On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:08:27 -0700
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
hdf5-1.8.8 is now in rawhide. Any packages that build against hdf5
need to be rebuilt. I've already done R-hdf5 and gdl. Note that
there is no soname bump but the hdf5 library checks that the runtime
and compile
I'm working on packaging OpenColorIO for Fedora and ran into an issue
with bundled libraries.
The project is currently statically compiling in yaml-cpp, tinyxml,
and lcms. Upstream doesn't have a problem with unbundling lcms, but is
not sure about the other two, here's his explination:
hmmm
I'm working on packaging OpenColorIO for Fedora and ran into an issue
with bundled libraries.
The project is currently statically compiling in yaml-cpp, tinyxml,
and lcms. Upstream doesn't have a problem with unbundling lcms, but is
not sure about the other two, here's his explination:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
I'm working on packaging OpenColorIO for Fedora and ran into an issue
with bundled libraries.
The project is currently statically compiling in yaml-cpp, tinyxml,
and lcms. Upstream doesn't have a problem with unbundling
quvi 0.4.0 is both an ABI and API break. See the rawhide report for
details.
Nicoleau, please remember to announce changes that may affect others:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainer_responsibilities#Notify_others_of_changes_that_may_affect_their_packages
- ajax
signature.asc
On 11/17/2011 02:46 AM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:08:27 -0700
Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
hdf5-1.8.8 is now in rawhide. Any packages that build against hdf5
need to be rebuilt. I've already done R-hdf5 and gdl. Note that
there is no soname bump but the hdf5
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:49:41PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
We *have* had Cisco's IPSec over TCP working; it's not particularly
difficult. However, we never really worked out how to make it work
nicely on Linux; the kernel really *really* wants to eat all TCP packets
and will give a TCP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754725
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:11:06AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
I'm working on packaging OpenColorIO for Fedora and ran into an issue
with bundled libraries.
The project is currently statically compiling in yaml-cpp,
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:10 -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
Why not use a tun/tap interface set up with a private ip address which the
vpn application causes to be masqueraded by the host? That should work and
be portable across all kernel versions.
Yeah, that's one of of the options. But
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754725
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
I have a package that contains ruby scripts in /usr/lib/packagename/
These scripts are only called/included via other binaries.
If I do not make these executable, then rpmlint complains about
non-executable content in /usr/lib/packagename/ and suggests I
move it to /usr/share/packagename. If I
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:26:13PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
I have a package that contains ruby scripts in /usr/lib/packagename/
These scripts are only called/included via other binaries.
If I do not make these executable, then rpmlint complains about
non-executable content in
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
When you talk about scripts, do you mean that the code calling these scripts
does the equivalent of this (note, I generated my examples by reading up on
ruby on the web just prior to posting... please allow for this perhaps not
being real ruby code
On Nov 15, 2011, at 1:54 AM, Marek Goldmann wrote:
I see the same issue with clone on F16:
[goldmann@nightmare fedora]$ fedpkg clone appliance-tools
Could not execute clone: must be type, not classobj
[goldmann@nightmare fedora]$ rpm -q fedpkg
fedpkg-1.5-1.fc16.noarch
Downgrading to
On Nov 14, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 17:48 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Fedora 16 is not science fiction. It is here right now:
http://get.fedoraproject.org
Hmm, no jigdo downloads any more?
Releng say they dropped jigdo due to overwhelming
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 01:09:47PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
When you talk about scripts, do you mean that the code calling these scripts
does the equivalent of this (note, I generated my examples by reading up on
ruby on the web just prior to
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
[SNIP]
Only if he's significantly modifying the bundled libs and upstream won't
take the changes. If you unbundle and build against the system versions,
and it works, that's what you need to do. Always link
2011-06-23 : FTBFS not responded to
2010-06-30 : -static packaging bug not responded to
Plus, release 0.89 from 20-May-2011 is available whereas Fedora contains
0.84 from 2010 ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/courier/files/cone/ ).
This looks like somebody with interest in Cone should sign up
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:36:36PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
1:libguestfs-1.15.3-3.fc17.i686 requires /usr/lib/libkdb5.so.5
1:libguestfs-1.15.3-3.fc17.x86_64 requires /usr/lib64/libkdb5.so.5
Should be fixed now.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
nod And also note -- the use of /usr/lib (*not* %{_libdir}) vs /usr/share
is debatable (I said could above rather than should). The modules that go
into the default search path, for python, perl, and ruby, for instance, all
end up in /usr/lib if
Main package syslinux does:
Obsoletes: syslinux-devel %{version}-%{release}
Provides: syslinux-devel
However, a syslinux-devel subpackage definition is present. A -devel
package is built. No comment explains above Obs/Prov pair.
%changelog only says:
* Thu Dec 17 2009 Peter Jones … -
Ok, reviving this conversation!
I ran into the issue that user mythtv can not create the file
/var/run/mythbackend.pid. I see other services that have their pid
file owned by their own user...
Also, user mythtv can't write to the log file in /var/log/mythtv/
How do I do this with systemd?
I
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, reviving this conversation!
I ran into the issue that user mythtv can not create the file
/var/run/mythbackend.pid. I see other services that have their pid
file owned by their own user...
systemd doesn't really
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, reviving this conversation!
I ran into the issue that user mythtv can not create the file
/var/run/mythbackend.pid. I see other services that
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, reviving this conversation!
I ran into the issue that user mythtv can
Hi list,
could someone explain why an update in a branch that's supposed
to be stable and is nearing EOL requires me to download 14MB worth
of additional packages (57 extra dependencies) for a 360KB package?
Doesn't this go against our update guidelines?
For the record, the installed version is
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:28:48PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi list,
could someone explain why an update in a branch that's supposed
to be stable and is nearing EOL requires me to download 14MB worth
of additional packages (57 extra dependencies) for a 360KB package?
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:33 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:28:48PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
Hi list,
could someone explain why an update in a branch that's supposed
to be stable and is nearing EOL requires me to download 14MB worth
of
On 17/11/11 22:09, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Richard Shawhobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jeffrey Olliej...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Richard Shawhobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, reviving this conversation!
I
Is it possible to push this update direct to stable to close this bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754741
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kdiff3-0.9.96-5.fc16
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 20:26 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
Is it possible to push this update direct to stable to close this bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754741
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kdiff3-0.9.96-5.fc16
It's not critical path, so you only need a single
- Original Message -
From: Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, 18 November, 2011 5:41:19 AM
Subject: Re: Anyone interested in abi-compatibility-checker?
Just an FYI to anyone who's interested.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: CGI::Session emits deprecation warning when running under 'use
warnings'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
Summary: CGI::Session emits
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
--- Comment #1 from Simon Andrews simon.andr...@bbsrc.ac.uk 2011-11-17
06:37:27 EST ---
The fix is to change line 882 from:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for abi-compliance-checker:
eb6be17e017a581793cf2fd1d793d470 abi-compliance-checker-1.95.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1e3d82d88f3b468ffe407279f5ac5f55936f6acc
Author: Richard M. Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Nov 17 11:29:40 2011 -0600
Initial import (#753900).
.gitignore |1 +
ChangeLog | 221 +++
Summary of changes:
1e3d82d... Initial import (#753900). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
1e3d82d... Initial import (#753900). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754446
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
From 1a0660f4fa2da22a6918078442afffba51c8c225 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:41:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] use slapi_hexchar2int and slapi_str_to_u8 everywhere
uniqueid code was using local str2Byte - use slapi_str_to_u8 instead
there
42 matches
Mail list logo
