Re: RSB repo commits need approval

Am 30.04.23 um 23:53 schrieb Chris Johns: On 29/4/2023 3:48 am, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote: Hello Joel, Am 28.04.23 um 00:19 schrieb Joel Sherrill: On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 7:06 PM Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote:     Hi,     All RSB repo commits need to be posted for review

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 29/4/2023 3:48 am, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote: > Hello Joel, > > Am 28.04.23 um 00:19 schrieb Joel Sherrill: >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 7:06 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: >> >>     Hi, >> >>     All RSB repo commits need to be posted for review and independent >>    

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

Hello Joel, Am 28.04.23 um 00:19 schrieb Joel Sherrill: On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 7:06 PM Chris Johns > wrote: Hi, All RSB repo commits need to be posted for review and independent approval given before being pushed to the top level repo. I thought

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 27.04.23 20:05, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:27 AM Karel Gardas wrote: On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: Why don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS Project? I don't know, but certainly github.com is not available as an open-source

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 28/4/2023 4:05 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:27 AM Karel Gardas wrote: >> On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Why >>> don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS >>> Project? >> >> I don't know, but certainly github.com is not

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 7:06 PM Chris Johns wrote: > Hi, > > All RSB repo commits need to be posted for review and independent approval > given > before being pushed to the top level repo. > I thought this was the policy for all top level repositories. There is a degree of trust on any posted

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:27 AM Karel Gardas wrote: > > On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Why > > don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS > > Project? > > I don't know, but certainly github.com is not available as an > open-source solution which may be

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: Why don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS Project? I don't know, but certainly github.com is not available as an open-source solution which may be seen as a major roadblock. Am I right assuming that GitLab Community

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 27/4/2023 4:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > what is your (or the RTEMS Project in general) plan to maintain the tools and > ensure that we can use up to date versions of Newlib, GCC, Binutils, and GDB? > This involves building the latest versions, reviewing build issues, reporting > bugs,

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

Hello Chris, what is your (or the RTEMS Project in general) plan to maintain the tools and ensure that we can use up to date versions of Newlib, GCC, Binutils, and GDB? This involves building the latest versions, reviewing build issues, reporting bugs, writing patches, etc. Currently, I do

RSB repo commits need approval

Hi, All RSB repo commits need to be posted for review and independent approval given before being pushed to the top level repo. Thanks Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel