On 05/11/2013 05:07 AM, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
On 30 April 2013 11:46, Glauber Costa glom...@openvz.org wrote:
Currently, vps_setup_res() have an explicit test for state != VPS_STARTING
before applying beancounter limits. This means that we can set limits without
further problems when the
On 05/13/2013 12:11 PM, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
On 13 May 2013 16:11, Glauber Costa glom...@parallels.com wrote:
On 05/13/2013 12:08 PM, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
On 13 May 2013 15:50, Glauber Costa glom...@parallels.com wrote:
[...]
Aren't macroses supposed to be UPPER CASE named?
Yes, and
On 13 May 2013 16:16, Glauber Costa glom...@parallels.com wrote:
On 05/13/2013 12:11 PM, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
On 13 May 2013 16:11, Glauber Costa glom...@parallels.com wrote:
On 05/13/2013 12:08 PM, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
On 13 May 2013 15:50, Glauber Costa glom...@parallels.com wrote:
Currently, vps_setup_res() have an explicit test for state != VPS_STARTING
before applying beancounter limits. This means that we can set limits without
further problems when the container is running, but will fail to do so when the
container is starting. In fact, hooks_vz have an explicit call
On 30 April 2013 11:46, Glauber Costa glom...@openvz.org wrote:
Currently, vps_setup_res() have an explicit test for state != VPS_STARTING
before applying beancounter limits. This means that we can set limits without
further problems when the container is running, but will fail to do so when
