Hi Joakim!
> > This somehow disappeared from my radar. I think you need to give me admin
> > access to the repository in order to move it to the RIOT organization (and
> > rename it to riotdocker).
>
> What do you mean?
> If you create a new empty riotdocker repo in the RIOT organization we
> can
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> > Also, I need to have an organisation owner (Oleg, Kaspar, Emmanuel or
>> > Matthias Wählisch) create the repo since maintainers do not have the proper
>> > access to do it.
>>
>> Sure, I can do so. Let's wait if no one objects against
Hi!
> > Also, I need to have an organisation owner (Oleg, Kaspar, Emmanuel or
> > Matthias Wählisch) create the repo since maintainers do not have the proper
> > access to do it.
>
> Sure, I can do so. Let's wait if no one objects against the proposed name.
This somehow disappeared from my radar
Hi,
+1 for riotdocker, riotbuild is confusing.
Cheers
matthias
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Joakim Gebart wrote:
>
> riotdocker is more descriptive for the github repo name, I like it.
>
> Best regards, Joakim
>
> On Feb 24, 2015 8:20 AM, "Oleg Hahm" wrote:
> Hi Joakim!
>
> > Wha
riotdocker is more descriptive for the github repo name, I like it.
Best regards, Joakim
On Feb 24, 2015 8:20 AM, "Oleg Hahm" wrote:
> Hi Joakim!
>
> > What is a suitable name for the new repo?
> > I have been using "riotbuild" for my Docker development at
> > https://github.com/gebart/riotbuild
Hi Joakim!
> What is a suitable name for the new repo?
> I have been using "riotbuild" for my Docker development at
> https://github.com/gebart/riotbuild
I don't have any particular ideas for the name, so, for me "riotbuild" (or
"riotdocker") would be fine.
> Also, I need to have an organisatio
What is a suitable name for the new repo?
I have been using "riotbuild" for my Docker development at
https://github.com/gebart/riotbuild
Also, I need to have an organisation owner (Oleg, Kaspar, Emmanuel or
Matthias Wählisch) create the repo since maintainers do not have the
proper access to do it
Hi Joakim,
+1 from my side!
Cheers,
Hauke
On 23.02.2015 09:35, Oleg Hahm wrote:
Hi Joakim!
I'm completely fine with that. Thanks for the effort!
Cheers,
Oleg
Am Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:18:42AM +0100 schrieb Joakim Gebart:
I'd like to hear if anyone is strongly opposed to this, otherwise I
Hi Joakim!
I'm completely fine with that. Thanks for the effort!
Cheers,
Oleg
Am Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:18:42AM +0100 schrieb Joakim Gebart:
> I'd like to hear if anyone is strongly opposed to this, otherwise I
> will go ahead and create a new repository tomorrow.
>
> Best regards,
> Joakim Ge
I'd like to hear if anyone is strongly opposed to this, otherwise I
will go ahead and create a new repository tomorrow.
Best regards,
Joakim Gebart
www.eistec.se
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Ludwig Ortmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> fine with me, thank you for the initiative =)
>
> Cheers,
> Ludwig
>
Hi,
fine with me, thank you for the initiative =)
Cheers,
Ludwig
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:54:16AM +0100, Joakim Gebart wrote:
> Dear relentless RIOTers,
> I would like to introduce an official repository for keeping Dockerfiles
> used for building Docker images. The images can be used to build
11 matches
Mail list logo
