Looks good to me (sorry for my previous email, I should have checked this
mailbox first).
Is there known any OS that does not have
IPV6_JOIN_MULTICAST/IPV6_LEAVE_MULTICAST ? I understand you provide the
defines for backwards compatibility, but I'd be curious if this is truly
necessary...
Thanks,
4.3.99.8 release snapshot has resolved this error
No idea why but it works.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
this allows current to compile on OpenBSD. Originally from itojun.
--
Todd Fries .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Daemon Consulting, LLCLand: 405-748-4596
http://FreeDaemonConsulting.com Mobile: 405-203-6124
"..in support of free software solutions."
Key fingerprint:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:20:16PM -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:
> I've recently been made aware of the XFree86 Savage driver that VIA released
> and is now available on Alan Hourihane's web site. This driver is so much
> superior to the one I've been maintaining that I should be embarrassed.
>
> M
as to ATI, I just went to their web-site and for tv-out for linux they
point to atitvout (which is no longer maintained) and to Gatos which in
turn says that tvout is not available due to refuse of ATI to give any
information regarding implementation of this feature.
BTW I saw information on Gat
I've recently been made aware of the XFree86 Savage driver that VIA released
and is now available on Alan Hourihane's web site. This driver is so much
superior to the one I've been maintaining that I should be embarrassed.
My question is: has anyone actually taken an action item to incorporate
well, I am interested in all of them :)
at work we're using nvidia with closed drivers (I must say their
tvout/screen+twinview configuration support by driver is pretty cool - I
haven't seen other drivers with such a full set of options) or
alternatively we use framebuffer+nvtv program, but also
The SiS driver fully supports TV out. Open source.
Thomas
Alex Deucher wrote:
several drivers support TV out but not all. I believe via, trident,
and savage have open source support for most tv out options. Matrox
provides binary support for the g400 (although you can get tv out
working with th
several drivers support TV out but not all. I believe via, trident,
and savage have open source support for most tv out options. Matrox
provides binary support for the g400 (although you can get tv out
working with the linux frambuffer driver for all recent matrox cards),
as does nvidia. for ATI
ATI beat ya to it ;) Support for the 9800 and a few others as well as a
few other fixes were added to CVS last week.
Alex
--- Markus Bäurle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I hacked XFree86 4.3.0 to recognize my ATI Radeon 9800 Pro card. I
> added a new
> chip type ATI_CHIP_R35
Can anybody tell me what's the status of tvout support in XFree86 drivers?
As far as I understand it's only available for several graphic cards and
only from their manufacturer close-source drivers. From gatos project I
learned there are some legal issues with ATI boards but don't know
anything
Hello everybody,
I hacked XFree86 4.3.0 to recognize my ATI Radeon 9800 Pro card. I added a new
chip type ATI_CHIP_R350, but in the end it's also mapped to CHIP_FAMILY_R300
just like a 9700 Pro, naturally.
Works fine so far. :-)
Are you interested to get my changes? If so, to whom can I send th
On 10 Jul 2003, Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
> > > > > http://www.alexander-pohoyda.privat.t-online.de/patches/twm.Imakefile.diff
> > > > Can you elaborate on why is it useful to switch from single quote
> > > > quoting to backslashes?
> > > It may be not useful as much, but with an old version we
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Erik van het Hof wrote:
> Please find below an email and patch by Rik Faith to make XTEST work
> with Xinerama. I have backported this to a 4.2.1 version on my debian
> box and it worked. Could someone add this to cvs? it shouldn't be a lot
> of work.
Done.
Marc.
+--
I think there is already accel support for 69030 including dualhead
support in xfree86.
Alex
--- Rob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MessageIt appears i'm lying and the accellerated X driver is no
> longer on
> said page. The framebuffer driver thats required for the acceleretd
> friver
> to
send a patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex
--- Rob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Messageumm, there already exits a working accelerated driver for the
> 69030,
> see http://www.humboldt.co.uk/. i also have a port of this to 4.2.0
> that i
> can email you if you want.
>
> relatedly, what would b
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 19:04, Chris Edgington wrote:
> Still working on this siliconmotion upgrade for the 0730 chipset. Running
> RH9, latest xfree code from cvs. Got hardware cursor working but I'm
> only getting hardware cursor-related calls in certain scenarios. If I start
> gimp - hardware
Title: Message
It
appears i'm lying and the accellerated X driver is no longer on said page. The
framebuffer driver thats required for the acceleretd friver to work is still
there. anyway, i can still send you a diff against 4.2.0 if you
want.
Rob
-Original Message-From: Rob Tay
Title: Message
umm,
there already exits a working accelerated driver for the 69030, see http://www.humboldt.co.uk/. i also have a
port of this to 4.2.0 that i can email you if you want.
relatedly, what would be the process nowadays for getting this driver
into the tree?
Rob
Taylor
19 matches
Mail list logo
