Re: Requirement Document generator tool

Hello Chris, please let me pick up the discussion again so that we manage to come to a conclusion. Like Matthias said oflist, we are trying to address the problem of the missing project overview in a separate thread. But it would be really relevant to get a result for the python topics. Again:

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

- Am 29. Jan 2020 um 23:48 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: > On 29/1/20 7:40 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> On 28/01/2020 23:15, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 28/1/20 10:22 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: [...] >> If I understood you correctly your main problem with both suggested ones >>

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 3/2/20 4:19 am, Christian Mauderer wrote: > like discussed: A ticket for it: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3860 > Please take a look at it. Feel free to add something if I missed it. Thank you. I have added a possible hurdle, defining how we test each change as the tool is introduced. Chris

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 31/01/2020 19:44, Gedare Bloom wrote: But I think implementing that would be a lot bigger task than the one we are just discussing. One of the first problems would be finding a style checker that can produce _exactly_ the coding style that is defined for score. >>> Agreed.

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:39 AM Christian Mauderer wrote: > > On 30/01/2020 23:13, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 30/1/20 8:35 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > >> On 29/01/2020 23:48, Chris Johns wrote: > >>> On 29/1/20 7:40 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > On 28/01/2020 23:15, Chris Johns wrote:

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 30/01/2020 23:13, Chris Johns wrote: > On 30/1/20 8:35 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> On 29/01/2020 23:48, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 29/1/20 7:40 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: On 28/01/2020 23:15, Chris Johns wrote: > On 28/1/20 10:22 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> I'm quite

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 30/1/20 8:35 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > On 29/01/2020 23:48, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 29/1/20 7:40 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >>> On 28/01/2020 23:15, Chris Johns wrote: On 28/1/20 10:22 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > I'm quite indifferent which style we use But you

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 29/01/2020 23:48, Chris Johns wrote: > On 29/1/20 7:40 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> On 28/01/2020 23:15, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 28/1/20 10:22 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: I'm quite indifferent which style we use >>> >>> But you are arguing a position, such as ... >>> but do

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 29/1/20 7:40 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > On 28/01/2020 23:15, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 28/1/20 10:22 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >>> I'm quite indifferent which style we use >> >> But you are arguing a position, such as ... >> >>> but do you really think that it >>> is a good idea to roll

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 28/01/2020 23:15, Chris Johns wrote: > On 28/1/20 10:22 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> I'm quite indifferent which style we use > > But you are arguing a position, such as ... > >> but do you really think that it >> is a good idea to roll our own RTEMS-Python-style instead of using one >>

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 28/01/2020 23:15, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 5:22 AM Christian Mauderer > > wrote: > > On 28/01/2020 11:41, Chris Johns wrote: > > > > > > On 28/1/20 8:14 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > >> On 28/01/2020

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 28/1/20 10:22 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > I'm quite indifferent which style we use But you are arguing a position, such as ... > but do you really think that it > is a good idea to roll our own RTEMS-Python-style instead of using one > of the big ones (like PEP8, Google or some other that

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 5:22 AM Christian Mauderer < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 28/01/2020 11:41, Chris Johns wrote: > > > > > > On 28/1/20 8:14 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > >> On 28/01/2020 01:42, Chris Johns wrote: > >>> On 28/1/20 10:48 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 28/01/2020 11:41, Chris Johns wrote: > > > On 28/1/20 8:14 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> On 28/01/2020 01:42, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 28/1/20 10:48 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:18 PM Chris Johns >>> > wrote: On 24/1/20

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 28/1/20 8:14 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > On 28/01/2020 01:42, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 28/1/20 10:48 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:18 PM Chris Johns >> > wrote: >>> >>> On 24/1/20 9:57 pm, Jose Valdez wrote: >>> > In fact these

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 28/01/2020 01:42, Chris Johns wrote: > On 28/1/20 10:48 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:18 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: >> >> On 24/1/20 9:57 pm, Jose Valdez wrote: >> > In fact these tools target the pre-qualified project. >> >> Do you

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 28/1/20 10:48 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:18 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 24/1/20 9:57 pm, Jose Valdez wrote: > > In fact these tools target the pre-qualified project. > > Do you see this as different to the RTEMS project? > >

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:18 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 24/1/20 9:57 pm, Jose Valdez wrote: > > In fact these tools target the pre-qualified project. > > Do you see this as different to the RTEMS project? > > > Since it was Sebastian who suggested to create this set of python tools, > > I think

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 24/1/20 9:57 pm, Jose Valdez wrote: > In fact these tools target the pre-qualified project. Do you see this as different to the RTEMS project? > Since it was Sebastian who suggested to create this set of python tools, I think Sebastian is wanting a smooth path for these tools into the

RE: Requirement Document generator tool

priate). José -Original Message- From: Christian Mauderer [mailto:christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de] Sent: quinta-feira, 23 de janeiro de 2020 06:42 To: Chris Johns; j...@rtems.org Cc: Jose Valdez; Gedare Bloom; sebastian huber; devel@rtems.org Subject: Re: Requirement Document generato

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 23/01/2020 00:19, Chris Johns wrote: > On 22/1/20 7:20 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> On 22/01/2020 02:39, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 21/1/20 8:10 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: On 20/01/2020 22:37, Chris Johns wrote: > On 14/1/20 7:18 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> On 13/01/2020

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 22/1/20 7:20 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > On 22/01/2020 02:39, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 21/1/20 8:10 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >>> On 20/01/2020 22:37, Chris Johns wrote: On 14/1/20 7:18 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > On 13/01/2020 18:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On Mon, Jan

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 22/01/2020 02:39, Chris Johns wrote: > On 21/1/20 8:10 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> On 20/01/2020 22:37, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 14/1/20 7:18 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: On 13/01/2020 18:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:04 AM Christian Mauderer >

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 21/1/20 8:10 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > On 20/01/2020 22:37, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 14/1/20 7:18 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >>> On 13/01/2020 18:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:04 AM Christian Mauderer >>> >

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:10 AM Christian Mauderer wrote: > > On 20/01/2020 22:37, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 14/1/20 7:18 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > >> On 13/01/2020 18:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:04 AM Christian Mauderer > >>> >>>

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 20/01/2020 22:37, Chris Johns wrote: > On 14/1/20 7:18 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> On 13/01/2020 18:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:04 AM Christian Mauderer >>> >> > wrote: >>> >>> Hello Jose, >>> >>> On

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 14/1/20 7:18 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: > On 13/01/2020 18:03, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:04 AM Christian Mauderer >> > > wrote: >> >> Hello Jose, >> >> On 10/01/2020 17:33, Jose Valdez wrote: >> > Hello,

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

t; > Christian > > > > > Best regards > > > > José > > > > -Original Message- > > From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org > <mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org>] On Behalf Of Chris Johns >

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

added to > rtems-tools (which includes the whole qualification tools). > > Best regards > > Christian > > > > > Best regards > > > > José > > > > -Original Message- > > From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Chris Johns

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

> > Best regards > > > > José > > > > -Original Message- > > From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Chris Johns > > Sent: quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2020 20:57 > > To: Gedare Bloom; sebastian huber > > Cc: devel@rtems.

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

; José > > -Original Message- > From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Chris Johns > Sent: quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2020 20:57 > To: Gedare Bloom; sebastian huber > Cc: devel@rtems.org > Subject: Re: Requirement Document generator tool > > On 1

RE: Requirement Document generator tool

: Requirement Document generator tool On 10/1/20 4:45 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 11:51 PM Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> >> On 08/01/2020 19:31, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>>> >>>> I agree completely on the proposed approach with Python tools. >

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 10/1/20 4:45 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 11:51 PM Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> >> On 08/01/2020 19:31, Gedare Bloom wrote: I agree completely on the proposed approach with Python tools. >>> Yes. Reading it I'm actually reminded about Google's approach toward

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 11:51 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 08/01/2020 19:31, Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> > >> I agree completely on the proposed approach with Python tools. > >> > > Yes. Reading it I'm actually reminded about Google's approach toward > > Python which includes many of the elements

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 08/01/2020 19:31, Gedare Bloom wrote: I agree completely on the proposed approach with Python tools. Yes. Reading it I'm actually reminded about Google's approach toward Python which includes many of the elements mentioned. Although their guide is probably more comprehensive and verbose

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:47 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 7:26 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> >> Hello Jose, >> >> On 03/01/2020 11:52, Jose Valdez wrote: >> Should be in rtems-tools? If so, in which place? >> >>> I think this is the best place given the

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 7:26 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello Jose, > > On 03/01/2020 11:52, Jose Valdez wrote: > Should be in rtems-tools? If so, in which place? > >>> I think this is the best place given the information I have. I would > >>> need to

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

edare Bloom [mailto:ged...@rtems.org] > Sent: quinta-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2020 17:21 > To: Joel Sherrill > Cc: Jose Valdez; devel@rtems.org > Subject: Re: Requirement Document generator tool > > Hello José et al., > > I have only a few points I would like clarified, bel

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

Hello Jose, On 03/01/2020 11:52, Jose Valdez wrote: Should be in rtems-tools? If so, in which place? I think this is the best place given the information I have. I would need to have more detail before I could provide any specific direction here. All host tools are in rtems-tools so at this

RE: Requirement Document generator tool

Same message with no attachs. -Original Message- From: Jose Valdez Sent: sexta-feira, 3 de janeiro de 2020 10:49 To: 'Gedare Bloom'; Joel Sherrill Cc: devel@rtems.org Subject: RE: Requirement Document generator tool Hello Gedare and Joel, Please see my answers below for both of you (see

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

gt;> Please find below my answers. >> >> José >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Chris Johns [mailto:chr...@rtems.org] >> Sent: sexta-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2019 19:09 >> To: Jose Valdez; devel@rtems.org >> Subject: Re: Requirement Document generator

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

19 19:09 > To: Jose Valdez; devel@rtems.org > Subject: Re: Requirement Document generator tool > > On 14/12/19 3:09 am, Jose Valdez wrote: > > In the scope of ESA's RTEMS SMP project, we are developing a tool which > will > > allow to generate RTEMS software documentation >

RE: Requirement Document generator tool

Hello Chris, Thank you for your reply. Please find below my answers. José -Original Message- From: Chris Johns [mailto:chr...@rtems.org] Sent: sexta-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2019 19:09 To: Jose Valdez; devel@rtems.org Subject: Re: Requirement Document generator tool On 14/12/19 3:09

Re: Requirement Document generator tool

On 14/12/19 3:09 am, Jose Valdez wrote: > In the scope of ESA’s RTEMS SMP project, we are developing a tool which will > allow to generate RTEMS software documentation I assume this is the pre-qual effort. > (Requirements, Design, Test Specification and other software documents). How do these