On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:49:12AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Ruth A. Kramer wrote:
Here's what it says at www.xfree86.org:
quote
No More Core Team
[30 December 2003]
The XFree86 core team has voted to disband itself, effective 31 December
2003. The
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Ruth A. Kramer wrote:
Here's what it says at www.xfree86.org:
The XFree86 core team has voted to disband itself, effective 31 December
2003. The XFree86 Project and its active cutting-edge developers are all
still very much alive and residing in our
Sven Luther wrote:
That said, i perfectly understand that these issues are quite puzzling
for outside people, who mostly know XFree86 only from using it, but
nothing of the internal quarrels we had in the past.
Sven,
Or outsiders who knew (or thought they knew) a little about past
internal
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Sven Luther wrote:
The XFree86 core team has voted to disband itself, effective 31 December
2003. The XFree86 Project and its active cutting-edge developers are all
still very much alive and residing in our development forum. Comments
about this can be made there;
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:11:14PM -0500, Ruth A. Kramer wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
That said, i perfectly understand that these issues are quite puzzling
for outside people, who mostly know XFree86 only from using it, but
nothing of the internal quarrels we had in the past.
Sven,
Or outsiders
I think David's explanation below is very good. It would help stem
the tide of confused emails to add almost exactly this wording to the
notice on the front page of XFree86.Org.
--Torrey
At 1:59 PM -0500 1/14/04, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:11:14PM -0500, Ruth A. Kramer
Hi,
I'd like to focus attention of application developpers on one of the X
server feature that will become more used in the near future: the
XSecurity extension which create the possibility of using 'xauth
generate' to dynamically create xauth cookies.
By default clients connecting with these
Le 12.01.2004 08:39:22, Yukun Chen a crit:
Hi All
I am a developer from XGI Technology which is a new company
stem
from graphic dpt. of Trident and graphic dpt. of Sis. Now we want to
share our linux 2D driver with open
source community. Then what should we do? Pls give some advice or
In building the top of the tree on Mac OS X 10.2 I have run into
troubles linking the GLX support in Xserver/GL. The problem is that
native OpenGL in Mac OS X 10.2 does not include
glActiveStencilFaceEXT() and glWindowPos3fARB(), which have been
added to g_render.c and g_renderswap.c since
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 06:54:04PM -0500, James Harris wrote:
Hi,
The CVS version of XFree SEGVs on FreeBSD-4.8 and DragonFly-CURRENT on
my Asus A7V8X-VM (VIA KM400 using on board video). This happens after
switching to a graphics mode but before the cross hatching. Also, I'm
using a old
The i810 driver in xfree86 supports XvMC and the savage driver from
S3/VIA supports it although that code has not yet been integrated into
an xfree86 release.
Alex
--- Yukun Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Until now, we support Xv but not XvMC. Then , any idea for support
it?
Thanx
Hello all,
I have a problem during
run redhat-config-xfree86 under Xwindow : monitor will be closed (include
sync).
But run it normally under text console mode. I think
thatmay be brought by driver , because it's ok under Xwindow if using vesa
driver.
I foundexec
Torrey Lyons wrote:
In building the top of the tree on Mac OS X 10.2 I have run into
troubles linking the GLX support in Xserver/GL. The problem is that
native OpenGL in Mac OS X 10.2 does not include glActiveStencilFaceEXT()
and glWindowPos3fARB(), which have been added to g_render.c and
13 matches
Mail list logo
