Re: This karma stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Emanuel Rietveld
On 03/15/2012 08:24 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: Luke Macken does Bodhi. It certainly sounds non-trivial to me, for a start, Bodhi uses FAS and Bugzilla does not. It would be trivial if these decisions would be made by a human who is CCed on both (i.e. the maintainer of the

libdb-5.3.15 update with soname bump

2012-03-16 Thread Jindrich Novy
Hi all, very soon I'm going to update libdb to 5.3.15 in rawhide. Thanks, Jindrich -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vůl.

Re: Possible to access Koji build directory?

2012-03-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:00:59AM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:45:22 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I suspect the answer is 'no', but is is possible to access or download the build directory of a failed build, on the Fedora Koji servers?

Re: Possible to access Koji build directory?

2012-03-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering wrote: Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:00:59AM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:45:22 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I suspect the answer is 'no', but is is possible to access or download the build directory of a failed build, on the

Bug 803646- Password is visible on gnome-terminal

2012-03-16 Thread Anish Patil
Hi, The description of the bug says With English-typing-booster enabled on gnome-terminal, while using su- command, password appears in the text. English typing booster is IBUS-IME for english language. Any thoughts or comments regrading solution will be appreciated. Regards, Anish Patil. --

Re: libdb-5.3.15 update with soname bump

2012-03-16 Thread Paul Howarth
On 03/16/2012 09:17 AM, Jindrich Novy wrote: Hi all, very soon I'm going to update libdb to 5.3.15 in rawhide. Perhaps now would be a good time to make a concerted effort to move all db4 users over to libdb to avoid problems like these: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768846

Re: Possible to access Koji build directory?

2012-03-16 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:16:51 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: That works very well. However, the base64 output in my first log was corrupt, due to some asynchronous output (stderr about job completion) that was emitted in the middle of the big base64 block. Adding the sync; sleep 10 part below

Re: Bug 803646- Password is visible on gnome-terminal

2012-03-16 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/3/16 Anish Patil apa...@redhat.com: Hi, The description of the bug says With English-typing-booster enabled on gnome-terminal, while using su- command, password appears in the text. English typing booster is IBUS-IME for english language. Any thoughts or comments regrading

Re: Bug 803646- Password is visible on gnome-terminal

2012-03-16 Thread Niels de Vos
On 03/16/2012 11:21 AM, Anish Patil wrote: Hi, The description of the bug says With English-typing-booster enabled on gnome-terminal, while using su- command, password appears in the text. English typing booster is IBUS-IME for english language. Any thoughts or comments regrading solution

F-17 Branched report: 20120316 changes

2012-03-16 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Mar 16 08:15:27 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [HippoDraw] HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray

Re: Possible to access Koji build directory?

2012-03-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Jan Kratochvil wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:16:51 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: That works very well. However, the base64 output in my first log was corrupt, due to some asynchronous output (stderr about job completion) that was emitted in the middle of the big base64 block. Adding the sync;

Re: This karma stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Michael Scherer
Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit : Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works for me is a real pain. Have you tried fedora-easy-karma ?

Re: Possible to access Koji build directory?

2012-03-16 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:01:59 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: However, I would suggest that any make check-spawned process that does not terminate is a test script bug that should be fixed upstream, I agree. New testcases are reviewed with this rule in mind. But the existing testcases are handled

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-16 Thread Matej Cepl
On 15.3.2012 09:38, Tomasz Torcz wrote: Why and why just us? Good question, we deviate from upstream default: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DistrosDefaultLayout Do we have somebody to make the stupid item 3 go away? # If you're having issues with authorization and your permissions are #

does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
hi everybody, in recent fedora releases I can see we have /etc/sysctl.d/ but does it really get evaluated eg. let's put in /etc/sysctl.d/00-ojuba-enabled-sysrq.conf kernel.sysrq = 1 and keep it 0 in /etc/sysctl.conf kernel.sysrq = 0 then reboot then type sysctl kernel.sysrq it was

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 16.03.12 14:40, Muayyad AlSadi (als...@gmail.com) wrote: hi everybody, in recent fedora releases I can see we have /etc/sysctl.d/ but does it really get evaluated eg. let's put in /etc/sysctl.d/00-ojuba-enabled-sysrq.conf kernel.sysrq = 1 and keep it 0 in /etc/sysctl.conf

rawhide compose failing?

2012-03-16 Thread Stijn Hoop
Hi, did I miss the last two days of rawhide compose mails or are they failing? If so where can I check? Regards, --Stijn -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 16.03.12 14:54, Muayyad AlSadi (als...@gmail.com) wrote: but this does not make sense the idea behind all .d is to allow packages to provide default (either kernel defaults or distro defaults) because the other choice is to use %post and sed eg. let's say I made a firewall package

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 03/16/2012 02:28 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 16.03.12 14:54, Muayyad AlSadi (als...@gmail.com) wrote: but this does not make sense the idea behind all .d is to allow packages to provide default (either kernel defaults or distro defaults) because the other choice is to use %post

Re: rawhide compose failing?

2012-03-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:02:39 +0100 Stijn Hoop st...@sandcat.nl wrote: Hi, did I miss the last two days of rawhide compose mails or are they failing? If so where can I check? http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-February/162652.html It looks like they composed, but didn't

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
As I understand it, Muayyad has different problem. Right now, the /etc/sysctl.conf we ship is not empty. It has several values set, one of them is sysrq=0 he used in his example. No one set this is value, it's just default value and yet, no package can change it by placing its file in

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Michal Schmidt
Dne 16.3.2012 14:40, Michal Hlavinka napsal: As I understand it, Muayyad has different problem. Right now, the /etc/sysctl.conf we ship is not empty. It has several values set, one of them is sysrq=0 he used in his example. No one set this is value, it's just default value and yet, no package

Question about commiting the sources

2012-03-16 Thread Sergio Belkin
Perhaps and stupid question: After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added to .gitignore: Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file I don't understand! By default it add sources files to .gitignore and then it asks for commit them? Is it something that

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.03.2012 15:21, schrieb Michal Schmidt: Dne 16.3.2012 14:40, Michal Hlavinka napsal: As I understand it, Muayyad has different problem. Right now, the /etc/sysctl.conf we ship is not empty. It has several values set, one of them is sysrq=0 he used in his example. No one set this is

Re: Question about commiting the sources

2012-03-16 Thread Jan Synacek
On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: Perhaps and stupid question: After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added to .gitignore: Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file I don't understand! By default it add sources files to .gitignore and

Re: Question about commiting the sources

2012-03-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: Perhaps and stupid question: After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added to .gitignore: Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file

Re: Question about commiting the sources

2012-03-16 Thread Bryn M. Reeves
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2012 02:33 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: Perhaps and stupid question: After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added to .gitignore: Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit

Re: Question about commiting the sources

2012-03-16 Thread Sergio Belkin
2012/3/16 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: Perhaps and stupid question: After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added to .gitignore: Source upload

Re: rawhide compose failing?

2012-03-16 Thread Stijn Hoop
/pipermail/devel/2012-February/162652.html It looks like they composed, but didn't send email for some reason. Will investigate. kevin Thanks. Actually I do see an error in critpath.log, http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20120316/logs/critpath.log Maybe that explains? Regards

Re: Question about commiting the sources

2012-03-16 Thread Sergio Belkin
2012/3/16 Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2012 02:33 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: Perhaps and stupid question: After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: Uploaded and added to .gitignore:

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 04:13:31PM +0200, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: As I understand it, Muayyad has different problem. Right now, the /etc/sysctl.conf we ship is not empty. It has several values set, one of them is sysrq=0 he used in his example. No one set this is value, it's just default

Mass deduplication and reassignment of ABRT bugs

2012-03-16 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
As a part of the ABRT Backtrace Deduplication Service[1], we are planning to close and reassign old ABRT bugs in bugzilla. Bugs which were found to have similar backtraces will be closed as duplicates of the bug with most CCed users. If the bugs originate from different components and their

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 15:16 +, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 04:13:31PM +0200, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: As I understand it, Muayyad has different problem. Right now, the /etc/sysctl.conf we ship is not empty. It has several values set, one of them is sysrq=0 he used

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org said: No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. Why not? For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use of IPC and needs the msgmni and msgmnb limits raised beyond the default values. Why

Re: This karma stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread John Ellson
On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit : Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works for me is a real pain. Have you tried fedora-easy-karma ?

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 09:56 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote: On 15.3.2012 09:38, Tomasz Torcz wrote: Why and why just us? Good question, we deviate from upstream default: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DistrosDefaultLayout Do we have somebody to make the stupid item 3 go away? # If you're

Re: This karma stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:15 AM, John Ellson john.ell...@comcast.net wrote:  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-0.9.3.995-0.6.git20120314.fc17 The update contains fixes for three problems:  800690, 798102, 802540 I contributed to the first bug, 800690, and duly tested and

[Bug 680418] missing man page for xpath

2012-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680418 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: /etc/sysctl.conf is interpreted after /etc/sysctl.d is. The former hence overrides settings in the latter. and Muayyad AlSadi responded: but this does not make sense the idea behind all .d is to allow packages to provide default

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-16 Thread David Quigley
On 03/16/2012 04:56, Matej Cepl wrote: On 15.3.2012 09:38, Tomasz Torcz wrote: Why and why just us? Good question, we deviate from upstream default: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DistrosDefaultLayout Do we have somebody to make the stupid item 3 go away? # If you're having issues with

[perl-XML-XPath] 680418 - missing man page for xpath applied debian patch, which added POD into xpath code, but also

2012-03-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 06198004f6132c58258cfdf3d930f05f1b784c4b Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com Date: Fri Mar 16 17:41:28 2012 +0100 680418 - missing man page for xpath applied debian patch, which added POD into xpath code, but also fix debian bug(#185292) perl-XML-XPath.spec | 11

Re: rawhide compose failing?

2012-03-16 Thread Dennis Gilmore
://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20120316/logs/critpath.log Maybe that explains? I refactored the scripts that build rawhide this week to enable primary and secondary arches to use the same scripts. in that i broke the bit that sends email. im testing a fix for it now. Dennis -- devel

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org said: No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. Why not? For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use of IPC and needs the

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-16 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2012 12:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 09:56 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote: On 15.3.2012 09:38, Tomasz Torcz wrote: Why and why just us? Good question, we deviate from upstream default:

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

2012-03-16 Thread Tore Anderson
* Dan Williams On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 20:47 +0100, Lars Seipel wrote: The current behaviour of tearing down working IPv6 connections is just painful IMHO. If the IPv6 method is ignore (which is the current default) then NM shouldn't be touching IPv6 stuff on that interface; kernel-assigned

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org said: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org said: No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. Why not? For example, I use a

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Gerry Reno
On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same problem. Graphics is Geforce FX 5600 Ah. Then that'll be

Re: This karma stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 12:15 -0400, John Ellson wrote: On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit : Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works

Re: This karma stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 12:15 -0400, John Ellson wrote: On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit : Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works

Re: This karma stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
On 03/16/2012 05:15 PM, John Ellson wrote: On 03/16/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 12:49 -0400, John Ellson a écrit : Can we just generate karma from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix works for me is a

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:31 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same problem.

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org said: No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. Why not? For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use of IPC and needs

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com said: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org said: No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy. Why not? For example, I use a commercial

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net said: Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org said: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org said: No package should be automatically changing the

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

2012-03-16 Thread Tore Anderson
Hi Dan, * Dan Williams On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:52 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote: That is true, however, if IPv6 completes first, and IPv4 (still running in the background) eventually ends up failing, the *entire connection* will be torn down - including the perfectly working IPv6

Fedora is featuring on GSoC 2012

2012-03-16 Thread Buddhike Kurera
Hello, I am delighted to announce that the Fedora Project has been accepted for the GSoC 2012 program[0]. This would be the 7th time where the Fedora project represents the program since 2005. The students' application procedure and other relevant information will be published soon. If you are

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

2012-03-16 Thread Tore Anderson
* Petr Pisar How does fd00::/16 differes from 10.0.0.0/8? Why getting site scope address in IPv4 is Ok, while getting such address in IPv6 is considered as failure? Just a little comment regarding the terminology used here. The terms global, site, and link scope have very specific and defined

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
What happens if two packages want to set a sysctl to different values ? that's why they are prefixed with numbers, the higher number will take effect eg. 99-foobar.conf sometimes we have conventions for number ranges like this

Re: Debuginfo package for Python-2.7 on F14 mismatched or (l)user error?

2012-03-16 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote: And both machines pass rpm -Va just fine. So the binaries should, um, be the same. + It is a core from yesterday, There can be difference one of the machines has the files prelink-ed while the other one does

Re: This karma stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread David Tardon
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:29:33AM +0100, Emanuel Rietveld wrote: On 03/15/2012 08:24 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: Luke Macken does Bodhi. It certainly sounds non-trivial to me, for a start, Bodhi uses FAS and Bugzilla does not. It would be trivial if these decisions would

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:42:50PM +0200, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: What happens if two packages want to set a sysctl to different values ? that's why they are prefixed with numbers, the higher number will take effect eg. 99-foobar.conf sometimes we have conventions for number ranges

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Gerry Reno
On 03/16/2012 02:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:31 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: Yeah,

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 17:01 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: On 03/16/2012 02:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:31 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-15 at

webkitgtk3 and webkitgtk both installed

2012-03-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
hi, I made a spin with gimp pre-installed and found that webkitgtk and webkitgtk3 both installed the old webkitgtk is installed only because of gimp is there any plan to port gimp to webkitgtk3 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
If 00-foo sets something to value A, and 99-bar sets it to B, and B A, foo may not function correctly. This isn't an ordering problem, it's an exclusivity problem, because sysctls are system-wide, not per-package. this applies to every thing, if 00-foo sets foo as the best font for

Re: This karma stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
David Tardon wrote: How do we prevent inexperienced testers from giving undeserved karma and thus causing an update to be automatically pushed to stable? One has to fulfil certain requirements before one becomes a packager. But anyone with FAS account can give karma to an update... +1, the

Re: This karma stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: That might be an appropriate time to try and work some kind of connection between Bugzilla and Bodhi. But I still think it might be very difficult to do; it's very difficult to parse a freeform Bugzilla comment That's why it's best to leave this to a human! Software is

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver against a debug kernel without tweaking something somewhere. It works fine if you use a non-debug kernel. Not really: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751891 Anything dlopening libGL

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Reindl Harald wrote: yes, but the really bug is that sysctl.conf is not shipped empty it should be the global place where the admin can override ANY setting from any other file/package and so it is correct to apply systcl.conf as last item - as said only if it would be shipped empty +1, Kay

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 23:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver against a debug kernel without tweaking something somewhere. It works fine if you use a non-debug kernel. Not really:

Re: This karma stuff is a pain!

2012-03-16 Thread Johannes Lips
On 03/16/2012 10:06 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: David Tardon wrote: How do we prevent inexperienced testers from giving undeserved karma and thus causing an update to be automatically pushed to stable? One has to fulfil certain requirements before one becomes a packager. But anyone with FAS

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 16.03.12 14:40, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote: On 03/16/2012 02:28 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 16.03.12 14:54, Muayyad AlSadi (als...@gmail.com) wrote: but this does not make sense the idea behind all .d is to allow packages to provide default (either

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

2012-03-16 Thread Glen Turner
On 2012-03-15 Dan Williams wrote: The only effect this checking will have is to change NetworkManager's state from CONNECTED_GLOBAL to CONNECTED_SITE or CONNECTED_LOCAL. It doesn't do anything odd like disconnect and retry some other connection, which wouldn't make much sense. It just

Qt compiler tool names

2012-03-16 Thread Aaron Faanes
I was wondering why Qt compiler tools (qmake, moc, uic, etc.) are installed with each name suffixed with -qt4 (qmake-qt4, moc-qt4). This diverges from how upstream names its tools (specifically, without qt4 added), so it caused me a little confusion when these tools appeared to be missing. My

Re: Fedora is featuring on GSoC 2012

2012-03-16 Thread Harish Pillay
Buddhike - | I am delighted to announce that the Fedora Project has been accepted | for the GSoC 2012 program[0]. | This would be the 7th time where the Fedora project represents the | program since 2005. | | The students' application procedure and other relevant information | will be published

Re: Qt compiler tool names

2012-03-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Aaron Faanes wrote: I was wondering why Qt compiler tools (qmake, moc, uic, etc.) are installed with each name suffixed with -qt4 (qmake-qt4, moc-qt4). This diverges from how upstream names its tools (specifically, without qt4 added), so it caused me a little confusion when these tools

Re: Qt compiler tool names

2012-03-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Aaron Faanes wrote: We used the -qt4 postfix (which is a common practice among most distros these days) to allow for a parallel-installable qt3. Ah, I figured it was something like that. I couldn't find it using the following: $ yum provides '*/bin/*-qt3' Loaded plugins:

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Gerry Reno
On 03/16/2012 06:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 23:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver against a debug kernel without tweaking something somewhere. It works fine if you use a

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 00:17 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: On 03/16/2012 06:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 23:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver against a debug kernel

Re: Qt compiler tool names

2012-03-16 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: Aaron Faanes wrote: We used the -qt4 postfix (which is a common practice among most distros these days) to allow for a parallel-installable qt3. Ah, I figured it was something like that. I couldn't find it using the following: $ yum

[Test-Announce] 2012-03-19 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2012-03-16 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2012-03-19 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time once more. We're deep into Beta cycle now, and we have Test Days to report also.

[Bug 797179] perl-PatchReader needs updating

2012-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797179 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added