appreciate your > and others' efforts to expand the number of platforms > we can run on. Great work!

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add SunStudio/Libtool helper script for post-configure

Hello Ethan, * Ethan Mallove wrote on Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 09:24:16PM CET: > > I'm seeing the same issue with the faulty "wl" Libtool > variable in 2.2.6 with Linux SunStudio: That's really weird, because this change should have fixed that:

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add SunStudio/Libtool helper script for post-configure

Our previous mails overlapped, sorry about that. * Ethan Mallove wrote on Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:52:09PM CET: > > The above appears to be looking for a Fortran version string from the > C compiler, but it wouldn't match our version string anyway: > > $ f90 -V > f90: Sun Ceres Fortran 95 8.3

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add SunStudio/Libtool helper script for post-configure

Hello Ethan, all, * Ethan Mallove wrote on Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:33:08PM CET: > On Thu, Nov/20/2008 07:00:31PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Ah, ok. Please try the patch below instead of yours, thanks. > > Your patch seems to work, though I get this: > >libt

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add SunStudio/Libtool helper script for post-configure

[ Libtool list readers: this thread is ] I'm applying this patch to Libtool master, to fix $wl for the Sun Ceres Fortran compiler. Cheers, Ralf Fix matching of Sun Fortran compiler on Linux. * libltdl/m4/libtool.m

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add SunStudio/Libtool helper script for post-configure

* Ethan Mallove wrote on Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 09:01:56PM CET: > On Fri, Nov/21/2008 01:02:12PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > IMHO OpenMPI can use > > the solaris_use_stlport4=yes until such a functionality is in place. > > Nice. This workaround works. I don't suppose ther

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add SunStudio/Libtool helper script for post-configure

Hello Ralph, * Ralph Castain wrote on Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:39:13PM CET: > On Nov 23, 2008, at 1:19 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> >> While I suppose your patch works, I think in similar situations, >> OpenMPI has resorted to patching input files to configure (like >&

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add SunStudio/Libtool helper script for post-configure

* Ethan Mallove wrote on Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 09:27:28PM CET: > On Sun, Nov/23/2008 09:19:12AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > While I suppose your patch works, I think in similar situations, OpenMPI > > has resorted to patching input files to configure (like aclocal.m4 or &g

Re: [OMPI devel] Forwarding SIGTSTP and SIGCONT

Hello Rolf, * Rolf Vandevaart wrote on Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 08:00:42PM CET: > > One problem is that with SIGTSTP no longer delivering a stop signal to > mpirun, one cannot CTRL-Z at their terminal to stop mpirun. I am trying > to figure out how big a problem that is. Why not first deal with

Re: [OMPI devel] make dependency problem?

Hello Eugene, Jeff, the interesting data points here would be the dependency tracking scheme selected by automake (CCDEPMODE in ompi/mca/bml/r2/Makefile), with and without --enable-dependency-tracking passed to configure. Also, the contents of ompi/mca/bml/r2/.deps/bml_r2.Plo, after ensuring that

Re: [O-MPI devel] configure hangs in libtool..

Hi Peter, * Peter Kjellström wrote on Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 05:21:27PM CEST: > > I just checked out 7046 and my configure hangs at: > > configure: creating ./config.status > config.status: creating Makefile > config.status: creating config.h > config.status: executing depfiles commands > configur

Re: [O-MPI devel] configure hangs in libtool..

Here's a bit more info: * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 05:27:44PM CEST: > * Peter Kjellström wrote on Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 05:21:27PM CEST: > > > > I just checked out 7046 and my configure hangs at: > > checking for libtool-supplied linker flags...

Re: [O-MPI devel] configure hangs in libtool..

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 06:04:19PM CEST: > > Libtool version previous to 1.5.16 had a bug in the macro to detect > this; it was often wrong before. Now it should be pretty bogus. Gah. That should've been: Now it should be pretty good. Sorry.

Re: [O-MPI devel] OpenIB results

* Troy Benjegerdes wrote on Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 04:18:06PM CEST: > > Did you manage to get this working on a debian system with just the > newer version of libtool? Jeff suggests I build libtool and all the > other autotools as well, but I'd like to see if I can avoid that, and > just update libt

Re: [O-MPI devel] configure hangs in libtool..

* Peter Kjellström wrote on Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 06:24:43PM CEST: > On Friday 26 August 2005 18.04, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Libtool version previous to 1.5.16 had a bug in the macro to detect > > this; it was often wrong before. > > my libtool is indeed rather an

Re: [O-MPI devel] OpenIB results

Hi Troy, * Troy Benjegerdes wrote on Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:38:02AM CEST: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:35:07PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > (It would be good to augment the autogen.sh script so that it hono

[O-MPI devel] tar file name length limit

>From a recent ChangeLog entry: | Part 1 of 2 of a commit to reduce filenames in the romio component | (because we kept bumping up against the max filename limit in "tar" | when making tarballs, especially if the version number got long). If you can allow to limit developers to Automake >= 1.9, yo

[O-MPI devel] small shell quoting issue

A small patch: On one hand, Bourne shells do not do word splitting after parameter expansion and command substitution, of stuff on the right hand side of an assignment. On the other hand, nested quotes within backquotes are not portable. (This is also documented in the Autoconf manual). Examples

Re: [O-MPI devel] small shell quoting issue

* Jeff Squyres wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:45:32PM CEST: > Huh. And I always thought it was the other way around (you *had* to > put "" around it or they would be treated as separate words). They do it usually. They don't do it on the right hand side of an assignment (i.e., after "="), nor

[O-MPI devel] Small ltdl use update

Please apply the first patch (or a similar solution) to include ltdl.h directly. This is both how it's documented and how it will work with Libtool 1.5.x and 2.x: the latter has other included files, which live one directory level further down. Below is another tiny patch to please "make distche

[O-MPI devel] "fix" for romio configure.in

This is a rather subtle issue, and pretty ugly, unfortunately. For the curious reader, here is a rather technical explanation: Somewhere, inside some if test "$arch_..." branching construct (but not inside an Autoconf macro definition!), the configure.in script uses the macro AC_CHECK_HEADER. T

Re: [O-MPI devel] Small ltdl use update

Hi Jeff, * Jeff Squyres wrote on Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:58:05PM CEST: > On Aug 31, 2005, at 2:48 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > Please apply the first patch (or a similar solution) to include > > ltdl.h directly. This is both how it's documented and how > > it

Re: [O-MPI devel] ltdl.h problem

Hi George, * George Bosilca wrote on Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 05:54:15AM CEST: > Starting from yesterday I'm unable to compile on several clusters. I check > the version of libtool, automake and autoconf and they all are the latest. > However, in all the component I get similar errors: > > In file in

Re: [O-MPI devel] ltdl.h problem

* George Bosilca wrote on Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 06:27:27AM CEST: > I trace this one as far as I could. And the results are mostly unexpected. > On some of the clusters it compiles without any problems and on some > others it doesn't. The difference is ... if there is an ltdl.h installed > in the sys

Re: [O-MPI devel] ltdl.h problem

Hi George, * George Bosilca wrote on Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 06:49:48AM CEST: > > Now I see the reason behind this change. Anyway, few month ago we decide > to switch the compilation process, and to modify all the files in order to > start all the #include directives with the full path of the includ

Re: [O-MPI devel] IMPORTANT: Libtool version

Hi Jeff, * Jeff Squyres wrote on Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:23:35PM CEST: > Haven't heard back from any of the other core developers about their > versions of Libtool. I don't belong in this group, but FWIW: 1.5.20 (or CVS versions). > FAIR WARNING: If I don't hear back from anyone by COB today, I

Re: [O-MPI devel] Small ltdl use update

Hi Jeff, * Jeff Squyres wrote on Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:45:41PM CEST: > On Aug 31, 2005, at 7:46 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > >>> Please apply the first patch (or a similar solution) to include > >>> ltdl.h directly. This is both how it's documented and

Re: [O-MPI devel] rcache

Hi George, (Note I know hardly anything about rcache, or mca for that matter, but a bit about Automake) * George Bosilca wrote on Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 08:29:44PM CEST: > It can happpens that the compilation will fails after the rcache > commit. It's again a dependency problem. You just have to

Re: [O-MPI devel] rcache

Hi George, * George Bosilca wrote on Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 09:08:36PM CEST: > On Sep 7, 2005, at 2:47 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * George Bosilca wrote on Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 08:29:44PM CEST: > > > >> It can happpens that the compilation will fails after the rcache &

Re: [O-MPI devel] 64bit shared library problems

Hi Nathan, Nathan DeBardeleben writes: I've been having this problem for a week or so and I've been asking other people to weigh in if they know what I'm doing wrong. I've gotten no where on this so I figure I'll finally drop it out on the list. First, here's the important info: The machi

Re: [O-MPI devel] 64bit shared library problems

Hi Nathan, > Nathan DeBardeleben writes: > > > > I've been having this problem for a week or so and I've been asking > > other people to weigh in if they know what I'm doing wrong. I've gotten > > no where on this so I figure I'll finally drop it out on the list. > > First, here's the importa

Re: [O-MPI devel] error message on make

Hi Jeff, Tim, James, * Jeff Squyres wrote on Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 02:55:26AM CEST: > > There appear to be two problems: > > - I borked up the libnuma configure.m4 such that mpicc (and friends) > don't get the right flags for libnuma when you compile OMPI statically. > > - James' problem seems

Re: [O-MPI devel] why do we need the backward dependencies ?

Hi George, Andrew, * Andrew Friedley wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:09:11PM CEST: > I'm going to take a stab at this, though Jeff should be the definitive > authority on how this all works. Yes. FWIW, I believe you summarized it quite well. > On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:56 PM, George Bosilca wrot

Re: [O-MPI devel] why do we need the backward dependencies ?

Andrew, * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:42:34AM CEST: > * Andrew Friedley wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:09:11PM CEST: > > On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:56 PM, George Bosilca wrote: > > > > > > Now we get this message for all .so file we generate: > >

Re: [O-MPI devel] why do we need the backward dependencies ?

Hi George, * George Bosilca wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:05:28PM CEST: > > But I still see a problem. **Just to refresh the memories, I'm the only > complaining on a regular base about the useless dependencies**. And > there are a lot. I know that most of the shared libraries in ompi use >

Re: [O-MPI devel] Back to 32bit on 64bit machines...

Hi Nathan, Jeff, * Jeff Squyres wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:39:59PM CEST: > This looks like it *might* be a libtool problem -- it's picking up the > /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so when you're compiling in 32 bit mode (and > therefore barfing). Yep, I think it is. > Can you send the libtool com

Re: [O-MPI devel] bproc question

Hi Greg, * Greg Watson wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:27:22PM CEST: > > Trying to install ompi on a bproc machine with no network filesystem. > I've copied the contents of the ompi lib directory into /tmp/ompi on > each node and set my LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /tmp/ompi. However when I run > th

Re: [O-MPI devel] Dumb SVN question (was RE: Segfaults on startup?)

Hi Troy, * Troy Benjegerdes wrote on Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:07:05PM CEST: > > So.. I have a checkout of ompi/branches/v1.0 .. is there any easy way for > me do something like: > > 'svn up [UNKOWN FLAG] http://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi/trunk' Yes: svn switch http://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi/tr

Re: [O-MPI devel] ppc64 linux bustage?

* Brian Barrett wrote on Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 01:15:41AM CEST: > On Oct 24, 2005, at 6:07 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:40:39AM -0500, Brian Barrett wrote: > > > >> Can you build dynamically and run "ompi_info -all" and send the > >> results to the list? > > > > To save

Re: [O-MPI devel] ppc64 linux bustage?

Hi Troy, * Troy Benjegerdes wrote on Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:30:46AM CEST: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 07:30:54PM -0500, Brian Barrett wrote: > > On Oct 24, 2005, at 6:56 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > > > > >> | configure: /bin/sh './configure' *failed* for opal/libltdl > > >> > > >> Troy, could yo

Re: [O-MPI devel] Segfaults on startup? (ORTE_ERROR_LOG)

Hi Jeff, Troy, * Jeff Squyres wrote on Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 06:43:38PM CEST: > Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > > > Another note.. I think I may have had some problems because I built with > > 'make -j16'.. has anyone else tried parallel make builds? > > I am jumping into this thread late -- but FWIW:

Re: [O-MPI devel] ppc64 linux bustage?

Hi Troy, * Troy Benjegerdes wrote on Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 08:01:08AM CEST: > > > > > Do you have a debian system you can remove the libltdl3 and libltdl3-dev > > > packages? > > > > Yes, I could try that tonight (my timezone), but.. (I can't try that, actually, without upgrading my sarge instal

[O-MPI devel] libtoolize --ltdl non-failure (was: ppc64 linux bustage?)

only). ] > * Troy Benjegerdes wrote on Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 08:01:08AM CEST: > [ reported this: ] * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:38:11AM CEST: > It's a bug when > libtoolize --ltdl > succeeds although it did not find the libltdl source files. To reproduce

Re: [O-MPI devel] New build methodology

Hi Ralph, * Ralph H. Castain wrote on Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 03:12:38PM CET: > > While I generally find the new build methodology (i.e., reducing the > number of makefiles) has little impact on me, I have now encountered > one problem that causes a significant difficulty. In trying to work > on

Re: [O-MPI devel] New build methodology

* Ralph H. Castain wrote on Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 03:45:26PM CET: > At 07:33 AM 11/15/2005, you wrote: > > > >Would it help if only the change not to build a convenience archive in > >orte/dps would be reverted? You could then > > cd orte > > make dps/libdps.la > > > >and would only have to iss

Re: [O-MPI devel] New build methodology

Hi Ralph, * Ralph H. Castain wrote on Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 04:04:34AM CET: > Just as an FYI -- this proposed fix didn't work. It apparently takes > a great deal more to "undo" the Makefile consolidation. I worked on > it for a couple of hours and finally just gave up. I'm sorry. If you describ

Re: [O-MPI devel] ltdl.h problem

Hi George, * George Bosilca wrote on Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 08:15:30AM CET: > As I continue to have the same problem with the missing ltdl.h header I > reported few days ago, I spend some time today to dig a little bit inside > to find out what and how happens. Finally, I figure out the problem. I

Re: [O-MPI devel] PGI configure failure..

Wow, several bugs for the price of one report. :) * Jeff Squyres wrote on Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 08:24:33PM CET: > On Nov 25, 2005, at 4:03 PM, Galen M. Shipman wrote: > > > On a fresh co of the trunk, after a successful autogen.sh I get the > > following error with this configure: > > > > ./con

Re: [O-MPI devel] PGI configure failure..

st here what I wrote to them. > On Dec 3, 2005, at 10:30 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > [1] wget \ > > http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/~checkout~/config/config/ > > config.sub \ > > http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/~checkout~/config/config/ > > con

[O-MPI devel] mailing list web archive oddity

When looking at http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2005/12/0573.php for example, the "previous message" link points to http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/private.cgi/devel/2005/11/0572.php which is inaccessible without a password. This seems to be some mailing list configuration error, as

Re: [O-MPI devel] Libtool 1.5.22

* Craig Rasmussen wrote on Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 04:36:39PM CET: > On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:34 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > > If you are watching the commit logs, you'll notice that Libtool > > 1.5.22 has been released. It fixes some problems that some of our > > users have been running into, and star

Re: [O-MPI devel] debugging methods

* Craig Rasmussen wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:45:55PM CET: > > The CCA people seemed to be worried that there was a long dead time > between releases and were wondering if they should give up on autoconf > and move to something else (cmake). I love (to hate) autoconf and was > hoping that it

Re: [O-MPI devel] debugging methods

Hi Brian, * Brian Barrett wrote on Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 04:26:58PM CET: > On Jan 5, 2006, at 4:22 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Are the improvements/bugfixes you/the CCA people need already in CVS > > Autoconf? > For Open MPI, I can think of a couple of thin

Re: [O-MPI devel] configure warning

* Greg Watson wrote on Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:58:35PM CET: > Running configure from 1.0.2a3 on OSX 10.4.3: > > configure: WARNING: net/if.h: present but cannot be compiled > configure: WARNING: net/if.h: check for missing prerequisite > headers? Yes. The test is broken. You need to #in

Re: [O-MPI devel] configure warning

* Brian Barrett wrote on Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:28:55AM CET: > On Jan 10, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Greg Watson wrote on Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:58:35PM CET: > >> Running configure from 1.0.2a3 on OSX 10.4.3: > >> > >> configure: WARN

[O-MPI devel] f77_check.m4 changes

Hi Brian, Did you mean this in your recent changes to the trunk? I'm not quite sure, I don't really understand the code at a glance. Without it, configure barfs over here because it contains if ...; then fi somewhere, which is a shell syntax error. Cheers, Ralf Index: config/f77_check.m4 ==

Re: [O-MPI devel] f77_check.m4 changes

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:28:09PM CET: > > Did you mean this in your recent changes to the trunk? > I'm not quite sure, I don't really understand the code > at a glance. Hmm, another thing that fails here is that ompi_fortran_integer16_t gets set

Re: [O-MPI devel] f77_check.m4 changes

* Brian Barrett wrote on Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:53:33PM CET: > Yup - Jeff found this one this morning. Stupid me testing on x86 > only :(. Anyway, this and your other one were just fixed in SVN. Thank you very much, seems to work fine! Cheers, Ralf

[O-MPI devel] ompi_get_version

Hello there, Proposed below is a patch to remove the redundant instance of the version algorithm, together with some cleanup (for unification of the two algorithms, which have diverged a little) and a micro bit more efficiency. One could add a rebuilding rule to config/Makefile.am, if you think i

Re: [O-MPI devel] Path detection patch

Hi George, * George Bosilca wrote on Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:39:48PM CET: > I have some troubles on windows getting the correct path for the ompi > installation directory as well as all tools used inside. We need this > path in order to be able to use the wrappers compilers, to load the > sh

Re: [O-MPI devel] ompi_get_version

Hi Brian, * Brian Barrett wrote on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 03:38:24AM CET: > > I'm running into some problems with the patch. D'oh. 'T' is GNU sed-specific. I should've known that. Should be fixed in patch below. Also, and I forgot to add this in the first version of the patch: for configure, p

Re: [O-MPI devel] ompi_get_version

Hi Jeff, * Jeff Squyres wrote on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 12:39:26PM CET: > On Jan 21, 2006, at 3:19 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > Should be fixed in patch below. Also, and I forgot to add this in the > > first version of the patch: for configure, produce some output if the

Re: [O-MPI devel] ompi_get_version

Hi Brian, * Brian Barrett wrote on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 11:53:41PM CET: > > Ralf, I was wondering if you could take a look at what I actually > committed (r8779) and let me know what you think. It's mostly your > patch, but I rewrote a good chunk of the m4 macro to take better > advantage

Re: [O-MPI devel] ompi_get_version

Hi Brian, * Brian Barrett wrote on Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 06:53:12PM CET: > On Jan 22, 2006, at 2:34 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Brian Barrett wrote on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 11:53:41PM CET: > >> It's the thread that never ends... :) Hehe. > > Which systems'

[OMPI devel] ompi/Makefile.am: DIST_SUBDIRS

Please distribute trunk/ompi/datatype as below, thanks! :-) BTW, a 'svn update' currently wants a password from me: | Authentication realm: Open MPI Subversion repositories access A bit weird for read-only access.. but I guess that is part of the temporary changes.

Re: [OMPI devel] ompi/Makefile.am: DIST_SUBDIRS

* Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote on Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 03:02:45PM CET: > > > > > BTW, a 'svn update' currently wants a password from me: > > > | Authentication realm: Open MPI > > > Subversion repositories access > > Fixed. Sorry about that. We had a few glitches

Re: [OMPI devel] bproc configure help

Hi Greg, * Greg Watson wrote on Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 04:17:27PM CET: > > ./configure --enable-static --disable-shared --without-threads --with- > devel-headers > ./configure --enable-static --disable-shared --without-threads -- > without-mpi-threads --with-devel-headers > > In both cases, I'm

Re: [OMPI devel] PG 5.2 build problem with v1.0.2a10

Hi Josh, * Josh Hursey wrote on Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 06:05:29PM CET: > I recently ran into a build problem using the Portland 5.2 compilers > on Odin (x86_64). It looks like the soft link is broken in the build > system. > It is linked to libopal.so.0.0.0 instead of libopal.so.0 Do you still

Re: [OMPI devel] PG 5.2 build problem with v1.0.2a10'

Hi Josh, * Josh Hursey wrote on Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 06:48:55PM CET: > On Mar 20, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >* Josh Hursey wrote on Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 06:05:29PM CET: > >>I recently ran into a build problem using the Portland 5.2 compilers > >>on O

Re: [OMPI devel] PG 5.2 build problem with v1.0.2a10

* Josh Hursey wrote on Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 06:48:55PM CET: > On Mar 20, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >Do you still have the complete build log? The place where libopal is > >created is interesting, as well as './libtool --config'. > > Sorr

Re: [OMPI devel] PG 5.2 build problem with v1.0.2a10

* Josh Hursey wrote on Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:20:54PM CET: > >>On Mar 20, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >>> > >>>Do you still have the complete build log? The place where > >>>libopal is > >>>created is interesting, as well

<    1   2