Hi Joakim!
> > This somehow disappeared from my radar. I think you need to give me admin
> > access to the repository in order to move it to the RIOT organization (and
> > rename it to riotdocker).
>
> What do you mean?
> If you create a new empty riotdocker repo in the RIOT organization we
> can
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> > Also, I need to have an organisation owner (Oleg, Kaspar, Emmanuel or
>> > Matthias Wählisch) create the repo since maintainers do not have the proper
>> > access to do it.
>>
>> Sure, I can do so. Let's wait if no one objects against
Hi!
> > Also, I need to have an organisation owner (Oleg, Kaspar, Emmanuel or
> > Matthias Wählisch) create the repo since maintainers do not have the proper
> > access to do it.
>
> Sure, I can do so. Let's wait if no one objects against the proposed name.
This somehow disappeared from my radar
Hi,
+1 for riotdocker, riotbuild is confusing.
Cheers
matthias
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Joakim Gebart wrote:
>
> riotdocker is more descriptive for the github repo name, I like it.
>
> Best regards, Joakim
>
> On Feb 24, 2015 8:20 AM, "Oleg Hahm" wrote:
> Hi Joakim!
>
> > Wha
riotdocker is more descriptive for the github repo name, I like it.
Best regards, Joakim
On Feb 24, 2015 8:20 AM, "Oleg Hahm" wrote:
> Hi Joakim!
>
> > What is a suitable name for the new repo?
> > I have been using "riotbuild" for my Docker development at
> > https://github.com/gebart/riotbuild
Hi Joakim!
> What is a suitable name for the new repo?
> I have been using "riotbuild" for my Docker development at
> https://github.com/gebart/riotbuild
I don't have any particular ideas for the name, so, for me "riotbuild" (or
"riotdocker") would be fine.
> Also, I need to have an organisatio
What is a suitable name for the new repo?
I have been using "riotbuild" for my Docker development at
https://github.com/gebart/riotbuild
Also, I need to have an organisation owner (Oleg, Kaspar, Emmanuel or
Matthias Wählisch) create the repo since maintainers do not have the
proper access to do it
Hi Joakim,
+1 from my side!
Cheers,
Hauke
On 23.02.2015 09:35, Oleg Hahm wrote:
Hi Joakim!
I'm completely fine with that. Thanks for the effort!
Cheers,
Oleg
Am Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:18:42AM +0100 schrieb Joakim Gebart:
I'd like to hear if anyone is strongly opposed to this, otherwise I
Hi Joakim!
I'm completely fine with that. Thanks for the effort!
Cheers,
Oleg
Am Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:18:42AM +0100 schrieb Joakim Gebart:
> I'd like to hear if anyone is strongly opposed to this, otherwise I
> will go ahead and create a new repository tomorrow.
>
> Best regards,
> Joakim Ge
I'd like to hear if anyone is strongly opposed to this, otherwise I
will go ahead and create a new repository tomorrow.
Best regards,
Joakim Gebart
www.eistec.se
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Ludwig Ortmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> fine with me, thank you for the initiative =)
>
> Cheers,
> Ludwig
>
Hi,
fine with me, thank you for the initiative =)
Cheers,
Ludwig
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:54:16AM +0100, Joakim Gebart wrote:
> Dear relentless RIOTers,
> I would like to introduce an official repository for keeping Dockerfiles
> used for building Docker images. The images can be used to build
Dear relentless RIOTers,
I would like to introduce an official repository for keeping Dockerfiles
used for building Docker images. The images can be used to build RIOT in
conjunction with the work being proposed in [1]. The images will contain
supported versions of tool chains to make getting start
12 matches
Mail list logo
