Re: bugs [WAS:] XFree86 4.4.0 RC1

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:36:57PM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 20:19, David Dawes wrote: >> If you have any open bugs in our bugzilla, you need to verify whether >> or not they are still valid against this release candidate. Send a note >> here for bugs that are confirmed

Re: [Fwd: [Bug 931] New: RFE: Update xc/extras/freetype2/ to Freetype 2.1.7...]

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 06:04:54AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: >David Dawes wrote: >> >> How does 2.1.4's handling of Type1 fonts compare with the Type1 >> >> backend? >> > >> >Do you mean xc/lib/font/Type1/ vs xc/lib/font/FreeType/ ? In my opinion >> >the xc/lib/font/Type1/ should be retired since

Re: [Fwd: [Bug 931] New: RFE: Update xc/extras/freetype2/ to Freetype 2.1.7...]

David Dawes wrote: > >> How does 2.1.4's handling of Type1 fonts compare with the Type1 > >> backend? > > > >Do you mean xc/lib/font/Type1/ vs xc/lib/font/FreeType/ ? In my opinion > >the xc/lib/font/Type1/ should be retired since it causes server crashes > >such as "Fatal server error: Beziers thi

Re: [Fwd: [Bug 931] New: RFE: Update xc/extras/freetype2/ to Freetype 2.1.7...]

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:58:07AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: >David Dawes wrote: >> >> >What about updating the FreeType code shipped with Xfree86 to version >> >> >2.1.7 before Xfree4.4.0 gets released (see bugzilla RFE below) ? >> >> >> >> The feature freeze was over 6 weeks ago. The integratio

Re: XFree86 4.4.0 RC1

I forgot to add that the latest online docs are available at . Updates are welcome. Especially updates for the release notes. On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:19:59PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: >The first release candidate for XFree86 4.4.0 (aka 4.3.99.901) was ta

Fwd: [OT] rsync 2.5.6 security advisory

--- Forwarded message --- From: Fabian Uebersax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OT] rsync 2.5.6 security advisory Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 10:02:06 +0100 From http://rsync.samba.org/ : December 4th 2003 Background The rsync team has received evidence that a vulnerability

Re: [Fwd: [Bug 931] New: RFE: Update xc/extras/freetype2/ to Freetype 2.1.7...]

David Dawes wrote: > >> >What about updating the FreeType code shipped with Xfree86 to version > >> >2.1.7 before Xfree4.4.0 gets released (see bugzilla RFE below) ? > >> > >> The feature freeze was over 6 weeks ago. The integration phase is > >> over. > > > >I wasn't considering this as "feature"

Re: [Fwd: [Bug 931] New: RFE: Update xc/extras/freetype2/ to Freetype 2.1.7...]

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:03:46AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: >David Dawes wrote: >> >What about updating the FreeType code shipped with Xfree86 to version >> >2.1.7 before Xfree4.4.0 gets released (see bugzilla RFE below) ? >> >> The feature freeze was over 6 weeks ago. The integration phase is

Re: [Fwd: [Bug 931] New: RFE: Update xc/extras/freetype2/ to Freetype 2.1.7...]

David Dawes wrote: > >What about updating the FreeType code shipped with Xfree86 to version > >2.1.7 before Xfree4.4.0 gets released (see bugzilla RFE below) ? > > The feature freeze was over 6 weeks ago. The integration phase is > over. I wasn't considering this as "feature", more as a way to g

Re: [Fwd: [Bug 931] New: RFE: Update xc/extras/freetype2/ to Freetype 2.1.7...]

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:53:27PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >Does fontconfig work with it yet? When FreeType 2.1.7 was announced I >tried building it, then building fontconfig 2.2.1 and finding fontconfig >couldn't build since it didn't use the #include MACROs preferred by the >FreeType deve

Re: [Fwd: [Bug 931] New: RFE: Update xc/extras/freetype2/ to Freetype 2.1.7...]

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 03:16:23AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: >Hi! > > > >What about updating the FreeType code shipped with Xfree86 to version >2.1.7 before Xfree4.4.0 gets released (see bugzilla RFE below) ? The feature freeze was over 6 weeks ago. The integration phase is over. David --

Re: [Fwd: [Bug 931] New: RFE: Update xc/extras/freetype2/ to Freetype 2.1.7...]

Does fontconfig work with it yet? When FreeType 2.1.7 was announced I tried building it, then building fontconfig 2.2.1 and finding fontconfig couldn't build since it didn't use the #include MACROs preferred by the FreeType developers, and now required to use the FreeType headers in 2.1.7. I haven

Re: patch for a crash in x86 emulator

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:57:44PM -0800, Tim Roberts wrote: >On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:35:02 -0500, Sergey Babkin wrote: >> >>I've been running XFree86 4.3.0.1 on a machine with a particularly >>weird videocard and I've got the VESA driver craching. >>... >>A little investigation has shown that it cr

[Fwd: [Bug 931] New: RFE: Update xc/extras/freetype2/ to Freetype 2.1.7...]

Hi! What about updating the FreeType code shipped with Xfree86 to version 2.1.7 before Xfree4.4.0 gets released (see bugzilla RFE below) ? Original Message Subject: [Bug 931] New: RFE: Update xc/extras/freetype2/ to Freetype 2.1.7... Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:51:57 -0500

Re: patch for a crash in x86 emulator

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:35:02 -0500, Sergey Babkin wrote: > >I've been running XFree86 4.3.0.1 on a machine with a particularly >weird videocard and I've got the VESA driver craching. >... >A little investigation has shown that it crashes in >x86emuOp_mov_word_SR_RM() >... >This happens because d

Re: bugs [WAS:] XFree86 4.4.0 RC1

On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 20:19, David Dawes wrote: > If you have any open bugs in our bugzilla, you need to verify whether > or not they are still valid against this release candidate. Send a note > here for bugs that are confirmed to still be a problem, and close ones > that you confirm are fixed.

patch for a crash in x86 emulator

Hi, I've been running XFree86 4.3.0.1 on a machine with a particularly weird videocard and I've got the VESA driver craching. If anyone wonders, the BIOS data in the log is: (II) VESA(0): VESA BIOS detected (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE Version 3.0 (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE Total Mem: 1024 kB (II) VESA(0):

XFree86 4.4.0 RC1

The first release candidate for XFree86 4.4.0 (aka 4.3.99.901) was tagged late on 2 December. Links to the source can be found in the usual place . I'm hoping that we'll have some binary sets available for people to download in the next day or so. The release

RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200

It always works if you watch it close enough. Actually I changed kernel to the 2.6.0-test11 that just came out. I kept the old configuration except I compiled agpgart as a module instead of being built into the kernel. now glxinfo says it's doing direct rendering!! glxgears gives about 1000 FPS alt

RE: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D

> >run ldd on your glxgears or glxinfo executables and see > which libGL it > >is using. > > It is using the ones from the driver. It uses libGL which > points to a link > which is the drvier lib. I made a diff on the file which is > in the driver > directory and the installed libGL.so.1.2 and

RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:02:44 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >You found that quickly. I don't know what the chipset is. How can I figure >that out? I am researching the kernel. Their ads sayit has a via chipset. >So I tried tust the via-agp module and got the same problem. I looked again

RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200

grep through the dmesg for agp stuff. the kernel log is usually /var/log/messages Alex --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > > take a look at the output of dmesg or your kernel log. You need to > > load via_agp.ko and agpgart.ko and radeon.ko > > > > Alex > demesg

Re: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:35:57 -0800 (PST), Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >run ldd on your glxgears or glxinfo executables and see which libGL it >is using. It is using the ones from the driver. It uses libGL which points to a link which is the drvier lib. I made a diff on the file which i

RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200

On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > take a look at the output of dmesg or your kernel log. You need to > load via_agp.ko and agpgart.ko and radeon.ko > > Alex demesg is just full of debug messages from acpi and where is the kernel log? It's getting late here. > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D

run ldd on your glxgears or glxinfo executables and see which libGL it is using. Alex --- "Gerhard W. Gruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 11:52:43 -0800 (PST), Alex Deucher > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >KDE probably crashes or locks up since it preloads libGL. it's all >

Re: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 11:52:43 -0800 (PST), Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >KDE probably crashes or locks up since it preloads libGL. it's all >related to the fact that HW 3D doesn't work. perhaps you have multiple >versions of libGL floating around? How can I verify that? I think I loo

RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200

take a look at the output of dmesg or your kernel log. You need to load via_agp.ko and agpgart.ko and radeon.ko Alex --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You found that quickly. I don't know what the chipset is. How can I > figure > that out? I am researching the kernel. Their ads sayit has a via >

RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200

You found that quickly. I don't know what the chipset is. How can I figure that out? I am researching the kernel. Their ads sayit has a via chipset. So I tried tust the via-agp module and got the same problem. I looked again and the mother board should have a Via ProSavage KN400 chipset. I can't

Re: REGION_* rework (CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk))

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:36:52AM +0100, Harald Nordgård-Hansen wrote: >While I'm at it, there seems to be a quite significant delay from when >changes are published on the cvs-updates list until they are available >with cvsup from anoncvs. Is there any information available as to how >informati

Re: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D

KDE probably crashes or locks up since it preloads libGL. it's all related to the fact that HW 3D doesn't work. perhaps you have multiple versions of libGL floating around? Alex --- "Gerhard W. Gruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:57:10 +0100, Alexander Stohr > <[EMAIL P

Re: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:57:10 +0100, Alexander Stohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >how about a totally pure and simple XFree86? >this will launch an X-Server without any window manager. >shut it down with CTRL-ALT-Backspace if the mouse moves. > >other attempt, try fvwm2, twm or GNOME window manager.

RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200

it seem to be an AGP problem: (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI. (II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make sure the agpgart kernel module is loaded before the radeon kernel module. it looks like you have lots of agp modules

Re: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:57:10 +0100, Alexander Stohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >how about a totally pure and simple XFree86? >this will launch an X-Server without any window manager. >shut it down with CTRL-ALT-Backspace if the mouse moves. OK. Never thought of that. On the other hand my desktop

Re: (Warning long!) Re: X11 CVS with linux 2.6.0-test9?

FH> I suppose I could have a hardware problem, since my PC is a couple years FH> old now. However, I can leave the same computer just running a 2.4.x FH> kernel for days with no problems. HZ is 1000 by default in 2.6; the different scheduling might perhaps cause a deadlock somewhere. Can you try

RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200

On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > what does your xfree86 log say? how about the output of lsmod or your > dmesg? > lsmod: Module Size Used by ati_agp 6284 - via_agp 5600 - sis_agp 3840 - amd_k7_agp 5548 - e

RE: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D

> I always get these errormessage when I load agpgart and fglrx > and then startx. > > The weird thing is that X starts up with this gray screen and > the mouse > working. It only crashes the instant when the KDE dialog > should be coming up. > > (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4"

Re: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 07:49:05 -0800 (PST), Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Like I said before: If you MB is 8x you will need to patch your 2.4 >kernel with 8x support (or if you can set your BIOS to 4x only mode) or >use a 2.6 kernel. once you have that done you can just use the DRI >snap

Re: REGION_* rework (CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk))

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Harald Nordgård-Hansen wrote: > Matthieu Herrb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I see that on OpenBSD too. > On Debian stable and unstable it says: > security.c: In function `SecurityCensorImage': > security.c:1232: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > security.c:

RE: (Warning long!) Re: X11 CVS with linux 2.6.0-test9?

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Alexander Stohr wrote: > > I tried just leaving the display running without doing anything > > interactive with the interface and X ran for several hours before > > freezing. All that was running was Xscreensaver. I then tried > > again using > > X normally but with a different

AFTER-HOURS TRADING - Breaking News...barbara

AFTER-HOURS TRADING - BREAKING NEWS Get Quote - http://quote.money.cnn.com/quote/quote?symbols=htds Hard to Treat Diseases Incorporated - HTDS - Announces: Receipt of Tubercin Toxicity Study and Formation of Scientific Advisory Panel - Wednesday December 3, 8:04 pm ET DELRAY BEACH, Fla.--(BUSIN

Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200

what does your xfree86 log say? how about the output of lsmod or your dmesg? Alex --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have tried everything. I have kernel 2.6.0test10 with radeon > module(radeon.ko). I am running on an Acer 1355LMi_ATI laptop with a > Radeon > mobility 9200. I have loaded glx and

can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200

I have tried everything. I have kernel 2.6.0test10 with radeon module(radeon.ko). I am running on an Acer 1355LMi_ATI laptop with a Radeon mobility 9200. I have loaded glx and dri in XF86Config. I have radeon selected as device. When this didn't work I went to the dri wiki web site and loaded an

Re: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D

Like I said before: If you MB is 8x you will need to patch your 2.4 kernel with 8x support (or if you can set your BIOS to 4x only mode) or use a 2.6 kernel. once you have that done you can just use the DRI snapshots. This will allow you to use 4x mode. if you want to use 8x, you will have to a

RE: (Warning long!) Re: X11 CVS with linux 2.6.0-test9?

> I suppose I could have a hardware problem, since my PC is a > couple years > old now. However, I can leave the same computer just running a 2.4.x > kernel for days with no problems. Would the redesigned kernel > 2.6.x bang the hardware so much more; going beyond that of > kernel 2.4.x? It ca

Re: (Warning long!) Re: X11 CVS with linux 2.6.0-test9?

maybe there is just a power save flaw, ACPI has been significantly reworked, and I think it's on by default now. ACPI BIOS implementations are also notoriously buggy. ACPI can also affect your IRQ routing etc, so if you're using it you might want to try turning it off and seeing what happens. C

Re: REGION_* rework (CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk))

Matthieu Herrb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I see that on OpenBSD too. On Debian stable and unstable it says: security.c: In function `SecurityCensorImage': security.c:1232: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type security.c:1233: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type security.

hi

Watch the Hottest Adult Hustler DVD's All at Megasixtynine for Just $1!!!   CLICK HERE FOR A FREE TOUR! no more of these

Radeon 920, hardware 3D

I've got my new machine with the Radeon 9200. I want to try and setup the hardware 3D support for it. I am going to build the latest development snapshot and or the CVS and try to set it up. How stable are these? Do you have any tips or suggestions on the building or configuration? Is there an

Re: REGION_* rework (CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk))

Marc Aurele La France wrote (in a message from Wednesday 3) > On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Harald Nordgård-Hansen wrote: > > > Marc Aurele La France <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Log message: > > > An improved implementation of ... > > > >573. Rework REGION_* macros to eliminate NEED_SCRE

development artifacts of XFree86 needed for certification effort

We want to use XFree86 in an avionics sofware product certified to DO-178B. To get XFree86 certified we need to reference any requirements standards, design standards and coding standards that have been used in the development of XFree86. I found something that looks like a part of design standard