Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Marek Skalický wrote: > Hello everyone, > I would like to ask what do you think about enabling c++11 in library in > F22? Is it permitted by Fedora guidelines? > > I am asking because of this bug - >

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-10-26)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

rawhide report: 20151026 changes

Compose started at Mon Oct 26 05:15:02 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On 26/10/15 11:23, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Marek Skalický wrote: Hello everyone, I would like to ask what do you think about enabling c++11 in library in F22? Is it permitted by Fedora guidelines? I am asking because of this bug -

F-23 Branched report: 20151026 changes

Compose started at Mon Oct 26 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Summary: Added Packages: 0 Removed Packages: 0 Modified Packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 (0 ) Size change of modified packages: 0 (0 ) Size of removed packages: 0 (0 ) Size change: 0 (0 ) Compose finished at Mon Oct 26 11:26:17 UTC

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-10-26)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/26/2015 12:52 AM, wrote: > python-reportlab [...] I'll gladly take care of this one, since it's needed by Gourmet and a handful of other packages. My first goal will be to bump it to 3.2 in Rawhide after classes tomorrow. :) Regards.

Review request for qbs package

Hello, I've got a review request for the qbs package (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262515, https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jakepetroules/qbs/, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11578581). It would be greatly appreciated if someone could look into getting

Re: Bodhi updates not pushed?

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Christopher wrote: > On https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272694 it was brought to my > attention that my updates for the zookeeper package weren't pushed to the > f22 and f21 updates-testing repos, though I do see the one in

Re: Bug dnf update

On 10/26/15, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Albino B Neto wrote: > >> Yes. He were loading for more time. >> >> > Well, having a slow connection to your nearest mirror is not really a bug > in dnf. Try again later or

Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer - jamielennox

Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email addresses in FAS). If they're not

Re: No emails about bodhi updates

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 06:56:51PM +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 26/10/15 17:36 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Seems like I'm no longer getting emails about significant bodhi > > events, particularly when a package has spent days in testing and > > can be pushed to stable. > > > > Example

Re: Packaging question on MPI requires

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: >> Surely this isn't scalable. What would happen with a common API for N >> different Scheme implementations, for instance? I'm also interested in >> Haskell; others might want the bindings to Common Lisp, ruby, Tcl... >> Currently

Re: Packaging question on MPI requires

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:34:17PM +, Dave Love wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > > >> Surely this isn't scalable. What would happen with a common API for N > >> different Scheme implementations, for instance? I'm also interested in > >> Haskell; others

Re: Bodhi updates not pushed?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, 04:46 Peter Robinson wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Christopher wrote: > On https :// bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: rpm changed behavior it terminates build if wrong version is specified

On 10/26/2015 10:48 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 10/23/2015 07:47 AM, Lubos Kardos wrote: Hi, I want to just to inform you that the new version of rpmbuild (rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc24) that is available in rawhide terminates build when a wrong version format is used in spec i. e. epoch is

Re: make unmaintained ??

On Mon, 26 Oct, 2015 at 12:49:23 GMT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > * New variables: $(MAKE_TERMOUT) and $(MAKE_TERMERR) are set to non-empty > values if stdout or stderr, respectively, are believed to be writing to a > terminal. These variables are exported by default. Hrm. This

Re: FC1 in archive missing a bunch of RPMs?

Also, intel wasn't shipping x86_64 systems at the time, FC1 was pretty specifically AMD64, and there was a lot of weirdness back then. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Justin Forbes wrote: > FC1 32bit was a little bit different. Technically x86_64 was a secondary > arch

Re: FC1 in archive missing a bunch of RPMs?

FC1 32bit was a little bit different. Technically x86_64 was a secondary arch at the time, in fact the RH build system couldn't get everything together and the ISOs were built on my home system. By FC2, this wasn't an issue anymore. I would not be surprised if the archives were a bit off as the

Re: make unmaintained ??

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/2015 06:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 19:53 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> wrote: >>> I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can >>>

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 2 packages were orphaned gdesklets-goodweather [f22] was orphaned by sergiomb Themeable weather and condition display for gdesklet

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

Hi. As the reporter let me briefly phrase the main concerns: - the driver works only with software which is built for the same ABI, it is one of the cases where things break immediately otherwise - we ran into this problem when building 3rd-party software (referee box of the RoboCup Logistics

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On 26.10.2015 13:59, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 26/10/15 12:50, Tim Niemueller wrote: > >> - the driver works only with software which is built for the same ABI, >> it is one of the cases where things break immediately otherwise > > You need to be very clear what you mean here. Do you mean built

Re: make unmaintained ??

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > In this case it is worth looking at the actual changelog for 4.1: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2014-10/msg0.html > The list of new features is: > > * New variables: $(MAKE_TERMOUT) and $(MAKE_TERMERR) are set to non-empty > values if

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

I'm afraid of some runtime dependencies clash, small amount of rebuilds to all (r-)deps? -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On 26/10/15 13:01, Tim Niemueller wrote: On 26.10.2015 13:59, Tom Hughes wrote: On 26/10/15 12:50, Tim Niemueller wrote: - the driver works only with software which is built for the same ABI, it is one of the cases where things break immediately otherwise You need to be very clear what you

Re: make unmaintained ??

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 08:37:05AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/25/2015 06:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 19:53 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On 26/10/15 12:50, Tim Niemueller wrote: - the driver works only with software which is built for the same ABI, it is one of the cases where things break immediately otherwise You need to be very clear what you mean here. Do you mean built with -std=c++11 or built with

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Cxx11AbiCompatibility I guess this is what is causing problems if mongo-cxx-driver and an application using it do not use the same language version. Tim On 26.10.2015 14:09, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 26/10/15 13:01, Tim Niemueller wrote: >> On 26.10.2015 13:59, Tom

[Bug 1268632] perl-experimental-0.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268632 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-experimental-0.016-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 11:29 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 26/10/15 11:23, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Marek Skalický > > wrote: > >> Hello everyone, > >> I would like to ask what do you think about enabling c++11 in library in > >> F22? Is it

DNF 1.1.3 and DNF-PLUGINS-CORE 0.1.13 Released + bonus

New release of DNF stack (dnf, dnf-plugins-core, dnf-plugins-extras, hawkey and libsolv) is going to Fedora 21, 22, 23 and rawhide. Most of the fixes happened under the hood in DNF libraries. The emphasis was on stability and making smooth system upgrades. For more information take a look at

Re: make unmaintained ??

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote: >> >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I

Fedora Rawhide 20151026 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde disk raw armhfp No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151025 Images in Rawhide 20151025 but not this: Kde disk raw armhfp Soas disk raw armhfp Failed openQA tests: 14 of 52 ID: 7404Test: x86_64 kde_live default_install ID: 7403Test: x86_64

Re: make unmaintained ??

On 10/26/2015 05:21 PM, drago01 wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote: On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I built 4.1 for rawhide.

No emails about bodhi updates

Seems like I'm no longer getting emails about significant bodhi events, particularly when a package has spent days in testing and can be pushed to stable. Example update that I never got email about: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-072d89c28d I've checked my email pretty

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 06:24:43PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I am trying to upgrade to F23 (I know still not finished but...) > > In past I always done 'distro-sync'. Albeit with yum. > > Now I tried: > dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync > dnf system-upgrade

Re: No emails about bodhi updates

On 26/10/15 17:36 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Seems like I'm no longer getting emails about significant bodhi > events, particularly when a package has spent days in testing and > can be pushed to stable. > > Example update that I never got email about: > >

Re: make unmaintained ??

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:21 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > > > On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" > wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew

Re: rpm changed behavior it terminates build if wrong version is specified

On 10/23/2015 07:47 AM, Lubos Kardos wrote: > Hi, > > I want to just to inform you that the new version of rpmbuild > (rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc24) that is available in rawhide terminates build > when a wrong version format is used in spec i. e. epoch is not unsigned > integer > or mutilple

To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

I am trying to upgrade to F23 (I know still not finished but...) In past I always done 'distro-sync'. Albeit with yum. Now I tried: dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync --best dnf system-upgrade download

Re: DNF 1.1.3 and DNF-PLUGINS-CORE 0.1.13 Released + bonus

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:03:47PM -0400, Honza Šilhan wrote: > [3] http://dnf.baseurl.org/2015/10/26/mark-command-usecase/ Is there any work on integrating the history of user-installed packages with packagekit / GNOME Software? That seems like that'd knock out a gigantic class of cases when

[Bug 1268518] perl-Test-Strict-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268518 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Strict-0.30-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b1b8b845c8 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1268518] perl-Test-Strict-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268518 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Strict-0.30-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-fd629b525c -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1274981] perl-Test-Strict-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274981 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Strict-0.30-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-fd629b525c -- You are receiving this mail

jplesnik uploaded Smart-Comments-1.06.tar.gz for perl-Smart-Comments

94dcd64287ec2b42adaa1ee21cabfbef Smart-Comments-1.06.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Smart-Comments/Smart-Comments-1.06.tar.gz/md5/94dcd64287ec2b42adaa1ee21cabfbef/Smart-Comments-1.06.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1275017] perl-Smart-Comments-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275017 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jplesnik's perl-Smart-Comments-1.06-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=694287 -- You are receiving this

ppisar uploaded Thread-Queue-3.07.tar.gz for perl-Thread-Queue

d34f43b3749e4c36327cdecf4ddccaf3 Thread-Queue-3.07.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Thread-Queue/Thread-Queue-3.07.tar.gz/md5/d34f43b3749e4c36327cdecf4ddccaf3/Thread-Queue-3.07.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

pghmcfc pushed to perl-PadWalker (perl-PadWalker-2.2-1.fc24). "Update to 2.2 (..more)"

From 63861e45d0632982814096cdb9baa0067de77c5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:54:04 + Subject: Update to 2.2 - New upstream release 2.2 - Convert to PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT https://github.com/robinhouston/PadWalker/pull/2 -

[Bug 1275017] perl-Smart-Comments-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275017 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

pghmcfc pushed to perl-PadWalker (master). "Update to 2.2 (..more)"

From 63861e45d0632982814096cdb9baa0067de77c5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:54:04 + Subject: Update to 2.2 - New upstream release 2.2 - Convert to PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT https://github.com/robinhouston/PadWalker/pull/2 -

[Bug 1275092] No Menu with XFT - Example VB

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275092 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- I have no idea what /bin/VB is. It looks like not delivered by the Fedora. Maybe you don't have the proper font installed. Try to install liberation-sans-fonts package. I cannot help if I

ppisar pushed to perl-Thread-Queue (f21). "3.07 bump"

From fbd243d1965ddfe6fc875ff3e3841301c18fb550 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:43:38 +0100 Subject: 3.07 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Thread-Queue.spec | 5 - sources| 2 +- 3 files

[Bug 1274981] perl-Test-Strict-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274981 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Strict-0.30-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b1b8b845c8 -- You are receiving this mail

pghmcfc uploaded PadWalker-2.2.tar.gz for perl-PadWalker

6bcc741f77b1831a893b2a22c785e31a PadWalker-2.2.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-PadWalker/PadWalker-2.2.tar.gz/md5/6bcc741f77b1831a893b2a22c785e31a/PadWalker-2.2.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing

[Bug 1274112] perl-Text-Unidecode-1.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274112 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Text-Unidecode-1.27-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to

[Bug 1274109] perl-autobox-Core-1.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274109 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-autobox-Core-1.30-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to

[Bug 1265681] perl-autobox-Core-1.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265681 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

ppisar pushed to perl-Thread-Queue (f23). "3.07 bump"

From a7f4b0a279b55bf173a7bc0876daf7f94c114b2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:43:38 +0100 Subject: 3.07 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Thread-Queue.spec | 5 - sources| 2 +- 3 files

ppisar pushed to perl-Thread-Queue (master). "3.07 bump"

From a7f4b0a279b55bf173a7bc0876daf7f94c114b2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:43:38 +0100 Subject: 3.07 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Thread-Queue.spec | 5 - sources| 2 +- 3 files

[Bug 1273416] perl-Log-Report-1.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273416 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Report-1.09-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test

jplesnik pushed to perl-Smart-Comments (master). "1.06 bump"

From 4007b9c6528cb7f4e8d56201baa0f506c50fe39d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:00:54 +0100 Subject: 1.06 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Smart-Comments.spec | 15 +++ sources | 2 +- 3

ppisar pushed to perl-Thread-Queue (f22). "3.07 bump"

From cb85573be0ab5e19b659082fecd76e7c21191703 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:43:38 +0100 Subject: 3.07 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Thread-Queue.spec | 5 - sources| 2 +- 3 files

[Bug 1275117] perl-Lingua-EN-FindNumber-1.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275117 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Test-Strict (f23). "0.29 bump"

From 4fe753da40b61bd001e75a414971bfad8c4af1be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:59:08 +0200 Subject: 0.29 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Test-Strict.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

jplesnik pushed to perl-Test-Strict (f23). "0.30 bump"

From 0ad3bd5eec71aa0c15ba7cb271810052617ac0f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:42:28 +0100 Subject: 0.30 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Test-Strict.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

libicu upgrade to 56.1 with soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I'll upgrade libicu to 56.1 in rawhide, which as usual comes with a soname bump. I requested a side tag for the builds, David Tardon will help with rebuilding the dependent packages. Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. GPG key "ID"

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel5 (2015-10-26)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in epel5 (2015-10-26)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

jplesnik uploaded Lingua-EN-FindNumber-1.32.tar.gz for perl-Lingua-EN-FindNumber

edc9b091b4b97b8b3d37984ff50959d5 Lingua-EN-FindNumber-1.32.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Lingua-EN-FindNumber/Lingua-EN-FindNumber-1.32.tar.gz/md5/edc9b091b4b97b8b3d37984ff50959d5/Lingua-EN-FindNumber-1.32.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

jplesnik pushed to perl-Test-Strict (master). "0.30 bump"

From dfb10790c4b157c0cd3e6b25f03a9fb311dba1c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:42:28 +0100 Subject: 0.30 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Test-Strict.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel6 (2015-10-26)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2015-10-26)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

jplesnik uploaded Test-Strict-0.30.tar.gz for perl-Test-Strict

3244d83e75628791a7d01289ccbbe6ac Test-Strict-0.30.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-Strict/Test-Strict-0.30.tar.gz/md5/3244d83e75628791a7d01289ccbbe6ac/Test-Strict-0.30.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

[Bug 1274981] perl-Test-Strict-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274981 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Test-Strict (f22). "0.29 bump"

From 4761f579c088d89814cb1ad0144b4a893b4f9765 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:59:08 +0200 Subject: 0.29 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Test-Strict.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

jplesnik pushed to perl-Test-Strict (f22). "0.30 bump"

From 7a322f6cb53864dd10de4dab923c81344911f449 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:42:28 +0100 Subject: 0.30 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Test-Strict.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

jplesnik pushed to perl-Lingua-EN-FindNumber (master). "1.32 bump"

From f6ba05bb1b8039a5fd3b60b3867f293269c559ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:14:20 +0100 Subject: 1.32 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Lingua-EN-FindNumber.spec | 5 - sources| 2 +-

[Bug 1274981] perl-Test-Strict-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274981 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1275117] perl-Lingua-EN-FindNumber-1.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275117 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1267292] Upgrade perl-DBD-Firebird to 1.21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267292 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DBD-Firebird-1.21-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1267292] Upgrade perl-DBD-Firebird to 1.21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267292 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DBD-Firebird-1.21-1.fc

[Bug 1274112] perl-Text-Unidecode-1.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274112 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Text-Unidecode-1.27-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 737 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893 libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 501 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 351

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 127 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 110 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 104

[Bug 1275456] perl-Unicode-Normalize-1.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275456 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1086649 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1086649=edit [patch] Update to 1.23 (#1275456) -- You are

[Bug 1275449] New: perl-File-Modified-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275449 Bug ID: 1275449 Summary: perl-File-Modified-0.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-File-Modified Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1275449] perl-File-Modified-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275449 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1086642 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1086642=edit [patch] Update to 0.10 (#1275449) -- You are

[Bug 1275456] New: perl-Unicode-Normalize-1.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275456 Bug ID: 1275456 Summary: perl-Unicode-Normalize-1.23 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Unicode-Normalize Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1275445] New: perl-Devel-Pragma-0.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275445 Bug ID: 1275445 Summary: perl-Devel-Pragma-0.62 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Devel-Pragma Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1275449] perl-File-Modified-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275449 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11590436 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1275456] perl-Unicode-Normalize-1.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275456 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11590469 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1274981] perl-Test-Strict-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274981 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1268518] perl-Test-Strict-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268518 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1267292] Upgrade perl-DBD-Firebird to 1.21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267292 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DBD-Firebird-1.21-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1267292] Upgrade perl-DBD-Firebird to 1.21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267292 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DBD-Firebird-1.21-1.fc

[Bug 1268823] Rebuild perl-Devel-Cover against the latest perl in stable branches

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268823 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-Cover-1.03-6.fc2

jplesnik pushed to perl-Bytes-Random-Secure (master). "0.29 bump"

From 534fdc7a8eabe3a3c9200ec3bc148c4be3254c78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:53:09 +0100 Subject: 0.29 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Bytes-Random-Secure.spec | 11 +-- sources |

[EPEL-devel] gifsicle 1.87 for el6?

Hello all, I have a colleague in our software development department that would like to use gifsicle for our image repository application. Unfortunately, there are some bugs and improvements that are hindering development that occurred after the last version available for el6 (1.60) in epel.

Re: [EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2015-10-26)

- Original Message - > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

spot uploaded Email-Valid-1.198.tar.gz for perl-Email-Valid

b225e87b4870f1e4da4ef6094fccc4af Email-Valid-1.198.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Email-Valid/Email-Valid-1.198.tar.gz/md5/b225e87b4870f1e4da4ef6094fccc4af/Email-Valid-1.198.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

  1   2   >