Next time you rebase on ovirt-engine master, please clear your browser
cache to pick up changes required by the new blue theme [1][2].
Best wishes,
Greg
[1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/79973
[2] http://imgur.com/a/H7ad6
--
Greg Sheremeta, MBA
Sr. Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
Hi all,
As some of you probably noticed, the support for Fedora since 23 or so
was considered "tech preview", and required some manual workarounds,
mainly installing python2-dnf.
I now spent some time on yet another workaround, as I got a report
that above is not enough for Fedora 26, and
>> A ping that has no side effects and a "watchdog" mechanism to confirm
>> connectivity.
>
> This sounds as exactly the right solution right now.
Just to clarify: Removing the undocumented side effects from ping. Not
introducing ping2.
Martin
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Martin Sivak
But it isn't as I said already. And so we are keeping the ping code
and that is why vdsm needs to solve the setupNetworks/ping bug.
Martin
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Roy Golan wrote:
> This is for 4.1 https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78916/ , track that, it should
> be in.
>
This is for 4.1 https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78916/ , track that, it should
be in.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 at 15:10 Martin Sivak wrote:
> What stomp heartbeat? There is no such thing in the Python json rpc client.
>
> Martin
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Roy Golan
What stomp heartbeat? There is no such thing in the Python json rpc client.
Martin
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Roy Golan wrote:
> Why isn't the stomp heartbeat enough?
>
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 at 13:45 Martin Sivak wrote:
>>
>> MOM and hosted engine use
Hi,
Please `sudo dnf update ovirt-js-dependencies` to line up with branding
changes soon to be merged to master. The latest version is
ovirt-js-dependencies-1.2.0-3.1
It's in the repos [1], but let me know if you have issues installing it.
Best wishes,
Greg
[1]
Why isn't the stomp heartbeat enough?
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 at 13:45 Martin Sivak wrote:
> MOM and hosted engine use the ping verb to verify the connection is
> still OK. The RPC client did not have any reconnect logic in the past
> (and I think it still does not..).
>
> Martin
MOM and hosted engine use the ping verb to verify the connection is
still OK. The RPC client did not have any reconnect logic in the past
(and I think it still does not..).
Martin
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Roy Golan wrote:
> Petr, why do you need the ping verb? what
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We see a sporadic failure in the upgrade test. from what I can see from
>> the log it is related to the firewalD package.
>>
>> Test
Petr, why do you need the ping verb? what are you after?
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 at 11:54 Martin Sivak wrote:
> > The proposed solution is focused on making sure a command does one thing
> and
> > not two:
> > A ping that has no side effects and a "watchdog" mechanism to confirm
>
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
> *Hi, *
>
>
>
> * We see a sporadic failure in the upgrade test. from what I can see from
> the log it is related to the firewalD package. Test failed:
> 001_upgrade_engine.test_initialize_engine Link to suspected patches: Link
**
*Hi, *
*
**
We see a sporadic failure in the upgrade test. from what I can see from
the log it is related to the firewalD package.
Test failed: *001_upgrade_engine.test_initialize_engine*
Link to suspected patches:
Link to Job:
> The proposed solution is focused on making sure a command does one thing and
> not two:
> A ping that has no side effects and a "watchdog" mechanism to confirm
> connectivity.
This sounds as exactly the right solution right now.
>>> Still someone could call conirmConnectivity, no?
We do not
Hi Milan,
Please feel free to ping me if you'll need assistance with the structure of
the upgrade suites.
Thanks,
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> Daniel Belenky writes:
>
> > As Barak said, I think it's a good idea to try and
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Roy Golan wrote:
> Still someone could call conirmConnectivity, no? so the state isn't
> guarded from localhost tinkering anyhow. If you really need a solution you
> can acuire a token for this operation by setupNetworks, and confirm
>
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:28 PM Roy Golan wrote:
>
>> Still someone could call conirmConnectivity, no? so the state isn't
>> guarded from localhost tinkering anyhow. If you really need a solution you
>>
17 matches
Mail list logo