On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:52 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
It's not so much cups start up being slow as discovering network printers.
That can take up to a minute I think.
This is true... however, discovered printers are cached so this is only
an issue the first time CUPS starts after
Hi all,
Is there any guideline / examples to package lisp packages ?
Kushal
--
http://fedoraproject.org
http://kushaldas.in
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any guideline / examples to package lisp packages ?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Lisp
--
Arun S.A.G
http://zer0c00l.in/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dne 9.8.2011 00:24, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
A bit of detective work led to:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24615
apparently Arch has been seeing the same thing. They've addressed it by
reverting the following upstream glibc commit:
Maybe the subject is a bit misleading, I will clarify it.
Bash is using hash table to remember locations of executed commands.
Whenever you try to run a command bash looks in hash table. When the
command is found in table then bash will you full path name as it is in
the table.
However there
2011/8/19 Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com:
Dne 9.8.2011 00:24, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
A bit of detective work led to:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24615
apparently Arch has been seeing the same thing. They've addressed it by
reverting the following upstream glibc commit:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 03:41:33 AM Tim Waugh wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:52 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
It's not so much cups start up being slow as discovering network
printers. That can take up to a minute I think.
This is true... however, discovered printers are cached so this
On 08/19/2011 12:35 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 03:41:33 AM Tim Waugh wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:52 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
It's not so much cups start up being slow as discovering network
printers. That can take up to a minute I think.
This is true...
On 19. aug. 2011 16:00, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/19/2011 12:35 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 03:41:33 AM Tim Waugh wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:52 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
It's not so much cups start up being slow as discovering network
printers. That can
On 19 August 2011 13:35, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
All security guidance says turn off or get rid of avahi. We really don't want
to
require it just to print.
Then security is flying in the face of usability.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dne 19.8.2011 14:06, Peter Robinson napsal(a):
Do you have IPv6, I wonder if its somehow related to that.
I haven't disabled it, but the turtle doesn't dance, so it is not
configured.
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Friday, August 19, 2011 10:50:51 AM Richard Hughes wrote:
On 19 August 2011 13:35, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
All security guidance says turn off or get rid of avahi. We really don't
want to require it just to print.
Then security is flying in the face of usability.
Generally
Am 19.08.2011 16:50, schrieb Richard Hughes:
On 19 August 2011 13:35, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
All security guidance says turn off or get rid of avahi. We really don't
want to
require it just to print.
Then security is flying in the face of usability
this is always so,
On Friday, August 19, 2011 10:38:59 AM Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 19. aug. 2011 16:00, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/19/2011 12:35 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 03:41:33 AM Tim Waugh wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:52 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
It's not so much
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:07:45AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 10:38:59 AM Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 19. aug. 2011 16:00, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/19/2011 12:35 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 03:41:33 AM Tim Waugh wrote:
On Thu,
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 11:03 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
People running in a LSPP configuration would be horrified
to know avahi is now required for printing top secret documents.
Just to clarify: it is not required. Most likely in an LSPP
configuration not even CUPS Browsing is used, but
On Friday, August 19, 2011 11:24:39 AM Tim Waugh wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 11:03 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
People running in a LSPP configuration would be horrified
to know avahi is now required for printing top secret documents.
Just to clarify: it is not required. Most likely in an
On 08/19/2011 10:08 AM, Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 19. aug. 2011 16:00, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/19/2011 12:35 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 03:41:33 AM Tim Waugh wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:52 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
It's not so much cups start up being
On Friday, August 19, 2011 11:12:25 AM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:07:45AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 10:38:59 AM Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 19. aug. 2011 16:00, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/19/2011 12:35 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
On
On Fri, 19.08.11 11:03, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 10:50:51 AM Richard Hughes wrote:
On 19 August 2011 13:35, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
All security guidance says turn off or get rid of avahi. We really don't
want to require it just to
On 08/19/2011 03:39 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
We need a way to specify in the service init files which targets the service
is allowed
to run in by default.
You do that in the install section of the unit file
[Install]
WantedBy=$foo.target
So basically all desktop related service should only
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 17:47 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Well, I think Fedora is more interested in real-life users than
synthetic certifications.
I think you are not the arbiter of what fedora is interested in.
If this is a point of conflict it should be discussed with the board and
On Fri, 19.08.11 17:12, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
Just a thought - would it make sense to create a server-target (and/or
desktop-target) that is independent of graphical-target?
I would hope there are pre-canned targets for different crowds. I also hope
there is a
On Fri, 19.08.11 11:51, seth vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 17:47 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Well, I think Fedora is more interested in real-life users than
synthetic certifications.
I think you are not the arbiter of what fedora is interested in.
Am 19.08.2011 17:47, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
Well, I think Fedora is more interested in real-life users than synthetic
certifications
well, when will you start to fix the usability-faux-passes you brought
for the normal users? the last systemd update is long ago
* no feedback of
The lightweight tag 'perl-Devel-StackTrace-AsHTML-0.11-2.el6.1' was created
pointing to:
f24b3eb... * EPEL6: Disable test t/enconding.t as Devel::StackTrace i
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f24b3eb466844331c5b3dce7fc96b1fa9f140f98
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Fri Aug 19 17:26:44 2011 +0100
* EPEL6: Disable test t/enconding.t as Devel::StackTrace is too old
perl-Devel-StackTrace-AsHTML.spec |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1
On Fri, 19.08.11 18:00, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Heya,
* no feedback of systemctl and wrong from /sbin/service-wrapper
Like most Unix commands systemctl will not output anything in case of
success, only on failure. See cp, ln, mv, rm for similar behaviour.
* systemctl
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 17:47 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 19.08.11 11:03, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2011 10:50:51 AM Richard Hughes wrote:
On 19 August 2011 13:35, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
All security guidance says turn off
commit 0632e318d238ef7bfa66f12c9193e254bec82391
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Fri Aug 19 18:31:22 2011 +0100
* First EPEL6 release (based on a F15 SRPM with a modified BR -
perl(Devel::StackTrace))
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Plack.spec | 35
The lightweight tag 'perl-Plack-0.9974-2.el6.1' was created pointing to:
0632e31... * First EPEL6 release (based on a F15 SRPM with a modified
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 08/19/2011 01:24 PM, Roman Rakus wrote:
I have a question, if it is worth to enable this option by default? It
will not confuse some people, but can increase disk searching. Comments
welcome.
Confusion can only happen in this particular case, I think:
1) you run a command and the cache is
2011/8/19 Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it
On 08/19/2011 01:24 PM, Roman Rakus wrote:
I have a question, if it is worth to enable this option by default? It
will not confuse some people, but can increase disk searching. Comments
welcome.
Confusion can only happen in this particular
Am 19.08.2011 18:46, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Fri, 19.08.11 18:00, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Heya,
* no feedback of systemctl and wrong from /sbin/service-wrapper
Like most Unix commands systemctl will not output anything in case of
success, only on failure. See
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
I'm getting the same mail for some time now for my critpath security
update. I'm just wondering how long it takes before update reaches
users
IMHO, the time it has taken so far is already too long. Stuff gets stuck in
the queue literally forever due to this stupid
Tim Waugh wrote:
Oh, I just noticed this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd#Socket_activation
Since Fedora currently doesn't want any services to do on-demand
loading, all socket activated services must autostart.
What the heck?! We're disabling systemd's main
Looks like I forgot to reply to this:
Adam Williamson wrote:
That's ass backwards, though. We need the testing _to determine if the
things should be in the release_. Really, I think if you look at the
quality of the releases that have happened since this policy was
changed, it's pretty clear
On 08/19/2011 06:02 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
Hi - the purpose of this email is to introduce myself as a prospective
new package maintainer for Fedora.
My recently filed review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Hello Steve Jenkins, welcome to Fedora.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/19/2011 06:02 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
Hi - the purpose of this email is to introduce myself as a prospective
new package maintainer for Fedora.
My recently filed review request is here:
Hello,
You may have noticed a lot of packaging activity on the fedora-medical
front[1]. There are still quite a few packages in the review queue. Some
have been approved, and we'd like to get started with the comps group.
I've created a patch (attached). Please review it :)
If all's okay, I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731907
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit c73c5a702ebb5b15c7a5956022dfa400174ae674
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Aug 19 10:55:23 2011 +0200
Upstream update.
.gitignore|3 +--
perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon.spec | 19 +++
sources
Summary of changes:
c73c5a7... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Plack:
5dc7c6b8fec4b51adc5ff076a0aacc8c Plack-0.9982.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8ddc36b6dcd0dc8a970beec4d3651df5a68eb6c1
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Aug 19 12:30:48 2011 +0200
Upstream update.
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-Plack.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon
perl-Eval-LineNumbers has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Eval-LineNumbers-0.31-1.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Test-Vars has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Vars-0.001-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Test-Vars-0.001-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013-3.fc16.noarch requires
perl(tmpl_var)
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.013-3.fc16.noarch requires
main_module)
perl-Gtk2-WebKit has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Gtk2-WebKit-0.09-1.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Gtk2-WebKit-0.09-1.fc15.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-Data-Section-Simple has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Section-Simple-0.02-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Data-Section-Simple-0.02-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders-0.20-3.fc15.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Perlbal-XS-HTTPHeaders-0.20-3.fc15.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as
perl-Shipwright has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Shipwright-2.4.24-2.fc16.noarch requires perl(that)
On i386:
perl-Shipwright-2.4.24-2.fc16.noarch requires perl(that)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731907
--- Comment #2 from Jack Tanner i...@hotmail.com 2011-08-19 16:03:05 EDT ---
Updating to the latest upstream code in EPEL would
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731907
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-08-19 16:35:35 EDT ---
Hmm, even the version in Rawhide is well out of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664090
Bernard Johnson bjohn...@symetrix.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722604
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722604
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-19
17:58:55 EDT ---
perl-HTML-Format-2.09-1.fc14 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722604
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-19
17:59:18 EDT ---
perl-HTML-Format-2.09-1.fc15 has
61 matches
Mail list logo
