On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 06:57:53AM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:59:09 +0200, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
RH Am 28.04.2011 01:17, schrieb Itamar Reis Peixoto:
why ipv6 and ipv4 have different name for the tools ?
...
RH because the same hostname can
W dniu 29 kwietnia 2011 04:09 użytkownik Jasper Boot
jasper.b...@gmail.com napisał:
Hi,
2011/4/29 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com
Hi,
By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
On 29/04/11 00:37, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
is directly under /.
By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
Hi,
On 04/29/2011 01:19 AM, Andy Grimm wrote:
Hello, all. A brief bio on me:
I started using Red Hat Linux in college in 1997. I spent half a decade
as a Linux sys admin, and long ago I used to lurk in #redhat and #fedora
giving tech support to new users. I first met some of these fine
Hi,
On 04/29/2011 12:37 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hello,
I've been a Fedora user since FC6 and a little RH6 before that. Our
family pretty much uses Fedora exclusively, including my desktop,
MythTV box, and wife's laptop. The wife's laptop can still dual boot
Vista, but she never uses it.
On 04/26/2011 06:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 07:55 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I decided to reinstall using netinstall.iso.
Just a general note here: during pre-release time netinstall is always
more likely to have trouble than media install. We test installation
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:14 AM, John Keller fed...@johnkeller.com wrote:
Right now the only options, to my knowledge, are to use the netinst
(hybrid image) or use some special tool/process to convert the DVD ISO
into a bootable USB key. The former can be flaky (as you mention) and
the latter
Compose started at Fri Apr 29 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal-storage.so.1()(64bit)
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit)
On Tue 26 April 2011 21:58:08 Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
it is better to have the package (even if it's poorly
maintained) than to not have it at all!
I think that's where some of us disagree with you.
Having lots of parts of poor
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 02:29 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
On Tue 26 April 2011 21:58:08 Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
it is better to have the package (even if it's poorly
maintained) than to not have it at all!
I think that's where some of us
On 04/29/2011 05:43 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 02:29 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
On Tue 26 April 2011 21:58:08 Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
it is better to have the package (even if it's poorly
maintained) than to not have it at
All,
After updating my system two days ago I have been having errors when
running vlc, system settings to name a couple. Below is some of what I
am seeing in my .xsession-errors file. I am not sure where to continue
looking to try and correct these errors. I have tried gnome and xcfe
desktop
Phillip Lynn wrote:
All,
After updating my system two days ago I have been having errors when
running vlc, system settings to name a couple. Below is some of what I
am seeing in my .xsession-errors file. I am not sure where to continue
looking to try and correct these errors. I have
On 04/29/2011 12:14 AM, Petr Sabata wrote:
Why don't we let the getaddrinfo() decide in this case as well? It's already
used in other applications so why not here?
Just to give it some more exposure (somewhat related):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697149
getaddrinfo()
commit 5c6ad956ee98c2a584a3cdcfd0d46524f8dfc590
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Apr 29 15:07:51 2011 +0200
Upstream update.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Params-Util.spec | 12 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
Oh! And thanks to Hans for taking me under his wing!
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 07:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Phillip Lynn wrote:
All,
After updating my system two days ago I have been having errors when
running vlc, system settings to name a couple. Below is some of what I
am seeing in my .xsession-errors file. I am not sure where to
Please read:
http://kparal.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/autoqa-0-4-7-released/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am I the only one having problems with entries in /etc/xdg/autostart not
getting executed in the fallback session? This leads for example to the
fact that policykit authentication does not work, since the
authentication agent is not running.
Thanks
Sandro
On 04/28/2011 05:55 PM, Bastien
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:28:15 -0700
Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 4/28/2011 13:25, Bill Nottingham wrote:
EPEL now has a 'Package Review' component in bugzilla. If you've
got an EPEL-only package you'd like to get reviewed, feel free to
file it there.
How is this
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:19:29 -0400
Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, all. A brief bio on me:
I started using Red Hat Linux in college in 1997. I spent half a
decade as a Linux sys admin, and long ago I used to lurk in #redhat
and #fedora giving tech support to new users. I first
Summary of changes:
5c6ad95... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
a30b1c9... - Upstream update. (*)
50ac7d9... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
5c6ad95... Upstream update. (*)
7de2192... Merge.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 7de2192c2ed9c5c43c762b2030d6d44c34404804
Merge: 64bcb78 5c6ad95
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Apr 29 16:05:46 2011 +0200
Merge.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Params-Util.spec | 10 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Hi,
On 04/28/2011, Martin Cermak mcer...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/27/2011, Hans De Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm a sponsor and I would be happy to sponsor you. But first I would like to
see slightly more of your packaging skills / understanding of the Fedora
packaging guidelines
Summary of changes:
06fd3e6... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
8ea50d5... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
b81229d... - Upstream update. - Revert Marcela's 2010-05-04 changes. - (*)
7d922d5... - Rebuild for perl-5.12.x. (*)
d199eb5... dist-git conversion (*)
a30b1c9... -
commit 2c5ed62890cba7e788e889766d6f75ff99661011
Merge: 05e9519 5c6ad95
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Apr 29 17:05:27 2011 +0200
Merge.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Params-Util.spec | 10 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 00:37 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
is directly under /.
I guess I missed some discussion of this. You'd need to update
libselinux at least, definition of SELINUXMNT in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/2011 11:07 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 00:37 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
is directly under /.
I guess I missed some discussion of
2011/4/29 seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org:
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 23:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:37:26AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
existance? For seven years FHS requires that this
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 17:26 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/4/29 seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org:
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 23:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:37:26AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the
Outage: FAS and dependent web apps - 2011-05-02 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2011-05-02 21:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2011-05-02 21:00
Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said:
On 4/28/2011 13:25, Bill Nottingham wrote:
EPEL now has a 'Package Review' component in bugzilla. If you've
got an EPEL-only package you'd like to get reviewed, feel free to
file it there.
How is this any different, given that
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-Format:
07b43da2e23ad4f6eeacee8219c65fa4 HTML-Format-2.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f5a71422d0eb3eb0a163d39b5746fec6824ae95a
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Apr 29 17:55:33 2011 +0200
Upstream update.
Reflect upstream having switched to Build.PL.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-HTML-Format.spec | 19 +++
Summary of changes:
f5a7142... Upstream update. Reflect upstream having switched to Build. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On 4/29/11 8:54 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
How is this any different, given that process-git-requests creates a
rawhide branch without regard to whether one asks for it or not?
I think the idea is that it allows people who wish to see reviews that
are EPEL only. So, perhaps they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, I'm new to contributing but not new to Linux. I started on RHL 7.1
around 2000 and have used Slackware, Gentoo and Debian in the past. I
was active at my university LUG and Gaming Club (running the game
servers on Slackware) and now I work for Red
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 23:01 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:58:57PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 23:06 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 07:10:48PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ben Boeckel wrote:
One thing I liked a lot with
A tangentially related question about spec files...
As a new package maintainer I read the guidelines many a time and
noticed that the current spec temples don't quite agree with the
packaging guidelines
Shouldn't they be updated to no longer include BuildRoot: or %clean as
they are obsolete? Or
Having been not terribly impressed with GNOME 3 in F-15 alpha, I thought
I'd try installing the beta with KDE, just to see if the grass is any
greener. I'm still trying to find my way around that one too, but
I've run into one significant problem: when I close my laptop, the
machine doesn't go to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700890
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=495832action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Tom Lane wrote:
1. An F-15 bug (and if so, which component ought I file it against)?
Something here. The expectation is the system to go to sleep (mine does).
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
=
#fedora-bugzappers: F15 blocker review #3
=
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-29/f15-blocker-review.2011-04-29-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:20 -0400, Phillip Lynn wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 07:33 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Phillip Lynn wrote:
All,
After updating my system two days ago I have been having errors when
running vlc, system settings to name a couple. Below is some of what I
On 04/29/2011 11:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
A tangentially related question about spec files...
As a new package maintainer I read the guidelines many a time and
noticed that the current spec temples don't quite agree with the
packaging guidelines
Shouldn't they be updated to no longer
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/29/2011 11:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
A tangentially related question about spec files...
As a new package maintainer I read the guidelines many a time and
noticed that the current spec temples don't quite agree
On 04/30/2011 12:53 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Is it essential that the templates remain the same across distros or
is it more for simplicity of maintaining the package?
Simplicity.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Jerry,
/*Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com*/ wrote on 04/28/2011 10:19:39 PM
+0450:
Hi all,
I'd like to swap a couple of reviews. My packages:
openfst: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681976
This is the next chunk of a voice recognition stack (CMU Sphinx) I've
slowly been
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-NoTabs:
2f084761009e61084ff9c3bb8facb732 Test-NoTabs-1.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 29.04.11 00:37, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
is directly under /.
Yes, I think this would be a good thing to have in F16.
Note however that this needs a tiny kernel patch to work, to create
perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable-0.0011-6.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable-0.0011-6.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast has broken dependencies in the F-15
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast-0.00903-5.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast-0.00903-5.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole-0.15-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole-0.15-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP) = 0:0.80
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.05-10.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class-0.05-10.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-CHI has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CHI-0.44-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-CHI-0.44-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
On x86_64:
perl-CHI-Test-0.44-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Runtime has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80032-1.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80032-1.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
= 0:0.95
perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80032-1.fc15.noarch
perl-File-ChangeNotify has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.16-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.16-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras
perl-MooseX-InsideOut has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-InsideOut-0.105-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP) =
0:0.80
On i386:
perl-MooseX-InsideOut-0.105-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP) =
0:0.80
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose-0.02-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose-0.02-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable-0.09-4.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP) = 0:0.84
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable-0.09-4.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP) = 0:0.84
Please resolve this
perl-MooseX-Types has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Types-0.22-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Types-0.22-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Moose has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Moose-1.25-1.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(Class::MOP::Module)
perl-Moose-1.25-1.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(Class::MOP::Attribute)
perl-Moose-1.25-1.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(metaclass)
perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude has broken dependencies in the F-15
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude-0.10-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-View-Component-SubInclude-0.10-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl(Class::MOP)
perl-Moose-Autobox has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Moose-Autobox-0.11-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(metaclass)
On i386:
perl-Moose-Autobox-0.11-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(metaclass)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-MooseX-Traits has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-Traits-0.11-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP) =
0:0.84
On i386:
perl-MooseX-Traits-0.11-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Class::MOP) =
0:0.84
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
On Fri, 29.04.11 17:26, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
2011/4/29 seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org:
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 23:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:37:26AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
By the way, maybe it would be good to think
I just bought tickets for EuroPython (http://ep2011.europython.eu/)
and I'm wondering if anyone here is going to the event.
It would be nice to meet some Fedora friend there :)
--
Gianluca Sforna
http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu
--
devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/2011 06:56 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 29.04.11 00:37, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
is directly under /.
Yes, I think this would be
On Fri, 29.04.11 11:21, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
I guess I missed some discussion of this. You'd need to update
libselinux at least, definition of SELINUXMNT in
libselinux/src/policy.h, used by selinux_init_load_policy() to mount
selinuxfs for initial policy load. And
On Fri, 29.04.11 11:07, Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov) wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 00:37 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
is directly under /.
I guess I missed some discussion of this. You'd need to
2011/4/30 Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/2011 06:56 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 29.04.11 00:37, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
is
Compose started at Fri Apr 29 13:15:40 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit)
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:30:02PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
Looking at the code, the 4-second delay is only used when the device is
actually connected to something. State 3 == DISCONNECTED, state 2 ==
UNAVAILABLE, so it's performing as expected here. Were there actually
an IP address
On Fri, 29.04.11 16:34, Greg KH (g...@kroah.com) wrote:
I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
is directly under /.
Yes, I think this would be a good thing to have in F16.
Note however that this needs a tiny kernel patch to work, to create the
On Fri, 29.04.11 17:46, Greg KH (g...@kroah.com) wrote:
I think /srv actually makes a lot of sense. Probably not so much on the
desktop, but the boundaries are blurry, and I see no reason to set
things up differently in this respect between servers and desktops. I
see little benefit
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:08:10PM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 04/19/2011 05:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Actually it looks like I was even lazier than that and just built it
from source. I seem to be running 2.32.52. I just needed whatever
version would interoperate with my Mandriva
On 4/29/2011 9:12, Jesse Keating wrote:
It is somewhat difficult, and odd, to create a git repo that does not
have a master branch. It would be a little more odd to potentially at
some point in the future create the master branch for a package should
it find a home within Fedora.
As you say,
Summary of changes:
31ad9d8... Import. (*)
81f8ea7... Import. (*)
f1bd5ab... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
c7e68e7... Upstream update. Spec cleanup. (*)
d831afb... Merge. (*)
974fea1... Merge.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no
commit 974fea1492e7db654b61777c9ea5d608c8517355
Merge: 815d06a d831afb
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Apr 29 08:02:18 2011 +0200
Merge.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-List-UtilsBy.spec | 12 +---
sources|2 +-
3 files
Summary of changes:
222729b... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:00:46PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote:
Some dual-life modules, like PathTools and CGI, are placed within
vendor path in Fedora 15.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700412
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:45:40AM +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:00:46PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote:
Some dual-life modules,
commit 3bf6ef6ace704aa06bb16be653cfa987f2526e75
Merge: 29721ee 222729b
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Apr 29 14:31:49 2011 +0200
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into f14/master
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-Slurp.spec |5 -
Summary of changes:
222729b... Upstream update. (*)
751485d... Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into f13/maste
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
commit 751485daa150ab25d3d8175bd9535391afbca60c
Merge: 81c74a4 222729b
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Apr 29 14:34:58 2011 +0200
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into f13/master
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-Slurp.spec |5 -
Summary of changes:
ab2d6e6... - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib (*)
845754e... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
8b78c3b... Upstream update. Reflect Source0:-URL having changed. Rewor (*)
f5a7142... Upstream update. Reflect upstream
commit d2c282afd6ef9003b579d31e49f2a7de49da6a7f
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Apr 29 18:49:01 2011 +0200
Merge.
perl-HTML-Format.spec |9 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-HTML-Format.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700923
--- Comment #1 from Gajdos Tamás gajdipa...@gmail.com 2011-04-29 15:44:06 EDT
---
Created attachment 495852
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] perl-Padre-0.64-1.fc14: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by
signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700923
Summary: [abrt]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700875
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=495819action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
92 matches
Mail list logo
