http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/952/4890952/root.log
There's no conflict in dracut.spec. However mdadm.spec has the
following lines:
%if %{fedora} = 18
Conflicts: dracut 024-23
[...]
%endif
%if %{fedora} = 17
Conflicts: dracut 009-14
[...]
%endif
But as far as I can see from
Richard W.M. Jones píše v Út 22. 01. 2013 v 08:19 +:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/952/4890952/root.log
There's no conflict in dracut.spec. However mdadm.spec has the
following lines:
%if %{fedora} = 18
Conflicts: dracut 024-23
[...]
%endif
%if %{fedora} = 17
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:54:01AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones píše v Út 22. 01. 2013 v 08:19 +:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/952/4890952/root.log
There's no conflict in dracut.spec. However mdadm.spec has the
following lines:
%if %{fedora} = 18
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 01/22/2013 07:43 PM +9:00:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:54:01AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones píše v Út 22. 01. 2013 v 08:19 +:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/952/4890952/root.log
There's no conflict in dracut.spec. However
Hi all,
I'm going to push update cyrus-sasl-2.1.26 into Rawhide soon. Part of this
update
is also SONAME bump to libsasl2.so.3.
The main issue with this update is that it would break buildroot since there is
the openldap
package requiring libsasl2.so.2 which is part of buildroot. So I'll do
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 15:19:18 +0100,
Petr Lautrbach plaut...@redhat.com wrote:
It's my understanding that there will be mass rebuild soon so I wouldn't
rebuild all of them manually,
but I would wait for this rebuild.
Comments? Suggestions?
The rebuild will likely be in a side tag and
On 01/22/2013 03:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 15:19:18 +0100,
Petr Lautrbach plaut...@redhat.com wrote:
It's my understanding that there will be mass rebuild soon so I wouldn't
rebuild all of them manually,
but I would wait for this rebuild.
Comments? Suggestions?
John Reiser wrote:
I await documentation of claims that anaconda RAM requirements
have been skyrocketing over the last several releases.
The officially documented RAM requirements are, at least:
RHL 9: http://www.gurulabs.com/downloads/RELEASE-NOTES-RHL9.html
| Memory:
| - Minimum for
On 01/22/2013 03:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 15:19:18 +0100,
Petr Lautrbach plaut...@redhat.com wrote:
It's my understanding that there will be mass rebuild soon so I
wouldn't rebuild all of them manually,
but I would wait for this rebuild.
Comments? Suggestions?
Summary of changes:
aa1c16c... * First Fedora build. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
aa1c16c... * First Fedora build. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 23:43:07 +0100,
Björn Persson bjorn@rombobjörn.se wrote:
And since people don't check the certificate anyway it would be better
if Firefox would silently switch to plain HTTP when it can't verify the
certificate? Not just use the unverified certificate but skip all the
Le Lun 21 janvier 2013 16:47, Susi Lehtola a écrit :
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:30:04 +0100
Michael J Gruber m...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I would like to help this poor soul get his package into Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249
(adobe-source-code-pro-fonts)
I'm a
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:53:06 -0600
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 15:19:18 +0100,
Petr Lautrbach plaut...@redhat.com wrote:
It's my understanding that there will be mass rebuild soon so I
wouldn't rebuild all of them manually, but I would wait for this
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 16:13:49 +0100,
Petr Lautrbach plaut...@redhat.com wrote:
The rebuild will likely be in a side tag and things won't be fixed until the
rebuild is complete. It may be better to do the manual rebuild for the affected
packages.
At first I'd planned to do it manually
As mentioned in the FUDCon kernel talk, we are trying to figure out
exactly what causes the massive slowdown for some people with debug
kernels. At this point, debug is completely off in the rawhide kernel.
Every update this week will turn on more debug options until we find out
which one is
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:17:48 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
John Reiser wrote:
I await documentation of claims that anaconda RAM requirements
have been skyrocketing over the last several releases.
The officially documented RAM requirements are, at least:
RHL 9:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:31:37 -0600
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
If you expect simple rebuilds (just changing the version in the spec
file) to work, you can ask for help from proven packagers and
probably get it. I'd probably be able to help depending on the
timing. Kevin has been
On 01/21/2013 07:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
* DO NOT REWRITE code! It will ALWAYS break things!
You're joking, right? If nobody ever rewrote code... we wouldn't have Linux.
~m
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Please take discussions like these to the installer development list;
fedora-devel is too broad a list to discuss mintuae like this I think.
On 01/20/2013 05:15 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
we see 3 items, one of them no disk selected
it has the same level of importance as the rest two,
I believe
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sysadm-Install:
9f9d3a7b174b8be45a326b833dd8401e Sysadm-Install-0.42.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3060956d5f15186b1b2a84bb4270659254997980
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Jan 22 16:47:00 2013 +
Update to 0.42
- New upstream release 0.42
- No longer silently remove directories that are in the way before untar()
- Better error diagnosis on
On 01/20/2013 11:43 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Ray Strodewrote:
Hi,
I find it easier (and smaller) to download the netinst.iso (like
Fedora-18-x86_64-netinst.iso)
Loop-back mount and pull the vmlinuz and initrd.img into /boot
The
Always was done with yaboot. Do we know if OLPC will move to UEFI?
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse formatting and brevity.
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Thu, 17 Jan 2013 06:35:08 -0500 (EST)
Anthony Green gr...@redhat.com escribió:
Dennis wrote:
I am right now building a compat-libffi package that has just the
old .so nothing to be built against. so expect that early this week
the .so of
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
=
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to push update cyrus-sasl-2.1.26 into Rawhide soon. Part of this
update
is also SONAME bump to libsasl2.so.3.
Are there any reasons for soname bump? Could you please point out for
those?
Are there are changes to existing
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
Always was done with yaboot. Do we know if OLPC will move to UEFI?
I very much doubt it
Sent from my phone. Please excuse formatting and brevity.
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Alexander Bokovoy píše v Út 22. 01. 2013 v 19:59 +0200:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to push update cyrus-sasl-2.1.26 into Rawhide soon. Part of this
update
is also SONAME bump to libsasl2.so.3.
Are there any reasons for soname bump? Could you please point
2013/1/22 Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov
On 01/20/2013 11:43 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Ray Strodewrote:
Hi,
I find it easier (and smaller) to download the netinst.iso (like
Fedora-18-x86_64-netinst.iso)
Loop-back
On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote
The hundreds series is speific to the fedora version. Currently
f17 is 1xx and f18 is 2xx. The purpose is to keep f18 versions
ahead of f17 versions so that updates will work better.
..
Presumably as new kernels come out the base number will
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 14:13:23 -0500,
Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote
The hundreds series is speific to the fedora version. Currently
f17 is 1xx and f18 is 2xx. The purpose is to keep f18 versions
ahead of f17 versions so
On Jan 22, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov
wrote:
On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote
The hundreds series is speific to the fedora version. Currently
f17 is 1xx and f18 is 2xx. The purpose is to keep f18 versions
ahead of f17 versions so that
Le Dim 20 janvier 2013 06:46, David Tardon a écrit :
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 03:20:29PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 19.1.2013 12:46, Tomasz Torcz napsal(a):
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
On 01/22/2013 11:28 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
7xx, 8xx, 9xx, 0xx,
The first number of a Fedora release seems mostly superfluous.
9xx-0xx breaks the goal that updates will work better.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Le Sam 19 janvier 2013 13:34, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
2013/1/19 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net:
Do you have any hints on working on option 3? Well, that means not
using fontconfig, so might not be worth for a generic Linux solution...
What renderer is
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:44:11AM -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
7xx, 8xx, 9xx, 0xx,
The first number of a Fedora release seems mostly superfluous.
9xx-0xx breaks the goal that updates will work better.
Also would be unnecessarily confusing. It's not like we're running out of
numbers here.
--
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive:
d80a27859c13d471019c75494409282e Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001008.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello Fedora faithful,
My name is Ben Harper and work for Rackspace as a RPM developer in
Austin, TX. My duties include creating RPMs for internal use, but also
for iuscommunity.org (IUS). IUS provides new versions of packages found
in RHEL. I am looking to become a package maintainer for
Jaroslav Reznik schreef op wo 16-01-2013 om 12:35 [-0500]:
See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/175876.html
for details. Once gcc-4.8.0-* is built into Fedora, after a few days or weeks
a mass rebuild should be performed.
I see that gcc 4.8 was just imported in
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
We would like to replace MySQL with MariaDB in early development cycle for
Fedora 19. MySQL will continue to be available for at least one release, but
MariaDB will become the default. Also, we do not
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:22:00PM +0100, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik schreef op wo 16-01-2013 om 12:35 [-0500]:
See
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/175876.html
for details. Once gcc-4.8.0-* is built into Fedora, after a few days or
weeks
a
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:23:44PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 14:13:23 -0500,
Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote
The hundreds series is speific to the fedora version. Currently
f17 is 1xx and f18 is
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:25:46 -0500
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
We would like to replace MySQL with MariaDB in early development
cycle for Fedora 19. MySQL will continue to be available for at
least
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes:
Would this involve moving around any of the provides for mysql over to
MariaDB?
Yes, that's the general idea --- any dependencies on mysql should result
in installing mariadb, unless the user takes specific action to get
mysql instead. Ideally we'd just do
On 22 Jan 2013 20:35, Josh Boyer jwbo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:23:44PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 14:13:23 -0500,
Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote
The hundreds series
I'm starting to look at packaging up x2go (http://x2go.org) which appears to
be taking up the charge of maintaining the nx libraries as well as developing
new tools around it.
So the proposal would be to replace the current nx packages with a nx-libs
package using the x2go sources. Some
Good evening all,
Please join us tomorrow in #fedora-arm on Freenode for a VFAD to address our
final
blockers for F18 RC1 for ARM.
Let's start off with a short meeting beginning at 10am (EST) to discuss the
remaining
items - what needs to be done and who will be assisting with each part.
Hi,
Ext4 metadata checksums feature was merged into Linux 3.6. Can I use
it out of the box with Fedora kernel or is there some magic switch to
enable it?
Are there any plans to support it in e2fsprogs shipped in Fedora -
backport or rebase to 1.43 version?
Last but equally important - how
On Mon, 21.01.13 10:25, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
The glibc maintainers don't seem to be against this idea and I am
willing to put time into design and implementation.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what you're after, but doesn't getaddrinfo_a
already provide an async
Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said:
Yes, that's the general idea --- any dependencies on mysql should result
in installing mariadb, unless the user takes specific action to get
mysql instead. Ideally we'd just do the standard Provides/Obsoletes
dance for replacing one package with another, but
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 19:00 CET) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #896 Refine Feature
On 1/22/13 7:10 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
Ext4 metadata checksums feature was merged into Linux 3.6. Can I use
it out of the box with Fedora kernel or is there some magic switch to
enable it?
Are there any plans to support it in e2fsprogs shipped in Fedora -
backport or rebase to
Hey folks!
At FUDCon Lawrence, Tim Flink presented on the Fedora blocker bug and
'NTH' processes, and we got some interesting and useful feedback. People
felt that the 'nice to have' / 'accepted' name used in that process was
confusing and difficult to understand, and that the aliases used for
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 19:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I can think of a couple of potential issues with the 'dynamic' tracker
names (I'm not sure whether nominations will 'transfer' from one release
to the next when we change where the alias points, and if so, whether we
want that,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 19:30:25 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
There was a very solid consensus that the old scheme sucked and the
final form of the new proposal was miles better, and this is not the
first time the topic has come up (there are various proposals in the
list
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the
3) ghc - using LLVM as compiler, as a result incorrect triplet
Not sure what this is referring to: ghc ARM devel for F18 is
basically done (except for a few minor libs appearing
in the Branch report that need rebuilding) and working fine.
Maybe this is referring to this Rawhide llvm issue
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Juerg Haefliger jue...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyboy,
My name is Juerg Haefliger and I'm a software engineer with
Hewlett-Packard based in Switzerland. Part of my responsibilities is
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said:
(If the compatibility testing goes *really* smoothly, maybe we could
just drop the requirement for original mysql to still be available,
in which case it reduces to the standard package-replacement problem.
But I'm
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 02:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said:
(If the compatibility testing goes *really* smoothly, maybe we could
just drop the requirement for original mysql to still be available,
in which case it reduces
Summary of changes:
d0d3143... Disable Coro properly (*)
9f50def... 1.623 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893916
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Clone-0.34-1.fc18,perl-DBI-1.623-1.fc18,perl-DBD-CSV-0.38-1.fc18 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755903
Daniel Piddock dgp...@corefiling.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dgp-bz@corefiling |
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3:
387b58a73efb0cac913e191fa6d8fbaf ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit aa1c16c29e27c3ca9b37600f435740abe641c692
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Tue Jan 22 16:09:31 2013 +
* First Fedora build.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3.spec | 89 +
sources |
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sysadm-Install-0.42-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
3060956... Update to 0.42
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2eb099ea57647e423d21840f96e70a3d1d35f90a
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Jan 22 20:09:01 2013 +
Update to 0.001008
- New upstream release 0.001008
- Rewrite -tag to :tag for Exporter.pm
- Fix prereqs
- Update old Test::More patch, and
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001008-1.fc19' was created
pointing to:
2eb099e... Update to 0.001008
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5a4563c... Initial setup of the pre-review repo
ab3a777... Initial package for Fedora
6702df3... Don't use the %{__perl} macro
eedf434... Add two missing requirements
6c7399c... New submission for Fedora
efbc943... The package was approved in Fedora
df4e8ed...
commit 5a4563c3f94b1e8d67efa8cbee987dbe6c995b50
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jan 15 16:36:35 2013 +0800
Initial setup of the pre-review repo
0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index
commit ab3a77758c925c6085a1b7728b243566816afa42
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Jan 16 12:01:31 2013 +0800
Initial package for Fedora
This was submitted for review on Tue Jan 15 2013:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895480#c0
commit 6702df363b6bc6cf0c1ba39461bd688c9c641063
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jan 22 11:35:41 2013 +0800
Don't use the %{__perl} macro
This was suggested by Petr during the review.
perl-ClamAV-Client.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 4
commit eedf43498f5233299e9bfd237c9656e89045
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jan 22 11:36:09 2013 +0800
Add two missing requirements
These were caught by Petr during the review.
perl-ClamAV-Client.spec |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+),
commit 6c7399c7f719a0639b74de3e9ceb857672ee4449
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jan 22 11:50:51 2013 +0800
New submission for Fedora
This was submitted on Tue Jan 22:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895480#c2
perl-ClamAV-Client.spec
commit df4e8ed0cb37f48c015da228ffaba45e239ff1be
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Jan 23 12:16:44 2013 +0800
Upload the sources
.gitignore |1 +
sources|1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
commit efbc9439a40c3810628e2d0b11864ce1fd128b9b
Merge: fba5557 6c7399c
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Jan 23 12:16:05 2013 +0800
The package was approved in Fedora
perl-ClamAV-Client.spec | 59 +++
1 files changed,
Hi 389 developers,
We have a separate Windows Active Directory (AD) environment and a separate
389-LDAP (389) environments. Users that existing in both environments will have
the same username. I.E. jsmith in AD and 389, but may have the same or
different password.
We have a security
78 matches
Mail list logo
