I haven't looked too closely, but I think at least the ideas put
forward in https://github.com/RIOT-OS/thirdparty_cpu/pull/3 are
useful. The PRs are old so they probably won't work on the current
master but the LPM stuff is interesting.
On the thirdparty_boards repo I didn't find anything interesti
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> > Also, I need to have an organisation owner (Oleg, Kaspar, Emmanuel or
>> > Matthias Wählisch) create the repo since maintainers do not have the proper
>> > access to do it.
>>
>> Sure, I can do so. Let's wait if no one objects against
Hi!
> > Also, I need to have an organisation owner (Oleg, Kaspar, Emmanuel or
> > Matthias Wählisch) create the repo since maintainers do not have the proper
> > access to do it.
>
> Sure, I can do so. Let's wait if no one objects against the proposed name.
This somehow disappeared from my radar
Dear rousing IoTlers,
since we don't need the thirdparty repositories for CPUs and boards any more
for quite some time, I think we should finally remove them. Any objections?
Can anyone with some experience with the Cortex ports take a look at the PRs
in these repos that are still open and see if
Hi Simon,
you can use network_uint16_t as integer by accessing it's u16 member, but
since bitfields are usually accessed using bit-arithmetics anyways I'm
wondering if it makes so much sense to use network_uint16_t, since they are
primarily used to warn about byteorder issues.
Cheers,
Martine
201
Hi Everyone,
I am trying to define the Header Datastructure for the new TCP
implementation. I'd like to use C Bitfields in structs for the Control
Bits and would like to use the Type of network_uint16_t (That seems to
be common for most other Header Structures). My compiler tells me that
thats no
Dear radioing IoTlers,
the next regular bi-weekly PlaceCam meeting would usually be scheduled next
Wednesday at 10am CET. However, since we have some potential participants in
other timezones (including me), I would like to ask if we could reschedule the
meeting to 2pm CET again? This would be 8am
Oleg Hahm wrote:
> I (and I guess I'm speaking for most of us) want a
> (R)IOT device being able to be connected _directly_ to anything. Be it another
> RIOT powered device, a Contiki device, my home gateway, my smartphone, or any
> server in the Internet.
That's why it's called "Thing-to-thing
Hi!
I just realized that I'll probably learn something about IoTivity and AllJoyn
today at the T2TRG meeting:
https://github.com/t2trg/2015-ietf92/blob/master/agenda.md
I guess there won't be now audio stream, but at least the slides should be
online later this day.
> Concerning IoTBase, I woul
Hi,
in case anyone wonders what happened to the Wiki entry;
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/Board%3A-ST-nucleo-l1
I renamed it to
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/wiki/Board:-Nucleo-L1
in order to match the naming scheme of the other Nucleo boards.
Cheers,
Ludwig
10 matches
Mail list logo
