Hi Haoyang,
welcome to RIOT!
> I forward this mail to my colleague Oleg, who is actually doing the same
> thing - so I guess he is probably the best one to help you!
Since you already found the mailing list, I took the liberty of replying here
instead.
Yes, I'm working indeed on CCN for RIOT.
Hi Oleg,
I understand and tried what you said. The problem I faced for a long time is
that
txtsnd: I cannot set the interface, if I use tap0, which will echo: error:
invalid interface given.
I found the tutorial that said using addr, but I do not have the addr command
when I use the R21
Hi Ilias,
I'd love to have such possibility, but from my knowledge there is no
coulomb counter (or similar) on that board or on any common hardware. If
you find a way, please let me know :-) !
Cheers,
Peter
Am 23.10.2015 um 11:31 schrieb Ilias Seitanidis:
Hi Peter,
First of all I want to
Hi Haoyang!
> The problem I face now is that I want to use the embedded default network
> stack to make two Atmel R21board to send packet with each other through RF,
> before I implemented the a new protocol on Network stack. Do you have any
> experience about that? I did not find many resources
Hi Oliver,
Thanks for your quick response! These resources will be very useful for me, I
will ask more question here.
The problem I face now is that I want to use the embedded default network stack
to make two Atmel R21board to send packet with each other through RF, before I
implemented the
Hi RIOT,
I'm currently working in the area Data confidentiality on the Internet of
Things and I have problems on simulation tools. I wonder if there is a
simulation tools i can use it for that security mechanism.
Key-words: IoT, security, Data confidentiality, Privacy, attacks
Thank you in
Hi Haoyang,
2015-10-23 20:08 GMT+02:00 Haoyang Yu :
>
>- txtsnd: I cannot set the interface, if I use tap0, which will echo:
>error: invalid interface given.
>
> You need to use the interface on the node, not the TAP. The TAP is the
endpoint on the host system
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote:
> To answer your question: it depends on what exactly you're planning to do.
> E.g., do you want to implement a full firmware update, i.e. replacing the
> whole binary or just update a single library or the application?