On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
if *that* is what is supposed to make DNF faster it's just a lie
This is not the only thing that DNF does differently to try to make
On 19. 6. 2014 at 14:24:39, Jon wrote:
and BTW i am not playing around that much on my Rawhide VM but had
*two times* today by type dnf whatever the there is already an
instance, wating for PID... nonsense caused by the background
metadata refresh
do you *really* think that's a good
On 20. 6. 2014 at 08:55:18, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
if *that* is what is supposed to make DNF faster it's just a lie
This is not the
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:55 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
if *that* is what is supposed to make DNF faster it's just a lie
the failed to load plugin copr is also just a bug
In that case please file it here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora
It is already filed and a fix is on the way:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104088
Thanks
Jan
--
devel mailing list
Le 19/06/2014 09:33, Remi Collet a écrit :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Php56
I have rebuild all dependencies
(waiting for the broken dep report to check I have not forget some)
Broken package
php-pecl-parsekit
FTBFS #492 (probably to drop as unmaintained
Am 20.06.2014 08:55, schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Whether you like it or not, one of the most common complaints about yum
(especially from people
Am 20.06.2014 09:11, schrieb Jan Zelený:
On 19. 6. 2014 at 14:24:39, Jon wrote:
and BTW i am not playing around that much on my Rawhide VM but had
*two times* today by type dnf whatever the there is already an
instance, wating for PID... nonsense caused by the background
metadata refresh
On 20 June 2014 10:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 08:55, schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Whether you like it or
Am 20.06.2014 11:57, schrieb Mat Booth:
On 20 June 2014 10:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 08:55, schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org
On 20. 6. 2014 at 11:22:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 09:11, schrieb Jan Zelený:
On 19. 6. 2014 at 14:24:39, Jon wrote:
and BTW i am not playing around that much on my Rawhide VM but had
*two times* today by type dnf whatever the there is already an
instance, wating for PID...
Am 20.06.2014 12:23, schrieb Jan Zelený:
On 20. 6. 2014 at 11:22:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 09:11, schrieb Jan Zelený:
On 19. 6. 2014 at 14:24:39, Jon wrote:
and BTW i am not playing around that much on my Rawhide VM but had
*two times* today by type dnf whatever the there is
On 20. 6. 2014 at 12:29:32, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 12:23, schrieb Jan Zelený:
On 20. 6. 2014 at 11:22:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 09:11, schrieb Jan Zelený:
On 19. 6. 2014 at 14:24:39, Jon wrote:
and BTW i am not playing around that much on my Rawhide VM but
had
Am 20.06.2014 12:36, schrieb Mat Booth:
On 20 June 2014 11:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 11:57, schrieb Mat Booth:
On 20 June 2014 10:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net
On 20 June 2014 11:50, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 12:36, schrieb Mat Booth:
On 20 June 2014 11:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net mailto:
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 11:57, schrieb Mat Booth:
On 20 June 2014 10:19,
On 20 June 2014 12:04, Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
On 20 June 2014 11:50, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 12:36, schrieb Mat Booth:
On 20 June 2014 11:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net mailto:
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 11:57, schrieb Mat Booth:
On 20 June 2014 10:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 08:55, schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at
Am 20.06.2014 13:04, schrieb Mat Booth:
On 20 June 2014 11:50, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 12:36, schrieb Mat Booth:
On 20 June 2014 11:19, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net
Am 20.06.2014 13:13, schrieb drago01:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
your whole machine has no idea about your WAN connection
As he said there is a NM API but it is indeed somehow limited as the
example you mentioned shows also it
Le 20/06/2014 10:46, Remi Collet a écrit :
I have rebuild all dependencies
(waiting for the broken dep report to check I have not forget some)
The missing ones are:
** ice-3.5.1-6.fc21 - already FTBFS
OK lasso-2.4.0-4.fc21
OK ming-0.4.5-4.fc21
Done
Remi.
--
devel mailing
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
In testing dnf on rawhide I nearly always do dnf clean metadata dnf
update purely because I found most of the time dnfs metadata was out of
date. To me dnf fetching the metadata behind the scenes just doesn't work
right.
Hi,
just a short question: Is http://copr.fedoraproject.org/ down?
--
Regards,
Heiko Adams
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Am 20.06.2014 14:04, schrieb Tim Lauridsen:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
mailto:den...@ausil.us wrote:
In testing dnf on rawhide I nearly always do dnf clean metadata dnf
update purely because I found most of
the time dnfs metadata was out of
On 06/20/2014 02:11 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
Hi,
just a short question: Is http://copr.fedoraproject.org/ down?
Yes it is - planned outage.
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4416
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
On Sex, 2014-06-20 at 14:11 +0200, Heiko Adams wrote:
Hi,
just a short question: Is http://copr.fedoraproject.org/ down?
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://copr.fedoraproject.org/
It's not just you!
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 20.06.2014 14:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 14:04, schrieb Tim Lauridsen:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
mailto:den...@ausil.us wrote:
In testing dnf on rawhide I nearly always do dnf clean metadata dnf
update purely because I found most
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 13:32 +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 20/06/2014 10:46, Remi Collet a écrit :
I have rebuild all dependencies
(waiting for the broken dep report to check I have not forget some)
The missing ones are:
**ice-3.5.1-6.fc21 - already FTBFS
OKlasso-2.4.0-4.fc21
On 06/16/2014 06:40 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:52:18PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Meetings will be cancelled until we have some topics to discuss. If
you have something, please let us know on mailing list:
env-and-sta...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On item for a
On even weeks WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC, 14:00 Central Europe,
8:00 (noon) Boston, 5:00 San Francisco, 21:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting
on Freenode.
= Topics =
* status of related features
* todo (writing code, policies)
* new members, two free seats
*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 03:19:55 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
f20:
*filelists.sqlite.bz2 3.5 M
*filelists.xml.gz 3.3 M
*primary.sqlite.bz22.7 M
*primary.xml.gz1.3 M
*other.sqlite.bz2
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 02:39:25PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 20.06.2014 14:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 14:04, schrieb Tim Lauridsen:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
mailto:den...@ausil.us wrote:
In testing dnf on rawhide I
Dne 20.6.2014 15:52, Chuck Anderson napsal(a):
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 02:39:25PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 20.06.2014 14:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.06.2014 14:04, schrieb Tim Lauridsen:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
mailto:den...@ausil.us
It should be back up and processing now.
Sorry for the longish outage...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
===
#fedora-meeting: BaseWG
===
Meeting started by masta at 15:13:52 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-06-20/basewg.2014-06-20-15.13.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
* === BaseWG Roll Call
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 08:55 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
if *that* is what is supposed to make DNF faster it's just a lie
This is
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:38:32PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 06/16/2014 06:40 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:52:18PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Meetings will be cancelled until we have some topics to discuss. If
you have something, please let us know on
On 20.06.2014 15:44, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 03:19:55 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
f20:
*filelists.sqlite.bz2 3.5 M
*filelists.xml.gz 3.3 M
*primary.sqlite.bz22.7 M
*primary.xml.gz
because thats how createrepo works!? :)
I'm talking in general, why not use the same improved compression for all!
I haven't mentioned an interactive, rpm based, package managers, at all. :)
But when you mention them, it is obvious that we need features and
performance of the delta repodata,
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 20:13:00 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
because thats how createrepo works!? :)
I'm talking in general, why not use the same improved compression for
all!
Because createrepo wants to keep backward compatibility?
For things that can use xz, they only
On 20.06.2014 21:44, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 20:13:00 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
because thats how createrepo works!? :)
I'm talking in general, why not use the same improved compression for
all!
Because createrepo wants to keep backward compatibility?
Wait
On 20.06.2014 17:55, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 08:55 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
if *that* is what is supposed to make DNF
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:55:02PM -0500, Jon wrote:
I also suggest that /etc/os-release be switched using the alternatives
system (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Alternatives), with the
variant in either the VERSION field (VERSION=21 (Cloud)) or a new
os-release field which we
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:12:47AM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 06/18/2014 10:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
[snip]
I also suggest that /etc/os-release be switched using the alternatives
system (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Alternatives), with the
variant in either the VERSION
I've drafted a comps change (further to the quick one I did yesterday to
throw in NetworkManager-wifi to the desktop groups) to account for the
recent (March) split of several bits of NetworkManager functionality
into subpackages. As it's a relatively major change I thought I'd run it
by devel@
Working on comps for the NetworkManager submodule change (see other
email) made me wonder: are the comps 'categories' actually used for
anything any more?
I believe they were used in oldUI for presentation of the 'pick a
package' UI. We don't have that UI any more, haven't since Fedora 18. I
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 23:27 +0200, poma wrote:
On 20.06.2014 17:55, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 08:55 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Hi Lubomir,
Thank you for the information! As suggested, I took a look at a couple of
package submissions.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689
Any tips/hints regarding
Compose started at Fri Jun 20 08:15:03 UTC 2014
New package: konversation-1.5-4.el7
A user friendly IRC client
New package: libcsv-3.0.3-2.el7
Small, simple and fast CSV library
New package: perl-Tree-R-0.06-1.el7
Perl extension for the R-tree data
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:01:26PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
If someone steps up to say they'll take ownership of TurboGears1 (one of the
comaintainers or someone new), then I'll reassign these packages to them.
If no one does, then I'll retire them in epel7 and ask that the packages be
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
789
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
136
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
121
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
789
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
243
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
124
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104134
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104134
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110872
Andreas Bierfert andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110723
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com ---
External References:
https://metacpan.org/release/RJBS/Email-Address-1.905
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108094
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108635
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-autobox-Core-1.27-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110724
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Email-Address-1.905-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Email-Address-1.905-1.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110725
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Email-Address-1.905-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Email-Address-1.905-1.el5
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110726
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Email-Address-1.905-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Email-Address-1.905-1.el6
--
You are
61 matches
Mail list logo
